On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 11:31:07PM -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 04:27:21PM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > Hi James,
> > yes, it's totally related to the font face used:
> >
> > $ gvim -u NONE -c 'set guifont=PragmataPro\ 12&#
On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 10:30:36PM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Package: cpufrequtils
> Version: 008-1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch pending
> Control: tags 793913 pending
> Control: tags 889895 pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for cpufrequtils (versioned as 008-1.1) and
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 05:09:26PM +, Witold Baryluk wrote:
> Package: cpufrequtils
> Version: 008-1+b1
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> it appears cpufreq-info has issues with a lot of CPUs?
cpufrequtils is unmaintained upstream and is in the archive essentially
only because i
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 07:07:53AM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
[...]
> Gianfranco,
> if you need a work-around, changing the file prefix to something that is
> a legal C identifier might help.
Gianfranco,
so are you going to patch virtualbox?
In terms of severity, I think this bug again
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 06:33:45AM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 02:56:55PM +0200, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> > control: reassign -1 src:acpica-unix
> > control: found -1 20180508-1
> > control: affects -1 virtualbox
> >
> > On Tue,
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 02:56:55PM +0200, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> control: reassign -1 src:acpica-unix
> control: found -1 20180508-1
> control: affects -1 virtualbox
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2018 19:12:32 +0200 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
> > Package: virtualbox
> > Version: 5.2.12-dfsg-1
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 11:31:37AM -0400, Phil Susi wrote:
> On 9/28/2017 9:51 AM, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:16:52PM -0400, Phil Susi wrote:
> >> Package: cpufrequtils
> >> Version: 008-1
> > ...
> >> is the case, should cpu
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:16:52PM -0400, Phil Susi wrote:
> Package: cpufrequtils
> Version: 008-1
...
> is the case, should cpufrequtils not be removed now?
Yes, indeed it should. Thanks for nagging.
There's a little more work required to smooth the transition.
$ apt-cache rdepends cpufrequtils
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 05:06:39PM +0100, Sebastian Humenda wrote:
> Hi
Hi,
it looks like we almost overlapped in our replies.
> Andreas Henriksson schrieb am 08.03.2017, 21:55 +0100:
> >On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:57:38AM +0100, Sebastian Humenda wrote:
...
> >> Mar 08 10:54:47 kraftkrust cpufreq
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 09:55:02PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> Hello Sebastian Humenda,
>
> Thanks for your bug report
>
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:57:38AM +0100, Sebastian Humenda wrote:
> > Package: cpufrequtils
> > Version: 008-1+b1
> > Severity: g
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:57:42PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
...
> 3.289s uml-utilities.service
...
> The following code snippet has an explicit sleep, which has to retry for
> a max of 5 secs.
>
> WAIT=5
> while ! test -e $UML_SWITCH_CTL; do
> sleep 1
severity 843071 important
forwarded 843071 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135391
thanks
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 05:54:36PM +0100, Julien RIVAUD (_FrnchFrgg_) wrote:
> Followup-For: Bug #843071
> Package: linux-cpupower
> Version: 4.8.5-1
>
> I forgot to include the url of the upstrea
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 02:10:16PM +0100, Diego Herchhoren wrote:
> Package: cpufrequtils
> Version: 008-1
>
> When installing the package, the process doesn't generate the directory
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq
>
> In the console appear this:
>
> "Seleccionando el paquete cpufrequtils
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:20:25PM +0300, Андрей Василишин wrote:
> Package: acpica-tools
> Version: 20140926-1
>
> Hello!
> Iam sorry,but there are no turbostat binary in acpica-tools package
Hi,
not so siliently actually, from changelog:
* Closes: #731761 -- add changelog info on turbostat:
27;s one that is build
tested and working.
Regards
--
mattia
:wq!
commit 8cee65c3229f5f692ad97df9bca117ef194c9ac7
Author: Mattia Dongili
Date: Sun Oct 16 18:08:41 2016 -0700
libcpufreq-dev depends on its corresponding binary package
Closes: #840852
Signed-off-by: Mattia Dongil
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 03:14:13PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 06:20:34AM -0700, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> >...
> > Let's see where I get to in integrating the UML build with src:linux,
> >...
>
> If you need help let me know.
>
> This
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 08:20:18PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-09-15 at 20:55 +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > On Thu, September 15, 2016 7:16 pm, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > ...
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm open to the possibility of foldi
On Thu, September 15, 2016 7:16 pm, Ben Hutchings wrote:
...
>
> I'm open to the possibility of folding this into src:linux, if someone
> in (or joining) the kernel team can take responsibility for maintaining
> it. Now that all the userland tools are built from src:linux, it might
> not be that h
Thanks for opening this bug.
Building UML as part of the regular kernel release has been on my todo list for
years now (including making a real attempt with patch long ago - didn't get
much attention then).
My employer will soon sponsor some work in this area, I hope I can get a step
closer at
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 03:42:42PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Control: tag -1 +pending
>
> On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 18:22 -0400, Allen Chan wrote:
> >
> > The location of tunctl has changed from /usr/sbin/tunctl to /usr/bin/tunctl.
> > Ho
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:14:13PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> I have the ok from the Release Managers to consider this issue as RC
> for stretch. I'm going to wait at least one week before raising
> this to "serious".
>
> There is a patch available for this bug. If you need some
severity 811544 normal
thanks
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 06:36:17PM +0100, Christian Pernegger wrote:
...
> So the init scripts are just expensive noops. Maybe they're still
> needed in some cases but I think the default should be off (with a
> working low prio debconf question to enable).
Thanks fo
Source: linux
Version: 4.2.6-1
Severity: normal
Hello,
To be fair, this is probably the tip of the iceberg since my unbootable
dreamplug went through an upgrade from wheezy to stretch and an u-boot
upgrade too. In any case, u-boot seems functional at the moment and I
will only be able to check th
Package: pius
Version: 2.2.1-1
Severity: important
Hi,
gpg introduced new messages that pius trips on thinking they are
unknown errors.
Upstream has a pull request dealing with this, it'd be good to have the
patches applied in Debian until a new release is available, since
current pius is alread
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 01:25:42PM +0100, Jan Spurny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the same (probably) problem on freshly installed Debian 8 - in syslog,
> cpufreq writes:
>
> cpufreqd: get_class_device_attribute: couldn't open
> /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0C0A:00/power_supply/BAT0/energ
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 06:28:36AM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> Hi Alessandro.
>
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:52:24PM +0200, Alessandro Selli wrote:
> > Package: cpufreqd
> > Version: 2.4.2-2
> > Severity: normal
> > Tags: patch
> >
> > System get
Hi Alessandro.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:52:24PM +0200, Alessandro Selli wrote:
> Package: cpufreqd
> Version: 2.4.2-2
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> System gets log flooded with these messages:
> Apr 30 12:36:41 luminol cpufreqd: get_class_device_attribute: couldn't open
> /sys/devices/L
Package: vim-gtk
Version: 2:7.4.488-5
Followup-For: Bug #760873
Hi James,
yes, it's totally related to the font face used:
$ gvim -u NONE -c 'set guifont=PragmataPro\ 12'
$
** (gvim:26280): CRITICAL **: ascii_glyph_table_init: assertion
'gui.ascii_glyphs->num_glyphs == sizeof(ascii_chars)' fa
Package: cpufrequtils
Version: 008-1
Followup-For: Bug #764582
Tim,
the sysfs file that cpufreq-set uses to find related CPU is incorrect in
my previous email. This is what is actually used:
grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/related_cpus
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bug
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:08:56AM +0100, Tim Small wrote:
> Package: cpufrequtils
> Version: 008-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> On 3.14 with Jessie this worked:
>
> cpufreq-set -g ondemand --max 2.1GHz -r
>
> since upgrading to 3.16 (it's possible that another upgrade installed at
> the same
Package: geeqie
Version: 1:1.2-1
Followup-For: Bug #762162
Hi Klaus,
thanks a lot and feel free to ask if you need me to test the fix related
to this bug.
Regards,
Mattia
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis
Package: geeqie
Version: 1:1.2-1
Followup-For: Bug #762162
Just for a comparison on package versions, this is from a system where
the bug doesn't show.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (1001, 'unstable'), (1001, 'testing'), (1001, 'stable'),
Package: geeqie
Version: 1:1.2-1
Followup-For: Bug #762162
I just updated the system and I can still (actually I just opened geeqie
after a long time so I don't really know when it started) reproduce the
SIGSEGV.
I'll rebuild from source later, but just in case this is useful:
- the stack trace
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 07:44:08PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Jakub Wilk , 2014-04-15, 15:39:
> >The package builds successfully and seems to work on i386. I'll test on
> >amd64 later.
>
> It works on amd64 works, too. :)
>
> Would it be okay if I NMUed the package?
sure, without any delay wou
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:48:01PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Ansgar Burchardt , 2014-03-18, 12:04:
> >user-mode-linux build-depends on linux-source-3.12 which is no longer in
> >the archive. The current version is linux-source-3.13.
>
> Any news on this? Do you need help?
Yes, at the moment I'
On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 07:04:56AM +, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> Package: user-mode-linux
> Version: 3.2-2um-1+deb7u2+b1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: patch
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> This bug is perennial. If we go through old bugs with
> "cannot reproduce"
reassing 733545 cpufreqd
retitle 733545 cpufreqd should honour bios_limit when setting max/min freq
thanks
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:55:00PM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 04:30:33AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Which scaling driver is being used?
>
&g
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 04:30:33AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Which scaling driver is being used?
acpi-cpufreq
> Which scaling governor are you using?
ondemand
> What was the last kernel version where this worked?
I don't know, I usually just leave ondemand do it's work without
interfering.
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 11:15:45AM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
...
> Note that this is most likely upstream since I'm using my self rolled
> 3.13-rc5.
forgot to mention:
Linux hilbert 3.13.0-rc5+ #25 SMP PREEMPT Mon Dec 23 12:18:40 JST 2013 x86_64
GNU/Linux
acpipdump: http://www.tai
reassign 733545 linux
title 733545 cannot set max cpufreq frequency
thanks
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 10:13:01AM +1300, martin f krafft wrote:
> Package: cpufreqd
> Version: 2.4.2-2
> Severity: important
>
> For weeks now, I've not been able to get cpufreqd to work. The log
> (and -V7) shows only th
Package: sonata
Version: 1.6.2.1-5
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hi,
using MPD from unstable (>=0.18) broke sonata.
Sonata sadly displays a "No Read Permissions" instead of any more
appropriate error or even logging the actual exception causing it to
think it doesn't have permissions.
The patch
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 12:15:59PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Ansgar Burchardt writes:
> > Ansgar Burchardt writes:
> >> user-mode-linux build-depends on linux-source-3.2 which is no longer
> >> available in unstable.
> >
> > That's still the case. And user-mode-linux in testing/unstable no
rsions in unstable and testing so maybe
that needs rebuilding against new ibus?
> Another confirmation.
see below for all the other questions.
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 04:10:49PM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > ibus-daemon barks with the warning/errors below when changing
Package: ibus
Version: 1.5.3-7
Followup-For: Bug #722325
just to add the package versions where the problem actually happens.
Thanks
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64
Package: ibus
Followup-For: Bug #722325
Hi Osamu,
I have the same problem, on amd64.
To get working versions:
sudo apt-get install ibus:amd64=1.5.1.is.1.4.2-3
ibus-gtk:amd64=1.5.1.is.1.4.2-3 ibus-gtk3:amd64=1.5.1.is.1.4.2-3
To break again:
sudo apt-get install ibus:amd64 ibus-gtk:amd64 ibus-gtk
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 02:17:18PM +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
...
> Can we just ignore this bug for wheezy? To me, the licensing intention
> seems very clear.
Can it be closed even? I don't think this bug applies at all.
--
mattia
:wq!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ..
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 05:06:35PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 27.03.2013 13:44, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> >Mattia Dongili writes:
> >>yes it is, that's what Al did already:
> >>http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/acpica-unix_20130214-0.3.html
> >I see.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:47:33AM +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> Hi Ansgar, Mattia,
>
> Ansgar Burchardt writes:
> > I also checked the initial Debian package on snapshot.debian.org
> > (version 20050930-1). It also has only the non-free license in the
> > individual files, but states "Dual
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package cpufreqd
Message-ID: <1364160589.24071.38.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
> On Sun, 2013-03-24 at 11:29 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > c
ufreqd-2.4.2/debian/changelog 2013-03-23 21:51:28.0 +0900
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+cpufreqd (2.4.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Fix reading the correct battery attribute
+(Closes: #619913 and Closes: #644567).
+
+ -- Mattia Dongili Sat, 23 Mar 2013 21:42:31 +0900
+
cpufreqd (2.4.2-1) uns
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 07:36:15AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Topol Morgul (topolm5...@mail.ru):
>
> > Dear Mr. Perrier
...
> > 1.) installed cpufrequtils via apt-get install cpufrequtils
> >
> > 2.) touch /etc/default/cpufrequtils and echoed
> > GOVERNOR="ondemand"
> >
> > 3.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 01:39:18AM +, forthurst wrote:
> I am currently running 6.0.5 with kernel 3.2.0-0.bpo.2-amd64
this sounds unrelated to the problem reported originally. It also sounds
like a kernel issue rather than cpufreqd's, please report a bug against
the linux-image you're using.
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 10:06:41AM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> Just an FYI: did a little re-thinking and made the package closer to
> pure upstream. New versions are available here:
>
>$ dget
> http://downloads.ahs3.net/packages/acpica-tools/acpica-unix_20130117-2.dsc
>
> If there's anything I
z to latest linux-source.
+ * Set new kernel options:
+ SECURITY_APPARMOR_COMPAT_24=y
+ NET_SCH_CODEL=m
+ FQ_CODEL=m
+ * Bump version number to upload as a proper foreign package.
+
+ -- Mattia Dongili Fri, 04 Jan 2013 07:11:32 +0900
+
user-mode-linux (3.2-1um-1) unstable; urgency=low
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 10:12:07AM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I looked at your changes and found one error:
>
> +BUILT_USING := $(shell dpkg-query -f '$${binary:Package} (=
> $${source:Version}), ' -W linux-source-$(kernel_version))
>
> It needs to be $${source:Package} here as th
tags 697300 + pending
thanks
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 07:21:19PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Package: src:user-mode-linux
> Version: 3.2-1um-1
> Severity: serious
Thanks, I made the necessary changes to the package, I will upload a
fixed version later today.
--
mattia
:wq!
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Package: nvidia-kernel-dkms
Version: 310.19-0+exp1
Severity: normal
Hi,
/lib/modules/$(uname -r)/source/include/linux/version.h is not updated
on recent kernels.
The top level makefile in linux sources define
version_h := include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 06:26:16PM +0100, mdt wrote:
...
> acpica-unix: New upstream release 20121114 whit full support for the
> ACPI 5.0 specification
Yup, I should be able to get there. Fedora has also adopted the
bigendian patches and ported them to a recent release so it should be
simple to p
tags 692552 + moreinfo
thanks
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 04:08:57PM +0100, Andreas Glaeser wrote:
...
> > Looking at your configuration you're telling cpufreqd that as long as
> > you're on mains power you want full high speed CPU.
> > WHen configuring cpufreqd, running the deamon using a very verbos
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 12:52:07PM +0100, Andreas Glaeser wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Package: cpufreqd
> Version: 2.4.2-1
> Severity: important
>
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
>
> Installing cpufreqd shows paradox results. Without cpufreqd CP
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:51:02AM +0200, tk wrote:
> Package: cpufrequtils
> Version: 008-1
> Followup-For: Bug #622277
>
> I do have the sampe problem. I have an E8400 with 2x 3.0Ghz running with
> 2.0GHz.
> It's not possible to get it to 3.0Ghz.
...
> It seems like the full power is only used w
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:59:44AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
...
> it would be great if you could enable systemd support for cpufrequtils by
> packaging the service file [1][2].
...
> [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Systemd/Services#cpufreq
> [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 10:47:21PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
> Cpufrequtils homepage link (under kernel.org) doesn't seem to work anymore.
> I found https://github.com/emagii/cpufrequtils
> It says: "Clone of kernel.org cpufrequtils, until it is back in business"
> Can it considered new home of c
> +Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 5.0.0), quilt, linux-source-3.2,
> docbook-to-man, bzip2, m4, module-init-tools, libvdeplug2-dev, libpcap-dev
> Uploaders: Mattia Dongili
> Standards-Version: 3.8.3
> Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/git/pkg-uml/user-mode-linux.git
> diff --
found 657819
thanks
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 12:10:50AM -0500, Graham wrote:
> Package: cpufrequtils
> Version: 007-1+squeeze1
Hi Graham!
> I have Debian running on an Atom N270. It's mostly Squeeze, but I've
> had to upgrade the kernel and a few other bits to Testing. I received
> this error mes
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:46:49PM +0200, Mirosław Zalewski wrote:
> Package: cpufrequtils
> Version: 007-2
> Severity: wishlist
>
> The current upstream version of cpufrequtils is 008. What bugs me,
> is that it seems to be around since 5 July 2010, so it is over a
> year now. In the meantime (3
forcemerge 636141 636194
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 10:51:33AM +0200, Martin Fiedler wrote:
> Package: cpufrequtils
> Version: 007-1
> Severity: important
...
> My suggestion would be to move the auto-loading code to a point *after*
> FREQDRIVER is evaluated or load_detected_cpufreq_modules() is call
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 12:13:59PM -0400, Matt Behrens wrote:
> Package: cpufrequtils
> Version: 007-1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
>
> I discovered that my system was loading p4-clockmod instead of
> acpi-userfreq and it seems the reason is that kernel 3.0.0 rearranged
> the modules a bit:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 06:05:50PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Package: cpufrequtils
> Version: 007-1
> Followup-For: Bug #635348
>
> I'm having the same problem. loadcpufreq tries to load the wrong kernel
> modules (it should be acpi-cpufreq in my case).
> Not entirely sure if it's related to t
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 09:02:29PM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 3.0.0-1
>
> Seen at boot:
> Loading cpufreq kernel modules...FATAL: Error inserting powernow_k7
> (/lib/modules/3.0.0-1-486/kernel/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k7.ko): No such
> device
Hi all,
I'm a
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:35:19PM +0200, Laurent CARON wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics
> Version: 1.4.0-1+b1
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Hi,
> Since this version i can't use the vertical/horizontal scrolling areas
> from my laptop (Sony Vaio Z1 series)
your xorg.conf is broken
> Se
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 07:50:03PM +0200, Ulrich Dangel wrote:
> Package: cpufrequtils
> Version: 007-1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> The init script /etc/init.d/loadcpufreq does not support AMD E-350 cpus
> or to be more precise AMD cpu family 20. As the cpu is already supported
> by power
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 09:13:20AM +0200, Giuseppe Lavagetto wrote:
> I was able to reproduce the problem:
>
> if I copy several GBs of small files over nfs to the machine it
> eventually hangs kswapd eating up all CPU of one core.
>
> This machine is not under any kind of heavy workload, it is j
And here comes another one:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/22/183
Let's see how it goes.
--
mattia
:wq!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:49:42AM +0100, Fabien C. wrote:
>
> > No, I meant that those numbers were really a power saving failure :)
>
> Why?
because the ondemand governor not keeping up with "demand" doesn't sound
like a big success to me.
cheers
--
mattia
:wq!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 07:06:35PM +0100, Fabien C. wrote:
...
> >> Here are my results in GB/s (several averages) for the AMD CPU:
> ...
> > but this looks really awful in terms of powersaving.
>
> Why? Because sampling often is power consuming?
No, I meant that those numbers were really a power
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 06:35:53PM +0100, Fabien C. wrote:
> Package: cpufrequtils
> Version: 007-1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Hello,
>
> Some CPUs (particularly from AMD) have a very high latency for frequency
> changes. This is visible at the user level and can lead the user to chan
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 05:12:44PM +0100, Patrick Heinen wrote:
> http://wiki.debian.org/IntelEmbeddedMediaGraphicsDriver
> i'm going to try it now
those ubuntu packages you pointed at first work for me (using sid Xorg).
Actually I modified them a bit as they have some fundamental issues,
I'll pos
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 10:02:56PM +0100, Riccardo Murri wrote:
> As of rootstrap 0.3.24-5, any failure in a rootstrap module triggers
> throwing a string exception in builder. With Python 2.6, this gets
> particularly annoying since the interpreter throws a TypeError
> ("exceptions must be old-st
/changelog
===
--- trunk/src/rootstrap/debian/changelog(revision 331)
+++ trunk/src/rootstrap/debian/changelog(revision 334)
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+rootstrap (0.3.24-6) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * use the stable release in the default rootstrap.conf
+
+ -- Mattia Dongili Sat, 29 Jan 201
lease unblock.
Thanks!
Full diff is:
commit d3fc4a3f04f67bae4d1fc4f904f35b26554f54b1
Author: Mattia Dongili
Date: Thu Jan 27 07:10:27 2011 +0900
Update to latest kernel config available for squeeze
Signed-off-by: Mattia Dongili
diff --git a/config.amd64 b/config.amd64
index 6f
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 05:25:17PM -0500, P. J. McDermott wrote:
...
> an orig.tar.gz from the gma500 PPA on Launchpad, as I have yet to find
> upstream development for this stuff). After I patch it to build against
I doubt there is any upstream development at all. Those git repositories
I have li
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:37:33AM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> On 2011-01-16 00:18, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >Filipus Klutiero (15/01/2011):
...
> >>Section "Module"
> >>Load "synaptics"
> >>EndSection
> >>[…]
> >You probably want to remove that part. If you have both evdev and
> >synapti
Package: smplayer
Version: 0.6.9-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
adding the patch at #609815 on 0.6.9-2 broke playing videos with mplayer
on one of my computers.
You can see other people having problems with ffodivxvdpau here:
http://smplayer.berlios.de/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=285
and here a statement ab
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 08:19:43PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Bug#603455
>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Cristau
> Cc: debia...@lists.debian.org
> ---
> en/issues.dbk| 91
> ++
> en/whats-new.dbk | 22 +
> 2 files changed, 11
"Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko" wrote:
>On 01/04/2011 11:43 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 07:16:06AM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 05:23:48PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 05:23:48PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 08:00:41PM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > I spent a couple of days trying to figure what was wrong but I don't
> > seem to make any bit progress.
> > I have a number of symptoms
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:34:57AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 12/19/2010 06:01 AM, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> >Yes, no questions on install v/s questions on install.
>
> i find it very sad that you didn't even bother to look at tftpd-hpa.
> users only get questio
tags 607329 + wontfix
thanks
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 12:55:10PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 12/18/2010 11:55 AM, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> >why again and again? The user does it once and that's it. And only if
> >the default behaviour is not appropriate (which I doubt h
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 06:32:33AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> reopen 607329
> retitle 607329 please ship sample in /etc/default/cpufrequtils
> thanks
>
> Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > The fact that the package doesn't provide a default configuration file
> > is t
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 08:02:34PM +0100, Daniel Suchy wrote:
> Hello,
> I had similar problem with cpufreqd running on 2.6.36 kernel.
> I found patch on Gentoo website addressing my issue on
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=255083&action=view
>
> I successfully patched cpufreqd 2.4.2-1
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 03:38:00AM +0100, Witold Baryluk wrote:
> Package: cpufreqd
> Version: 2.4.2-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> cpufreqd-get shows as all profiles, and active one.
>
> It would be also usefull to know active rule which triggered this profile.
> I often do not know why my cpu freq
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 03:22:30PM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> retitle 601946 Freeze exception for acpidump 20100513-3
> thanks
>
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 04:44:25PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:57:54 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> >
retitle 601946 Freeze exception for acpidump 20100513-3
thanks
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 04:44:25PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:57:54 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
>
> > > madt was also removed from upstream's toplevel makefile since the
> >
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 06:51:05PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 20:27:06 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
>
> > +ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),ia64)
> > + BINARIES = acpixtract acpidump madt
> > + MANPAGES = acpixtract madt
> > +else
> >
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 07:40:43PM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Mattia Dongili:
> >
> > One thing you may want to check is if the configuration is preventing
> > higher freq/voltages when the cpu temperature is too high.
>
> /etc/cpufreqd.conf l
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 07:15:21PM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Mattia Dongili:
...
> > One thing you may want to check is if the configuration is preventing
> > higher freq/voltages when the cpu temperature is too high.
>
> That's what I wonder. It neve
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 06:02:10PM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Mattia Dongili:
> > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 04:07:36PM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
> > > Package: cpufreqd
> > > Version: 2.3.3-4
> > > Severity: important
> > >
> > >
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 04:07:36PM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
> Package: cpufreqd
> Version: 2.3.3-4
> Severity: important
>
> Yo. This is an HP Pavilion dv4. I'm running fluxbox, CPU's barely
> ticking over at 0-1%, yet this (it's presently at C 80):
>
>
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 06:46:38PM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
>
> Hi Release Managers,
> Actually I have to blame myself for not checking the status of acpidump
> build logs.
> Anyway, long story short, I fixed a FTBFS on ia64 that prevented
>
1 - 100 of 567 matches
Mail list logo
