Package: web2ldap
Version: 1.1.43~dfsg-1
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/web2ldap
I understand that it's much work to maintain such a package and that Debian
maintainers sometimes cannot keep up with development.
But for me as upstream author it seems better not to have a Debian package at
all
Package: python-weblib
Version: 1.3.9-1
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python-weblib
I understand that it's much work to maintain such a package and that Debian
maintainers sometimes cannot keep up with development.
But for me as upstream author it seems better not to have a Debian package at
Package: python-ldap
Version: 2.4.10-1
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python-ldap
I understand that it's much work to maintain such a package and that Debian
maintainers sometimes cannot keep up with development.
But for me as upstream author it seems better not to have a Debian package at
all
Marc, I hope you understand that this is not meant as personal offense.
It's just facing the fact that it's too hard to keep up for the maintainer in
the current situation. Ok?
Ciao, Michael.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Philipp Hahn wrote:
retitle 742487 Update of python-ldap to upstream version 2.4.16
tag 742487 patch
Please note that 2.4.18 was released and should be considered for package
update:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-ldap/2.4.18
Ciao, Michael.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic
Philipp Hahn wrote:
The attached version contains my fix for that problem, which I sent
upstream and which is already committed to the maintainers CVS
repository:
http://python-ldap.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/python-ldap/python-ldap/Lib/ldap/ldapobject.py?r1=1.139r2=1.141
I prefer not having
Package: python-ldap
Version: 2.4.10-1
Please upgrade the package python-ldap to new upstream version 2.4.15. It
contains important fixes for ReconnectLDAPObject and some new features which
are useful for application programmers. AFAICS is does not break any existing
applications.
smime.p7s
Package: python-weblib
Version: 1.3.9-1
Please upgrade the package python-weblib to new upstream version 1.3.11. It
contains only minimal changes but important fixes for two Unicode issues.
Please consider to do the package renaming requested in
Sebastian Humenda wrote:
Package: python-ldap
Version: 2.4.10-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
Please provide a package for python3-ldap, as available e.g. on
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python3-ldap
Please note that both module packages have a completely separate code base.
So
Is the set of trusted CA certs exactly the same on both systems?
Note that on Debian libldap is linked against GnuTLS. In this case the
ldap.SERVER_DOWN exception does not contain a useful diagnostic message.
When linking libldap against OpenSSL a message generated by OpenSSL is
returned by
Gareth Walters (2K Australia) wrote:
Neither system(s) have any extra ca certs trusted. The code sets the ldap
options to disable cert verification.
As this is bad practice anyway:
Could you please test with explictly the trusted CA certs?
Also note that if you really want to disable all
Marc Haber wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 08:55:20AM +0300, Paul Totterman wrote:
web2ldap needs python-weblib 1.3.8 or later.
I disagree on that, I am using web2ldap on Debian squeeze.
Michael, what do you say?
1.3.8+ is definitely required. Otherwise exceptions are raised.
See also
Evgeni Golov wrote:
Maintainer should modify the hash-bang line in python scripts from
`#!/usr/bin/python' to `#!/usr/bin/python2.5'
because some DeprecationWarning appeared and said md5, sha, mimify modules
should be replaced.
I think your report is a bit wrong.
Yes, running pyca does
Being the author of pyweblib I wholeheartly agree that this package
should be renamed to python-pyweblib. And while you're at it I'd
appreciate if you upgrade to version 1.3.5.
Ciao, Michael.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
14 matches
Mail list logo
