Brian,
I believe I have all the archives from the list. No need to start recreating
anything…
stew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:52:28PM -0400, Guy Hulbert wrote:
On Wed, 2012-27-06 at 12:49 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 06/27/2012 12:38 PM, Guy Hulbert wrote:
It's unenforcable if the modules in question do not incorporate any
OpenSSL code and are just an interface to the library.
Kai Storbeck k...@xs4all.nl writes:
I'm a bit perplexed that the module authors have anything to do with
this as long as they are clearly stating their code is released under
the artistic license.
The license of the perl module is not the concern. The concern is that
we are violating the
Package: gnome-settings-daemon
Version: 3.4.2-3
Severity: minor
The manpage for gnome-settings-daemon lists a --no-daemon option:
--no-daemon
Do not detach the daemon process from its controlling terminal
However, try to run gnome-settings-daemon with that option fails:
Package: python-uno
Version: 1:3.5.3-5
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 7.2
during an upgrade, the python-uno preinst script calls:
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unopkg
This file seems to come from the libreoffice-core pacakge. According
to the policy:
Pre-Depends are also required
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 16:59:53 +0100, Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org wrote:
In any case a multi-arch enabled dpkg will not miss wheezy.=20
Guillem,
Are you really in a position to declare this? The release team as
previously said [0] directly to you that they were looking for an upload
in
tags 625050 unreproducible
thanks
I'm unable to reprodue this bug on amd64. Is anyone else able to
reproduce this?
pgp97XyjhsYYf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Thomas,
I'm unable to reproduce this. It also looks like there has been a new
version of this package uploaded since your report was filed.
Are you still able to reproduce this bug?
stew
pgpcAqonAeWlx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I'm unable to reproduce this bug.
Is anyone else able to reproduce this bug?
stew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
freesba has only ever had one upload, its been RC buggy for months with no
response from the maintainer. It has no reverse depends and a popcon ~ 10.
thanks,
stew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
aolserver4-nsimap has an RC bug that hasn't gotten a response in 6 months, it
hasn't had an upload in years, and the popcon is 5 and it has no reverse
depends. It seems like a good candidate for removal.
thanks,
stew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
severity 646729 serious
thanks
The section of policy referenced in the Justification is quite clear on
this one:
2. Source Code
The program must include source code, and must allow distribution in
source code as well as compiled form.
We on the ftp team have been requiring this of
Package: dtc-common
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.2
dtc seems to put lots of configuation files in /var/lib/dtc, contrary to
policy.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 22:01:58 +0800, Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr wrote:
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote:
In case that the bug numbers are not obvious: #614302, #614304,
#611680, #414480, #566654.
We're going more than 4 years in the past here, with some being false
positive.
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:52:59 +0800, Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr wrote:
* This package depends on being able to modify configuration files of
other packages. (see #637501 and the bugs referenced in that bug)
Yes, which is the goal of the software, yes.
If the gaol this software is
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:31:19 +0800, Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr wrote:
The goal of my software is to handle the configuration of the server. If
we follow what you are saying, then an administrator would have to spend
hours to setup his server manually for a single installation. Do you
Thomas Goirand writes:
I don't see any configuration file there.
seriously?
How about named.conf?
How about vhosts.conf?
root@testdtc:~# source /etc/apache2/envvars
root@testdtc:/root# apache2 -S
192.168.122.137:* is a NameVirtualHost
default server www.foo.com
I don't understand your response. I don't know what chrooted users have
to do with this bug.
The problem is that you are allowing the dtc user to run any program
they wish as root. This means that any apache vulnerability easily
becomes a remote root vulnerability. If your intention is to let
Package: dtc-common
Version: 0.32.10-2
Severity: important
Tags: upstream, security
The two logPushlet.php pages do not sanitize input allowing for SQL injection.
as an example, going to a url like:
http://127.0.0.1/dtcadmin/logPushlet.php?vps_node='%20or%201%20into%20outfile%20'/tmp/kilroy
Package: dtc-common
Version: 0.32.10-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.4
It seems to me that the package tries to subvert policy 10.7.4 here. Other
bugs have been opened against this source package in the past (for example
#414469, #402432, #414484). I think that trying to get
Source: dtc
Version: missing source for shared/gfx/skin/grayboard/js/DD_roundies-min.js
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
shared/gfx/skin/grayboard/js/DD_roundies-min.js is minimized javascript without
included source. Upstream provides non-minimized source which is clearly the
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
It's a shame having to do this for a package with an active maintainer, but I
strongly feel like dtc should be removed from debian. My reasons for thinking
this:
* It seems like anyone that spends any time looking at this package finds
security bugs.
*
this bug wasn't enough.
Note that when I first attempted to alert you to the issue that started
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2011/07/msg00325.html that first
you obviously didn't actually read my report fully. My report:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:43:19 -0400, Mike O'Connor s...@vireo.org wrote
Package: dtc-common
Severity: important
Tags: upstream, security
/usr/share/dtc/admin/install/functions: chmod 666 /var/log/dtc.log
root@testdtc:~# ls -l /var/log/dtc.log
-rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 27664 Aug 13 00:40 /var/log/dtc.log
Why would a log file like this need to be world writable? 0666 is
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 09:27:18 +0800, Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr wrote:
On 08/13/2011 12:27 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
* No priviledge separation: everything -- including apache -- runs as
the user dtc which also owns config files for apache, bind and
others. This probably makes
Package: dtc-common
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole
the install script gives sudo access to the dtc user (the user that is running
apache) unrestricted access to chrootuid, which essentially gives root access
to the dtc account:
root@testdtc:/var/lib/dtc/etc#
Package: dtc-common
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream, security
If maxmind is enabled, it uses the predictable filename: /tmp/maxmind.ws.cache
allowing a symlink to use the dtc priveleges to overwrite a file:
nobody@testdtc:/$ whoami
nobody
nobody@testdtc:/$ ln -s
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:52:59 +0800, Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr wrote:
* It seems like anyone that spends any time looking at this package
finds security bugs.
.snip.
This is purely your appreciation and your view on my software, I don't
think this is reality.
I was waiting for
Package: python-m2crypto
Severity: serious
That may take a little more time, as I noted that demo/x509/proxylib.py is not
free:
# Matt Rodriguez, LBNL
#Copyright (c) 2003, The Regents of the University of
Source: php-html-common
Version: 1.2.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
debian/copyright refers to the php 2.02 license, but the source code refers to
the 3.01 license. The copyright files claims that PHP Group is the copyright
holder of this software. Where did that information
Source: php-net-ping
Version: 2.4.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
The source code claims to be copyright by several of the upstream authors, but
the source code itself doesn't have these copyright claims anyway. The
sourcecode claims to be held by the the PHP Group. Please
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:01:13 +0100 (BST), MJ Ray m...@phonecoop.coop wrote:
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
We feel that it is infeasible for Debian to be in complete compliance
with the current GNOME trademark license. [...]
OK, sorry if this is an old chestnut, but do we actually need a
licence in
Package: dtc-core
Version: 0.32.10-2
Severity: normal
debian/dtc-core.templates contains this:
In any case, please make sure that your MySQL root password is set. As per
default, Debian installs it with a blank password. To set your MySQL root
password, issue the following command:
Source: libnatpmp
Version: 20101211-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
Some of the source files carry a MIT like license which is not mentioned in the
package copyright file
bye,
stew
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (600,
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 20:08:30 +0800, Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr wrote:
It assumes I have ssh installed. If I don't, the script terminates early
with
an error.
Sure, it assumes sshd to be installed: that's the hole point of the
script! Do you think it should be made more
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:43:02 +0800, Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr wrote:
On 07/12/2011 08:43 PM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
Source: libnatpmp
Version: 20101211-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
Some of the source files carry a MIT like license which is not mentioned
tag 552995 + unreproducible
thanks
I'm not able to reproduce this with a current version of emacs and ecb.
I suspect that whatever was causing your problem has since been fixed.
Can you confirm whether or not you are still able to reproduce this bug?
Thanks,
stew
pgpwDce4x1n1l.pgp
tag 269794 + unreproducible
tag 471693 + unreproducible
tag 426805 + unreproducible
tag 384590 + unreproducible
thanks
I'm not able to produce this bug with current versions of emacs/ecb.
As these bugs were filed a long time ago, I believe it is quite possible
that these bugs were fixed by
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 23:30:19 +0800, Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr wrote:
On 07/12/2011 09:23 PM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
Remember that the goal is to provide a helper to quickly disable port
forwarding. It does work on a freshly installed server. I don't mind
improving the script if you can
Source: tumgreyspf
Version: 1.35-7
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
As discussed offline in email with maintainer, this package claims that the
software is GPL-2+, when it seems that there is no reason to believe it is
anything other than GPL-1
bye,
stew
-- System Information:
Package: dtc-stats-daemon
Version: 0.32.10-2
Severity: normal
the package creates a new group and new user in postinst. According to policy
9.2.2, a package requiring a user should be allocating system users.
bye,
stew
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
anything other than GPL-1
Pardon me, that should read anything other than GPL-2
stew
pgpdWscDnjHrg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Source: mlmmj
Version: 1.2.17-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
find_email_adr.c is the source package is a 4-clause BSD license. This license
is not documented in any of the copyright files. This needs to be documented,
as does the copyright holder of this file.
As an asside.
Source: dtc
Version: 0.32.10-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
shared/gfx/xanjaxXHR.js appears to be distributed under the AGPL, but this
license isn't mentioned in debian/copyright. (there are also several other
copies of this same file)
---
debian/copyright contains the
Source: nova
Version: 2011.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
In reviewing this source package, I find several problems with the copyright
file:
tools/ajaxterm/sarissa* are LGPL, but this is not mentioned in
debian/copyright. The rest of ajaxterm is public domain
In the
Package: sbox-dtc
Version: 1.11.3-1
Severity: normal
sbox-dtc uses groupadd/useradd without -r. According to policy 9.2.2, a
package requiring a user should be allocating system users.
when the package is purged, this user/group is left on the system.
thanks,
stew
-- System Information:
Package: sbox-dtc
Version: 1.11.3-1
Severity: normal
when I install sbox-dtc, it creates /var/log/sbox.log owned by dtc:dtcgrp
However, the logrotate file it installs has:
create 640 www-data www-data
Seems like these cant both be correct.
Should the adm group be givin read permission
Package: dtc-xen
Version: 0.5.14-1
Severity: normal
While purging the package, I get:
dpkg: warning: while removing dtc-xen, directory '/usr/share/dtc-xen' not empty
so not removed.
When I inspect:
# ls /usr/share/dtc-xen/
Properties.pyc daemon.pyc
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
I also see that:
authorized_keys2 dtc-xen-firewall-custom-rules dtc-xen-firewall.sh
dtc-xen.cert.cert dtc-xen.cert.csr dtc-xen.cert.key htpasswd
privkey.pem
are all left in /etc/dtc-xen after purging both dtc-xen and
dtc-xen-firewall.
pgpfCVAWhc3PS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: dtc-xen
Version: 0.5.14-1
Severity: minor
I cannot figure out why /usr/sbin/vgdisplay_free_size is useful.
It assumes that you have a lvm named lvm1?
I don't see anything in dtc-xen that creates a lvm1. The only other reference
I see is that the fsckVPSpartition verb in the SOAP
Package: dtc-xen
Version: 0.5.14-1
Severity: normal
I find a number of issues with /usr/sbin/dtc-xen_finish_install
The user is told via debconf that this script should be run to finish the
install of dtc-xen. This script however seems to do I bunch of things that I
find suspect.
chown
reassign 632142 emacs23
thanks
So the problem here is really that cedet, speedbar, eieio are now
implemented by emacs directly. These packages, which are no longer in
testing/unstable, should not have targetted emacs23. But since that cat
is already out of the bag, the easiest way to avoid this
When you say Installing ecb results in a broken package due to several
errors regarding missing libs from CEDET (though all such packages are
installed) What packages do you mean? CEDET is part of emacs, so there
should be no additional packages. Do you have cedet packages installed
From stable
Source: gecko-mediaplayer
Severity: serious
Justification: 3.3
Trying to email the maintainer of this package results in:
550 5.1.1 norse...@ubuntu.com: Recipient address rejected: User
unknown in virtual alias table
A valid email address is required by policy 3.3.
bye,
stew
Source: gnome-mplayer
Severity: serious
Justification: 3.3
Trying to email the maintainer of this package results in:
550 5.1.1 norse...@ubuntu.com: Recipient address rejected: User
unknown in virtual alias table
A valid email address is required by policy 3.3.
bye,
stew
Source: tolua++
Severity: serious
Justification: 3.3
Trying to email the maintainer of this package results in:
550 5.1.1 norse...@ubuntu.com: Recipient address rejected: User
unknown in virtual alias table
A valid email address is required by policy 3.3.
bye,
stew
pgpzYSNwE7WGp.pgp
Source: conky
Severity: serious
Justification: 3.3
Trying to email the maintainer of this package results in:
550 5.1.1 norse...@ubuntu.com: Recipient address rejected: User
unknown in virtual alias table
A valid email address is required by policy 3.3.
bye,
stew
pgpekkDDBhmwd.pgp
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
After discovering that this package was no longer maintained, I had the
oppertunity to speak to the listed maintainer of this package, who indicated
that he is no longer participating in Debian, and his packages should be
orphaned
The package description is:
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The maintainer of this package has indicated to me that he is no loner
participating in the Debian project and that his packages should be orphaned.
The package description is:
pidgin-audacious is a plugin for pidgin which provides integration
with Audacious.
.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The maintainer of this package has indicated to me that he is no loner
participating in the Debian project and that his packages should be orphaned.
The package description is:
The pidgin-mpris plugin sets the title of a currently playing track
in a user
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The maintainer of this package has indicated to me that he is no loner
participating in the Debian project and that his packages should be orphaned.
The package description is:
This is The Qualcomm enhanced version of the Post Office Protocol
Daemon (POP3
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The maintainer of this package has indicated to me that he is no loner
participating in the Debian project and that his packages should be orphaned.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Source: upse
Justification: 3.3
Severity: serious
The listed maintainer of this package is William Pitcock
neno...@sacredspiral.co.uk, however the only listed MX record for this
domain is unusable:
stew@tang:~ $ host -t mx sacredspiral.co.uk
sacredspiral.co.uk mail is handled by 5
Source: qpopper
Justification: 3.3
Severity: serious
The listed maintainer of this package is William Pitcock
neno...@sacredspiral.co.uk, however the only listed MX record for this
domain is unusable:
stew@tang:~ $ host -t mx sacredspiral.co.uk
sacredspiral.co.uk mail is handled by 5
Source: pidgin-mpris
Justification: 3.3
Severity: serious
The listed maintainer of this package is William Pitcock
neno...@sacredspiral.co.uk, however the only listed MX record for this
domain is unusable:
stew@tang:~ $ host -t mx sacredspiral.co.uk
sacredspiral.co.uk mail is handled by
Source: gtkglext
Justification: 3.3
Severity: serious
The listed maintainer of this package is William Pitcock
neno...@sacredspiral.co.uk, however the only listed MX record for this
domain is unusable:
stew@tang:~ $ host -t mx sacredspiral.co.uk
sacredspiral.co.uk mail is handled by 5
Source: pidgin-audacious
Justification: 3.3
Severity: serious
The listed maintainer of this package is William Pitcock
neno...@sacredspiral.co.uk, however the only listed MX record for this
domain is unusable:
stew@tang:~ $ host -t mx sacredspiral.co.uk
sacredspiral.co.uk mail is handled
Package: diff-ext
Version: 0.3.2-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.3
The listed maintainer of this package is:
Maintainer: Andrea Veri andrea.ver...@gmail.com
However, attempting to email this address results in:
andrea.ver...@gmail.com
SMTP error from remote mail server
Source: xorg
Version: 1:7.6+7
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
The debian/copyright for this package is confusing to me. It seems to try to
indicate that the copyright holder of this software changes depending on
whether this is a debian or a ubuntu package? Can this be clarified?
Package: ifupdown
Version: 0.6.10
Severity: wishlist
one of the first examples in
/usr/share/doc/ifupdown/exmamples/network-interfaces.gz is:
# auto eth0
# iface eth0 inet static
# address 192.168.0.42
# network 192.168.0.0
# netmask 255.255.255.0
# broadcast 192.168.0.255
#
tags 617303 +pending
tags 617303 +fixed-upstream
tags 548854 +pending
thanks
Since the maintainer of this package seems MIA, and hasn't responded to
any of the bugs in this package in the last few years, I intend to
hijack this package.
I've sent the maintainer a private email, and I uploaded
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
The functionality of notmuchsync has now been integrated into notmuch itself as
of the 0.5 release of notmuch, which is now available for all arches in both
testing and unstable, so this package is no longer of much value.
thanks,
stew
--
To
On Wed, 25 May 2011 02:54:47 +, Clint Adams cl...@debian.org wrote:
Strictly speaking, it doesn't do the equivalent of notmuchsync -p.
sure, but notmuch search --output=files tag:delete | xargs rm does,
and I don't think this alone warrants keeping notmuchsync.
pgp8MXt9yG4KK.pgp
On Sat, 14 May 2011 20:40:05 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
You mistakenly closed another again.
Well maybe this one is fixed anyway.
This bug was automatically closed when the package it was assigned to
(yaird) was removed from debian. Since the software this bug pertains
to is no longer
Package: rkhunter
Version: 1.3.8-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.3
The 1.3.8-3 upload of rkhunter had the Maintainer listed as:
Maintainer: Debian Forensics forensic-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
However, emailing that address results in:
SMTP error from remote mail server after
Package: unhide.rb
Version: 12-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.3
the unhide.rb packages lists this as Maintainer:
Debian Forensics forensic-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
however, emailing that address results in:
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT
Package: rsakeyfind
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.3
the rsakeyfind packages lists this as Maintainer:
Debian Forensics forensic-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
however, emailing that address results in:
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT
Source: b43-fwcutter
Version: 1:013-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
debian/copyright states that this package is GPL, however, it appears to have a
2 clause BSD license, and some code in the public domain. The BSD license
requires that copyright holders be listed, and they are
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:37:34 -0800, Vincent Cheng vincentc1...@gmail.com
wrote:
As promised earlier, I've re-packaged Dropbox (based off of Ivan's work) and
have tried to address the licensing issues in the packaging. I would be
grateful if any Debian developers/maintainers could look through
Do we really need libshell-perl-perl and libapp-repl-perl and
perl-console (which is already in the repos)?
Do either of these new ITPs provide any functionality that we don't
already have in debian?
bye,
stew
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:16:59 +0900 (JST), TANIGUCHI Takaki tak...@debian.org
wrote:
' = {},
'escape' = 1
}, 'CGI' )
);
Regards,
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:46:06 -0500
s...@debian.org(Mike O'Connor) said:
[1 text/plain (quoted-printable)]
Do we really need libshell-perl-perl and libapp-repl-perl and
perl-console (which is already in the repos)?
Do
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:41:47 -0800 (PST), Rian Hunter r...@dropbox.com wrote:
hi all
we recently released a distribution of dropbox that corrects all the
complains listed in these debian bug reports. thanks for the feedback,
please let me know if there is anything i can do to make dropbox
Package: notmuch
Version: 0.5+nmu2
Severity: normal
since upgrading to 0.5+nmu2, notmuch-show-view-raw-message has stopped
working. When running it in notmuch-show mode, I just get the message:
notmuch-show-message-top: Beginning of buffer
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
APT
severity 610776 minor
thanks
I realized today that this only happens with emacs-snapshot, not with
emacs23, so downgrading to minor.
FWIW:
emacs-snapshot:
Installed: 1:20110112-1
Candidate: 1:20110112-1
Version table:
*** 1:20110112-1 0
500 http://emacs.naquadah.org/ unstable/
Source: psi-plus
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1, Policy 12.5
There are many files which are LGPL-2.1+ and many files which are GPL2+, your
debian/copyight is not accurate about this saying only that the software is
LGPL-2+ and pointing to GPL instead of the LGPL
--
I noticed
found 610338 0.15~svn3447
thanks
Have you seen updated packages?
No, I only looked at the version in testint/unstable. Marking the bug
accordingly.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
dpkg in lenny depends on lzma, so lzma must be Priority: required. dpkg in
squeeze and later does not have this dependency, so the Priority:
required is not warranted, and the override for this package was changed.
This is intentional, and in no way a bug. so I'm closing this report.
thanks,
Source: libtextcat
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.3
The maintainer of this package is listed as: Daniele Favara
no...@dsslive.org, however the dsslive.org domain doesn't accept email. A
working email address is required by policy 3.3
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Package: bgoffice-computer-terms
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.3
debian-addons-bg-maintain...@openfmi.net is not a valid email address, since
its only listed MX server does not allow SMTP connections.
This was discovered when dinstall tried to send email to the maintainers, which
Package: bgoffice-dict-downloader
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.3
the domain name of the Maintainer address does not accept email.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Package: docbookwiki
Version: 0.9.1cvs-11
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.4
the maintainer scripts directly modify /etc/sudoers which is a conffile of the
sudo package.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (600, 'unstable'), (500,
Package: docbookwiki
Version: 0.9.1cvs-15
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
There are many files in the tarball which are GFDL licensed some with and some
without invariant sections, this license is not, however, mentioned in the
copyright file
-- System Information:
Debian
Package: tilecache
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.3
Trying to send email to the maintainer address of this package caused the
following DSN:
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
Package: gadmin-openvpn-server
Version: 0.1.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 9.1.1
The configuration created by gadmin-openvpn-server contains these two lines:
log/etc/gadmin-openvpn/server/openvpn-server.log
status /etc/gadmin-openvpn/server/openvpn-server-status.log
I don't see
Package: gadmin-openvpn-server
Version: 0.1.5-1
Severity: minor
*** Please type your report below this line *** If you enable the Require
Authentication option (which is by default enabled), The following line is
added to the configuration:
plugin /usr/lib/openvpn/openvpn-pam-auth.so login
I
Package: monkeysphere
Version: 0.31-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
monkeysphere-authentication fails when a userid contains an apostrophe, and
Unfortunately all of my userids contain apostrophes. reported upstream:
https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/2544
-- System Information:
Debian
retitle 594519 multiple copyright problems make software non-redistributable as
currently packaged
thanks
I encouraged the submitter to submit this bug after he raised concerns
on IRC about some of software in this package. I thought that I'd
better take a closer look at this source myself, and
I rejected titantools with a message saying that because of a bug in
dak, we are unable to easily handle non-sourceful uploads that move a
package from main to non-free. As we are bogged down with other stuff,
the quickest way to get titantools through new is going to be making a
sourceful
forcemerge 588019 592077
tags 588019 +pending
thanks
I've uploaded the patch from Jakub Wilk from 592077 to DELAYED/3. It
fixes both bugs. Thanks Jakub.
interdiff attached
stew
pgpJlLXUSz2wd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
message/external-body;
tags 542476 +pending
minor 542476 minor
thanks
Downgrading this bug as it is only a documentation bug. The software
works fine when invoked correctly.
(require gnuserv-compate) instead of (require gnuserv)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
1 - 100 of 375 matches
Mail list logo
