On 8/8/21 10:16 PM, Antonio Russo wrote:
> and I'd like to keep unstable/bookworm on 2.0, since my
understanding is that it is long-term stable, while 2.1 is short-
term stable.
Hi,
I am also not sure how the version system will work out in the future
but *2.1 is a LTS release* for ZFS as you
Source: zfs-linux
Version: 0.7.4
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
0.7.5 has been released with some minor fixes.
https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/releases
Niklas
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64
Package: zfs-dkms
Version: 0.7.3-3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
could you upgrade zfs-linux to the latest release (0.7.4) as you can see here:
https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/releases
Thanks!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
Package: zfs-dkms
Version: 0.7.3-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I am unable to upgrade my zfs-dkms from 0.7.3-1 to 0.7.3-2. Here is the whole
error:
root@Debian-Server:~# apt-get install zfs-dkms
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
4 matches
Mail list logo