Here is a patch updating the checksum
Description: Adapt target.dam checksum following dazzcon update
daligner is now producing slightly different .dam files, so a checksum
in the test suite needed to be updated.
Author: Paul Mars
Bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1082216
e/emscripten/emrun.py
so this will also need fixing.
Upstream dropped the executable flag, so maybe it's not meant to be
called directly. /usr/bin/emcc calls it as an argument to $python.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ss, please reach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=sonic-visualiser
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for sonic-visualiser (4.5.2-2 to 5.0-1): BLOCKED:
Rejected/violates migration policy/in
ng, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/la
stable and testing, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/la
stable and testing, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/la
ng, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/la
Hi Athos,
On 18-09-2024 22:52, Paul Gevers wrote:
Well, we'd first need to add your repo to the ci.d.n infrastructure.
I'll do that tomorrow.
I notice that you have a new archive for (probably) each rebuild. It
might be less hassle in the use of ci.d.n if you can maintain a
can
out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=haxe
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for haxe (1:4.3.4-2 to 1:4.3.6-1): BLOCKED: Cannot
migrate due to another item, which is blocked (please check which
de
Hi Athos,
On 18-09-2024 22:47, Athos Ribeiro wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 08:40:31PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
I suppose I would need to also push php8.4 and php-defaults to that
repository so autopkgtest would pick those up, right? Or is it possible
to pick those from experimental?
You can
ckage is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
This bug report has been automatically generated and has only been sent
manually. If you have any comments with regards to the content or the
process, please reach out to
ent or the
process, please reach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=golang-github-vulcand-oxy
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for golang-github-vulcand-oxy (1.3.0-3 to 2.0.0-1):
BLOCKED
ach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=git-delta
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for git-delta (0.17.0-5 to 0.18.0-1): BLOCKED:
Rejected/violates migration policy/introduces a regressi
ckage is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
This bug report has been automatically generated and has only been sent
manually. If you have any comments with regards to the content or the
process, please reach out to
ckage is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
This bug report has been automatically generated and has only been sent
manually. If you have any comments with regards to the content or the
process, please reach out to
ent or the
process, please reach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=lomiri-ui-toolkit
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for lomiri-ui-toolkit (1.3.5100+dfsg-1 to
1.3.5100+dfsg-2): BLOC
out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=twisted
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for twisted (24.3.0-3 to 24.7.0-2): BLOCKED:
Rejected/violates migration policy/introduces a regression
Issues
ation and figure out how to resolve
it?
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/latest/amd64.html
[2]
https://tests.reprodu
ation and figure out how to resolve it?
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/latest/amd64.html
[2]
https://tests.reprodu
ation and figure out how to resolve
it?
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/latest/amd64.html
[2]
https://tests.reprodu
ation and figure out how to resolve
it?
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/latest/amd64.html
[2]
https://tests.reprodu
ng, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/la
rds to the content or the
process, please reach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=generate-ninja
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for generate-ninja (0.0~git20240328.93ee9b9
nd testing, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/la
nd testing, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/la
nd testing, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/la
nd testing, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/la
nately the Debian infrastructure
doesn't allow arch:all packages to be properly binNMU'ed. Hence, I will
shortly do a no-changes source-only upload to DELAYED/15, closing this
bug. Please let me know if I should delay or cancel that upload.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-de
out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=sqlite3
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for sqlite3 (3.46.0-1 to 3.46.1-1): BLOCKED:
Rejected/violates migration policy/introduces a regression
Issues
Linux although the latter doesn't have high priority at the
moment.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Source: python-greenlet
Version: 2.0.2-1
Followup-For: Bug #1081542
Hello,
just as a heads-up: This issue has been fixed upstream with version 3.1.0,
so that this bug report can be closed once that version has been uploaded
to unstable.
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adria
Hello,
On Sat, 2024-03-16 at 18:29 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> the attached patch adds support for building python-greenlet on sh4, it's
> a modified (fixed) version that is currently open for review upstream [1].
This patch has now been merged upstream such that this
process for new architectures.
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
ach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=microsocks
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for microsocks (1.0.3-2 to 1.0.4-2): BLOCKED: Cannot
migrate due to another item, which is blocked (pl
out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=delve
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for delve (1.22.1-1 to 1.23.0-1): BLOCKED:
Rejected/violates migration policy/introduces a regression
Issues preventing
reach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=python-skbio
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for python-skbio (0.6.1-3 to 0.6.2-1): BLOCKED: Maybe
temporary, maybe blocked but Britney
out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=halide
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for halide (18.0.0-6 to 18.0.0-8): BLOCKED: Maybe
temporary, maybe blocked but Britney is missing information (c
ach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=rust-ring
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for rust-ring (0.17.5-1 to 0.17.8-1): BLOCKED: Maybe
temporary, maybe blocked but Britney is missing i
Unattended-Upgrade::MinimalSteps "true";
So, I believe that if you have:
1) dkms based packages
2) don't configure unattended-upgrades to only run before shutdown
you should turn this to false.
Disclaimer: I just interpret this from reading the configuration file (
/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50u
because the latter has a
transistive
dependency on nodejs which has only limited platform support.
Please switch libgit2 back to libhttp-parser-dev for architectures that don't
build
libllhttp-dev because they don't have support for nodejs.
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John
Hi
On 06-09-2024 17:32, Paul Gevers wrote:
I also think that the faux-packages list is/can be architecture
specific, so it's probably trivial to fix but adding all architectures
but armel.
I have made the constraints arch specific and dropped armel from the
list. Looking at the cu
-ports-team/dsa-puppet
> [2] https://salsa.debian.org/dsa-team/mirror/dsa-puppet
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Package: musescore3
Version: 3.2.3+dfsg2-17
Severity: normal
Dear Debian folks,
Using Debian sid/unstable with *gnome-shell* 47~rc-3 from the suite
*experimental*, and scaling the screen content to 200 %, the buttons are
too big in MuseScore as seen in the attachment.
Kind regards,
Paul
ss, please reach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=rust-num-complex
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for rust-num-complex (0.4.0-2 to 0.4.6-1): BLOCKED:
Rejected/violates migration policy/in
ent or the
process, please reach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=cinnamon-desktop-environment
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for cinnamon-desktop-environment (5.8.0 to 6.0.1)
ease reach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=far2l
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for far2l (2.6.2~beta+ds-1 to 2.6.3~beta+ds-1):
BLOCKED: Maybe temporary, maybe blocked but Britney
Hi,
On 11-09-2024 08:17, EiPiFun wrote:
The only thing I want to confirm is that will tests be performed again
if lintian is upgraded?
Failing tests are retried after 1 day once the results come in.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
e're using our
migration software to do the autoremoval via removal hints and that
process isn't designed to handle removal hints in a block. So while it's
technically possible to fix this issue, I don't think anybody will spend
their time on this problem any time soon.
Paul
ss, please reach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gnome-characters
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for gnome-characters (46.0-1 to 47~alpha-1): BLOCKED:
Maybe temporary, maybe blocked b
content or the
process, please reach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=golang-github-anacrolix-fuse
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for golang-github-anacrolix-fuse (0.2.0-2 to 0.3.1-1)
e
process, please reach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=r-cran-glmmtmb
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for r-cran-glmmtmb (1.1.8+dfsg-3 to 1.1.9+dfsg-2):
BLOCKED: Rejected/violates migrat
out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=restic
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for restic (0.16.4-2 to 0.17.0-1): BLOCKED: Cannot
migrate due to another item, which is blocked (please c
out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=audit
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for audit (1:3.1.2-4 to 1:4.0.1-1): BLOCKED:
Rejected/violates migration policy/introduces a regression
Issues
ss, please reach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=ruby-stackprof
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for ruby-stackprof (0.2.25-2 to 0.2.26-1): BLOCKED:
Rejected/violates migration policy/in
ease reach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=cups-pk-helper
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for cups-pk-helper (0.2.6-1 to 0.2.6-2): BLOCKED:
Rejected/violates migration policy/in
ss, please reach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=eclipse-jdt-debug
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for eclipse-jdt-debug (4.26-1 to 4.29-1): Waiting for
another item to be ready to m
reach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=eclipse-jdt-ui
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for eclipse-jdt-ui (4.26-1 to 4.29-1): Waiting for
another item to be ready to migrate (no actio
reach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=r-cran-survey
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for r-cran-survey (4.2-1-1 to 4.4-2-1): BLOCKED:
Rejected/violates migration policy/introduces a
ss, please reach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=r-cran-psychtools
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for r-cran-psychtools (2.4.2-1 to 2.4.3-1): BLOCKED:
Rejected/violates migrat
don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=r-cran-smcfcs
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
testing, flaky tests, i.e. tests that flip between
passing and failing without changes to the list of installed packages,
are causing people unrelated to your package to spend time on these
tests.
Don't hesitate to reach out if you need help and some more information
from our infrastructure.
mutter (at least on amd64) is failing on ci.d.n is
unacceptable. (The ratio where I'm starting to doubt about severity is
about 1/6 to 1/8 failures, but recent history is more like 1/2.)
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
On 06-09-2024 15:16, Simon McVittie wrote:
When we discussed this in 2022, Paul Gevers said that the release team
could probably disable this check and allow task-gnome-desktop to be
uninstallable on armel...
I recall that we currently can't build d-i on armel anymore because
ther
seems
that it needs convincing the right people which has failed until now. So
probably not your cup of tea.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
nd testing, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/la
nd testing, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/la
ng, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/la
your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=mesa
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=python-pyqtgraph
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
eyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=rust-num-traits
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=ruby-optimist
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=rust-target
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=r-cran-pbkrtest
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
d and trixie, so
it doesn't affect (old-)stable.
If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https:
rixie, so
it doesn't affect (old-)stable.
If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.
ks on regressions in testing, flaky tests,
i.e. tests that flip between passing and failing without changes to the
list of installed packages, are causing people unrelated to your package
to spend time on these tests. Just like Otto did.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
n 12 or Ubuntu 22.04, with Python 3.10:
I agree with this proposal. I suggest something like: "previous Debian
stable, if still managed by the Debian Release Team", or "all Debian
releases managed by the Debian Release Team".
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
with
upstream of viking before.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
r it's
> looking as though we will still get quite a lot of test failures.
The powerpc/ppc64 porterbox perotto.debian.net should be considerably faster
than any mips64el machine we have. So, you may give it a try there as well.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :&#
v64.new
"""
It would be nice to have the debootstrap.log around in that case.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 08:42:41 +0200 Alexandre Detiste wrote:
> I know of one single other instance
> at https://debbugs.gnu.org/
There are a few more Debbugs instances:
* Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/
* GNU: https://debbugs.gnu.org/
* Emacs: https://debbugs.juix.org/
* x2go: https://bugs.x
stable and 5 in testing) and they
all failed. Today I did the same, and 1 passed. So that's 19/20 failures.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
access to a testbed where the test just ran
and failed for you to inspect and "play with". Unfortunately I need to
be on-line in the current scheme, so we'd need to align our availability.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
xie which is
clearly not what you intended.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: found -1 1:9.18.2-1
Control: notfound -1 1:9.19.21-1
On Thu, 04 Jul 2024 16:44:20 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?Ond=C5=99ej_Sur=C3=BD?=
wrote:
Version: 1:9.19.0-1
This was introduced after 9.18.2-1 in:
Let's fix the meta-data then.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP di
Control: fixed -1 20230710
On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 12:04:07 +0200 Matthias Klose wrote:
Version. 20230710
Fixed now.
The BTS describes this bug still to unstable and trixie, hopefully
fixing that with the above control command.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Hi,
On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 18:28:30 +0200 Dennis Filder wrote:
I'm closing this as this was fixed with 1:5.2.98-1 in experimental.
Reopen at will.
Can we maybe have a solution in unstable/trixie too?
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: merge -1 1077928
Sorry for the noise, I hit sent too quickly.
On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 21:58:04 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
I noticed that it regularly fails.
I already reported this.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
more information
from our infrastructure.
Paul
https://ci.debian.net/packages/i/ironseed/testing/armel/51136260/
50s autopkgtest [19:00:46]: test savegames: [---
351s timeout: sending signal TERM to command ‘xvfb-run’
351s X connection to :99 broken (explicit kill or s
Release Team member I no longer worried about keepass2 being dropped.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
renaming the package to dbconfig-mariadb in coming months?
dbconfig-common is in the debian namespace. Go ahead and implement a
nice migration.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
is already in
pretty good shape, let's do another tpu.
The packaging changes between 127.0.6533.119-1 in sid and
127.0.6533.119-1~deb13u1 remain the same as in past tpus (eg, #1076396).
See attached.
Please go ahead and upload and lets check tomorrow evening where we
stand before hintin
ink the regression is less bad than leaving the
CVE's unfixed or the other way around? I.e. accept the regression, or
keep the fixed python-django out until the next point release (with a
fixed python-django-storages).
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
help and some more information
from our infrastructure.
Paul
https://ci.debian.net/packages/s/siridb-server/testing/amd64/51094728/
22s autopkgtest [08:41:33]: test http-api: [---
22s * fixing /etc/siridb/siridb.conf
22s * restarting siridb-server
22s * run queries
22s
/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/07/msg2.html
https://ci.debian.net/packages/l/lua-luv/testing/arm64/51094496/
57s ok 96 thread - test avoid thread be released before it done
57s ok 97 thread - thread_getcpu
57s ok 98 thread - getaffinity, setaffinity
these
tests.
Don't hesitate to reach out if you need help and some more information
from our infrastructure.
Paul
https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/pytango/testing/amd64/51094511/
111s === FAILURES
===
implemented in
the version in experimental. I understand that will work around the
problem raised above.
I believe that in general we're OK with going this route. I leave the
actual planning to pochu, Sebastinas and ginggs as they handle most
regular transitions.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
resolve
it? Regularly, if the build dependency is available in unstable,
helping the maintainer of your Build-Depends to enable migration to
testing is a great way to solve the issue. If your build dependency is
gone from unstable and testing, you'll have to fix the build process
in some o
n for filing it can be
found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/07/msg2.html
https://ci.debian.net/packages/s/sonic-pi/unstable/arm64/51053425/
237s Attribute Qt::AA_EnableHighDpiScaling mu
em is visible for 1.5 years now.
Paul
https://ci.debian.net/packages/t/trapperkeeper-scheduler-clojure/testing/i386/
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 6.10.6-amd64 (SMP
1 - 100 of 11229 matches
Mail list logo
