Bug#789931: tag this as wontfix/severity normal

2016-01-11 Thread Paul Yushkevich
Thanks, Gert I would recommend moving to itksnap 3.4 as soon as possible. This is a much "better" release. One caveat for 3.4 is that on Linux it should be built against qt4, not qt5. Thanks! Paul On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 5:48 AM, Gert Wollny wrote: > tags 789931 wontfix > severity 789931 seve

Bug#789931: itksnap: FTBFS in unstable

2015-06-25 Thread Paul Yushkevich
It looks like the ITK-SNAP build does not find the ITK directory. This is a pretty outdated version, we are up to 3.2 now... Paul On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Edmund Grimley Evans < edmund.grimley.ev...@gmail.com> wrote: > Source: itksnap > Version: 2.2.0-1.1 > Severity: serious > > You ca

Bug#698386: Is there a future for ITKSNAP?

2014-10-23 Thread Paul Yushkevich
I just pushed a commit in the dev32 branch that includes a CMAKE flag SNAP_PACKAGE_QT_PLUGINS. Setting this to off should disable the search for plugins. Thanks! Paul On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Paul Yushkevich wrote: > Oh... Weird. Could you try without the space after -D? > &g

Bug#698386: Is there a future for ITKSNAP?

2014-10-23 Thread Paul Yushkevich
Oh... Weird. Could you try without the space after -D? Thanks! On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Michael Hanke wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:57:19AM -0400, Paul Yushkevich wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > > > I am confused :) > > > > You previous

Bug#698386: Is there a future for ITKSNAP?

2014-10-23 Thread Paul Yushkevich
400, Paul Yushkevich wrote: > > Please try cmake ... -D CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH:STRING=/usr/lib/ > > x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake > > > > And let me know if that works any better. > > No, it doesn't -- such a directory doesn't exist. > > I believe the CMake setup ass

Bug#698386: Is there a future for ITKSNAP?

2014-10-23 Thread Paul Yushkevich
Michael Please try cmake ... -D CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH:STRING=/usr/lib/ x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake And let me know if that works any better. Thanks! Paul On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Michael Hanke wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:43:56AM -0400, Paul Yushkevich wrote: > > I am not q

Bug#698386: Is there a future for ITKSNAP?

2014-10-23 Thread Paul Yushkevich
I am not quite sure where on the Debian system Qt cmake files are, but I think you should be able to find them using locate Qt5Config.cmake Thanks! Paul On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Paul Yushkevich wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Please try setting the CMAKE_PREFI

Bug#698386: Is there a future for ITKSNAP?

2014-10-23 Thread Paul Yushkevich
10:22 AM, Michael Hanke wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 08:42:50AM -0400, Paul Yushkevich wrote: > > That's great to hear! As far as the CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH, I set it to > > /opt/Qt/5.3/gcc_64/lib/cmake. In my case, Qt is installed to /opt/Qt. I > am > >

Bug#698386: Is there a future for ITKSNAP?

2014-10-21 Thread Paul Yushkevich
at 07:49 -0400, Paul Yushkevich wrote: > > Ok - it was an easy fix. I just checked it into dev32. Gert - could you > > please confirm that the code runs and builds now? > > Okay, when I can build it with the patches applied (disabling the search > for the plug-ins with cmake

Bug#698386: Is there a future for ITKSNAP?

2014-10-21 Thread Paul Yushkevich
Ok - it was an easy fix. I just checked it into dev32. Gert - could you please confirm that the code runs and builds now? Thanks! Paul On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Paul Yushkevich wrote: > I'm getting the same error in QCoreApplication... Oddly, this happens in > Debian but no

Bug#698386: Is there a future for ITKSNAP?

2014-10-21 Thread Paul Yushkevich
I'm getting the same error in QCoreApplication... Oddly, this happens in Debian but not other OSs. Hope I can find a fix :) On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Gert Wollny wrote: > On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 06:31 -0400, Paul Yushkevich wrote: > > A quick question about the plugins:

Bug#698386: Is there a future for ITKSNAP?

2014-10-21 Thread Paul Yushkevich
ue, Oct 21, 2014 at 6:19 AM, Gert Wollny wrote: > Hello Paul, > > > > On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 04:45 -0400, Paul Yushkevich wrote: > > I am going to try looking into this problem this week. I have been > building > > on Centos, and there the Qt plugins are being picked

Bug#698386: Is there a future for ITKSNAP?

2014-10-21 Thread Paul Yushkevich
Hi Gert, I am going to try looking into this problem this week. I have been building on Centos, and there the Qt plugins are being picked up just fine. I suspect the crash is due to the missing plugin, but I am not sure. Could you tell me why including all VTK libs and GDCM libs was required? Th

Bug#698386: Is there a future for ITKSNAP?

2014-10-15 Thread Paul Yushkevich
Hi Michael Sorry that this is causing so much frustration. Unfortunately, ITK and VTK keep changing fairly rapidly, so code that compiles versus a certain version no longer compiles against older or later versions. Here is a table of version compatibility between versions of ITK-SNAP, ITK, VTK an