Bug#429789: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#429789: peth0: received packet with own address as source address

2008-04-28 Thread Ralph Passgang
Zitat von martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]: also sprach Adriaan Peeters [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.04.25.1648 +0400]: And we have a virtual interface, called eth0, which should be used if xen's domain0 wants to communicate via network. eth0 is also part of this bridge. eth0 should have the

Bug#429789: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#429789: peth0: received packet with own address as source address

2008-04-23 Thread Ralph Passgang
Zitat von martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]: also sprach Adriaan Peeters [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.04.23.1448 +0200]: It has been a while but yes, we were running two xen hosts in the same network. Since they were both standard Debian installs they had the same MAC address: FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF.

Bug#425083: Password expire bug not fixed in samba 3.0.25a-1

2007-05-28 Thread Ralph Passgang
Hello, I am sorry, but the bug I reported is not fixed in the latest upstream version 3.0.25a. I still have the same problem, that passwords are only valid for about 5 to 6 minutes after setting them. This makes samba more or less useless in my setup. pdbedit still shows something like this

Bug#425083: Password expire bug not fixed in samba 3.0.25a-1

2007-05-28 Thread Ralph Passgang
Am Montag, 28. Mai 2007 19:52:42 schrieben Sie: Quoting Ralph Passgang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Hello, I am sorry, but the bug I reported is not fixed in the latest upstream version 3.0.25a. I still have the same problem, that passwords are only valid for about 5 to 6 minutes after

Bug#425083: Samba 3.0.25-1 and 3.0.25-1+b1 is unusable as domain controller

2007-05-19 Thread Ralph Passgang
Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2007 08:01:49 schrieben Sie: From Jeremy Allison in upstream: People who have reported this bug (Endless Password Expiration in 3.0.25, bugzilla id #4630) can you please let me know if you're working on 64-bit machines please ? I'm trying to track this down for 3.0.25a

Bug#425083: Samba 3.0.25-1 and 3.0.25-1+b1 is unusable as domain controller

2007-05-18 Thread Ralph Passgang
Package: samba Version: 3.0.25-1+b1 Severity: important I am using samba since a long time as domain controller for a small domain of windows and linux computers. Since I upgraded to 3.0.25-1 samba is unusable for me and all domain users. Also upgrading to 3.0.25-1+b1 doesn't seem to fix this

Bug#415972: No xen kernel image for k7 anymore!

2007-03-23 Thread Ralph Passgang
Package: linux-source-2.6 Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-11 Severity: important Tag: etch With 2.6.18-4 Debian switched from non-pae to pae-only xen kernels. This means that xen is not useable anymore for many users, which were able to use non-pae kernels without a problem for a long time till now. In

Bug#414471: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#414471: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-i386-pae: small bug in package description

2007-03-12 Thread Ralph Passgang
Am Montag, 12. März 2007 02:06 schrieb Roberto C. Sanchez: On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 01:51:43AM +0100, Sander Marechal wrote: Package: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-i386-pae Version: 3.0.3-0-2 Severity: minor The package description reads: This version of the hypervisor is built with PAE

Bug#414040: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#414040: kernel: xen_net: Memory squeeze in netback driver.

2007-03-09 Thread Ralph Passgang
Am Freitag, 9. März 2007 04:07 schrieb Nate Carlson: On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Bob Tanner wrote: Package: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-amd64 Version: 3.0.3-0-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This bug looks to be tracked in upstream:

Bug#271051: Bug#342249: Help proposal :) [u]

2006-02-14 Thread Ralph Passgang
a couple of mailing lists waiting to be setup for the project as well so that discussion can be moved from BTS. Regards, Jeremy Guido Trotter wrote: On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:51:43AM +0200, Saku Ytti wrote: Hi, I've CC'd Ralph Passgang, he's previously expressed his