Bug#851827: scim-qt-immodule seems to be not working with Qt5 apps
Package: scim Version: 1.4.18-1 Followup-For: Bug #851827 Artem, thank you for your report. Unfortunately, scim does not yet support Qt5. You can follow upstream discussion at https://github.com/scim-im/scim/issues/21 I'm sorry, I don't have better news at this point in time. Regards Rolf
Bug#886026: thank you for the translations
Thank you for the translations. Pastebinit uses launchpad for many things, translations included. https://translations.launchpad.net/pastebinit/trunk I've made an attempt to upload it there.
Bug#830207: new VCS
the packaging is now being developed at https://github.com/leggewie-DM/audio-recorder
Bug#876386: Thank you for this report
Dear Shi, thank you for your report. I will shortly upload an interim "fix" to depend on net-tools until this can be properly fixed. Xie xie. Regards Rolf
Bug#866037: your report lacks information
Hello, there is basically no information whatsoever in your bug report what problem you experience with n2n. What am I supposed to make of this? Please provide steps to reproduce and what problems you experience. You even quoted the section requesting that information, yet ignored it. Regards Rolf
Bug#875738: disable version check
I believe that just like bug 871452, Debian ought to disable this check.
Bug#885284: gbirthday: Depends on unmaintained pygtk
On 11.01.2018 21:49, Jérôme wrote: > QBirthday now has a setup.py which makes it easier to install. I hope > it also makes it easier to create a .deb from the sources. > > Rolf (or anyone), would you like to package QBirthday? Jerome, thank you. That sounds pretty good. I shall look into it.
Bug#865460: No login and crash at reconnect
severity 865460 important thanks On 08.09.2017 00:40, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: > roger is unusablel with this bug. So I set the severity to grave. Hello Jörg, thank you for the report. FWIW, roger runs fine for me, albeit on an Ubuntu system. In your original report you write "since some days roger-router don't login at start and crashes at reconnect.", so I will assume it was initially working fine. To me that hints at a problem elsewhere, not in the roger package. Alsa maybe? Can you recollect any changes you made around the time the breakage occurred? I wonder if there is some kind of library incompatibility. Does rebuilding the package help at all? Furthermore, I suppose the CLI of roger would still be working even for you, or am I mistaken? As such, "a bug which has a major effect on the usability of a package, without rendering it completely unusable to everyone." seems to apply here and thus I would think that severity important is correct. Regards Rolf
Bug#873774: Many gui apps become slow responsive after upgrading my sid
On 31.08.2017 09:36, liuxu wrote: > Package: scim > Version: 1.4-18 > > many gui apps in my mate desktop env becomes slow responsive > [...] > After purge all scim packages, those problematic apps become normal > immediately. > After reinstall scim and scim-pinyin, those apps become probelmatic > again immediately. Hello Liuxu, thank you for your report. I'm sorry to hear about the troubles you are facing. Were you previously using version 1.4.17-1? Does downgrading to the version in testing help? Regards Rolf
Bug#871452: cherrytree: Please omit the menu option to check for newer version
Package: cherrytree Severity: minor Dear Maintainer, I believe that for a distro package it does not make sense to have a binary have a menu option to check upstream for a newer version. The latest available version in Debian is the one available from the mirrors. This should be easy enough to patch out. Regards Rolf
Bug#853406: gcc7 and package freelan
Hello Matthias, thank you for making us aware of the FTBFS of freelan with gcc7. Upstream provided a patch and I already uploaded the package. Unfortunately, I hadn't realized that I hadn't extended the validity of my key as DM in the official keyring. I've done that now, but seeing that the last update to it was 12 hours ago it might be another four weeks or so before the package comes through. I've bumped the release once more and uploaded it to https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/freelan/freelan_2.0-4.dsc I attach the debdiff against the latest version in testing/unstable here as well for your inspection. It would be great if you could help out and prevent removal of the package in about two weeks time, well before I expect my updated key to be included in the official keyring. Regards Rolf diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 257d999..a08bb26 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,17 @@ +freelan (2.0-4) unstable; urgency=medium + + [ Sebastien Vincent ] + * patches: backport 5014a8023b from upstream. Closes: #853406 +fix FTBFS with gcc7 + + [ Rolf Leggewie ] + * control: update to standards version 4.0.0 +- fix typo in manpage +- make the whatis entry for the freelan manpage more meaningful + * copyright: update my copyright to 2017 + + -- Rolf Leggewie <f...@rolf.leggewie.biz> Sun, 06 Aug 2017 17:57:54 +0800 + freelan (2.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium [ Julien Kauffmann ] diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 95b2986..2a1f58c 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), libssl-dev, libcurl4-openssl-dev, libboost-system-dev, libboost-thread-dev, libboost-program-options-dev, libboost-filesystem-dev, libboost-iostreams-dev, scons -Standards-Version: 3.9.8 +Standards-Version: 4.0.0 Homepage: http://www.freelan.org Vcs-Git: https://github.com/freelan-developers/freelan.git -b debian/unstable Vcs-Browser: https://github.com/freelan-developers/freelan-all/tree/debian/unstable diff --git a/debian/copyright b/debian/copyright index b4c00dc..1d164f9 100644 --- a/debian/copyright +++ b/debian/copyright @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ License: GPL-3+ Comment: Upstream grants a special exception to link with OpenSSL Files: debian/* -Copyright: 2015-2016 Rolf Leggewie <f...@rolf.leggewe.biz> +Copyright: 2015-2017 Rolf Leggewie <f...@rolf.leggewe.biz> 2012 Julien Kauffmann <julien.kauffm...@freelan.org> License: GPL-3+ diff --git a/debian/freelan.1 b/debian/freelan.1 index c561e76..bbaf7a2 100644 --- a/debian/freelan.1 +++ b/debian/freelan.1 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ .\" DO NOT MODIFY THIS FILE! It was generated by help2man 1.44.1. .TH FREELAN "1" "June 2015" "freelan 2.0.0 (2.0-8-g0545b2d) Sun 21 Jun 2015" "User Commands" .SH NAME -freelan \- manual page for freelan 2.0.0 (2.0-8-g0545b2d) Sun 21 Jun 2015 +freelan \- peer-to-peer VPN .SH DESCRIPTION .SS "Generic options:" .TP @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ The DNS script. Do not run as a daemon. .TP \fB\-s\fR [ \fB\-\-syslog\fR ] -Alwats log to syslog (useful when running with +Always log to syslog (useful when running with \fB\-\-foreground\fR on OSX with launchd). .HP \fB\-p\fR [ \fB\-\-pid_file\fR ] arg A pid file to use. diff --git a/debian/patches/5014a8023b.patch b/debian/patches/5014a8023b.patch new file mode 100644 index 000..3ac53ec --- /dev/null +++ b/debian/patches/5014a8023b.patch @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +From 5014a8023b42762052d6417ebbc0cd2adb1fda90 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Sebastien Vincent <sebastien.vinc...@cppextrem.com> +Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 20:10:55 +0200 +Subject: [PATCH] Fixes compilation with g++-7. + +--- + libs/asiotap/src/posix/posix_tap_adapter.cpp | 2 ++ + libs/netlinkplus/include/netlinkplus/endpoint.hpp | 8 +--- + 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/libs/asiotap/src/posix/posix_tap_adapter.cpp b/libs/asiotap/src/posix/posix_tap_adapter.cpp +index 71377cee..cdd7abf3 100644 +--- a/libs/asiotap/src/posix/posix_tap_adapter.cpp b/libs/asiotap/src/posix/posix_tap_adapter.cpp +@@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ namespace asiotap + { + result[name] = name; + } ++ break; + } + case tap_adapter_layer::ip: + { +@@ -213,6 +214,7 @@ namespace asiotap + { + result[name] = name; + } ++ break; + } + } +
Bug#780280: dak: generate rejection mail for mails with expired signature
Hello! Currently, the uploader of a package using an expired key is left guessing as to why the package was accepted but doesn't show up in the archive. Please remove this guesswork to improve productivity. Thank you. Regards Rolf
Bug#860568: iptraf-ng: cron spam due to duplicated logrotate rules
Package: iptraf-ng Version: 1.1.4-1 Followup-For: Bug #860568 FWIW, this problem also occurs in a Ubuntu Trusty installation. I'm mentioning this since my first assumption was this might be due to iptraf migrating to iptraf-ng but that hasn't happened in Ubuntu trusty.
Bug#861909: postgrey: Please add whitelist entry for mail.alibaba.com
Package: postgrey Version: 1.35-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, aliexpress.com and alibaba.com outgoing mail are handled by a large pool of outgoing MTA of the form mail123-456.mail.alibaba.com. I kindly request an appropriate entry be made for them in the default whitelist. Regards Rolf
Bug#830207: Next try
Hello and good morning! On 19.02.2017 19:45, David Rabel wrote: > dpkg-source emits a warning concerning the fiels that dh-clean deletes, > e.g.: > > dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file missing, use > --include-removal to override > > Is this a problem? No, that's just informational. On 19.02.2017 19:29, David Rabel wrote: > Good morning, > > On 19.02.2017 00:48, Rolf Leggewie wrote: >>> What you actually say is: IF we leave it as it is, the worst case is >>> that the software could be public domain. >> No. The software has whatever license it has.[...] > I meant leave it as it is "upstream". > In my opinion the software is DFSG-compliant in any way. If the > copyright holder is Osmo or Team audio-recorder or the software is > public domain. Part of the work as maintainer and especially when doing an ITP is to verify the code is indeed DFSG-free. Personally, I'd have trouble with ambiguity in the form of "Well, I can't really be certain if the software is licensed as GPL, LGPL or public domain but since all those are DFSG-free it should be OK". One should clarify what the license is and release the ITP only afterwards. > There are source files without copyright notice. Do we have to add > that? For example the header files under src/ . Publishing something without claiming copyright automatically makes it public domain. So, unless Person A publishes file X with a copyright notice and person B republishes it, stripping the copyright notice, those files do not usually have copyright. It's OK to assume that files for which we cannot find a copyright claim to be copyright-free (until we are made aware of the contrary, that is). > I think you are wrong here. intltoolize is not run by autoreconf. That's what I read during my research about dh-autoreconf (not autoreconf). It's entirely possible that I am mistaken. As I said, my changes were untested. Does the package still compile? By the way, why do you remove the autogenerated files in the first place when upstream apparently is keen to ship them and it creates a "problem" for you in having to recreate them? This is usually only necessary if those autogenerated files are old and do not support newer platforms. That's when you need to autoreconf. Otherwise, it's unnecessary but it does have the benefit of future-proofing the package somewhat. >> The Depends and Build-Depends lines look surprisingly long.[...] > I copied both Build-Depends and Depends from the upstream control file. > I'm not too familiar with ${misc:Depends} and ${shlibs:Depends} . Maybe > you would like to fix this? Not sure if this is even wrong. It just struck me as odd. I have not compiled your package yet. You could strip the additional packages from Depends, build the package and inspect the resulting deb file with "dpkg --info $path-to-deb-file" and if the dropped dependencies are still listed then listing them explicitly in debian/control wasn't necessary. If they are no longer there, I'd install the package, run the binary and unless I run into problems I'd assume the dependencies weren't actually really necessary. You can read more about ${misc:Depends} and ${shlibs:Depends} in "man 7 debhelper" under the heading "Automatic generation of miscellaneous dependencies." Regards Rolf
Bug#830207: Next try
On 19.02.2017 04:12, David Rabel wrote: > I was just thinking: Do we have to add a paragraph in debian/copyright > for files we delete with debian/clean? Yes, absolutely. The only other option is to create a separate dfsg-free upstream tarball and strip the relevant files from that tarball. In your case, of course, you might also use your upstream powers and consider to drop the file upstream depending on whether or not it should be shipped in upstream releases.
Bug#830207: Next try
Good morning David, On 19.02.2017 03:59, David Rabel wrote: > Hi Rolf, > > a general question: Are you OK with the way I commit every step in git > or would you prefer that I clean up the history a little bit before pushing? Whatever you think makes most sense. Your style looks absolutely fine to me. >> I am sure Osmo did not intend to release as public domain. > What you actually say is: IF we leave it as it is, the worst case is > that the software could be public domain. No. The software has whatever license it has. We are just documenting what that is. While doing this due diligence we might actually find out that the license as stated is not what the author intended (a license bug if that's how you want to look at it). Debian is doing this to guarantee to its users that all software complies with DFSG and thus the users do not have to do this work. Again, there really is no way around this. I am not sure that debian/copyright is currently complete, yet. "licensecheck -r" lists quite a few files under LGPL license for example and "rgrep -i copyright ." gives a lot more names than currently documented. There's still work to be done here. > We could drop the file, we just would have to run intltoolize before > the build process. I was not quite sure how to do it. It is already being done in line 18 of the current debian/rules file via "--with autoreconf". So, at least for Debian it seems that file (and possibly others) is not necessary and will be replaced during the build anyhow. dh-autoreconf is a superset of autotools-dev and thus I pushed an untested fix to the rl-wip branch on github. Feel free to cherry-pick after verification. The Depends and Build-Depends lines look surprisingly long. Why do you have so many explicit runtime dependencies in Depends? Isn't this picked up automatically by ${misc:Depends} and ${shlibs:Depends}? If necessary this can be fixed later, but it struck me as odd when I stumbled upon it now. Thanks again for your work. Regards Rolf
Bug#830207: Next try
On 18.02.2017 20:37, David Rabel wrote: > Hi there, > > I uploaded a new audio-recorder package to mentors: > https://mentors.debian.net/package/audio-recorder Awesome! Thanks. I see you pushed changes to github so I will focus my review on what's up there, assuming it is identical to what's on mentors.debian.net I've not looked at mentors. 60fd5fd4c It's a trivial fix, but if upstream has that spelling error I think it would be better to keep it. Where do you draw the line? Who knows, there might be some kind of intended meaning that you and I missed? In that part of our work, we are just documenting, not correcting IMO. 08dc66295a I'm not sure if changing "The entire Linux community" to "Team audio recorder" is sufficient. I'm not sure such an entity exists and it's basically equally opaque. If it's not specific enough to understand who to contact in case you'd like to ask for a relicensing of the code then it's not specific enough for Debian. Let's say you'd like to develop a closed-source variety of audio-recorder, who would you need to ask for permission? Besides, as I already mentioned previously, my feeling is that nobody but Osmo Antero has copyright. There are two conditions that need to be met for this NOT to be true; 1) significant contributions from third parties and 2) those parties requested for copyright when making those contributions. 2) is not documented in the files and it should be IF there was a third-party copyright. I understand that Osmo enjoys drinking his vine and keep things simple. But he is making things unnecessarily complicated here by adding an opaque group of people to the copyright holders. I believe that what he wants to do is acknowledge outside contributions. That's what the AUTHORS file is for which is actually present but does not list anybody besides him. It's fine for him to make a broad statement there such as "a multitude of patches were gladly received by a number of people from the Linux community. If you'd like to see your name here specifically contact me at XYZ". Copyright is about who owns the ultimate rights to the source. GPL extends quite a few of those rights to the users (such as the right to modify, redistribute, etc.) What Osmo is doing (and I'm absolutely certain that is unintentional) is to give basically everyone who can somehow claim to be part of the Linux community to fully OWN the code and that includes the right to relicense it, for example. This would effectively make the source public domain and strip it of the protections the GPL provides (such as disallowing redistribution as a closed-source binary program). I am sure Osmo did not intend to release as public domain. This absolutely needs clarification, no way around that. My suggestion is to simply drop the erroneous and very dangerous line giving the Linux community or Team Audiorecorder the copyright. All users already have very broad rights protected under the GPL. Adding that line actually puts those rights in jeopardy. dfe98839e3 adds Ian Holmes as copyright holder for src/gst-recorder.c. If there are any other other copyright holders then that's the way we should handle copyright attribution for them as well, unless they have copyright in a broad number of files. 329aa8ce287 "Other" is not a good name for License. I suggest to follow https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/g/granule/copyright-1.4.0-7-4 or https://github.com/giuliopaci/SPro/blob/master/debian/copyright which I found doing a quick Google search. https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2015/01/msg00054.html says there is a later version of the file with a better worded license term. If that's the case it would be advisable for upstream to exchange the current for the later version. If upstream doesn't do this, we can also do it in Debian only. If the file is not necessary to build the binary, we might want to simply drop it via debian/clean. This question needs more consideration. > Mainly it is an update of the debian/copyright file. But while I edited > it, I found a lot of auto-generated files in the source tarball. So I > deleted them via dquilt patch. I hope this is the right way to handle > such files. Are they giving any problems during the build? If no, then I'd say not to bother with them at all. If yes and they aren't removed by "dh clean" already then the file debian/clean is the proper place. Have a look at "man dh_clean". Simply put, you can list file names one per line in debian/clean to be removed as one of the first steps during the build. Wildcards are allowed, RegExp might be. This is better than using patches because deleting a 1MB file it takes a patch that's slightly bigger than 1MB. It's easier to read during code inspection as well. Regards Rolf
Bug#855308: qemu: runtime dependencies for qemu are too strict
Package: qemu Severity: normal Tags: patch Dear qemu packaging maintainers, the qemu binary package currently transitively depends on all available system emulation binary packages (via its dependency on qemu-system). These package are non-trivial in size and most users won't need all emulators. I have prepared a patch against current git HEAD that will change nothing by default but allow the user to have only the emulators installed that they really want and use. Regards Rolf Author: Rolf Leggewie Subject: relax qemu runtime dependencies --- control-in.orig 2017-02-16 22:53:29.567416355 +0800 +++ control-in 2017-02-16 23:01:45.809877093 +0800 @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ Package: qemu Architecture: amd64 arm arm64 armel armhf hppa i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc powerpcspe ppc64 ppc64el s390x sparc sparc64 x32 Multi-Arch: foreign -Depends: ${misc:Depends}, qemu-system (>= ${source:Version}), qemu-user (>= ${source:Version}) [linux-any], qemu-utils (>= ${source:Version}) +Depends: ${misc:Depends}, qemu-system (>= ${source:Version})|qemu-system-binary (>= ${source:Version}), qemu-user (>= ${source:Version}) [linux-any], qemu-utils (>= ${source:Version}) Suggests: qemu-user-static [linux-any] Description: fast processor emulator QEMU is a fast processor emulator: currently the package supports @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ # alpha m68k sh4 uses bootroms seabios, ipxe-qemu (>= 1.0.0+git-2013.c3d1e78-1~) Suggests: samba, vde2, qemu-block-extra (= ${binary:Version}), -Provides: ${sysprovides:misc} +Provides: ${sysprovides:misc}, qemu-system-binary Breaks: qemu-system (<< 1.3.0+dfsg-5) Replaces: qemu-system (<< 1.3.0+dfsg-5) Description: QEMU full system emulation binaries (miscellaneous) @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ ipxe-qemu (>= 1.0.0+git-2013.c3d1e78-1~), qemu-efi Suggests: samba, vde2, qemu-block-extra (= ${binary:Version}), -Provides: ${sysprovides:arm} +Provides: ${sysprovides:arm}, qemu-system-binary Breaks: qemu-system (<< 1.3.0+dfsg-5), :ubuntu: qemu-common (<< 1.3.0+dfsg-5), :ubuntu: qemu-kvm (<< 1.2.0.dfsg-1), @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ # all mips targets uses vgabios and bootroms seabios, ipxe-qemu (>= 1.0.0+git-2013.c3d1e78-1~) Suggests: samba, vde2, qemu-block-extra (= ${binary:Version}), -Provides: ${sysprovides:mips} +Provides: ${sysprovides:mips}, qemu-system-binary Breaks: qemu-system (<< 1.3.0+dfsg-5) Replaces: qemu-system (<< 1.3.0+dfsg-5) Description: QEMU full system emulation binaries (mips) @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ Recommends: qemu-utils, # ppc targets use vgabios-stdvga and bootroms seabios, ipxe-qemu (>= 1.0.0+git-2013.c3d1e78-1~) -Provides: ${sysprovides:ppc} +Provides: ${sysprovides:ppc}, qemu-system-binary Breaks: qemu-system (<< 1.3.0+dfsg-5), :ubuntu: qemu-common (<< 1.3.0+dfsg-5), :ubuntu: qemu-kvm (<< 1.2.0.dfsg-1), @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ # sparc64 uses vgabios-stdvga and bootroms seabios, ipxe-qemu (>= 1.0.0+git-2013.c3d1e78-1~) Suggests: samba, vde2, qemu-block-extra (= ${binary:Version}), -Provides: ${sysprovides:sparc} +Provides: ${sysprovides:sparc}, qemu-system-binary Breaks: qemu-system (<< 1.3.0+dfsg-5), :ubuntu: qemu-common (<< 1.3.0+dfsg-5), @@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ :ubuntu: cpu-checker Suggests: samba, vde2, qemu-block-extra (= ${binary:Version}), kmod [linux-any], sgabios, ovmf -Provides: ${sysprovides:x86} +Provides: ${sysprovides:x86}, qemu-system-binary :ubuntu:Conflicts: kvm (<< 1.3.0+dfsg-5) Breaks: qemu-system (<< 1.3.0+dfsg-5),
Bug#830207: good to see audiorecorder in Debian
David, thank you for your mail. On 14.02.2017 16:57, David Rabel wrote: > Thanks for your offer and of course I would appreciate your help. Awesome. Just add me to the uploaded fields as "Rolf Leggewie <f...@rolf.leggewie.biz>" please. > A few words regarding the workflow: Because Osmo publishes > audio-recorder as an Ubuntu package, it already contains a debian/ > directory. So I download the latest tarball, untar it, delete the > debian/ directory and tar it again. That's actually much more complicated than it needs to be. While it does make sense to ask upstream to stop shipping a debian directory, DebSrc3.0 which I believe is by now the default will overwrite any directory if you want that. The debian directory is always overridden (c.f. https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0#Advantages_of_new_formats). You only need to repack things if upstream tarball contains undistributable content according to DFSG (not licensed for redistribution, etc.). > I work with git and gbp, so the all the packaging work is done in a > git repository. That's what I use for my other packages, too, so I'm very familiar with it. > That is https://github.com/NoreSoft/audio-recorder at the moment. I am > not a big fan of github, but chose it for simplicity. If you prefer > something more free, let me know. If not, I could just give you write > access to the repo. You could host at alioth but personally I like github. My account on github is leggewie. Upstream uses launchpad.net which recently got git support. We might look into moving the debian packaging there. Do you know if upstream is proficient in git? >> "(C) linux community" really isn't saying anything at all so I am >> going to have >> to REJECT. Also missing other references (eg. Rosetta, but I stopped >> looking there) > So I am not quite sure yet how to handle this. My first idea is to ask > Osmo if he may have this in more detail. Anything passing through NEW will get the fine comb when it comes to copyright. You need to look at every single file before uploading. That's normal and you should prepare the upload accordingly. Regards Rolf
Bug#830207: Audio Recorder
On 14.02.2017 17:43, David Rabel wrote: > The audio-recorder package was rejected by Debien FTP masters, because > of the "(C) linux community". Can you say, who in particular > contributed to audio-recorder? Beware that unlike German Urheberrecht Copyright is not automatically assigned. So, unless contributions were made with a specific copyright request they are public domain. You can command copyright for your own work. I assume what you meant to do is acknowledge the contributions. But again, that does not mean the contributors have copyright and things become much simpler. Only you as upstream author have copyright and you are of course free to mention contributors (who again do not have copyright unless they requested this). IANAL, but that that's my understanding. > Viele Grüße, David Oh, Du bist Deutsch?
Bug#830207: good to see audiorecorder in Debian
Hello, great to see audiorecorder close to being included in Debian. I had offered help for packaging the software at https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1391951 but I never got around to doing an ITP. Let me know if you are interested in a co-maintainer. I am DM and would be able to upload packages without requiring a DD sponsor. Regards Rolf
Bug#743420: sane-utils: scanimage fails when avahi is enabled
Package: sane-backends Followup-For: Bug #743420 Hello, I believe this is https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208091 which Laurent Vivier traced down to a race condition in net.c He also provided a patch in above-mentioned URL. In any case, I reported #854705 to see if Debian wants to ship the patch. FWIW, Laurent says he no longer experiences the issue. Regards Rolf
Bug#854705: race condition in net backend
Package: libsane Severity: normal Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, one of the Ubuntu users has analyzed a segfault reported in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208091 which is linked to #734103. Laurent concluded that there is a race condition in the net backend for which he provided a patch in http://tinyurl.com/j5qjcqc. Please have a look and include the patch if you feel it is appropriate. Regards Rolf
Bug#824450: scanbd does not find scanner
On 02.06.2016 05:52, Chris Laif wrote: > After that I compiled scanbd_1.4.4-1rl1 and ... voila, it works Well, that's good news. I'm still wondering what's wrong with the Debian package itself. Are you available to test a package on Jessie?
Bug#853295: git-buildpackage should recommend or suggest libdistro-info-perl
On 01.02.2017 00:09, Guido Günther wrote: >> thank you for maintaining git-buildpackage. >> > >> > I noticed that git-dch uses functionality from libdistro-info-perl. >> > Wouldn't >> > it be a good idea to either recommend or suggest the package? > gbp doesn't use it by itself. Invokes dch from devscripts's which > already recommends it so I don't think we should also do so. Yeah, that's indeed good enough. I somehow missed this transitional dependency when looking at why the package hadn't been installed on one of my machines. Sorry for the noise.
Bug#853754: gjots2: Autosave is unsafe
Package: gjots2 Version: 2.4.1-2 Severity: important Tags: upstream I just found out that the autosave function of gjots2, while neat, has some serious shortcomings in implementation. Steps to reproduce 1) open a gjots file 2) change something, but don't save 3) close the file or quit the program I will not be asked if I want to save my changes. So, for example if I changed my mind on the changes in #2 and would like to discard them, ordinarily I would simply close the program and I'd assume to be back to my original state. Not with gjots2 anymore. The old state is preserved but the user will need to know where and most importantly be aware they need to recover back to the state in #1 manually. This is not in line with how other programs use autosave (for recovery) so this can potentially lead to data loss the next time the file is opened and autosaved.
Bug#853295: git-buildpackage should recommend or suggest libdistro-info-perl
Package: git-buildpackage Version: 0.6.22 Severity: normal Dear Guido, thank you for maintaining git-buildpackage. I noticed that git-dch uses functionality from libdistro-info-perl. Wouldn't it be a good idea to either recommend or suggest the package? Regards Rolf -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.7 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Versions of packages git-buildpackage depends on: ii devscripts2.15.3+deb8u1 ii git 1:2.1.4-2.1+deb8u2 ii man-db2.7.0.2-5 ii python2.7.9-1 ii python-dateutil 2.2-2 ii python-pkg-resources 20.10.1-1.1~bpo8+1 Versions of packages git-buildpackage recommends: pn cowbuilder ii pristine-tar 1.33 Versions of packages git-buildpackage suggests: ii python-notify 0.1.1-4 ii unzip 6.0-16+deb8u2 -- no debconf information
Bug#790584: gjots2: depends on python-gnome2 which is deprecated
Package: gjots2 Version: 2.4.1-2 Followup-For: Bug #790584 Emilio, thank you for making me aware of this problem. I relayed the information upstream and am happy to report that upstream has superseded all python-gnome2-related code in the latest release.
Bug#827522: [gjots2] Version 3.0.1 available
Package: gjots2 Version: 2.4.1-2 Followup-For: Bug #827522 Marek, I thought I had already replied to this ticket but it looks like I did not. Thank you for your report. There are ways in Debian to inform the maintainer automatically about new upstream releases (debian/watch). Specifically opening bug tickets about new upstream versions being available doesn't really help much. I had had a look at the new upstream quite a while ago and found several bugs so I reported them upstream and held off releasing to Debian. https://sourceforge.net/p/gjots2/bugs/ Regards Rolf Leggewie
Bug#849290: dovecot-core: incorrect information in /etc/dovecot/README
Package: dovecot-core Severity: minor Dear Maintainer, I would say that the file /etc/dovecot/README is pretty unnecessary. I run the version from Jessie and there is nothing particularly interesting in that file and the referenced directory does not even exist. Time to drop the file? Regards Rolf
Bug#849289: git-annex: [RFE] youtube-dl support
Package: git-annex Severity: wishlist Tags: upstream Dear Maintainer, it would be nice if git-annex supported the youtube-dl package as an alternative to quvi, especially considering that quvi is currently in RFA status (bug #831732). Regards Rolf
Bug#836186: libreoffice: README.Debian-source is outdated
Package: src:libreoffice Version: 1:5.2.0-2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, it seems that the information in README.Debian-source is obsolete. Lines 131ff read: "The .orig.tar.gz consists of the 6 seperate tarballs from http://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/openoffice/stable/3.2.0/ of which some non-free stuff has been removed:" That directory contains only openoffice sources whereas Debian has switched to Libreoffice quite a while ago. It would be nice if you found the time to go through this document and bring it up to date. Thank you for the work of maintaining LO in Debian. Regards Rolf Leggewie
Bug#836185: libreoffice-mysql-connector: bug script is faulty
Package: libreoffice-mysql-connector Version: 1:4.3.3-2+deb8u5 Severity: normal Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, the libreoffice-mysql-connector bug script is faulty. This leads to an error when reporting a bug with reportbug. "The package bug script /usr/share/bug/libreoffice-mysql-connector/script exited with an error status (return code = 256). Do you still want to file a report?" Please consider applying the attached patch to have it do the right thing. Proper credit in the changelog would be appreciated. Regards Rolf Leggewie Author: Rolf Leggewie <f...@rolf.leggewie.biz> Subject: fix bug script in libreoffice-mysql-connector --- new/libreoffice-mysql-connector.bug-script.in 2016-08-31 17:53:49.446917134 +0800 +++ orig/libreoffice-mysql-connector.bug-script.in 2016-08-31 17:53:14.422743461 +0800 @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ #!/bin/sh -/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unopkg list --bundled mysql-connector-ooo >&3 +/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unopkg list --bundled com.sun.star.mysql-connector-ooo-@PLATFORMID@ >&3
Bug#836184: libreoffice-mysql-connector: Please package the latest version of the mysql connector
Package: libreoffice-mysql-connector Version: 1:4.3.3-2+deb8u5 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, upstream has a newer version 1.0.4_3 for the mysql connector. Please consider to package it and upgrade from the current 1.0.2 version. http://extensions.libreoffice.org/extension-center/mysql-native-connector Regards Rolf Leggewie
Bug#770884: scim: Scim segfaults when gtk3-engines-unico is installed
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 17:06:34 -0500 Wyatt Wardwrote: > Package: scim > Version: 1.4.14-5+b1 > Severity: normal > Tags: l10n > > Dear Maintainer, > > I have had scim installed for a long time, and it always worked well. Then when I installed the unico engine, scim-panel-gtk began segfaulting and repeatedly restarting before crashing again. > > The problem resolves itself immediately upon the removal of the package gtk3-engines-unico. I've had gtk3-engines-unico installed forever and did not experience the crashes you mention. Is this still a problem for you?
Bug#826383: xpra hogs CPU
This is getting comical. On 06.06.2016 00:26, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > If you reasonably suspect that Raspberry is not powerful enough for > Xpra then why did you submit your bug in first place? You crack me up. Now, where did I say that? You seem to be hallucinating. I'm merely observing that the CPU is saturated. And it's well-known that the CPU on the Raspberry isn't the beefiest. That doesn't mean I'd expect extended CPU hogging. Quite the contrary, especially since I can run graphical apps over ssh X forwarding without any problem and with maybe 3-10% CPU consumption. But then again, what do I know what xpra is doing in the background? And indeed maybe there is a good explanation and it's likely not to change. Then this would be something that should be documented in README.Debian if there is no way to improve performance. Again, we know really nothing at this point. We merely have an observation of an odd behaviour. You stopped the bug triage in its tracks. OK... > Too bad if you expected (much) more than this as I can't satisfy your > expectations... I'm only asking you to care enough for a package you claim you want to maintain to actually maintain it. And that means for example bug triage, not ticket closing. > There some reasons why your bug was closed: > * No actionable tasks for maintainer. Nonsense. Apparently neither you nor I have any idea at this point if the CPU or some other part of the RPi is indeed underpowered for xpra. Or if this is somehow a mismatch of versions/platforms/$whatnot. Or PEBKAC. Or if it used to be a problem and no longer is in backports/testing/unstable. Just to name a few possibilities. All I know is that you don't seem to care to find out. And that it's your job as maintainer to _want_ to find out, during bug triage. And that's why you are not a good maintainer, even if you do not like to hear this valid criticism. > * Unsupported client from unsupported operating system. Nonsense. By the same token a critical security vulnerability in the Debian Apache package isn't even a bug if it is triggered from a remote windows client? Or a segfault in a package because of malformed input that the program didn't validate/discard? How did you ever manage to become DD? Seems like you missed the point again that the problem occurred in a fully up-to-date Jessie system (not the Ubuntu system)?! You've made it amply clear that you consider the version in Jessie ancient and unsupported. It hasn't really sunk in to your conscience apparently that this disregard for stable still disqualifies you as maintainer. And obviously, you don't like to hear it, but I'll still repeat it as that's simply the truth. You signed up to be maintainer, then be it, not only for unstable. > * Not really a bug report but support request. Buahahaha. I think we've exchanged our points of view and it seems I won't be able to convince you to take your job seriously. Oh, well... Have a great day.
Bug#826383: xpra hogs CPU
Hello Dmitry, On 05.06.2016 21:10, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: >> JFTR, the problem of high CPU load occured on a Jessie box. Last I >> looked, Jessie was still supported. > Then please try Xpra from jessie-backports. Not available for Raspbian. But that's not an issue. I can compile and backport packages myself if necessary. That can be part of meaningful bug triage but shouldn't be the first, immediate and only response to any problem in a stable release. At least for a maintainer that cares about quality software and user experience. For example, you as maintainer would know if the Raspberry is simply underpowered and 100% CPU on the simplest of tasks is to be expected with xpra on such a host. Or you'd equally know if there had been issues about a mix of versions of xpra causing problems for each other in the past. Or if you didn't know, as a good maintainer you'd be interested to learn and find this out. Bug triage. Closing a ticket isn't the most pressing concern for a good maintainer. >> Now, I wish you a nice day. Have fun closing tickets rather than fixing >> problems and delivering kick-ass software as the latter does not seem to >> be of much concern to you. > Before jumping to conclusion you could consider submitting meaningful bug > report properly with enough information to troubleshoot the issue. If you feel there wasn't enough information, you can always ask, you know. The most important information was there. "Up-to-date Jessie box talking to Trusty box causes high CPU load on the former". Out there for anyone who can be bothered to read. Can you be bothered? > Also you can consider seeking help upstream (since the problem is unlikely to > be Debian-specific) but you are likely to be told that 0.12.3 is an > unsupported version -- a something you should have known by now. Funny, first you tell me to go downstream. Now you tell me to go upstream. Well, actually you aren't really changing your message which is "go away and don't bother me". Fair enough. But again, people with that kind of attitude to users and bug triage don't make a good maintainer. If the problem in all likelihood now isn't Debian-specific but actually extends beyond it then why was the ticket closed? That's not the usual workflow. I stand by my analysis of the quality of the work you delivered in your first reaction to this ticket.
Bug#826383: xpra hogs CPU
Dmitry, as a fellow DM, I am sad to see your shitty attitude to delivering quality software. It's a sad regression to see you join xpra maintenance for which you obviously lack the necessary desire for delivering the best quality software experience. JFTR, the problem of high CPU load occured on a Jessie box. Last I looked, Jessie was still supported. Now, I wish you a nice day. Have fun closing tickets rather than fixing problems and delivering kick-ass software as the latter does not seem to be of much concern to you. On 05.06.2016 19:23, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Sunday, 5 June 2016 4:03:32 PM AEST Rolf Leggewie wrote: >> Version: 0.12.3+dfsg-1 > You are using ancient (unsupported) release. Please upgrade and try again. > > >> I have revisited using xpra today, connecting from a Ubuntu trusty > Why do you seek Ubuntu support in Debian? Please upgrade to Debian. > We do not support Ubuntu. > > >> laptop to a Raspberry headless machine running Jessie. The CPU on >> the RPi is fully saturated from the xpra process when doing simple >> things like hitting enter in the X terminal. Is xpra that >> inefficient or is something amiss here? Anything I can switch off >> to lower the load? > You can try to experiment with different encodings and other settings. > > I'm closing this bug since there is nothing actionable for maintainer here. > > Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you > have further comments please address them to 826...@bugs.debian.org, > and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. >
Bug#826383: xpra hogs CPU
Package: xpra Version: 0.12.3+dfsg-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, I have revisited using xpra today, connecting from a Ubuntu trusty laptop to a Raspberry headless machine running Jessie. The CPU on the RPi is fully saturated from the xpra process when doing simple things like hitting enter in the X terminal. Is xpra that inefficient or is something amiss here? Anything I can switch off to lower the load? Regards Rolf
Bug#826382: xz-utils: git packaging repo not updated
Package: xz-utils Version: v4.999.9beta+20100527-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, the git packaging repo hasn't been updated for quite a while. It would be nice if you did so. Regards Rolf PS: Even more important is to upload upstream 5.2.2 -> #731634
Bug#520619: Debian BTS: pigz as gzip replacement
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 16:18:44 +0200 Kerncwrote: > Are patches welcome? Disclosure: I'm not the maintainer, but patches should always be welcome, I suppose. And the way I know Eduard, he is quick to act on them, too.
Bug#824450: scanbd does not find scanner
Chris, sorry for the delay in responding. On 17.05.2016 13:50, Chris Laif wrote: >> Is there a chance you can try Debian unstable for testing purposes on >> your hardware? > I can try some unstable packages as long it does not mess up the whole > system, unfortunately it is not possible to dual-boot. > >> Do you know how to compile software on your own? >> > Yes, standard procedures shouldn't be a problem. You can even contact > me via private mail if that helps. Please try http://oss.leggewie.org/scanbd/scanbd_1.4.4-1rl1.dsc There are binary packages in that directory as well, but they are for i386. I added a bunch of tests for common configuration mistakes into the latest init script. Unfortunately, those didn't make it in time for jessie. Before changing the binary packages, try to replace /etc/init.d/scanbd with the latest version from git http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/scanbd.git/plain/debian/scanbd.init It might be enough to inform you where your configuration is wrong. Do "/etc/init.d/scanbd status" and "/etc/init.d/scanbd restart" as root to see you where you stand. I am almost certain your problem is not a true bug but a configuration mistake. Regards Rolf
Bug#779815: grub2: Re: grub-pc: hitting keys does NOT display menu with GRUB_HIDDEN_TIMEOUT
Package: grub2-common Followup-For: Bug #779815 Dear Ian, GRUB_HIDDEN_TIMEOUT has been deprecated for quite a while. Please use the alternatives. `GRUB_HIDDEN_TIMEOUT' Wait this many seconds before displaying the menu. If is pressed during that time, display the menu and wait for input according to `GRUB_TIMEOUT'. If a hotkey associated with a menu entry is pressed, boot the associated menu entry immediately. If the timeout expires before either of these happens, display the menu for the number of seconds specified in `GRUB_TIMEOUT' before booting the default entry. If you set `GRUB_HIDDEN_TIMEOUT', you should also set `GRUB_TIMEOUT=0' so that the menu is not displayed at all unless is pressed. This option is unset by default, and is deprecated in favour of the less confusing `GRUB_TIMEOUT_STYLE=countdown' or `GRUB_TIMEOUT_STYLE=hidden'.
Bug#806105: scim: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (No such file or directory)
On 22.05.2016 18:27, Santiago Vila wrote: > Hi. > > I've prepared two patches to fix this bug. Thanks, Santiago. I'm currently preparing an upload.
Bug#824450: scanbd does not find scanner
Hello Chris, thank you for your report. On 16.05.2016 17:07, Chris Laif wrote: > Package: scanbd > Version: 1.4.0-2 > Severity: important > > I've got a Canon scanner, which perfectly worked with Squeeze's > scanbuttond. After upgrading to Jessie (fresh install, all packages up > to date) the scanner is not recognized by scanbd. Are you an an i386 or amd64 or some other system? Is your device connected over USB3? Is there a chance you can try Debian unstable for testing purposes on your hardware? Do you know how to compile software on your own? Regards Rolf
Bug#817936: roger-router: Please add libpeas-1.0-0-python2loader to Depends
On 13.05.2016 12:26, Rolf Leggewie wrote: > there's been some talk in http://bugs.debian.org/620391 about Roger > Router and PEAS Python2 plugins. Make that http://bugs.debian.org/817936
Bug#817936: roger-router: Please add libpeas-1.0-0-python2loader to Depends
Jan-Michael, there's been some talk in http://bugs.debian.org/620391 about Roger Router and PEAS Python2 plugins. As upstream, are you actually aware of any Plugins for Roger that are Python 2? I'd rather see them ported to Python 3 or become deprecated than add a complicated web of additional dependencies to the Debian package. Would it be acceptable to do "sed s/python/python3/ ./libroutermanager/plugins.c" and require all python plugins to be ported to python3 from now on? FWIW, I'm not aware of any external, third-party plugins for Roger Router, irrespective of their programming language. Do they exist? Regards Rolf
Bug#817936: roger-router: Please add libpeas-1.0-0-python2loader to Depends
On 13.05.2016 08:51, Rolf Leggewie wrote: > Hello Barry, > > so, libpeas-1.0-0-python2loader has officially made it into Debian. I'm > now thinking how to deal with that for roger. > > On 03.04.2016 05:35, Barry Warsaw wrote: >> On Apr 02, 2016, at 10:33 PM, Rolf Leggewie wrote: >> >> Hi Rolf, >> >>> I'm still at a loss what it is you are asking of me. The title of this >>> bug requests me to add a run-time dependency that doesn't even exist in >>> Debian yet. In Ubuntu the change you advocate has been made, but >>> apparently there were no changes necessary for roger-router alongside. >>> In fact, roger-router in Ubuntu still depends on libpeas-1.0.0 and not >>> libpeas-1.0-0-python2loader even though the package does exist there. >> We should certainly fix roger-router in Ubuntu; I'm not sure how I missed >> that >> one over there. I'll file a bug and fix that early next week. > Ubuntu is still unchanged both in Xenial and Yakkety. > > The title of this ticket suggests I should add an explicit dependency on > libpeas-1.0-0-python2loader to Depends. I'm a bit reluctant to do that > since it would mean I need to maintain a fork since my main computer is > trusty. In any case, roger does not ship any python code at all. My > understanding is that it uses peas to allow third party plugins and > those could be written in python or other programming languages. I'm > actually not aware of any plugins and they could be written in either > python 2 or python 3. Adding a strong dependency to the python 2 loader > seems wrong to me. I feel like adding a Suggests for > "libpeas-1.0-0-python2loader|libpeas-1.0-0-python3loader" would be more > appropriate. Or should I be mistaken? If it really needs to be a > Depends wouldn't it be better to have debhelper and dh_shlibs take care > of doing the right thing? After further inspection of the peas packages in testing and unstable I have now learned that the new libpeas-1.0-0 includes what I thought was going to be carved out into libpeas-1.0-0-python3loader. Barry, I think that adding "libpeas-1.0-python2loader | libpeas-1.0-0 (<< 1.16.0-1ubuntu1)" to Depends for libroutermanager0 (all other roger binary packages depend on this one directly or indirectly) would fix this ticket as well as allow me to build from the same code base for trusty. Seeing that libpeas-1.0-0-python3loader was indeed added to Xenial (and Yakkety, so far, for that matter), I think that depending on "libpeas-1.0-python2loader | libpeas-1.0-0 (<< 1.16.0-1ubuntu1), libpeas-1.0-0 (>= 1.18.0-2) | libpeas-1.0-python3loader" would be needed to support all of trusty, xenial and unstable from the same roger code base. This assumes that Ubuntu will later during the Yakkety cycle go back to syncing libpeas from unstable and thus drop libpeas-1.0-python3loader. It would be appreciated if you confirmed this change for roger.
Bug#817936: roger-router: Please add libpeas-1.0-0-python2loader to Depends
On 13.05.2016 11:22, Rolf Leggewie wrote: > I think that depending on > "libpeas-1.0-python2loader | libpeas-1.0-0 (<< 1.16.0-1ubuntu1), > libpeas-1.0-0 (>= 1.18.0-2) | libpeas-1.0-python3loader" would be needed > to support all of trusty, xenial and unstable from the same roger code > base. Actually, that would need to be "libpeas-1.0-python2loader | libpeas-1.0-0 (<< 1.16.0-1ubuntu1), libpeas-1.0-0 (>= 1.18.0-2) | libpeas-1.0-0 (<< 1.16.0-1ubuntu1) | libpeas-1.0-python3loader" Puh, quite involved, but I think the above should cover all cases. It would be nice if Ubuntu merged libpeas-1.0-python3loader into libpeas-1.0-0 for Xenial LTS. Do you think such a thing has a chance to be SRU'd?
Bug#817936: roger-router: Please add libpeas-1.0-0-python2loader to Depends
Hello Barry, so, libpeas-1.0-0-python2loader has officially made it into Debian. I'm now thinking how to deal with that for roger. On 03.04.2016 05:35, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Apr 02, 2016, at 10:33 PM, Rolf Leggewie wrote: > > Hi Rolf, > >> I'm still at a loss what it is you are asking of me. The title of this >> bug requests me to add a run-time dependency that doesn't even exist in >> Debian yet. In Ubuntu the change you advocate has been made, but >> apparently there were no changes necessary for roger-router alongside. >> In fact, roger-router in Ubuntu still depends on libpeas-1.0.0 and not >> libpeas-1.0-0-python2loader even though the package does exist there. > We should certainly fix roger-router in Ubuntu; I'm not sure how I missed that > one over there. I'll file a bug and fix that early next week. Ubuntu is still unchanged both in Xenial and Yakkety. The title of this ticket suggests I should add an explicit dependency on libpeas-1.0-0-python2loader to Depends. I'm a bit reluctant to do that since it would mean I need to maintain a fork since my main computer is trusty. In any case, roger does not ship any python code at all. My understanding is that it uses peas to allow third party plugins and those could be written in python or other programming languages. I'm actually not aware of any plugins and they could be written in either python 2 or python 3. Adding a strong dependency to the python 2 loader seems wrong to me. I feel like adding a Suggests for "libpeas-1.0-0-python2loader|libpeas-1.0-0-python3loader" would be more appropriate. Or should I be mistaken? If it really needs to be a Depends wouldn't it be better to have debhelper and dh_shlibs take care of doing the right thing? Regards Rolf
Bug#620391: marked as done (scim keeps crashing)
On 12.05.2016 15:54, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Your message dated Thu, 12 May 2016 16:51:38 +0900 > with message-id <87twi367ed@gentoo.org> > and subject line Cannot reproduce on AMD64 > has caused the Debian Bug report #620391, > regarding scim keeps crashing > to be marked as done. Benda, thank you for your bug triage work. We usually do not close tickets without either being able to point to a specific code change that we are absolutely certain fixes the exact issue reported or giving the original reporter a chance to report back if the problem persists. Crashes are usually much more troublesome to triage from afar, so please exercise extra caution. Michal, please speak up if you are still affected by this problem especially if it is reproducible and I will look into how to reopen this ticket. Regards Rolf
Bug#620391: marked as done (scim keeps crashing)
On 12.05.2016 16:01, Rolf Leggewie wrote: > We usually do not close tickets without either being able to point to > a specific code change that we are absolutely certain fixes the exact > issue reported or giving the original reporter a chance to report back > if the problem persists. After visiting the BTS on the web I see that more information had been requested as early as 2012 and the ticket had been tagged moreinfo since 2014. So, it was indeed OK to close as WFM. Benda, it would have been helpful if the closing mail had included a mentioning of the missing information that had been requested from Michal and without which there isn't anything we can do. This ticket was indeed overdue for closure. Thanks for the clean-up and testing on your AMD64 system.
Bug#816337: prerm called with unknown argument `upgrade'
Package: scim Followup-For: Bug #816337 Hello Dan, thank you for this report. This is odd. 1.4.15-5.1 is the version where this should problem should be fixed. Did the upgrade error out or was this just informational? I see this in your report: > dpkg: trying script from the new package instead ... > dpkg: ... it looks like that went OK so I assume everything went OK afterwards? Regards Rolf
Bug#819977: jessie-pu: package roger-router/1.8.9-2jessie1
On 04.04.2016 16:58, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> I'd like to request to upload a bug-fix for the roger-router package >> to Jessie. This would fix bugs #798471 and #774116. >> >> Roger Router is a tool to interact with Fritzbox hardware from AVM. >> One of the things it can do is to send a fax. This was broken until >> version 1.8.9-3 because compilation happened as --with-cups-yes >> assuming this would include cups-support when in fact this disabled >> a known-good code base for cups-support and replaced it with a >> known-broken, experimental one. The patches are cherry-picked from >> 1.8.9-3 and 1.8.9-4. > > Please provide a source debdiff of the proposed package as built and > tested on Jessie, rather than indvidual patches; that's what we'll be > acking (or otherwise). Sure. I thought the individual patches would be easier to inspect and approve/reject as necessary. Attached is a single debdiff. diff --git a/debian/README.Debian b/debian/README.Debian index 13996bd..7a06d73 100644 --- a/debian/README.Debian +++ b/debian/README.Debian @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ += Configuration = + configuration help is available from http://wiki.ubuntuusers.de/FritzBox/Roger_Router @@ -6,10 +8,17 @@ http://forum.ubuntuusers.de/topic/roger-router-roger/ http://en.tabos.org/installation-prequel If you want to use the incoming call notification you will have to enable -it on your fritzbox with: #96*5* - -If you want to use the capifax plugin you will have to enable capi-over-tcp -on your fritzbox with: #96*3* +it on your fritzbox with: #96*5* If you want to use the capifax plugin +you will have to enable capi-over-tcp on your fritzbox with: #96*3* Both +of these settings will be reset to their default value of "off" whenever +you update the router firmware. Please reenable them as necessary. Please note, quick reconnect & display external ip in tooltip for Fritz!Box needs active UPnP support! + += Fax support = + +Roger installs a Cups printer. To be able to fax, you either need to use +roger_cli where you specify all necessary information including the number +to send to on the command line or you should have Roger GUI running and it +will prompt you for the receiving Fax number. diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index f02d242..fa2aca8 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,22 @@ +roger-router (1.8.9-2jessie1) stable; urgency=medium + + backport fixes to fax support from 1.8.9-3 and 1.8.9-4 + + * do not build the experimental (!) cups backend. +Closes: #774116, closes: #798471. + +Upstream uses a very funny (NOT!) semantics to their make-switches. +Who would expect that "--with-cups=yes" actually DISABLES a working +cups support? + + * README.Debian: +- add some information on how to send a fax +- add information what needs to be done after firmware updates + certain functions, such as fax support, will be reset to being + disabled every time a new firmware is installed + + -- Rolf Leggewie <f...@rolf.leggewie.biz> Mon, 04 Apr 2016 15:14:08 +0200 + roger-router (1.8.9-2) unstable; urgency=low * copyright: add copyright information for win32/printer/ghostpdf.ppd diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index a1df6d4..b660a8f 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -6,9 +6,7 @@ Uploaders: Jan-Michael Brummer <jan.brum...@tabos.org> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), dh-autoreconf, libappindicator3-dev, libcapi20-dev (>= 1:3.24), - libcups2-dev, libebook1.2-dev, - libgconf2-dev, libgstreamer1.0-dev, libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev, libgtk-3-dev, libnotify-dev, diff --git a/debian/libroutermanager0.symbols b/debian/libroutermanager0.symbols index 1d29ec1..7e302d9 100644 --- a/debian/libroutermanager0.symbols +++ b/debian/libroutermanager0.symbols @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ libroutermanager.so.0 libroutermanager0 #MINVER# fax_send@Base 1.8.4 fax_set_log_level@Base 1.8.4 fax_spandsp_workaround@Base 1.8.4 - fax_spooler_new_dir_cb@Base 1.8.4 +#MISSING: 1.8.9-2# fax_spooler_new_dir_cb@Base 1.8.4 fax_transfer@Base 1.8.4 faxophone_close@Base 1.8.4 faxophone_connect@Base 1.8.4 diff --git a/debian/roger-router-cli.install b/debian/roger-router-cli.install index d8d4c6b..1379a1c 100644 --- a/debian/roger-router-cli.install +++ b/debian/roger-router-cli.install @@ -1,8 +1,7 @@ usr/bin/roger_cli usr/lib/*/routermanager/ -usr/lib/cups/backend/roger-cups usr/share/man/*/roger_cli* -usr/share/roger/roger-cups +usr/share/roger/roger-cups usr/lib/cups/backend/ usr/share/roger/roger-fax.ppd usr/share/roger/install-fax.sh diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index 95b94a1..c7c5f2f 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ override_dh_auto_configure: dh_auto_configure -- \ --with-spandsp=6 \ --with-libn
Bug#798471: roger-router: "Cannot set file owner for /var/spool/roger/" when using fax printer
On 06.04.2016 18:35, tcrass wrote: > one funny thing: There are two identical RogerRouter icons in my KDE > system tray, both of which feature the same menu, albeit slightly > different in styling. Seems not to affect functionality, though. Ist this a new problem, not present in 1.8.9-2? In any case, please file a separate ticket about this.
Bug#798471: roger-router: "Cannot set file owner for /var/spool/roger/" when using fax printer
On 06.04.2016 13:56, tcrass wrote: > dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libroutermanager0: > libroutermanager0 depends on libcapi20-3; however: > Package libcapi20-3:i386 is not installed. > So still no luck installing you packages... Ah, right. Actually not surprising. You have an amd64-system. My packages are for i386. I've prepared amd64-packages now at http://oss.leggewie.org/bdo798471/
Bug#798471: roger-router: "Cannot set file owner for /var/spool/roger/" when using fax printer
On 06.04.2016 10:47, tcrass wrote: > I have the impression that I cannot install your packages without > severely deviating my system from its current "stable" state. Your current situation is anything but stable. Apparently, there's a bunch of other packages waiting to be installed or waiting for their dependencies to be installed. I was also of the impression that you have roger from the jessie repository installed which is not the case. Here's what I suggest you do. 1) remove the three packages for roger 2) make sure "aptitude install -f" runs through fine 3) "aptitude install roger" (from the jessie repo) 4) try once more what I suggested in yesterday's mail
Bug#798471: roger-router: "Cannot set file owner for /var/spool/roger/" when using fax printer
On 05.04.2016 21:01, tcrass wrote: > Rolf, > > > It would actually be very helpful if you installed the packages from >> http://oss.leggewie.org/bdo798471/ and report back if they work for you. > > I downloaded the roger-router_1.8.9-2jessie1_i386.deb package from the > mentioned URL, but when running > > sudo dpkg -i roger-router_1.8.9-2jessie1_i386.deb > > I just get a bunch of unpleasent messages: roger-router needs roger-router-cli and libroutermanager0 Try "cd tmp;for file in wget libroutermanager0_1.8.9-2jessie1_i386.deb roger-router-cli_1.8.9-2jessie1_i386.deb roger-router_1.8.9-2jessie1_i386.deb ; do wget http://oss.leggewie.org/bdo798471/$file;sudo dpkg -i $file;done" Then fix the other dependencies by installing them from the repositories.
Bug#798471: roger-router: "Cannot set file owner for /var/spool/roger/" when using fax printer
On 04.04.2016 16:53, tcrass wrote: > thank you so much! It would actually be very helpful if you installed the packages from http://oss.leggewie.org/bdo798471/ and report back if they work for you.
Bug#798471: roger-router: "Cannot set file owner for /var/spool/roger/" when using fax printer
Package: roger-router Followup-For: Bug #798471 Feel free to test the Jessie packages available at http://oss.leggewie.org/bdo798471/
Bug#798471: roger-router: "Cannot set file owner for /var/spool/roger/" when using fax printer
Package: roger-router Followup-For: Bug #798471 fixed 798471 1.8.9-3 tags 798471 jessie patch pending thanks Thorsten, tank you for the report. I've prepared the necessary patches for jessie and requested upload permission in bug 819977.
Bug#819977: jessie-pu: package roger-router/1.8.9-2jessie1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hello, first of all, reportbug lists only squeeze and wheezy when making a pu-related bug report. I'd like to request to upload a bug-fix for the roger-router package to Jessie. This would fix bugs #798471 and #774116. Roger Router is a tool to interact with Fritzbox hardware from AVM. One of the things it can do is to send a fax. This was broken until version 1.8.9-3 because compilation happened as --with-cups-yes assuming this would include cups-support when in fact this disabled a known-good code base for cups-support and replaced it with a known-broken, experimental one. The patches are cherry-picked from 1.8.9-3 and 1.8.9-4. I'd like to ship alongside some improvements in the README.Debian file to guide the user in case they run into problems. These changes should have little risk of regression and improve the user experience for stable customers considerably. Looking forward to your comments. Regards Rolf Leggewie >From 67bc92d83524ebce8c3c0253d19e509c2556e2ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rolf Leggewie <f...@rolf.leggewie.biz> Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 22:59:00 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] do not build the experimental (!) cups backend. Closes: #798471, Closes: #774116 OMG. the compilation switch "--with-cups" doesn't mean what you'd expect. It means "build the experimental, known-broken, WIP (!) version of cups-support", and disable the standard, working cups backend. Who in their right mind would expect that kind of semantic? Of course, upstream didn't document this anywhere. Grr! --- debian/control | 2 -- debian/libroutermanager0.symbols | 2 +- debian/roger-router-cli.install | 3 +-- debian/rules | 3 +-- 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index a1df6d4..b660a8f 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -6,9 +6,7 @@ Uploaders: Jan-Michael Brummer <jan.brum...@tabos.org> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), dh-autoreconf, libappindicator3-dev, libcapi20-dev (>= 1:3.24), - libcups2-dev, libebook1.2-dev, - libgconf2-dev, libgstreamer1.0-dev, libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev, libgtk-3-dev, libnotify-dev, diff --git a/debian/libroutermanager0.symbols b/debian/libroutermanager0.symbols index 1d29ec1..7e302d9 100644 --- a/debian/libroutermanager0.symbols +++ b/debian/libroutermanager0.symbols @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ libroutermanager.so.0 libroutermanager0 #MINVER# fax_send@Base 1.8.4 fax_set_log_level@Base 1.8.4 fax_spandsp_workaround@Base 1.8.4 - fax_spooler_new_dir_cb@Base 1.8.4 +#MISSING: 1.8.9-2# fax_spooler_new_dir_cb@Base 1.8.4 fax_transfer@Base 1.8.4 faxophone_close@Base 1.8.4 faxophone_connect@Base 1.8.4 diff --git a/debian/roger-router-cli.install b/debian/roger-router-cli.install index d8d4c6b..1379a1c 100644 --- a/debian/roger-router-cli.install +++ b/debian/roger-router-cli.install @@ -1,8 +1,7 @@ usr/bin/roger_cli usr/lib/*/routermanager/ -usr/lib/cups/backend/roger-cups usr/share/man/*/roger_cli* -usr/share/roger/roger-cups +usr/share/roger/roger-cups usr/lib/cups/backend/ usr/share/roger/roger-fax.ppd usr/share/roger/install-fax.sh diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index 95b94a1..c7c5f2f 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ override_dh_auto_configure: dh_auto_configure -- \ --with-spandsp=6 \ --with-libnotify=yes \ - --with-cups=yes \ --with-secret=yes \ --with-ebook=yes \ --with-gstreamer1=yes \ @@ -32,7 +31,7 @@ override_dh_install: override_dh_fixperms: dh_fixperms - chmod 755 debian/roger-router-cli/usr/share/roger/roger-cups chmod 755 debian/roger-router-cli/usr/share/roger/install-fax.sh + chmod 755 debian/roger-router-cli/usr/lib/cups/backend/roger-cups chown lp.fax debian/roger-router-cli/var/spool/roger chmod 2770 debian/roger-router-cli/var/spool/roger -- 1.9.1 >From ad80ff407b739f4975325fce7524dbe4ed740c86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rolf Leggewie <f...@rolf.leggewie.biz> Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 15:39:51 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 2/4] README.Debian: add some information on how to send a fax --- debian/README.Debian | 13 +++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian/README.Debian b/debian/README.Debian index 13996bd..8bb1f9f 100644 --- a/debian/README.Debian +++ b/debian/README.Debian @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ += Configuration = + configuration help is available from http://wiki.ubuntuusers.de/FritzBox/Roger_Router @@ -8,8 +10,15 @@ http://en.tabos.org/installation-prequel If you want to use the incoming call notification you will have to enable it on your fritzbox with: #96*5* +Please note, quick reconnect & display external ip in tooltip for Fritz!Box +needs active UPnP support! + += Fax support = + If you want to use the capifax plugin you will have to enable capi-
Bug#817936: roger-router: Please add libpeas-1.0-0-python2loader to Depends
On 02.04.2016 23:35, Barry Warsaw wrote: > I look at this as a tracking bug - something that needs to happen if another > bug gets resolved, but nothing to do right now. Thank you for the clarification. I'll keep this ticket open in the spirit your explained above.
Bug#817936: roger-router: Please add libpeas-1.0-0-python2loader to Depends
On 02.04.2016 21:34, Barry Warsaw wrote: > to reduce the overall dependence on Python 2 in Debian. We've already > made this split in Ubuntu and haven't seen any reports of problems Barry, thank you for the quick response. I'm still at a loss what it is you are asking of me. The title of this bug requests me to add a run-time dependency that doesn't even exist in Debian yet. In Ubuntu the change you advocate has been made, but apparently there were no changes necessary for roger-router alongside. In fact, roger-router in Ubuntu still depends on libpeas-1.0.0 and not libpeas-1.0-0-python2loader even though the package does exist there. Should I be mistaken to think that this ticket is invalid? Regards Rolf
Bug#817936: roger-router: Please add libpeas-1.0-0-python2loader to Depends
Barry, On 11.03.2016 19:45, Barry Warsaw wrote: > In bug #806824 I propose to split the Python loaders for libpeas into > separate binary packages. That split hasn't happened yet and it isn't even clear if libpeas-1.0-0-python2loader will ever hit the archive. To file this bug looks a bit premature. Currently, there's nothing to be done and it's not clear if there ever will be. Regards Rolf
Bug#799580: pastebinit: fails with http_s_://paste.debian.net
On Sat, 24 Oct 2015 01:06:46 +0200 Alberto Fuenteswrote: > pastebinit doesnt really support https. I attach some patches that enables > https in the configuration Stuart and Alberto, thank you for the report and the patches. Pastebinit 1.5 has just been released and as you can see all patches submitted to this ticket have landed. https://code.launchpad.net/~pastebinit-developers/pastebinit/trunk Regards Rolf
Bug#670485: pastebinit: support hidden pastes
Paul and Alberto, thank you for the report and the patches. Pastebinit 1.5 has just been released and as you can see your patch for this ticket landed upstream. https://code.launchpad.net/~pastebinit-developers/pastebinit/trunk Regards Rolf
Bug#803237: test.sh does not pass
Alberto, thank you for the report and the patches. Pastebinit 1.5 has just been released and as you can see quite a few of your patches made it. https://code.launchpad.net/~pastebinit-developers/pastebinit/trunk Here are the reasons for those that did not make it. 0001: Unacceptable upstream, requires an external python module (requests) 0003: No longer necessary, had apparently already been fixed in VCS 0005: No longer necessary, pastebin.com has been fixed 0006: No longer necessary, both pastebins were removed one is just dead and the other requires some kind of token now 0007: No longer necessary Regards Rolf
Bug#814396: twinkle: Unable to add myself to Uploaders
Package: twinkle Severity: normal Tags: patch Dear Peter, I tried to add myself to Uploaders for twinkle as previously discussed but the git repo would not let me make any changes. What do I need to do? Regards Rolf k diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 9cdf669..5af6b99 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Source: twinkle Section: comm Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian VoIP Team <pkg-voip-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org> -Uploaders: Peter Colberg <pe...@colberg.org> +Uploaders: Peter Colberg <pe...@colberg.org>, Rolf Leggewie <f...@rolf.leggewie.org> Build-Depends: bison, cmake, debhelper (>= 9),
Bug#810457: scanbd: please switch to libusb 1.0
On 13.01.2016 20:26, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Please change the build-depends OK. I was thinking of doing it as "Build-Depends: libusb-1.0-0-dev|libusb-dev". Any reason not to do that? It is technically correct that the package can build against either of the two versions. Thank you for your guidance.
Bug#810457: scanbd: please switch to libusb 1.0
On 09.01.2016 02:38, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Package: scanbd > Version: 1.4.1-7 > Severity: wishlist > > Dear Maintainer, > > scanbd has a build-depends on libusb-dev. A few years ago upstream > has released a new major version libusb 1.0 with a different API which > aims to fix design deficiencies with USB 2.0 and 3.0 in mind. > > The old libusb 0.1 package is not supported upstream anymore and should > be considered deprecated. > > If scanbd supports the new libusb 1.0 library, please consider > switching the build-depends from libusb-dev to libusb-1.0-0-dev. Aurelien, thank you for the heads-up. I specifically set the build dependency to libusb-dev to avoid dependency on a specific version. I believe you are the maintainer of the libusb-dev package. Do you plan to point that libusb version 1.0 eventually? That's the way I was hoping to do the migration. I tested today and the package scanbd compiles fine. The binary package seems to run fine as well. It turns out the bug you reported would be a non-issue on upgrade to the new API of libusb-dev. What do you suggest to do considering my preference to stay version-agnostic in the build dependencies. Regards Rolf
Bug#746554: Bug#770603: fte - package sponsorship
On 05.01.2016 03:40, Iain R. Learmonth wrote: > Do you still require a sponsor for these packages? Ian, thank you for your message. Yes, I'm still looking for a sponsor for these packages. They expired on mentors.debian.net so I uploaded them again. https://mentors.debian.net/package/libfte https://mentors.debian.net/package/fteproxy http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libf/libfte/libfte_0.1.0-1.dsc http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fteproxy/fteproxy_0.2.19-1.dsc As I believe you are aware some previous potential sponsors objected to the tight coupling of FTE with obfsproxy.
Bug#786165: This bug is not RC
Mattia, thanks again for your work.
Bug#786165: This bug is not RC
On 29.12.2015 03:53, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > control: severity -1 serious > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 12:13:52AM +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote: >> severity 786165 important > this bug IS RC: python-support was just removed from the archive Mattia, merry Christmas! Your work is appreciated, talking to a smart-ass usually isn't as you can imagine. This bug was not RC at the first time you marked it as such. It was not RC at the time I downgraded it back to non-RC. You were even specifically told *not* to mark bugs prematurely as RC in 746741 with regards to the removal of python-support. You still went ahead and did it nonetheless only about 24 hours later :-(. You are right that this bug is RC now. I do not plan to introduce 0.6.9 into Debian yet, so I do not want to accept your NMU to unstable. Feel free to redirect it to experimental. Please be sure not to push your changes to the master branch in git, use a separate branch instead. Thank you for your work. Regards & Happy New Year Rolf
Bug#746554: changing back to ITP
retitle 746554 ITP: fteproxy -- programmable proxy for censorship circumvention owner 746554 ! retitle 770603 ITP: libfte -- encryption library to thwart deep packet inspection censorship owner 770603 ! thanks packages have been waiting for sponsorship
Bug#786165: gbirthday and python-support
Hello guys, thank you for working on this bug. I'm happy some work has been done in experimental already. What I do not understand is why this bug is marked as RC. As far I am aware removal of python-support is not an RC-goal. I think this ticket should be downgraded. Mattia, do you have your changes in git somewhere? It would be nice if you pushed them to a separate branch in alioth. I'd like to cherry-pick the stuff I like. I haven't been able to upload for several months and I believe the issue with my key is as of now still unresolved. I'll have to look into it again. Regards Rolf
Bug#661110: RFA: isdnutils -- ISDN utilities
On 11.12.2015 04:05, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: > Hello Rolf, > > I have seen there is a problem with the pppdcapiplugin package > because of changes of the ppp package. > > I think about overtaking isdnutils. > What do you think about break out capiutils as standalone source > package (similar to libcapi20-3) and let isdnutils package "die"? Joachim, thank you for picking this up. The package is up for adoption so essentially you are free to do as you please. Thanks for asking. You might want to consider to do as I did which was to upload a separate new package that built and for the sake of higher version took over one of the binary packages of the old isdnutils source package. The left-over still remains. This approach requires to pass through NEW but that is the cleanest solution. isdnutils can then either continue to exist or eventually die off. I don't feel like killing it explicitly. Regards Rolf
Bug#762871: tora: offers only MySQL connections
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 22:23:27 +0200 Axel Stammlerwrote: > I would like to connect to a Postgres server but the âconnection > providerâ list only > contains âMySQLâ. Unfortunately, the (inactive) Debian maintainer of the package made a conscious choice about this. Not very user-friendly, but that's what it is. See bug 560687 for further information. You need to install the appropriate libqt4-sql-* packages.
Bug#551680: Please package debug symbols as polipo-dbg
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:09:09 -0700 Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote: Please consider creating a package of debug symbols. I'd gladly upload a fix for this package but since it introduces a new package it has to go through NEW and such uploads can only be done by a sponsoring DD not a DM. Looking for sponsors to http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/polipo/polipo_1.1.1-7.dsc
Bug#791275: scim: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 18:57:49 +0200 Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote: Control: tags -1 + confirmed needs a transition, or else plasma at least fails to build from source. Thanks, Matthias, for your work on the transition. I tried to upload the corresponding change last week but since this introduces a new package a DM like me cannot do it. Are you willing to sponsor? http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scim/scim_1.4.15-5.dsc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#655852: polipo: Polipo should log queries/fetches.
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:01:44 +1100 Donovan Baarda a...@minkirri.apana.org.au wrote: Package: polipo Version: 1.0.4.1-1.1 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, I'm used to using squid and using its logs to generate stats useful for analysing traffic and proxy performance. This has been very useful for tuning cache perfomance and identifying popular and/or problematic servers. https://github.com/jech/polipo/pull/35 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#426402: apt: Need better way to specify mirrors for Debian repositiories
On Mon, 28 May 2007 17:07:11 +0300 David Baron d_ba...@012.net.il wrote: Package: apt Version: 0.6.46.4-0.1 Severity: wishlist I am sure this is not original. Applies to Debian package repositories since they have a uniform structure: Sometimes (like now!), not all packages have made it to all mirrors, or one's favorite, closest mirror is down. I would like a better way of specifitying Debian mirrors. Foreign repos would remain is now and the current syntax would remain valid for Debian as well. Something like: Debian Mirrors: Preferred Mirror: ftp://... Mirror 2: http://... Mirror 3 ... End Debian Mirrors sounds a lot like the mirror method available in apt nowadays. Time to close this ticket as fixed? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#780608: ITP: freelan -- P2P VPN daemon
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Rolf Leggewie debian-b...@rolf.leggewie.biz * Package name: freelan Upstream Author : Julien Kaufmann * URL : http://www.freelan.org/ * License : (GPL) Programming Lang: (C, C++, Python) Description : P2P VPN daemon Freelan is an application to create secure ethernet tunnels over a single UDP port. It can be used to create virtual LANs (Local Area Network), hence the name: freelan. . Freelan may create peer-to-peer tunnel connections or rely on a more classic client/server layout. The virtual network can be shaped to fit exactly the bandwidth or topology constraints, providing an optimal virtual private network. . Freelan is particularly useful for remote sites interconnection and gaming. I already maintain n2n and was intruiged by the nice feature set and active development offered by freelan. I plan to maintain the package together with upstream. I might need a sponsor. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#780328: roger-router: Debian package does not prevent storing the router password in plain text
Package: roger-router Version: 1.8.9-3 Severity: normal Tags: upstream The package saves encrypted passwords if the necessary key manager is installed and running (this can be either gnome-keyring or the kwallet package). But it is possible that the password will be saved in plaintext if those conditions are not met. The user can easily verify the existence of any plaintext passwords via dconf dump /org/tabos/routermanager/|grep pass If desired, the whole configuration can be dropped, including the password via dconf reset -f /org/tabos/. The Debian package should do better in protecting the password at all times. One of the difficulties is that the password managers rely on X, whereas the goal of the CLI package is to provide support even in headless environments. Even after fixing this issue going forward, one thing to keep in mind as well is how to deal with passwords already stored in plaintext. Should the user be warned and if so, how? Should they be erased? After the above difficulties have been sorted out and tested, appropriate runtime dependencies on gnome-keyring|kwallet ought to be added. http://de.tabos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6t=3749 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#780285: unblock: roger-router/1.8.9-2jessie1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package roger-router Dear Release Team, as maintainer of the roger-router package I would like to upload a fix for #774116. I've already uploaded a fix to experimental and I would like to upload it to unstable as 1.8.9-2jessie1 and have it migrate eventually. I'd like to request a freeze exception before actually doing that. Faxing via the FritzBox device is one of the important functions of Roger Router. It is currently known-broken in testing. The background is that upstream has a makefile switch --with-cups which when set to yes builds an experimental, known-broken cups-support. Building as --with-cups=no actually builds the working CUPS support. Go figure! That tripped me and I would like to correct this mistake before jessie gets released. Regards Rolf Leggewie unblock roger-router/1.8.9-2jessie1 From a59161f6e088cf254438946433f7ef373fded9ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rolf Leggewie f...@rolf.leggewie.biz Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 22:59:00 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] do not build the experimental (!) cups backend. Closes: #774116 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit OMG. the compilation switch --with-cups doesn't mean what you'd expect. It means build the experimental, known-broken, WIP (!) version of cups-support, and disable the standard, working cups backend. Who in their right mind would expect that kind of semantic? Of course, upstream didn't document this anywhere. Grr! I was unable to verify this personally, but Dieter Schäfer and Markus Grunwald kindly confirmed that the test packages I put out for the purpose work fine for him. Thanks! --- debian/control | 2 -- debian/libroutermanager0.symbols | 2 +- debian/roger-router-cli.install | 3 +-- debian/rules | 3 +-- 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index a1df6d4..b660a8f 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -6,9 +6,7 @@ Uploaders: Jan-Michael Brummer jan.brum...@tabos.org Build-Depends: debhelper (= 9), dh-autoreconf, libappindicator3-dev, libcapi20-dev (= 1:3.24), - libcups2-dev, libebook1.2-dev, - libgconf2-dev, libgstreamer1.0-dev, libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev, libgtk-3-dev, libnotify-dev, diff --git a/debian/libroutermanager0.symbols b/debian/libroutermanager0.symbols index 1d29ec1..7e302d9 100644 --- a/debian/libroutermanager0.symbols +++ b/debian/libroutermanager0.symbols @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ libroutermanager.so.0 libroutermanager0 #MINVER# fax_send@Base 1.8.4 fax_set_log_level@Base 1.8.4 fax_spandsp_workaround@Base 1.8.4 - fax_spooler_new_dir_cb@Base 1.8.4 +#MISSING: 1.8.9-2# fax_spooler_new_dir_cb@Base 1.8.4 fax_transfer@Base 1.8.4 faxophone_close@Base 1.8.4 faxophone_connect@Base 1.8.4 diff --git a/debian/roger-router-cli.install b/debian/roger-router-cli.install index d8d4c6b..1379a1c 100644 --- a/debian/roger-router-cli.install +++ b/debian/roger-router-cli.install @@ -1,8 +1,7 @@ usr/bin/roger_cli usr/lib/*/routermanager/ -usr/lib/cups/backend/roger-cups usr/share/man/*/roger_cli* -usr/share/roger/roger-cups +usr/share/roger/roger-cups usr/lib/cups/backend/ usr/share/roger/roger-fax.ppd usr/share/roger/install-fax.sh diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index 95b94a1..c7c5f2f 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ override_dh_auto_configure: dh_auto_configure -- \ --with-spandsp=6 \ --with-libnotify=yes \ - --with-cups=yes \ --with-secret=yes \ --with-ebook=yes \ --with-gstreamer1=yes \ @@ -32,7 +31,7 @@ override_dh_install: override_dh_fixperms: dh_fixperms - chmod 755 debian/roger-router-cli/usr/share/roger/roger-cups chmod 755 debian/roger-router-cli/usr/share/roger/install-fax.sh + chmod 755 debian/roger-router-cli/usr/lib/cups/backend/roger-cups chown lp.fax debian/roger-router-cli/var/spool/roger chmod 2770 debian/roger-router-cli/var/spool/roger -- 1.9.1 From d89739a8fceda7f2b0897476f8b4daf42ab53428 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rolf Leggewie f...@rolf.leggewie.biz Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 15:39:51 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] README.Debian: add some information on how to send a fax --- debian/README.Debian | 13 +++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian/README.Debian b/debian/README.Debian index 13996bd..8bb1f9f 100644 --- a/debian/README.Debian +++ b/debian/README.Debian @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ += Configuration = + configuration help is available from http://wiki.ubuntuusers.de/FritzBox/Roger_Router @@ -8,8 +10,15 @@ http://en.tabos.org/installation-prequel If you want to use the incoming call notification you will have to enable it on your fritzbox with: #96*5* +Please note, quick reconnect display external ip in tooltip for Fritz!Box +needs active UPnP support! + += Fax support
Bug#774116: Bug is still there
Peter, thank you for your message. It seems you forgot to include the Debian BTS, please don't message me privately, let's keep it in the bug tracker. I will fullquote your message for reference. On 12.03.2015 00:16, Peter Schütt wrote: Hallo, I never use aptitude so did the following: apt-get --purge remove roger-router-cli apt-get -t experimental install roger-router dpkg -l roger* Gewünscht=Unbekannt/Installieren/R=Entfernen/P=Vollständig Löschen/Halten | Status=Nicht/Installiert/Config/U=Entpackt/halb konFiguriert/ Halb installiert/Trigger erWartet/Trigger anhängig |/ Fehler?=(kein)/R=Neuinstallation notwendig (Status, Fehler: GROSS=schlecht) ||/ Name Version Architektur Beschreibung +++-=-=-=-=== rc roger 1.8.9-1~no~secret amd64 Routermanager (roger) un roger-plugins-evolution keine keine (keine Beschreibung vorhanden) rc roger-plugins-fritzfon1.8.9-1~no~secret amd64 Routermanager (roger) - Plugin FritzFon un roger-plugins-google keine keine (keine Beschreibung vorhanden) un roger-plugins-gtknotify keine keine (keine Beschreibung vorhanden) un roger-plugins-indicator keine keine (keine Beschreibung vorhanden) un roger-plugins-kwallet keine keine (keine Beschreibung vorhanden) rc roger-plugins-notificatio 1.8.9-1~no~secret amd64 Routermanager (roger) - Plugin Notification rc roger-plugins-statusicon 1.8.9-1~no~secret amd64 Routermanager (roger) - Plugin Status Icon GTK rc roger-plugins-thunderbird 1.8.9-1~no~secret amd64 Routermanager (roger) - Plugin Thunderbird rc roger-plugins-vcard 1.8.9-1~no~secret amd64 Routermanager (roger) - Plugin VCard ii roger-router 1.8.9-3 amd64 Home router management tool - GUI ii roger-router-cli 1.8.9-3 amd64 Home router management tool - command-line interface Peter, as I suspected, the problem comes from you having installed upstream's binary packages in the past. There are still remnants of them left on your system. Your best bet is to try and identify ALL of them, then purge them. aptitude search \!~i~c will list all unpurged packages on your system. Upstream's packaging is known to violate Debian's policy in many ways and it is no surprise to me it is giving you problems now. Be prepared to continue to experience problems even in totally unrelated packages and even after removing upstream's packages (actually, especially in unrelated packages and especially after removal). Lesson learned: Installing third-party packages that do not go through the rigorous checks and adhere to Debian's policy does come at a cost. I'm afraid you are mostly on your own with this one. ls -l /var/spool/roger insgesamt 0 ls -l /var/spool insgesamt 44 drwxrws--- 2 lp fax 4096 Mär 8 16:59 roger I am a member of the group fax. When I use the printer now the windows opens to input the fax number . But the sending of the fax does not work. When I use the Fax-WebGUI of the Fritz.Box it works! I uses this fax number (of a web.de - account for playing: +4932121083XXX) Another error: When I update the fritz.box firmware when roger router is running then the roger router aborts: [1]+ Speicherzugriffsfehler roger Please report this as a separate issue via reportbug so that others can confirm and add required information to do the triage. Please only do this if you experience the segfault after trying as much as possible to remove any traces of upstream's packages from your system as they might be causing this problem as well. Please be sure to reenable the fax functionality in your FritzBox as laid out in README.Debian after any firmware update. Ciao Peter Schütt Regards Rolf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#774116: Bug is still there
On 11.03.2015 20:55, Peter Schütt wrote: Hallo, I tried the version 1.8.9-3 from experimental branch and I get the same error while faxing: E [11/Mar/2015:13:50:28 +0100] [Job 141] Cannot set file owner for /var/spool/roger/peter: Operation not permitted Hello Peter, sorry to hear about your troubles. Can you please verify and report back the following: 1) as root lpadmin -x Roger-Router-Fax aptitude purge roger-router-cli aptitude install roger-router 2) output of dpkg -l roger* 3) ls -l /var/spool/roger Then please try to fax again. Make sure Roger GUI is running at the time. Regards Rolf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#780285: unblock: roger-router/1.8.9-2jessie1
On 12.03.2015 02:02, Niels Thykier wrote: Hi Rolf, If the change truly drops a symbol in a public shared library, then I am afraid it is far far too late to accept this change. It implies doing an ABI transition, which we stopped accepting back in October 2014. Niels, thank you for the quick reply. I'm afraid the change is indeed pretty intrusive, it completely swaps out the used code base. Can I get in a change to README.Debian to inform the users of the non-working CUPS printer? Here is my suggestion. CUPS support for Roger Router in Jessie is currently known to be non-working. The maintainer will try to release a backport after the jessie release. Until then, you can either recompile version 1.8.9-3 or higher for yourself to get the fix or get the known-good, precompiled and signed binaries straight from the maintainer at http://oss.leggewie.org/bdo774116/; Would that be acceptable? Regards Rolf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#780027: roger-router: Roger should probe the box for activated fax support
Package: roger-router Version: 1.8.9-2 Severity: normal Tags: upstream Roger can fail for various reasons. If it does, the error it reports isn't always good (and oftentimes completely absent). This should be improved. One example is when the user hasn't yet activated fax support via #96*3*. I had done this in the past and thought everything was OK, but apparently this needs to be done again when a new firmware is uploaded to the FritzBox. When fax support is not active and the user initiates sending of a fax the program simply hangs with no error message at all. I suggest for Roger to probe the box for fax support and emit an error as necessary. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#774116: roger-router: Cups error message when trying to send a fax
On 07.03.2015 15:29, Rolf Leggewie wrote: If Fax works for you with version 1.8.9-2rl3 Test case from the command line roger_cli -d -s -f /usr/share/cups/data/default-testpage.pdf -n $number with the $number you want to fax to. In my case, nowadays, it simply hangs eventually. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#779975: roger-router: fails to send read-only PDF files
Package: roger-router Version: 1.8.9-2rl1 Severity: normal Roger Router CLI fails to send PDF files that are in a read-only location. The program obviously tries to save a temporary TIFF file alongside. My /usr is mounted read-only. See the attached log file for a test session. $ roger_cli -d -s -f /usr/share/cups/data/default-testpage.pdf -n $numberhidden 17:57:58 Debug: Roger Router 1.8.9 17:57:58 Debug: Setting file monitor to '/var/spool/roger' 17:57:58 Debug: Registering router plugin: 'Speedport' 17:57:58 Debug: Register libsecret password manager plugin 17:57:58 Debug: Registering router plugin: 'FRITZ!Box' 17:57:58 Debug: Network state changed from offline to online 17:57:58 Debug: fritzbox_present: Freeing previous data 17:57:58 Debug: fritzbox_present: Query http://fritz.box/jason_boxinfo.xml 17:57:59 Debug: fritzbox_present: Data available 17:57:59 Debug: Configured router found: FRITZ!Box Fon Speedport W701V 17:57:59 Debug: Current router firmware: 29.4.88 17:57:59 Debug: fritzbox_present: Freeing previous data 17:57:59 Debug: fritzbox_present: Query http://fritz.box/jason_boxinfo.xml 17:58:01 Debug: fritzbox_present: Data available 17:58:01 Debug: ReverseLookup: '/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/routermanager/plugins/reverselookup/lookup.xml' 17:58:01 Debug: Country Code: 31 17:58:01 Debug: Service: 'gebeld.nl', prefix: 0 17:58:01 Debug: Service: 'gevonden.cc', prefix: 0 17:58:01 Debug: Service: 'nummerzoeker.com', prefix: 0 17:58:01 Debug: Country Code: 49 17:58:01 Debug: Service: '11880.com', prefix: 0 17:58:01 Debug: Service: 'Das Oertliche', prefix: 1 17:58:01 Debug: AreaCodes: '/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/routermanager/plugins/areacodes_global/globalareacodes.csv' 17:58:03 Debug: Listen to controller #1 ... 17:58:03 Debug: CAPI connection established! 17:58:03 Debug: [fritzbox_login_04_74]: start 17:58:03 Debug: [fritzbox_login_04_74]: url: http://fritz.box/cgi-bin/webcm 17:58:06 Debug: [fritzbox_login_04_74]: save data 17:58:06 Debug: Currently not logged in 17:58:09 Debug: Login successful 17:58:26 Debug: Received status code: 7 17:58:26 Debug: Trying to connect to 'fritz.box' on port 1012 17:58:26 Debug: Connected to 'fritz.box' on port 1012 GPL Ghostscript 9.10: Could not open the file /usr/share/cups/data/default-testpage.pdf.tif . Error: /invalidfileaccess in --showpage-- Operand stack: 1 true Execution stack: %interp_exit .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push 1916 1 3 %oparray_pop 1915 1 3 %oparray_pop 1899 1 3 %oparray_pop --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 1 1 --nostringval-- %for_pos_int_continue --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 1793 0 9 %oparray_pop --nostringval-- --nostringval-- Dictionary stack: --dict:1175/1684(ro)(G)-- --dict:1/20(G)-- --dict:82/200(L)-- --dict:82/200(L)-- --dict:113/127(ro)(G)-- --dict:292/300(ro)(G)-- --dict:28/32(L)-- --dict:6/8(L)-- --dict:28/40(L)-- Current allocation mode is local Last OS error: Permission denied GPL Ghostscript 9.10: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1 17:58:29 Warning: Error converting print file to TIFF!
Bug#779867: scanbd: fails to purge: scanbd.postrm: update-inetd: not found
On 06.03.2015 02:43, Andreas Beckmann wrote: during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to purge due to a command not found. According to policy 7.2 you cannot rely on the depends being available during purge, only the essential packages are available for sure. [...] Purging configuration files for scanbd (1.4.1-4) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/scanbd.postrm: 10: /var/lib/dpkg/info/scanbd.postrm: update-inetd: not found Andreas, thank you for the report. I'm a bit puzzled now as to what is the appropriate way to handle this. I asked in #debian-mentors and even pabs didn't know a definite answer. I poked around other packages for guidance and inspiration and I'm still unclear. 1) handle removal in prerm only that seems premature 2) handle removal in prerm and postrm cups does this, while testing for the existence of the binary same problem as #1 3) handle removal only in postrm, but test for existence of the binary atftpd does this purge will succeed, but possibly leaving cruft behind None of these seems to be any good, really. So maybe there is a #4? Using sed or something like that? Can I ask for your kind guidance on how this ought to be dealt with properly? Regards Rolf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#774116: roger-router: Cups error message when trying to send a fax
Hello, for all of you like me looking for a working Fax solution with Roger Router, can you please test the packages I have uploaded to http://oss.leggewie.org/bdo774116/ ? Personally, I no longer get the error mentioned in this ticket, but Fax still isn't working. I do get a popup requesting to input a number (Roger GUI has to be running at that time), but sending the fax fails for some reason. I hear it works for others and it might be I am special case because I connect to the FritzBox via a VPN. If Fax works for you with version 1.8.9-2rl3 then I will upload that version to experimental and close this ticket. Your feedback is appreciated. Regards Rolf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#779694: openbsd-inetd: broaden the runtime-dependency on update-inetd to update-inetd|reconf-inetd
Package: openbsd-inetd Version: 2:1.9.2.39.3a460-3 Severity: normal Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, please consider to relax the run-time dependency on update-inetd to (update-inetd|reconf-inetd). I have prepared a patch. Regards Rolf --- debian/control.orig 2015-03-04 14:31:50.953955974 +0800 +++ debian/control 2015-03-04 14:32:12.102060846 +0800 @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Package: openbsd-inetd Architecture: any Multi-Arch: foreign -Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, lsb-base (= 3.2-13), update-inetd, tcpd +Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, lsb-base (= 3.2-13), update-inetd | reconf-inetd, tcpd Provides: inet-superserver Description: OpenBSD Internet Superserver The inetd server is a network daemon program that specializes in managing
Bug#779693: inetutils-inetd: broaden dependency on update-inetd
Package: inetutils-inetd Version: 2:1.9-2 Severity: normal Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, I think the dependency of inetutils-inetd on update-inetd should be broadened to update-inetd or alternatively reconf-inetd. Please look at the attached patch. Regards Rolf --- debian/control.orig 2015-03-04 13:44:28.403860537 +0800 +++ debian/control 2015-03-04 13:51:12.365863684 +0800 @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ Architecture: any Provides: inet-superserver, netkit-inetd Conflicts: inet-superserver, netkit-inetd -Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, update-inetd, tcpd, lsb-base, +Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, update-inetd | reconf-inetd, tcpd, lsb-base, inetutils-syslogd | system-log-daemon Description: internet super server Inetd is the daemon that listens on various TCP and UDP ports and spawns
Bug#775856: polipo hangs on HTTP basic authentication
On 21.01.2015 02:19, Nils Dagsson Moskopp wrote: Package: polipo Version: 1.1.1-5 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, when trying to use Polipo with a HTTP basic authentication, it just hangs. Hello Nils, thank you for your report and providing detailed steps on how to reproduce. I followed them (on a Ubuntu trusty machine, nonetheless) and was unable to reproduce the problem. $ curl http://logs.2pktfkt.de/nodrama.de/ -v --proxy 127.1:8123 * Hostname was NOT found in DNS cache * Trying 127.0.0.1... * Connected to 127.1 (127.0.0.1) port 8123 (#0) GET http://logs.2pktfkt.de/nodrama.de/ HTTP/1.1 User-Agent: curl/7.35.0 Host: logs.2pktfkt.de Accept: */* Proxy-Connection: Keep-Alive HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized Content-Length: 194 Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 02:40:50 GMT * Server nginx/1.6.2 is not blacklisted Server: nginx/1.6.2 Content-Type: text/html WWW-Authenticate: Basic realm=#nodrama.de Connection: keep-alive html headtitle401 Authorization Required/title/head body bgcolor=white centerh1401 Authorization Required/h1/center hrcenternginx/1.6.2/center /body /html * Connection #0 to host 127.1 left intact This needs further inspection. My system uses polipo 1.1.1-5 just like yours. Regards Rolf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#762723: pastebinit: [INTL:de] updated German po file translation
On 18.02.2015 02:44, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: I do not intend to introduce a delta for this in Debian. In this case it would be great if you could pull the (latest) de.po from upstream / launchpad Helge, in principle I agree, but as you can see above I already said I will not introduce a delta to upstream only for this. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#778591: unblock: pastebinit/1.4-4
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package pastebinit to allow the fix for RC-bug 778336 to propagate to testing. Thank you unblock pastebinit/1.4-3 diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 7de6407..b3370f0 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +pastebinit (1.4-4) unstable; urgency=medium + + [ Andrew Starr-Bochicchio ] + * detect_distro_with_python3.patch: Use platform instead of +lsb_release to detect the distro as lsb_release is not +available under Python 3 (Closes: #760341). pastebinit +will now default again to using paste.debian.net on Debian +(Closes: #778336). + + -- Rolf Leggewie f...@rolf.leggewie.biz Tue, 17 Feb 2015 11:35:07 +0800 + pastebinit (1.4-3) unstable; urgency=low * bump debhelper to version 9 diff --git a/debian/patches/detect_distro_with_python3.patch b/debian/patches/detect_distro_with_python3.patch new file mode 100644 index 000..e0737c3 --- /dev/null +++ b/debian/patches/detect_distro_with_python3.patch @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +Index: pastebinit/pastebinit +=== +--- pastebinit.orig/pastebinit 2015-02-16 12:37:04.434846203 -0500 pastebinit/pastebinit 2015-02-16 12:39:22.709104460 -0500 +@@ -37,8 +37,8 @@ + + # Now try to override it with a distributor pastebin + try: +-import lsb_release +-release = lsb_release.get_distro_information()['ID'].lower() ++import platform ++release = platform.linux_distribution()[0].lower() + if release == 'debian': + defaultPB = http://paste.debian.net; + elif release == 'fedora': diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series index 986704d..b17e68f 100644 --- a/debian/patches/series +++ b/debian/patches/series @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ upstream-r205_r201.patch increase_timeout.patch +detect_distro_with_python3.patch
Bug#760341: Bug#778336: pastebinit: fails in the default configuration
On 17.02.2015 01:49, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote: This could be fixed by fixing #760341 so that pastebinit defaults to paste.debian.net The root cause of that is lsb-release doesn't support Python 3, breaking the distro detection. The attached patch works around that by using platform to detect the distribution instead. Thanks, everyone, especially Andrew. I'm preparing an upload as we speak. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org