Bug#696650: [PATCH v5] md: protect against crash upon fsync on ro array

2013-01-31 Thread Sebastian Riemer
stian On 29.01.2013 13:29, Paul Menzel wrote: >> Any further objection? > > Small typo (occurs) in commit message. From adfac4df99edc1a83dced9c732464634d3381a9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sebastian Riemer Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 12:46:59 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v5] md: protect against

Bug#696650: [PATCH v4] md: protect against crash upon fsync on ro array

2013-01-29 Thread Sebastian Riemer
ch. Any further objection? From adfac4df99edc1a83dced9c732464634d3381a9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sebastian Riemer Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 12:46:59 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v4] md: protect against crash upon fsync on ro array If an fsync occurrs on a read-only array, we need to send a completion

Bug#696650: [PATCH v3] md: protect against crash upon fsync on ro array

2013-01-28 Thread Sebastian Riemer
On 28.01.2013 11:32, Sebastian Riemer wrote: > O.K., then I hope Neil applies the attached patch. I've changed the > return value to success. > > This is also something for linux-stable and should apply to many kernel > versions without an issue. > I've tried to

Bug#696650: [PATCH v2] md: protect against crash upon fsync on ro array

2013-01-28 Thread Sebastian Riemer
many kernel versions without an issue. >From fe0357344877c9b9cc623fd582a4e0670e448317 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sebastian Riemer Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 12:46:59 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2] md: protect against crash upon fsync on ro array If an fsync occurrs on a read-only array, we need to