Bug#969981: RM: acpitail -- RoQA; orphaned, abandoned upstream

2024-01-29 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
reassign 969981 ftp.debian.org retitle 969981 RM: acpitail -- RoQA; orphaned, abandoned upstream thanks better alternatives: acpitool, acpi_listen (from the acpid package)

Bug#846308: .

2024-01-28 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
reassign 846308 ftp.debian.org retitle 846308 RM: tpb -- RoQA; orphaned, abandoned upstream thanks tpb is orphaned, dead-upstream, has very few users, and its functionality is largely covered by the acpid package (modulo OSD, which major window managers do provide). the latest bug was filed 7y

Bug#726249: snarf: proposed removal

2023-12-27 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
reassign -1 src:snarf retitle -1 snarf: proposed removal usertags: proposed-removal thanks snarf has very few users, better alternatives exist, has not had a maintainer in 10y, and no active upstream

Bug#1032658: sponsorship

2023-12-05 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
I'd be happy to sponsor the uploads for this package (and its dependencies that are not already in the archive).

Bug#719792: RFA: reconf-inetd & DEP9 -- maintainer script for programmatic updates of inetd.conf

2020-02-12 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
tags 719792 wontfix thanks Sounds good to me.

Bug#853048: O: socnetv -- social network analysis and visualisation application

2017-01-29 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I intend to orphan the socnetv package. The socnetv package has not been updated by its nominal maintainer in more than three years, during which time there have been two NMUs (and I'm about to make a third one). The package description is: SocNetV is a graphical

Bug#758454: ITA: socnetv -- social network analysis and visualisation application

2014-08-31 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi Caitlin, Thanks for your work, it looks great! However it seems to fail to install when doc-base is already in place: (Reading database ... 357341 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../socnetv_1.3+dfsg-1_i386.deb ... Unpacking socnetv (1.3+dfsg-1) over (0.90-3.1)

Bug#758454: ITA: socnetv -- social network analysis and visualisation application

2014-08-28 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi Caitlin, Dimitris in CC (the upstream author) has just released version 1.3. Would you mind updating the package for it? Thanks Serafeim

Bug#758454: RFA: socnetv -- social network analysis and visualisation application

2014-08-17 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I request an adopter for the socnetv package. The package description is: SocNetV is a graphical application designed to be an easy tool for Social Networks Analysis and Visualisation (not to be confused with social networking, as in online communities). With

Bug#758456: RFA: beanstalkd -- simple, in-memory, workqueue service

2014-08-17 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I request an adopter for the beanstalkd package. The package description is: Beanstalkd is a simple, fast, workqueue service (a specific case of message queueing), in which messages are organised in tubes. Beanstalk clients can insert and consume messages into

Bug#758457: RFA: cflow -- Analyze control flow in C source files

2014-08-17 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I request an adopter for the cflow package. The package description is: GNU cflow analyzes a collection of C source files and prints a graph, charting control flow within the program. . GNU cflow is able to produce both direct and inverted flowgraphs for C

Bug#758455: RFA: bogofilter -- fast Bayesian spam filter (dummy package)

2014-08-17 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I request an adopter for the bogofilter package. The package description is: This package implements a fast Bayesian spam filter along the lines suggested by Paul Graham in his article A Plan For Spam. . This version substantially improves on Paul's proposal by

Bug#733866: nyancat-server: drop reconf-inetd dependency

2014-07-18 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi Jonathan, What are my options apart from manually removing reconf-inet's entries from /etc/inetd.conf and restart inetd using invoke-rc.d? It's unfortunate that the same link is used for both reconf-inetd and systemd. Can't you ship a new systemd service file that refers to another

Bug#750944: RM: nodebox-web -- ROM; low popcon, no response to RFA

2014-06-08 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal From my RFA, #749340, two weeks ago: I request an adopter for the nodebox-web package. I packaged it several years ago because it was needed for another package, one that is not in the Debian archive anymore. nodebox-web has low popcon and no rdepends,

Bug#736327: an update on the situation

2014-05-29 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi Jon, On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 07:54:11PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: I've recently revisited this issue. I've discovered two things: firstly, there are two distinct class heirarchies/families within the 'mailbox' library: the [..] Thanks for your interest in archivemail. In case you've

Bug#749339: O: cflow -- Analyze control flow in C source files

2014-05-26 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I intend to orphan the cflow package; I don't have the time for it. The package description is: GNU cflow analyzes a collection of C source files and prints a graph, charting control flow within the program. . GNU cflow is able to produce both direct and

Bug#749340: RFA: nodebox-web -- collection of web-related Python modules

2014-05-26 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I request an adopter for the nodebox-web package. I packaged it several years ago because it was needed for another package, one that is not in the Debian archive anymore. nodebox-web has low popcon and no rdepends, so adopt it only if you (plan to) use it

Bug#746814: Should build against and link with system's libtrio

2014-05-08 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Bonjour Didier! On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 11:35:59PM +0200, Didier Raboud wrote: I've noticed that bogofilter embeds a copy of libtrio's source files; the build system should ensure that libtrio-dev's header files are used and that bogofilter is linked against the system version of libtrio.

Bug#733866: nyancat-server: drop reconf-inetd dependency

2014-04-14 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi Jon, On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 09:37:51PM +0100, Jonathan McCrohan wrote: Given that you have already orphaned both reconf-inetd and update-inetd, and nobody else has come forward, I think it would be best for nyancat not to depend on either of them. I've RFA'd them; I'm still the

Bug#733866: nyancat-server: drop reconf-inetd dependency

2014-04-05 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi Jon, On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:51:09PM +0100, Jonathan McCrohan wrote: Hi Serafeim, On 02/01/14 23:13, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: Here's a list of instructions instead: - don't ship anything under /usr/share/reconf-inetd/ - replace dependency on reconf-inetd with one on update

Bug#733866: nyancat-server: drop reconf-inetd dependency

2014-01-02 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi Jon, On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 02:33:22AM +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote: Can you please supply a patch for this. DEP9 provides no guidance on how correctly to migrate users away from reconf-inetd in the postinst. Here's a list of instructions instead: - don't ship anything under

Bug#733866: nyancat-server: drop reconf-inetd dependency

2014-01-01 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Package: nyancat-server Version: 1.2.2-1 Severity: normal Hi, I plan to remove reconf-inetd from the Debian archive, since jessie will most likely be released with a modern init system which makes inetd even more irrelevant (and thus reconf-inetd not a worthwhile project). Please drop

Bug#728579: O: pdfshuffler -- merge, split and re-arrange pages from PDF documents

2013-11-03 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I have orphaned the pdfshuffler package due to no interest in it. The package description is: PDF-Shuffler is a small application which allows one to merge or split pdf documents and rotate, crop and rearrange their pages using an interactive and intuitive

Bug#719792: RFA: reconf-inetd DEP9 -- maintainer script for programmatic updates of inetd.conf

2013-08-15 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I request an adopter for the reconf-inetd package. The package description is: reconf-inetd is a dpkg-trigger script that updates the configuration of the internet superserver. It is a replacement for update-inetd, as per DEP9. . If the above does not mean

Bug#719794: RFA: update-inetd -- inetd configuration file updater

2013-08-15 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I request an adopter for the update-inetd package. The package description is: This package provides a program used by other packages to automatically update /etc/inetd.conf, the configuration file shared by all implementations of the Internet super-server. .

Bug#671728: AptHookFd test fixture script

2013-08-13 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Francesco, As discussed off-line, here's a script to somewhat emulate apt's behaviour according to the patch in this bug report, for the sake of testing. -- Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams apt-hook-fd-fixture.rb Description: application/ruby

Bug#441689: refreshed patch for the current apt-listbugs release

2013-08-13 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Attached the patch that was submitted six(!) years ago, refreshed for current apt-listbugs. I've modified it to change -F to a boolean switch, rather than one that requires an argument (as per msg #30 in this bug report). As discussed off-line, it'd be great if force-pin would default to true in

Bug#671726: apt: should be able to provide hook information through a named pipe

2013-08-12 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Daniel, David, On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 11:52:49PM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 08:15:32PM +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote: On 17 March 2013 19:56, Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 02:14:50PM +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote: The data

Bug#705198: reconf-inetd: port to python 3k

2013-04-11 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Package: reconf-inetd Version: 1.120603 Severity: normal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#705199: reconf-inetd: use a debian python helper to manage byte-compiled files

2013-04-11 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Package: reconf-inetd Version: 1.120603 Severity: normal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#628996: apt-listbugs: please use debconf

2013-04-07 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi Francesco, On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 07:22:27PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote [edited]: On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 01:09:43 +0100 Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: The current apt-listbugs text user interface displays the bugs that affect the installation/upgrade and then offers the user the following

Bug#704288: Upstream version 1.8 is out

2013-03-31 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 10:50:46AM +0200, Dennis Kaarsemaker wrote: Package: beanstalkd Version: 1.7-1 Beanstalkd is quite often going berserk and using 10% CPU on my machine. Looking at the beanstalkd bugtracker, this should be fixed in 1.8, which was released a few months ago. Thanks for

Bug#704256: reconf-inetd: add support for unlisted services

2013-03-30 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Package: reconf-inetd Version: 1.120603 Severity: wishlist reconf-inetd currenly only supports services that are associated with a well-known port (by being listed in /etc/services). unlisted services, such as approx, cannot be migrated to reconf-inetd until this bug is fixed. -- To

Bug#628996: Fwd: [OT] flag RC-buggy packages to users of testing

2013-03-26 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
- Forwarded message - From: Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org To: debian-v...@lists.debian.org Subject: [OT] flag RC-buggy packages to users of testing [M-F-T set to 628...@bugs.debian.org, as I believe this is becoming OT] On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:17:29PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote

Bug#660568: linux-ftpd-ssl: please migrate away from update-inetd to reconf-inetd as per DEP9

2013-03-25 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Control: severity -1 normal Control: tag -1 +patch Hi, Please find attached a patch for migrating your package to reconf-inetd, as per dep9 [0], in order to eliminate cross-package issues such as #168847. I'll be happy to answer any questions. cheers, sez [0]

Bug#660569: leafnode: please migrate away from update-inetd to reconf-inetd as per DEP9

2013-03-25 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep9/#index5h1 -- Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams commit 8b9b33eb0218b54858f574bde051182fdfe712af Author: Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org Date: Sun Mar 24 20:23:40 2013 +0100 inetd.conf entry: migrate away from

Bug#693577: libfso-glib: not properly built from source (actual source is in fso-specs)

2013-03-23 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Control: tag -1 -pending Removing months-old pending tag. -- Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#702233: Patches so far

2013-03-23 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi Uli, Any progress on the upload that you were preparing for this past week? cheers, sez -- Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#628996: apt-listbugs: please use debconf

2013-03-23 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi guys, Attached a proof-of-concept for the advanced use case (in which the user actually wants to review which buggy packages to pin or upgrade). Consider this as a basis for further discussion, rather than something anywhere near a working patch. To give it a try, save the attached files in

Bug#703553: patch for delayed NMU

2013-03-22 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Control: tag -1 +pending Dear maintainer, I've uploaded an NMU to delayed/5, using a repackaged source based on Prach Pongpanich's patch. Please feel free to override it. -- Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#703725: unblock: apt-spacewalk/1.0.6-2.1

2013-03-22 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
scripts for removing/disabling/enabling the apt hook +file, and change the latter to test the existence of post_invoke.py before +invoking it (Closes: #703207, 700821). + * Setting high urgency due to RC bugs + + -- Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:45:30 +0100 + apt

Bug#703731: unblock: keepassx/0.4.3+dfsg-0.1

2013-03-22 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
for version mangling. + * Setting high urgency due to RC bug. + + -- Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:04:39 +0100 + keepassx (0.4.3-2) unstable; urgency=low * Fix FTBFS with gcc 4.7. (Closes: #667224) diff -Nurp keepassx-0.4.3/debian/copyright felix/keepassx-0.4.3+dfsg/debian

Bug#692948: remove pending tag (it's been there for several months)

2013-03-21 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Control: tag -1 -pending -- Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#692948: patch

2013-03-21 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
dependency -common on packages that use common functions.sh + * In migrateDocSymlink(), remove multi-arch string from pkg name, if any + * All the above close #692948 (high urgency due to RC severity) + + -- Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:32:04 +0100 + firebird2.5 (2.5.2~svn

Bug#698832: NMU upload

2013-03-21 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Control: notfound -1 0.4.3+dfsg-0.1 On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:30:58PM +0100, Felix Geyer wrote: The upload looks good except that it doesn't close this bug (close vs. closes in the changelog). Oops, that's right. Thanks for the review. -- Every great idea is worthless without someone to do

Bug#698832: Copyright patch

2013-03-20 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Felix, Of course, you should disregard my comments about NMU in the changelog -- I've only now noticed that you're in the uploaders list. -- Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#703207: patch needs more work: works for dpkg, but not for apt

2013-03-20 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
tag 700821 -pending tag 703207 -pending tag 700821 -patch tag 703207 -patch thanks $ sudo dpkg -i apt-transport-spacewalk_1.0.6-2.1_all.deb Selecting previously unselected package apt-transport-spacewalk. (Reading database ... 369115 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking

Bug#700821: NMU patch

2013-03-20 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
of post_invoke.py before +invoking it (Closes: #703207, 700821). + * Setting high urgency due to RC bugs + + -- Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:45:30 +0100 + apt-spacewalk (1.0.6-2) unstable; urgency=low * [22c43b83] Rename binary package to apt-transport-spacewalk diff

Bug#698832: NMU upload

2013-03-20 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
and help_about.png icons (project Oxygen, and license CC-BY-SA +3.0 or LGPL respectively). + * The above three items close #698832 + * Update debian/watch for version mangling. + * Setting high urgency due to RC bug. + + -- Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:04:39 +0100

Bug#702791: confirmed in a not extremely slow box

2013-03-19 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Control: tag -1 -pending Untagging as it's been pending for over a week. FWIW I've reproduced the issue in a reasonably modern laptop (lenovo x201): Ran 2173 tests in 600.905s FAILED (skips=21, failures=1, errors=2, successes=2149) -- Every great idea is worthless without someone to

Bug#628996: apt-listbugs: please use debconf [was: Bug#628996: Bug#671726: Bug#671728: Bug#671726: apt: should be able to provide hook information through a named pipe]

2013-03-19 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi guys, On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:07:20AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:34:03 +0800 Daniel Hartwig wrote: [...] On 17 March 2013 16:17, Francesco Poli invernom...@paranoici.org wrote: [..] ยท -n, --force-no Assumes that you select no for all questions. This

Bug#628996: Bug#671726: Bug#671728: Bug#671726: apt: should be able to provide hook information through a named pipe

2013-03-18 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi Daniel, On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 05:34:03PM +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote: Control: reopen 628996 Control: retitle 628996 apt-listbugs: please use debconf #Control: tags 628996 - moreinfo On 17 March 2013 16:17, Francesco Poli invernom...@paranoici.org wrote: On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 10:41:52

Bug#628996: apt-listbugs: please use debconf

2013-03-18 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 08:00:51PM +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote: On 18 March 2013 18:56, Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org wrote: [..] If I understand correctly, debconf can only be used with predefined templates, thus predefined generic policy questions (as opposed to questions that can

Bug#698832: Copyright patch

2013-03-18 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Control: tag -1 +patch Hi Felix, Thanks for preparing the patch. Some minor points: - the release version should be 0.4.3+dfsg-0.1 (as per http://wiki.debian.org/NonMaintainerUpload) - the changelog entry should start with: * Non-maintainer upload. - the urgency should be bumped to

Bug#703207: proposed patch

2013-03-18 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Control: tag -1 +patch Works for me. commit 2674f3279495191233db770302d7e71d8647ce41 Author: Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org Date: Mon Mar 18 23:09:23 2013 +0100 add postrm/preinst scripts to handle apt hook file fixes #703207 diff --git a/debian/apt-transport

Bug#671726: Bug#671728: Bug#671726: apt: should be able to provide hook information through a named pipe

2013-03-17 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:36:22AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 00:07:21 +0100 Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: Do you agree then that adding the fifo feature to apt and adapting apt-listbugs accordingly is not needed nor does it suffice for fixing #662983? No, I don't

Bug#671726: apt: should be able to provide hook information through a named pipe

2013-03-17 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 02:14:50PM +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote: On 17 March 2013 06:56, Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org wrote: Hi Francesco, On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:25:36PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote [edited]: On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 12:05:09 +0100 David Kalnischkies wrote

Bug#671726: apt: should be able to provide hook information through a named pipe

2013-03-17 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 08:15:32PM +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote: On 17 March 2013 19:56, Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 02:14:50PM +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote: The data can be passed through an open fd, similar to dpkg --status-fd argument

Bug#671726: apt: should be able to provide hook information through a named pipe

2013-03-16 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi David Francesco, Thanks for the quick feedback. On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 12:05:09PM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote [edited]: Using a hook-defined fifoname rather than a random fifoname should be okay as the later isn't more secure than the former (if an attacker has root rights to write

Bug#671726: apt: should be able to provide hook information through a named pipe

2013-03-16 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 10:32:40PM +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote: Right. Apt-listbugs is effectively called in the same context as maintainer scripts, and those are not guaranteed to have an interactive shell. The program must be smart enough to detect this and do the right thing (I'm not sure

Bug#671726: apt: should be able to provide hook information through a named pipe

2013-03-16 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi Francesco, On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:25:36PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote [edited]: On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 12:05:09 +0100 David Kalnischkies wrote: [..] Using a hook-defined fifoname rather than a random fifoname should be okay as the later isn't more secure than the former (if an attacker

Bug#671726: Bug#671728: Bug#671726: apt: should be able to provide hook information through a named pipe

2013-03-16 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:25:18PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 16:04:38 +0100 Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: [...] I'm not sure any more that using a fifo instead of stdin is needed for a programmatic frontend. After all, the tracebacks in #662983 suggest that the failure

Bug#671726: apt: should be able to provide hook information through a named pipe

2013-03-16 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
tag 671726 +patch thanks Hi, The attached patch enables apt to pass Pre-Install-Pkgs hook data via a fifo, instead of via stdin (which remains the default, of course). Unlike the proposal in the initial bug report, the fifo filename is not randomised, but instead declared via the following

Bug#703050: www.debian.org: Please document the criteria for debian.net services to be integrated into debian.org

2013-03-15 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi Sebastian, On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 03:41:40AM +0100, Sebastian Harl wrote [edited]: On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 05:08:29PM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: Some debian.net services would serve their purpose better if they were integrated into the www.d.o namespace, but the criteria

Bug#703050: www.debian.org: Please document the criteria for debian.net services to be integrated into debian.org

2013-03-14 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, Some debian.net services would serve their purpose better if they were integrated into the www.d.o namespace, but the criteria for deciding which services would qualify is not documented. Here's some suggestions that could be a useful start: - there

Bug#701617: maint-guide: new URL for wnpp-by-tags

2013-02-25 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Package: maint-guide Version: 1.2.31 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, Please apply the attached patch to update the URL for the wnpp-by-tags service. Thanks, sez -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1,

Bug#698140: Beanstalkd: OUT_OF_MEMORY after crash

2013-01-14 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi Gregory, Thanks for the bug report. On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 01:04:37PM +0200, Gregory Potamianos wrote: [..] Beanstalkd reports OUT_OF_MEMORY error after unclean termination (crash) [1] Fix [2] seems to apply cleanly in 1.4.6-4 Unfortunately, it'll have to wait for an update after wheezy's

Bug#698140: Beanstalkd: OUT_OF_MEMORY after crash

2013-01-14 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi again, On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 04:24:45PM +0200, Potamianos Gregory wrote: [..] If the server crashes with an empty binlog, on the next startup it answers every submitted job with out of memory error and discards it. So the service is rendered useless and requires manual intervention.

Bug#698160: tpu: beanstalkd/1.4.6-5 (pre-approval)

2013-01-14 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
upstream commit 70b63d5) to fix +OUT_OF_MEMORY error after crash (Closes: #698140, aka upstream issue 44) + + -- Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:17:27 +0100 + beanstalkd (1.4.6-4) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low * Add fiu-fix.diff (upstream commit 3176e28

Bug#482446: The Debian package debram, and your ancient patch

2013-01-03 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi Thaddeus, On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 05:38:22PM +, Thaddeus H. Black wrote: Long ago, you submitted a patch to the Debian package Debram, on which I never acted. I have had plans to [..] You can take over maintenance of the package if you wish. You can become the regular maintainer of

Bug#695715: fixed in cflow 1:1.4+dfsg1-1

2012-12-14 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Dear Adam, On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 08:22:30PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 19:32 +, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: cflow (1:1.4+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=high . * Repackage with non DFSG-free texinfo files stripped out of the source and binary package

Bug#695715: fixed in cflow 1:1.4+dfsg1-1

2012-12-12 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 08:22:30PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 19:32 +, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: cflow (1:1.4+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=high . * Repackage with non DFSG-free texinfo files stripped out of the source and binary package (closes

Bug#665199: Initiate dumping of dbs, but actual dumping yet to be fixed

2012-12-11 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi, Here's a tested patch for the part of the problem that's described in message #17 in this bug report. We still need a solution for the issue described in message #68. Cheers, sez --- openldap-2.4.31/debian/slapd.postinst 2012-12-11 14:34:47.0 +0100 +++

Bug#695377: sysbench: /usr/share/doc/sysbench/manual.html is empty

2012-12-07 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Package: sysbench Version: 0.4.12-1+b1 Severity: normal hi, sysbench ships an empty html manual file. $ ls -l /usr/share/doc/sysbench/manual.html -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun 9 19:50 /usr/share/doc/sysbench/manual.html thanks, sez -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT

Bug#695198: pu: package bogofilter/1.2.2-2

2012-12-05 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
--- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +bogofilter (1.2.2-2+squeeze1) stable-security; urgency=high + + * Cherry-pick fix and test for CVE-2012-5468 (aka bogofilter-SA-2012-01) +from upstream release 1.2.3. Setting urgency to high. closes: #695139. + + -- Serafeim Zanikolas s

Bug#695139: bogofilter-common: CVE-2012-5468

2012-12-04 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 04:16:05PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Package: bogofilter-common Severity: grave Tags: security [..] Please upload an isolated fix to unstable and ask the release managers for an unblock. I have it in mind for tonight, thanks. -- Every great idea is worthless

Bug#695189: unblock: bogofilter/1.2.2+dfsg1-2

2012-12-04 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
. closes: #695139. + + -- Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org Tue, 04 Dec 2012 20:08:50 +0100 + bogofilter (1.2.2+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=low * Rebuild with repackaged source to exclude non-DFSG-free licensed security diff --git a/debian/patches/sa-2012-01-fix.diff b/debian/patches/sa-2012

Bug#690545: /usr/bin/fiu-ctrl: ignores deprecated options silently

2012-10-18 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 09:00:33PM +0100, Alberto Bertogli wrote [edited]: Allright, I found the problems (there were more than one), hopefully they should all be fixed in 82621d9 (http://blitiri.com.ar/git/?p=libfiu;a=commitdiff;h=82621d9). My problem was with -e not being effective and I see

Bug#690545: /usr/bin/fiu-ctrl: ignores deprecated options silently

2012-10-16 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:55:16PM +0100, Alberto Bertogli wrote: Thanks for the bug report! I've wrote commit 17fdac5 that should fix it: http://blitiri.com.ar/git/?p=libfiu;a=commit;h=17fdac56. Thank you too Alberto. If you don't mind some nitpicking: deprecated means still supported but

Bug#690545: /usr/bin/fiu-ctrl: ignores deprecated options silently

2012-10-15 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Package: fiu-utils Version: 0.91-1+b1 Severity: normal File: /usr/bin/fiu-ctrl Hi, fiu-ctrl ignores deprecated options silently. Please make it print a warning on stdout, if not fail loudly. Also, the listing of deprecated options in -h output does not include -d. Thanks, -- Every great idea

Bug#687402: beanstalkd: proposed TPU (diff for NMU version 1.4.6-3.1)

2012-10-13 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
+ + -- Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org Mon, 08 Oct 2012 18:57:43 +0200 + beanstalkd (1.4.6-3) unstable; urgency=high * Patch sh-tests/common.functions to randomise the listener port during diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 0eacaeb..ad2d77e 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian

Bug#687402: beanstalkd: proposed TPU (diff for NMU version 1.4.6-3.1)

2012-10-13 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:19:24PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On 13.10.2012 20:22, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: Dear RMs, here's an almost identical patch (also, dropping -i as it's also deprecated, and adding VCS headers). On the whole, this looks fine; thanks. However: + * Bump up

Bug#687402: beanstalkd: FTBFS: tests failed

2012-10-08 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 12:20:11AM -0700, Keith Rarick wrote: On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Keith Rarick k...@xph.us wrote: You can see the change at https://github.com/kr/beanstalkd/compare/fiu Thanks. No need for an upstream release. I'll also drop -i from the fiu-ctrl invocation

Bug#687402: beanstalkd: FTBFS: tests failed

2012-09-26 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
That's fine Keith. Let me know please when you have something ready. -- Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#687402: beanstalkd: FTBFS: tests failed

2012-09-25 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Keith, On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 05:03:45PM -0700, Keith Rarick wrote: If libevent 1.4 is not an option, I'll get the 1.4.x series of beanstalkd working with libevent 2 and make a bugfix release. Not, it's not an option. Should I do that? Your previous email sort of implied that you wouldn't

Bug#688244: unblock: beanstalkd/1.7-1

2012-09-20 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, The beanstalkd version in testing (1.4.6) is FTBFS (#687402) since libevent was upgraded from 1.4 to 2.0. Meanwhile beanstalkd 1.5 was released and dropped the libevent dependency all

Bug#687402: beanstalkd: FTBFS: tests failed

2012-09-19 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi Keith, beanstalkd 1.4.6 does not pass anymore the test binlog-diskfull-delete.sh. (Just a reminder: 1.4.6 is the version intended for the upcoming Debian stable, since 1.5 1.6 had failing tests and were not fixed before the Debian freeze deadline.) On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 03:07:51PM +0200,

Bug#666775: failing beanstalkd tests (was: Beanstalkd 1.5 .deb package)

2012-09-11 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
tag 666775 pending thanks On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 01:22:45AM -0700, Keith Rarick wrote: Ok, I believe this is fixed now in [..] If this looks good, I'm set to make a release. Thanks Keith. I've verified the fix on ppc, sparc mips. Please go ahead with a release. -- Every great idea is

Bug#666775: failing beanstalkd tests (was: Beanstalkd 1.5 .deb package)

2012-08-30 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
[adding back bug report in CC] On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 02:31:47PM -0700, Keith Rarick wrote: On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:09 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org wrote: I'm happy to keep 1.4 if you as upstream commit to support it for serious bug and security issues for another 3+ years

Bug#666775: failing beanstalkd tests (was: Beanstalkd 1.5 .deb package)

2012-08-29 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi Keith, Thanks for the prompt response. On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:09:09PM -0700, Keith Rarick wrote: On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 6:29 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org wrote: Since I haven't heard from you on a fix for 1.6, 1.5 tests never ran successfully, and I do not wish to keep 1.4

Bug#666775: failing beanstalkd tests (was: Beanstalkd 1.5 .deb package)

2012-08-28 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi Keith, On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:45:14AM +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: Hi Keith, On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 01:34:48AM +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 07:08:38PM -0700, Keith Rarick wrote: On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org

Bug#666775: failing beanstalkd tests (was: Beanstalkd 1.5 .deb package)

2012-07-29 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi Keith, On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 01:34:48AM +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 07:08:38PM -0700, Keith Rarick wrote: On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org wrote: I've uploaded 1.6 but many tests fail with a timeout in powerpc s390(x

Bug#675589: reconf-inetd: in certain cases, inetd.conf entries are concatenated

2012-06-02 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Package: reconf-inetd Version: 1.120523 Severity: important see http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/05/msg00479.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#673600: RFS: nyancat/1.0+git20120519.5fe3de9-1

2012-06-02 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
quoting Jakub Wilk: But next reconf-inetd run can happen a month later. (Or never.) In the mean time, nyancat server won't be running, will it? Or did I misunderstand something? That's right. I take responsibility for that; I didn't realise that the postinst script would run after the

Bug#675679: reconf-inetd: managed fragments are not removed upon purge

2012-06-02 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi Jon, On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 05:26:14PM +0100, Jonathan McCrohan wrote [edited]: reconf-inetd does not remove managed fragments when reconf-inetd itself is being purged. These fragments are, however, removed when reconf-inetd installed again. Thanks for reporting this. If you have the

Bug#673600: RFS: nyancat/1.0+git20120519.5fe3de9-1

2012-06-02 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 05:27:30PM +, Jakub Wilk wrote [edited]: [..] I would add -x/--line-regexp to the fgrep call. Wouldn't it be nice if the postinst also take care of the case when the user enabled the service? the line I'm suggesting in dep9 is: if fgrep -q '^exact entry

Bug#673600: RFS: nyancat/1.0+git20120519.5fe3de9-1

2012-06-02 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 07:03:33PM +, Jakub Wilk wrote: * Jonathan McCrohan jmccro...@gmail.com, 2012-06-02, 19:27: I would add -x/--line-regexp to the fgrep call. Wouldn't it be nice if the postinst also take care of the case when the user enabled the service? Couldn't both of these

Bug#673600: RFS: nyancat/1.0+git20120519.5fe3de9-1

2012-06-02 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 07:33:31PM +, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 07:03:33PM +, Jakub Wilk wrote: * Jonathan McCrohan jmccro...@gmail.com, 2012-06-02, 19:27: BTW, shouldn't you use --pattern (instead of, or maybe in addition to, --multi)? --patern

Bug#666775: failing beanstalkd tests (was: Beanstalkd 1.5 .deb package)

2012-05-22 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 07:08:38PM -0700, Keith Rarick wrote: On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org wrote: I've uploaded 1.6 but many tests fail with a timeout in powerpc s390(x) Looks like it fails on all the big-endian architectures. Debugging this would

Bug#666775: failing beanstalkd tests (was: Beanstalkd 1.5 .deb package)

2012-05-20 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi Keith, On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 05:36:32AM +, Keith Rarick wrote [edited]: [..] I'll make another release as soon as I can fix https://github.com/kr/beanstalkd/issues/114 I've uploaded 1.6 but many tests fail with a timeout in powerpc s390(x), as of now at least. For the full list of

  1   2   3   4   >