Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Soren Stoutner
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-construct-classes
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Contact: matejcik
* URL : https://github.com/matejcik/construct-classes/tree/main
* License
the package (and then making the upload include changes
> from both releases). Is that suitable from your POV?
Yes, that would be fine.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
> >
> > > On Mon, 16 Sept 2024 at 22:27, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> > > > Dmitry,
> > > >
> > > > debian/source/format lists this package as 3.0 (native). Is Debian
the
> > > > upstream for this package?
> > >
> > >
?
On Monday, September 16, 2024 1:31:16 PM MST Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Soren,
>
> On Mon, 16 Sept 2024 at 22:27, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> > Dmitry,
> >
> > debian/source/format lists this package as 3.0 (native). Is Debian the
> > upstream for this package?
&
of background on why parts of this package are
non-free? I am having a hard time imagining that the Free Software Foundation
released a bunch of documentation that isn’t DFSG-free.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Dmitry,
It looks like the Salsa repository does not contain your most recent changes.
When sponsoring packages I like to build from Git. Can you please push them
there?
On Monday, September 16, 2024 12:44:51 PM MST Soren Stoutner wrote:
> Control: owner -1 !
>
> Dmitry,
>
>
gcc-docs removed from testing (scheduled for September 20th).
>
> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2024/09/msg00059.html
> [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2024/09/msg00058.html
> [3] https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2024/09/msg00060.html
--
Soren Stoutn
ed as far as I know, if there is anything
> else please let me know.
>
> Latest (1.12) is uploaded to mentors.
Can you please push your changes to Salsa?
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
t; I did and responded but I haven't heard anything back since.
>
> Hope all is well, please let me know if you need anything and the status.
>
> Thanks,
> +Ad
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
maintainer. However, because I didn’t receive a response to my previous
email, if I don’t receive a response either way to this email I will look at
updating the package under the Debian Python Team umbrella. If you would
prefer I not do so, just let me know.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
#generated-files-list-debian-files
On Saturday, September 7, 2024 8:02:46 PM MST Soren Stoutner wrote:
> Adam,
>
> Debian/copyright must specify a license for each entry. The one for debian/
*
> is missing.
>
> W: bashbro source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright License [debian/co
re any problems please let me know - I'll address them as soon as
> possible.
>
> Thanks,
> +Ad
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
think it should be ready to release.
Soren
On Saturday, September 7, 2024 1:31:30 PM MST Soren Stoutner wrote:
> Control: owner -1 !
>
> Akash,
>
> I will take a look at this as I sponsored a previous release of ereandel.
>
> As a general rule I usually am willing to sponso
> * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon
>
> [5] reprotest
>
> * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --
auto-
> build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild
> * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathe
equences
>
> *<<+Ad>> They aren't stripped, if they are part of the filename (perhaps by
> accident) then Bashbro will allow the user to access/display them. *
> * Not a security concern. *
>
> > - Contains a byte sequence that isn't valid UTF-8 while run in a UTF-8
>
> *<<+Ad>> The encoding for links is actually handled by the browser in the
> current version of Bashbro, so if the browser doesn't care (and it *
> *might not) - in that case it would probably simply encode the filename in
> hex and pass it out as a link for Bashbro. The user would then be *
> *able **to access the file although **it's not valid UTF-8. Probably not a
> security concern. *
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
; https://scriptsandoneliners.blogspot.com/
>
> For / support: Have you tried creating a file with a / in it? It's not
> possible afaik. But I'll probably try to cover those edge
> cases anyway where possible - newlines and /'s although legal tend to break
> a lot of
gt; [Adam Danischewski - Chat @
> Spike](https://spikenow.com/r/a/?ref=spike-organic-signature&_ts=2rbwf2)
[2rb
> wf2]
>
> On September 4, 2024 at 7:17 GMT, Soren Stoutner wrote:
>
> Control: owner -1 !
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
ly using, is has some
> notable drawbacks against the minimal option already included in Debian.
>
> I would heartily recommend this to someone as an exercise to learn about
> bash programming -- especially if they are able to spot the things I
> highlighted above (or other
e I have left those out of this description, but they are
available in the man files (and gbp often will prompt you if one is mandatory
based on the circumstances). If you have any questions, just feel free to
ask.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a dig
lems with the
AppStream metadata file.
https://appstream.debian.org/sid/main/issues/nxt-firmware.html
Other than that, everything looks good to me.
Please let me know when the changelog is fixed.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Monday, September 2, 2024 10:18:13 AM MST Soren Stoutner wrote:
> Control: owner -1 !
>
> Nicolas,
>
> I would be happy to review the package.
Nicolas,
When attempting to build the package I receive the following errors. Is it
possible the gbp upstream or pristine-tar bran
CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon
>
> [5] reprotest
>
> * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --
auto-
> build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild
> * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004
> * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/
> * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
e mistake. I’m not sure how I did that.
The correct information is:
https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/fonts-adobe-sourcesans3
I’ll upload a fix today.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
ext package upload.
>
> [1] https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian-fonts%40lists.debian.org
Thanks for pointing that out. I probably would not have noticed. I will
upload a fix today.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
The needed changes in Qt WebEngine have been merged for the 6.8.0 release.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Thanks for looking at this so quickly.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
may be something special about the test that fails that
requires git.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Control: tags -1 patch
I have submitted an MR that implements building of .bdic binary dictionaries.
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/hunspell-fr/-/merge_requests/3
Thanks,
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
le, but generally two or three key endorsements
is equal to one key signature for the purpose of becoming a Debian Maintainer
(needs one key signature) or a Debian Developer (needs two key signatures).
So, if you have worked with two or three DD who can endorse your key based on
the history of
ou are a DM. Based on the quality of your packaging, would you
like me to grant you upload rights for markdown?
Also, I see you are involved with a lot of packages.
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=andrea%40pappacoda.it
Have you considered applying to become a Debian Developer?
--
Soren
Niels,
On Tuesday, August 13, 2024 1:08:45 PM MST Niels Thykier wrote:
> Soren Stoutner:
> > Niels,
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > I do not consider this to be simply a “lintian” issue. Rather, I consider
> > it
> > best practice as documente
Niels,
On Tuesday, August 13, 2024 9:02:43 AM MST Niels Thykier wrote:
> Soren Stoutner:
> > Andrea,
> >
> > On Tuesday, August 13, 2024 12:33:57 AM MST Andrea Pappacoda wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> That's a false positive. Rules-Requires-Root
Andrea,
On Tuesday, August 13, 2024 12:33:57 AM MST Andrea Pappacoda wrote:
> Il 12 agosto 2024 21:55:03 CEST, Soren Stoutner ha
scritto:
> >1. markdown source: quilt-patch-missing-description [debian/patches/
> >debian.patch]
> >
> >Could you please add a descri
how it would be best worded.
Soren
On Monday, August 12, 2024 12:27:30 PM MST Soren Stoutner wrote:
> Control: owner -1 !
>
> Andrea,
>
> I will take a look at sponsoring the package.
>
> Soren
>
> On Monday, August 12, 2024 12:12:22 PM MST Bastian Germann wrote:
>
> > prefer to avoid keeping the RM bug open for too long.
>
> I am not going to sponsor this. But I do not object to some other DD
> sponsoring it.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: licenserecon
Version: 1.14
Severity: normal
For some reason, licenserecon doesn't detect the BSD license for the files in
the
vendor subfolder. The only license listed in debian/copyright is GPL-3+.
https://salsa.debian.org/manuelguerra/baby/-/tree/1.0.58?ref_type=tags
-- System Infor
Phil,
On Friday, August 9, 2024 8:59:01 AM MST Phil Hagelberg wrote:
> Soren Stoutner writes:
> >> I will see if I can get gbp to pull from a branch where this deletion
> >> has already been committed manually in git instead of relying on it to
> >> filter out the
rget that it needs to run. I can
> work around this by adding this to debian/rules:
>
> execute_after_dh_clean: ; $(MAKE) clean
>
> But if there's a better solution I'm all ears. =)
The man file for dh_clean says:
'It does not run "make clean" to clean
ied.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?
repeatmerged=yes&src=licensecheck
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
That sounds like a good idea.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: licenserecon
Version: 1.14
Severity: wishlist
licenserecon detects licenses mentioned in passing in the header as being the
license the file is
released under.
For example, privacybrowser displays the following:
$ lrc
en: Versions: recon 1.14 check 3.3.9-1
Parsing Source Tree
R
Package: licenserecon
Version: 1.14
Severity: normal
For example, index.docbook in privacybrowser.
https://salsa.debian.org/soren/privacybrowser/-/blob/master/doc/index.docbook?ref_type=heads
$ lrc
en: Versions: recon 1.14 check 3.3.9-1
Parsing Source Tree
Reading copyright
Runni
of these packages are arch:all, the lack
> of qtwebengine-opensource-src prevents all of them (and probably others)
> from being installable, running their testsuite and therefore migrating
> to testing.
>
> Could you check if the patch still works and apply it if it does?
>
OK. I will work on a patch later this week.
On Monday, August 5, 2024 1:16:06 AM MST Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Hi Soren,
>
> Le samedi 15 juillet 2023 à 11:11 -0700, Soren Stoutner a écrit :
> > OK. I will hold off for now. If, after the package structure settles, yo
There is an upstream discussion about this with the libsrtp developers.
https://github.com/cisco/libsrtp/issues/721
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
x27; gbp:debug: pristine-tar []
> ['commit', '../open62541_1.4.3.orig-nodeset.tar.gz',
> 'f38a1be271027c8490bbce407be4f34c2397bf29'] gbp:debug: pristine-tar []
> ['commit', '../open62541_1.4.3.orig.tar.gz',
> '20bcbcfe79a001b805a52df0f3088b9868844ffc'] gbp:info: Successfully committed
> pristine-tar data for version 1.4.3-1 of ../open62541_1.4.3.orig.tar.gz with
> additional tarballs for open62541_1.4.3.orig-nodeset.tar.gz
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
would appear that you
> > only need options.
> >
> >
> > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dother.en.html#sourcel
> >
> >
> > But if for some reason you need both that is OK.
>
> I leave only options that is the one needed.
>
&
On Saturday, July 27, 2024 11:48:29 PM MST Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Soren Stoutner wrote:
> > On Saturday, July 27, 2024 5:02:13 PM MST gregor herrmann wrote:
> > > On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 12:09:08 -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> > > > 2. You have debian/baby.install,
I
have become a patient man.
> On the plus side, I reduced the time it takes to generate the
> orig.tar.xz from ~40 minutes to ~5 minutes, which should help a lot with
> testing the deletion of vendored libraries in the future!
That’s impressive. How did you accomplish that?
--
Soren
On Saturday, July 27, 2024 5:02:13 PM MST gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 12:09:08 -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> > 2. You have debian/baby.install, which works fine. If you have multiple
> > binaries you use binary-name.install for each install file. But as you
&g
Manuel,
The package is in pretty good shape. I just have a few questions that
shouldn’t be too
difficult.
THINGS THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BEFORE SPONSORSHIP
1. Your debian/control file specifies:
Rules-Requires-Root: binary-targets
This is used when the binary targets require root during
:
https://salsa.debian.org/soren/privacybrowser/-/blob/master/debian/control?
ref_type=heads
Soren
On Friday, July 26, 2024 12:51:54 PM MST Soren Stoutner wrote:
> Control: -1 owner !
> Control: -1 tags confirmed
>
> Julias and Phil,
>
> I, personally, don’t feel that this type
/master/debian/control?
ref_type=heads
On Friday, July 26, 2024 12:47:03 PM MST Soren Stoutner wrote:
> Control: -1 owner !
> Control: -1 tags confirmed
>
> Manuel,
>
> I have noted the emails going back and forth on this package. You’ve put
> forth a lot of effort and kept
gt; N: characters due to limitations in strings.
> N:
> N: Visibility: info
> N: Show-Always: no
> N: Check: binaries/spelling
>
> If we could fix this then we would be ready to mark it ready for a DD to look
> at.
>
> Regards
>
> Phil
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
up different, so be thorough.
>
> [3] 'lrc' from 'licenserecon' is located in Debian testing and newer.
>
> [4] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Mateusz,
On Thursday, July 25, 2024 11:56:23 AM MST Mateusz Łukasik wrote:
> I created new version of package with merged upstream changes as new tar.
> It is uploaded to mentors as 3.7.0+git20240706-1
Congratulations. I have sponsored the package to the NEW queue.
--
Soren Stout
e FTP masters
and ask them if they know what went wrong (and include me in the CC because I
would be interested to know as well).
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Richard,
I maintain the electrum package, which depends on python3-trezor. I would be
interested in becoming a co-maintainer of python3-trezor with you.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Google is making some progress on this issue.
https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/357543[1]
They still need to sort out the usage in:
third_party/webrtc/pc/srtp_session.cc
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
[1] https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/357543
Can you add support for building with libtiff now that upstream has included
the appropriate plumbing and removed their dependency on the private header?
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
. It includes a new program,
> otfautohint, required by the latest version of fonts-open-sans. For your
> convenience, I've prepared an update at https://salsa.debian.org/ncts/afdko.
> Please kindly update it; whether my update is used or not it's appreciated.
--
Soren Stoutn
age.
>
> --
> Akash Doppalapudi
>
> On 7/17/24 11:22 PM, Soren Stoutner wrote:
>
> > Akash,
> >
> >
> >
> > I will review your package for sponsorship.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tuesday, July 16, 2024 7:09:36 PM MST Phil Wyett wrote:
>
> 7. Install (No previous installs): Good
>
> 8. Upgrade (Over previous installs if any): N/A
>
> Summary...
>
> This is an initial submission of a very high quality - Excellent work Akash=
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
11:31:10 AM MST Mateusz Łukasik wrote:
> On 26.06.2024 at 17:52, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> > Mateusz,
> >
> > On Monday, June 10, 2024 3:58:57 PM MST Soren Stoutner wrote:
> >> I would recommend you file a bug report upstream (or otherwise contact the
> >> upstr
sponsor that upload to the NEW queue.
You might also consider taking a look at the outstanding bugs.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?repeatmerged=no&src=qutebrowser
It looks like a few of them are stale and could be closed.
Soren
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
gt; The last Sponsor I was working with preferred to have the WIP changes
> there before the work is done.
>
> If you prefer the other way, let me know and I will do the needful.
>
> Thanks for your time and looking into it
> Fritz
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signat
>
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> qutebrowser (3.1.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>[ Fritz Reichwald ]
>* Add upstream signing key to debian/upstream/signing-key.asc
>* New upstream version 3.1.0 (Closes: #1062231)
>* Add debian changes for release 3.1.0
>
> Regards,
> Fritz
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
;* Add upstream signing key to debian/upstream/signing-key.asc
>* New upstream version 3.1.0 (Closes: #1062231)
>* Add debian changes for release 3.1.0
>
> Regards,
> Fritz
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
;
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> dmidecode (3.6-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>* New upstream release (Closes: #1069767).
> - Rebase patches.
> - Remove upstream applied patches:
>+ debian/patches/0155-use_read_file.patch
> + deb
I can confirm this build failure on my local system.
Dmitry, do you have any idea off the top of your head as to the root cause? Do
you think it is related to the recent upgrade from gcc-13 13.2.0 to 13.3.0?
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
This thread indicates that, at least for now, Debian might support distutils
even though it is dropped upstream.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2024/06/msg00099.html[1]
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2024/06/msg00099.html
Mateusz,
On Monday, June 10, 2024 3:58:57 PM MST Soren Stoutner wrote:
> I would recommend you file a bug report upstream (or otherwise contact the
> upstream developer) for clarification of his intentions. My guess is that he
> will rectify the situation by changing the l
bin/filelist
> but cannot click them to see their contents.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
[1] https://sources.debian.org/src/gdal/3.9.1~rc2%2Bdfsg-1~exp1/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
out error.
>
> src/config.h
> version.h
>
> Note: This is the way I do it in this particular case, but other may have
> other solutions.
>
> [1] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds
>
> Regards
>
> Phil
Phil,
Thanks for catching this. I probably need
heck with
upstream and update the file accordingly.
Let me know when these small issues are resolved and I will be happy to
sponsor the package.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
and then upload
> the package for you.
>
> Regards
>
> Phil
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
It looks like upstream has remove the pcre dependency entirely in their
main development branch, but this change isn’t yet part of a stable
release.
https://github.com/ashaduri/gsmartcontrol/issues/40[1]
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
[1] https://github.com/ashaduri
firewall issue instead of a KDE
Connect
issue.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067873
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Thanks for the hint about nftables. I had the same problem and this pointed
me in the right direction. (In my case I just uninstalled both iptables and
nftables as I don’t use either one.)
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Control: tags -1 patch
I created a merge request at:
https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtwebengine/-/merge_requests/
26[1]
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtwebengine/-/merge_requests/
26
signature.asc
Description: This is a
WebEngine 5 is reaching end-of-life.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
[1] https://wiki.qt.io/QtWebEngine/ChromiumVersions
[2] https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt6/qt6-webengine/-/commit/
d4ea2d870d0db1afc9c16668bf537f8fac28f3d7
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
gs removed for reasons like size).
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#What_does_.2BIBw-dfsg.2BIB0_or_.2BIBw-ds.
2BIB0_in_the_version_string_mean.3F[1]
If you don’t intend to repackage the upstream tarball you probably need to
modify your
configuration to not do so.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
[1]
ren,
>
> Sorry for delay. I converted the sources into separate libraries in new
> mentors upload. The soname will change every new version.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Mateusz,
Did you have any questions about what I was asking here?
Soren
On Tuesday, February 20, 2024 2:40:04 PM MST Soren Stoutner wrote:
> Mateusz,
>
> When compiling locally on my system, the current version of lintian
(2.117.0)
> found the following problems. These are not
se about this online.
>
> This package didn't have a salsa repository created for it, I am unsure
> whether I should create a repository under my own namespace or if the
> package should be placed under the debian namespace.
>
> Thank you,
>
> --
>
On Wednesday, February 28, 2024 1:43:53 AM MST Simon Ruderich wrote:
> The problem was the -std=gnu++11 which mas missing in the regexp,
> now fixed in [1].
Thank you.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
ub.com/primer/octicons> (MIT
> Licensed SVGs)
>
> The font has only 1 glyph, Would it suffice to add this source image to
> d/missing-souces and add that copyright info to d/copyright?
I would assume so. If anyone on mentors knows differently please speak up.
> O
inified and pasted in them. While others have the sources that were
> used to generate them listed in the same folder.
>
> Should I copy these sources into the d/missing-sources directory?
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtwebe
e help me to understand
why qt5ct is including this shared library, if there are any other packages in
Debian that are building against this library, and if you feel that any of the
lintian checks above apply? If you feel they don’t apply I would recommend
you add lintian overrides and I will be
. I was
> wondering whether it would be okay to suppress these errors. Is there
> any other way to solve this?
>
> --
> Shriram Ravindranathan
>
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Control: affects -1 + python3-electrum
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
address the two bug reports at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?repeatmerged=no&src=afdko[1]
As well as looking into the problem you described at:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-fonts/2021/07/msg9.html
If you are amenable to that I can prepare MRs on Salsa and submit them
package are:
fonts-adobe-sourcesans3
fonts-adobe-source-sans3
fonts-adobe-source-sans-3
Does anyone have a strong preference as to which is used?
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
[1] https://github.com/adobe-fonts/source-sans/issues/192
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Control: tags -1 + pending
Thanks for catching this. python3-cbor is listed in build-depends, but the
system isn’t propagating that to the python3-electrum package. I will
manually add it when I package the next upstream release, which I am planning
to do in the next few days.
--
Soren
, that is something I expect to pick up through a
combination of hard work and being willing to ask questions.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: angelfish
Version: 22.11-1+b4
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
Angelfish currently depends on a private header for QQuickWebEngineDownloadItem.
See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1057755 for context.
This can be determined using the following command:
Package: kmail
Version: 4:22.12.3-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=477443
When composing an email in both plain text and HTML, the plain text is
truncated at 60 lines when the email is sent. The HTML contains the entire
message.
Source: qt6-webengine
Version: 6.4.2-final+dfsg-12
Severity: normal
Currently security patches to Qt WebEngine are not uploaded to Debian stable.
The purpose of this bug report is to track efforts to change that.
Source: usrmerge
Version: 37
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Sbuild environments based on unstable are currently broken because they cannot
update
from version 37 to version 38.
The following packages will be upgraded:
cpp-12 dpkg dpkg-dev g++-12 gcc-12 gcc-12-base
Package: blhc
Version: 0.13+git20230913.fb2c46d-1
Severity: normal
This bug appears to be a revival of #994422. It appears the that regex
exception added there needs to be slightly tweaked
to apply to all affected scenarios.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994422
It affects P
1 - 100 of 429 matches
Mail list logo
