Bug#389907: No printer in eclipse
There is no printer support available in 3.2, see http://www.eclipse.org/swt/faq.php#printOnGTK It will be available in 3.3. Stephan Michels. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#372880: eclipse can't start: problem opening page
2006/6/15, Arnaud Vandyck [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Michael Koch wrote: I can't reproduce this here on i386. Can you please make the output of /usr/bin/eclise -debug -consoleLog available? Attached. Note that when I click OK on the error window, everything disapears, but I have to C-c to stop the process (but it's not eating the cpu). Hi Arnaud! Have you tried also cacao or jamvm? I wonder if its an gcj-only problem. Eclipse on ppc with gcj works for me. Have you a special ppc machine? Stephan Michels. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344514: Man page for efj is missing
Here is the link to the Eclipse Bug report for the stand-alone formatter: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=75333 Stephan Michels.
Bug#362500: duplicated?
2006/4/24, Rafael Rodríguez [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I think this is a duplicate of #359979, found here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=359979 Wouldn't it be possible, at least, some kind of NMU? It isn't hard at all to fix... I'll will look later at that issue today or next days. Maybe Matthias knows more about the amd64 issue. Stephan Michels.
Bug#362500: duplicated?
2006/4/24, Rafael Rodríguez [EMAIL PROTECTED]: As you can see in the provided link, it's just a missing dependency... I just asked Matthias. And he said, that it is already fixed. So, I will see if I can do an upload. The problem is that we have to handle also the transition to gcj-4.1 Stephan Michels.
Bug#364368: Build-Dep on mozilla (library), please transition to xulrunner
2006/4/23, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]: It looks like your package still depends on a mozilla library in testing. As upstream declared mozilla to be dead and moved all functionality that is needed to embed gecko and friends to a new software suite (xulrunner), you should update your package to work with those. At the moment, it looks like we don't want to release etch with mozilla [1]. Yes, it is planned to use xulrunner instead of mozilla. We will make the transition as soon as possible. Stephan Michels.
Bug#359945: /usr/bin/eclipse: source is not a POSIX shell command
2006/3/29, Michal Politowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /usr/bin/eclipse is a /bin/sh script but it uses the source command, which is not specified by POSIX, to read ~/.eclipse/eclipserc. Hmm, so, what sould we use instead of source? Maybe we can use . ~/.eclipse/eclipserc instead ... Stephan Michels
Bug#362500: eclipse uninstallable for amd64
2006/4/13, Joel Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]: eclipse version 3.1.1-8 is uninstallable on my amd64 box due to the mixed upgrade to 3.1.2-1 in the repository. You are right. I didn't noticed it before.It affects me too, because I use a powerpc, which also not available. @Michael: Do you know what goes wrong? Stephan Michels
Bug#357301: eclipse randomly crashes, usually at startup
2006/3/16, César Enrique García Dabó [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I am trying to use eclipse in my testing/unstable system. Each time I start eclipse with j2se it crashes randomly. Sometimes it doesn`t go beyond the splashscreen, other times it crashes just after the framework has been showed, and other times (not often) it crashes when trying to open a project or a menu option. I append the error report file created by java. Also a window is showed with the command line options, I reproduced it below. The java version used is: Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (Blackdown-1.4.2-03 mixed mode) The stack trace seems to end at org.eclipse.jface.bindings.keys.formatting.AbstractKeyFormatter.format(Lorg/eclipse/jface/bindings/keys/KeyStroke;)Ljava/lang/String;+57 , which doesn't execute any native code. So I can exclude any problem which may occur with the SWT libs. I would assume that it is an error of your vm. As we do not support closed source software, you have to contact someone else. I have tried with sable-vm, but it randomly get hang, without response. I have also tried with kaffe, but it runs tremondously slowly and finally it also crashes (I found no log file). I don't know much sablevm and it is known that kaffe is very slow. And a new package for kaffe 1.1.7 is not available ATM. I have good experiences with gcj and cacao, which you should try. As I don't see any bugs I can solve, I will close this report. Stephan Michels.
Bug#355104: Me Too!
2006/3/17, Benjamin Eastep [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I am also experiencing this bug (on one of my two machines), however purging reinstalling the eclipse packages did not solve the problem for me. Eclipse packages are all 3.1.2-1 Can you please open a separate report for your problem if it still exists as you seems to have a different problem. And please run eclipse with -clean -consolelog -debug to get more information. I will close this report, because the original author has resolved his problem. Thank you, Stephan Michels.
Bug#358594: eclipse binary, desktop/menu things should be in eclipse-platform
2006/3/23, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Package: eclipse Version: 3.1.2 Forwarded from https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/eclipse/+bug/35871 I have just installed eclipse-platform-gcj on dapper and I have no /usr/bin/eclipse script anywhere on my system. It appears this is supposed to be in the eclipse-platform-common package but it's not. Even though it shouldn't be required, I tried installing the full eclipse package and sure enough /usr/bin/eclipse was hiding there. This is not a viable solution, however, as the eclipse package additionally requires me to install: ant-optional, eclipse-jdt, eclipse-jdt-common, eclipse-pde, eclipse-pde-common, eclipse-source, junit None of which I want to install. It seems that the core eclipse-platform files like /usr/bin/eclipse should either be moved back to eclipse-platform-common or the SDK files (and required dependencies) should be moved back into the eclipse-sdk package as it used to be. The eclipse executeable should be in the eclipse package. eclipse-platform-gcj is not a stand-alone package Through the installation of the eclipse package you ensure that you have everything installed. If you don't install all eclipse packages, then you will have missing dependencies in eclipse if you don't install for example the pde plugins. Eclipse won't work correctly without patching the features. And even if it works with patching of the features, I don't think it's a good idea, because other plugins can depend on the core plugins and then they will missing some plugins. @Michael: I really think its a better idea to a have one package, The current situation caused to much troubles. What do you think? Stephan Michels.
Bug#356028: eclipse-ecj is version 3.1.0, not 3.1.2
2006/3/9, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]: if ecj-java works, ecj-java -help still says it's version 3.1.0, not 3.1.2 Hmm, doesn't happen to me: $ ecj-java -help | grep 3.1 testing /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-ibm...Eclipse Java Compiler v_585_R31x, 3.1.2 release, Copyright IBM Corp 2000, 2006. All rights reserved. $ ecj-java -v testing /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-ibm...Eclipse Java Compiler v_585_R31x, 3.1.2 release, Copyright IBM Corp 2000, 2006. All rights reserved. $ ecj -v Eclipse Java Compiler v_585_R31x, 3.1.2 release, Copyright IBM Corp 2000, 2006. All rights reserved. Does it still occur? Thank you, Stephan Michels.
Bug#361696: libswt3.1-gtk-jni: Coarse dependencies
2006/4/9, Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Please put the Gnome and Mozilla shared libraries into their own binary packages to reduce the coarseness of libswt3.1-gtk-jni's dependencies. If I put the jni libraries into separate packages, then I have to separate the swt java lib too. This is much work and I don't see any benefit I would gain. Moreover swt wasn't design my the eclipse team to be apportionable. Do you see any reason why we should do it? Thank you, Stephan Michels.
Bug#352184: eclipse: cannot build from source with firefox support
2006/2/10, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The support for firefox-dev is for Ubuntu. It doenst exist on Debian. That is intentional. We removed the Dependencies on firefox becuase it just doesnt work. We are still investigating this. The only thing that works currently is the mozilla-browser. firefox misses some symbol in its libraries. When this solved we will readd the other browsers. I think we should switch to xulrunner. Using firefox for the browser bindings wasn't very successful and I don't want to install the mozilla browser only because of the browser bindings. Hopefully I can try it later with xulrunner. Stephan Michels.
Bug#361692: libswt3.1-gtk-jni: Conflicts with libswt-gnome-gtk-3.1-jni
2006/4/9, Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Unpacking libswt3.1-gtk-jni (from .../libswt3.1-gtk-jni_3.1.2-1_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libswt3.1-gtk-jni_3.1.2-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/jni/libswt-gnome-gtk-3139.so', which is also in package libswt-gnome-gtk-3.1-jni To have the same swt lib into two different packages was not our intention. It would be good to have one swt lib in the archive, then such things won't occur. Is it possible to merge your swt package with our swt package? Can we resolve the current situation somehow? Thank you, Stephan Michels..
Bug#356027: eclipse-ecj installation error
2006/3/9, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]: $ ecj-java -help cat: /etc/eclipse/java_home: No such file or directory Could not find a suitable JVM. maybe missing dependencies? It's not sure, that /etc/eclipse/java_home exists. Yes, seems so. java_home is installed by the eclipse package, but eclipse-ecj does only depend on eclipse-jdt-eclipse-platform-eclipse-rcp Stephan Michels.
Bug#356497: libswt3.1-gtk-java: depends on mozilla-browser on i386
On 3/12/06, J. Woch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (only) for i386 platforms, the package still depends on mozilla-browser. this should be replaced to something generic. Like what for example? xulrunner is not in a useable stage yet. And firefox is a pile of crap.
Bug#330238: RFP: xom -- tree-based API for processing XML with Java
Hi, I almost finshed a package for XOM, which I need for the package of CDK. At the moment I must wait until Wolfgang Baer upload a new version of libjaxen-java. Stephan Michels.
Bug#352184: eclipse: cannot build from source with firefox support
On 2/10/06, Bastian Kleineidam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the latest upload required me to install mozilla-browser, so I tried to build eclipse with firefox support. This adds a firefox-dev build dependency, which does not exist. So it is impossible to build eclipse with firefox support on Debian. Please enable the build with firefox on Debian, or even better, support both packages - firefox and mozilla - like the last version. We don't like Firefox anymore, and we won't support it any longer because of his bugs. Hmm, just kidding. We run into many difficulties with Firefox (1.4.99), and we trying to fix these first. If you try to build the package by your own, then change the variable in rules to with_browser := firefox
Bug#352178: eclipse: Error reading configuration
On 2/10/06, Mateusz Kaduk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I start eclipse I get exception about configuration file An error has occurred. See the log file /usr/share/eclipse/configuration/1139562299034.log. If chmod o+w /usr/share/eclipse/configuration then it creates dirs in /usr/share/eclipse/configuration and start. I changed the order of some lines and make a diff between your log output and mine: @@ -5,15 +5,15 @@ -jar /usr/share/eclipse/startup.jar -os linux -ws gtk --arch ppc +-arch x86 -launcher /usr/lib/eclipse/eclipse -name Eclipse -showsplash 600 --exitdata a00019 +-exitdata 300015 -install /usr/share/eclipse -debug -consolelog --vm /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java +-vm /usr/lib/j2sdk1.5-sun/bin/java -vmargs -Djava.library.path=/usr/lib/jni -Dgnu.gcj.precompiled.db.path=/var/lib/gcj-4.0/classmap.db @@ -25,10 +25,6 @@ Configuration file: file:/usr/share/eclipse/configuration/config.ini loaded Configuration location: -file:/home/stephan/.eclipse/org.eclipse.platform_3.1.2/configuration/ -Configuration file: - file:/home/stephan/.eclipse/org.eclipse.platform_3.1.2/configuration/config.ini not found or not read -Shared configuration location: file:/usr/share/eclipse/configuration/ Framework located: file:/usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.osgi_3.1.2.jar @@ -40,4 +36,4 @@ /usr/lib/eclipse/eclipse-nameEclipse-showsplash600/usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.platform_3.1.2/splash.bmp Debug options: -file:/home/stephan/.options not found +file:/home/mateusz/.options not found It seems that eclipse doesn't use .eclipse/org.eclipse.platform_3.1.2/configuration/ as your configuration directory. With your exception in the log I think it can't create a temporary lock file in .eclipse/org.eclipse.platform_3.1.2/configuration/org.eclipse.osgi/.manager: .tmpys9gk6.instance for example. Can you try to create this file to see if you have some weird problems with your file system. Stephan Michels.
Bug#351518: NPE occurs if I try the Jmol applet
Package: gcjwebplugin Version: 0.3.2-1 I got following exception if I try the jmol applet for example from http://jmol.sourceforge.net/demo/dots/ : java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range: 0 at java.lang.String.charAt(int) (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(java.lang.String, boolean) (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(java.lang.String) (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0) at gnu.gcjwebplugin.AppletViewer.createApplet(gnu.gcjwebplugin.AppletTag) (Unknown Source) at gnu.gcjwebplugin.PluginAppletWindow.setHandle(long) (Unknown Source) at gnu.gcjwebplugin.PluginAppletViewer.start(java.io.InputStream, java.io.OutputStream) (Unknown Source) at gnu.gcjwebplugin.AppletViewer.main(java.lang.String[]) (Unknown Source) at gnu.java.lang.MainThread.call_main() (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0) at gnu.java.lang.MainThread.run() (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0) Maybe ClassLoader.loadClass() is called with and should throw a ClassNotFoundException instead. I packaged a little testcase, which can download from: http://vern.chem.tu-berlin.de/~stephan/software/jmol-test.tar.gz Stephan Michels
Bug#350729: cacao: Incorrect result due to computations in extended precision on x86 (regression)
On 1/31/06, Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: According to the Java specifications, computations must correspond to the IEEE-754 double precision, and the result is incorrect. Package cacao 0.93-4 did not have this problem: z = 9.007199254740994E15 d = 0.0 Thank you for finding this bug. I got a patch from Christian Thalinger and the problem should be fixed in the next upload. Stephan Michels.
Bug#347749: eclipse-platform-common: allow documented -vmargs for /usr/bin/eclipse
On 1/12/06, Bastian Kleineidam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the current /usr/bin/eclipse script does not allow the -vmargs option. The patch scans for -vmargs and appends the custom options for the native eclipse binary. This way, I can run eclipse -vmargs -Xmx512 for example. Thank you for the patch, should be fix in 3.1.1-9. I fixed also -install, maybe it can be useful in some situations. Stephan Michels.
Bug#345756: eclipse-platform-common: The included patch fixes the problem (at least for me)
On 1/5/06, Yaacov Akiba Slama [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +OFS=$IFS +IFS=: What's the function fo OFS and IFS ? Anyway thank you for the patch, Sephan Michels
Bug#345677: eclipse: Eclipse doesn't start
On 1/3/06, Vedran Furač [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Arrgh, you can close this bug. The main reason I got these errors is existence of redundant libswt-gtk-3.1-java package in the archive and azureus depending on it. You should fix this ASAP. libswt-gtk-3.1-java is a separate package and has nothing to do with the Eclipse package. You shouldn't get problems if you install this package. Are you sure that Eclipse doesn't start if you install libswt-gtk-3.1-java? Also, I think that eclipse-source package isn't essential for eclipse. The org.eclipse.sdk feature depend on the source features and plugins. If we make this package optional, then we get complains from the framework. Stephan Michels.
Bug#344514: Man page for efj is missing
Package: eclipse-efj Version: 3.1.1-6 Man page for efj is missing. The option -help or similars doesn't work. Stephan Michels.
Bug#343315: Eclipse man page has no description for the -clean option
tag 343315 + pending On 12/14/05, Aldous D. Penaranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed that the eclipse manual page is lacking a description for the -clean option. I'm not very familiar with the current eclipse options as some of them might be missing in the man page too so consider this as a sort of reminder to update the manual page. Okay, I updated the man page with the missing commandline options. Most of them were missing because they are directed to OSGi framework. Stephan Michels.
Bug#344178: Installing plugins makes eclipse not startup anymore
On 12/21/05, Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 09:02 +0100, Michael Koch wrote: I raise the severity of this bug to important as it is really annoying that its not so easy to install plugins via this mechanism. We will need to take a deep breath and think about a solution for this. I wonder what fedora does in this case. There is something strange going on. Although it is completely repeatable for me locally Stephan cannot repeat it and installing these plugins does work for him. To be honest, I'm not working with gcj all the time. So the problem might depend on gcj. Billy give us a hint where the problem can be: I debugged this problem with pascal before. What's happening is that when you install something with the update manager, it refreshes the set of installed plugins. gcj will sometimes cause the file to be blank, because of some writing failure. When this happens, OSGi things you want to uninstall all plugins, and so it does once they've been uninstalled, you're screwed, it won't be able to resolve anything when you start up again. Stephan Michels
Bug#344177: eclipse: Eclipse CDT missing
On 12/21/05, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But there is already two (?) ITP bugs for CDT. No need to file another one. Found only one, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=195236 Michael comitted a cdt package to pkg-java, which is in a pretty good shape. I use it for some time now without problems. So, I think it's ready for an upload. Is there a way I can try out this package? Well, I'm still not happy with the package but lets share it. I will upload to the archive today. I changed some minor bits. So please wait one second because until I have rebuild the package. *I wish I had a faster computer* Stephan Michels.
Bug#344177: eclipse: Eclipse CDT missing
On 12/20/05, Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The CDT seems to be missing. Or I might not know which package it is in. I would expect eclipse-cdt, but that package doesn't seem to exist. CDT is not part of the eclipse package. It would be better if you file a RFP(Request for package) against WNPP, but anyway... Michael comitted a cdt package to pkg-java, which is in a pretty good shape. I use it for some time now without problems. So, I think it's ready for an upload. What do you think Michael?
Bug#344178: Installing plugins makes eclipse not startup anymore
On 12/20/05, Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't try installing these plugins on Debian (eclipse 3.1.1-6) it will seem to install nicely and restart eclipse at first but then on a later startup of eclipse it will complain about Bundle org.eclipse.compare version 3.1.1 has already been installed from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/org.eclipse.compare_3.1.1.jar and The update site has also the plugin org.eclipse.compare_3.1.1.jar, which comes with the eclipse package itself. I wonder why the update site includes the plugin. Maybe for pre-3.1.1 versions of eclipse... org.eclipse.core.runtime.CoreException[1]: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.eclipse.ui.internal.ide.IDEApplication. If this happens then the fix is to rm -rf ~/.eclipse (this will remove all your settings!). Hmm, I installed both plugins(btw great additions) without problems. Unfortunately, the bugzilla plugin eats all my cpu power if it tries to retrieve the bugzilla data. Better try the -clean option instead of removing the ~/.eclipse folder. Stephan Michels.
Bug#343315: Eclipse man page has no description for the -clean option
On 12/14/05, Aldous D. Penaranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed that the eclipse manual page is lacking a description for the -clean option. I'm not very familiar with the current eclipse options as some of them might be missing in the man page too so consider this as a sort of reminder to update the manual page. Not only -clean is missing. There other options as well, which doesn't occur in the man page. It's on my todo list to update the man page. Thank you.
Bug#342338: eclipse-rcp: prerm script fails if directories are not empty
Should be fixed in 3.1.1-7. Thank you for reporting the issue. Stephan Michels.
Bug#343089: eclipse-platform-common: Eclipse Help: Invalid Links to API Reference
On 12/12/05, Markus Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The links points to help/topic/org.eclipse.platform.doc.isv/reference/api/overview-summary.html, but this file is not available in eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.platform.doc.isv_3.1.1/doc.zip/reference/api. Yes, this is known bug of gjdoc and should be fixed in the upstream of gjdoc. Unfortunately gjdoc suffers currently from another bug of gcj and we can't create a new release for it. As soon there is a new release of gjdoc this issue should be fixed.
Bug#343114: eclipse: please, add menu entry for eclipse
There exist a menu entry for Eclipse in Applications/Development/Eclipse . Which Desktop or WindowManager do you use? Stephan Michels.
Bug#342341: eclipse: too many unneeded dependencies
On 12/7/05, Erwan David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: eclipse Severity: normal sudo apt-get -u install eclipse Password: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done The following extra packages will be installed: dbus-1 dbus-glib-1 eclipse-jdt eclipse-jdt-common eclipse-pde eclipse-pde-common eclipse-platform eclipse-platform-common eclipse-rcp eclipse-rcp-common eclipse-source gconf2 gconf2-common gnome-keyring gnome-mime-data junit libbcel-java libbonobo2-0 libbonobo2-common libbonoboui2-0 libbonoboui2-common libcommons-beanutils-java libcommons-collections-java libcommons-collections3-java libcommons-dbcp-java libcommons-digester-java libcommons-el-java libcommons-fileupload-java libcommons-launcher-java libcommons-logging-java libcommons-modeler-java libcommons-pool-java libfam0c102 libgconf2-4 libgnome-keyring0 libgnome2-0 libgnome2-common libgnomecanvas2-0 libgnomecanvas2-common libgnomeui-0 libgnomeui-common libgnomevfs2-0 libgnomevfs2-common libhal-storage0 libhal0 libjsch-java liblog4j1.2-java liblucene-java liblucene-java-doc libmx4j-java liborbit2 libregexp-java libscrollkeeper0 libservlet2.4-java libsmbclient libswt3.1-gtk-java libswt3.1-gtk-jni libtomcat5-java mozilla-browser scrollkeeper shared-mime-info zenity Which means 195 MB on disk... eclipse does not need gnome, so there is a dependency problem on this side. Same thing with mozilla-browser. The gnome libraries are needed for SWT, for example org.eclipse.swt.program.Program to get informations about the mine type and icons etc. for a given file. It seems that the SWT libraries handle the case if the gnome libs doesn't exist properly. But I don't think it's a good idea to remove the dependencies. Maybe a solution is to use recommendations instead. And the dependency to mozila-broser is needed for the SWT Browser widget. You should be able to use firefox instead, but nevertheless a browser is needed. In any case this makes the package uninstallable here (no gnome). Sad to hear, but to be honest if you can't spare 195 MB of diskspace then you won't have much fun with Eclipse. I tend to tag the report as WONTFIX, but wait on an opinion from Michael Koch.
Bug#342695: eclipse: debian/copyright file doesn't seem to be accurate anymore
On 12/9/05, Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: According to the package debian/copyright file, Eclipse seems to be released under the CPL. But eclipse.org website states that, from version 3.1 on, Eclipse has completed the migration[1] from the CPL to the EPL[2]. [1] http://www.eclipse.org/legal/cpl2epl/ [2] http://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/epl-v10.html IIUC, you should update the debian/copyright file accordingly. Thank you for reporting this. Should be fixed in 3.1.1-7 Stephan Michels.
Bug#342789: eclipse: Eclipse crashes at startup
Can you please try to execute eclipse with the -clean argument?
Bug#342789: eclipse: Eclipse crashes at startup
On 12/10/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Stephan Michels [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Can you please try to execute eclipse with the -clean argument? Thanks for your quick answer. Same problem with eclipse -clean : Can you please send the list of eclipse packages you have installed with dpkg -l | grep eclipse Thank you, Stephan Michels.
Bug#342789: eclipse: Eclipse crashes at startup
No pb. I'm sorry but I'm a eclipse/java devel beginner so I don't know what could help. Your help is very appreciated. AFAICS your installation seems to be fine. ii libgcj6-src4.0.2-5j2 libgcj java sources for use in eclipse Interesting! Didn't know this one. Can you execute following line for me and send the logfile, maybe we can get more information by this. eclipse -consolelog -debug | tee eclipse.log Which architecture do you use? Thank you.
Bug#304517: ITP: cacao -- Java virtual machine
I tried the to contact the original author of the ITP report, but got no respond. Meanwhile I create an own package, see http://vern.chem.tu-berlin.de/~stephan/software/upload/ If nobody file a protest then I will take-over the ITP.
Bug#342305: eclipse: today installation erase all data in /usr/local/lib
On 12/7/05, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Have you upgraded other packages recently that could have been to | blame for removing /usr/local/lib? In fact, the symbolic link /usr/local was delete and only eclipse stuff was in it. Well, there's no code that I can see in eclipse that would touch a /usr/local symlink. eclipse-rcp.prerm should remove only /usr/local/lib/eclipse if it's empty, just like the python package. Before /usr/local/lib/eclipse was part of eclipse-platform.dirs, which wasn't good. Maybe the conversion was guilty for the lost of your /usr/local/lib/eclipse directory. But /usr/local/lib or /usr/local should be touched. I can't replay it to give you more informations: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# LANG=C apt-get install --reinstall eclipse-rcp Reading package lists... 0% Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 86 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/19.1kB of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? (Reading database ... 364668 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace eclipse-rcp 3.1.1-6 (using .../eclipse-rcp_3.1.1-6_i386.deb) ... dpkg: warning - old pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/eclipse-rcp_3.1.1-6_i386.deb (--unpack): ~ subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: ~ /var/cache/apt/archives/eclipse-rcp_3.1.1-6_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Heh, now that's a bug I can confirm; the prerm will fail because it calls rmdir on directories that may not be empty, and doesn't trap the errors. I will look at it, thanks. Stephan Michels.
Bug#341101: eclipse-platform-common: Eclipse Help not working
On 11/28/05, Markus Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/catalina/realm/MemoryRealm From the original Eclipse build I saw that the missing class MemoryRealm is located in eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.tomcat_4.1.30.1/catalina.jar, but in the Debian version it is not. Maybe this is because it uses Tomcat5 instead of Tomcat4 like the original? Does this mean that /usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.tomcat_4.1.30.1/catalina.jar is missing or the class within this jar is missing? Does the jar /usr/share/tomcat5/server/lib/catalina.jar exists? The problem have maybe something to do with the symbolic link /usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.tomcat_5.0.30/catalina.jar - ../../../tomcat5/server/lib/catalina.jar Michael, shouldn't it point to /usr/share ? Stephan Michels.
Bug#341101: eclipse-platform-common: Eclipse Help not working
On 11/28/05, Markus Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The class file is missing within catalina.jar. The jar file exists and the symbolic link is correct. Which version of the tomcat5 package do you have installed?
Bug#341101: eclipse-platform-common: Eclipse Help not working - Solution?
On 11/28/05, Markus Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just found out that the missing class (org/apache/catalina/realm/MemoryRealm) is located in catalina-optional.jar instead of catalina.jar. But this jar file is not referenced in the manifest.mf, so eclipse does not know about it. So I added catalina-optional.jar to plugins/org.eclipse.tomcat_4.1.30.1/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF and *wow* it worked - the help system is running! The manifest in eclipse-platform-common should be fixed since 3.1.1-3. I have following lines in the manifest of the Tomcat plugin: Bundle-ClassPath: tomcatwrapper.jar, catalina.jar, bootstrap.jar, commons-beanutils.jar, commons-collections.jar, commons-digester.jar, commons-logging-api.jar, commons-modeler.jar, jasper-compiler.jar, jasper-runtime.jar, naming-common.jar, naming-factory.jar, naming-resources.jar, servlets-common.jar, servlets-default.jar, servlets-invoker.jar, servlets-manager.jar, tomcat-coyote.jar, tomcat-http11.jar, tomcat-util.jar, mx4j-jmx.jar, servlet-api.jar, jakarta-regexp-1.3.jar, catalina-optional.jar, jsp-api.jar, commons-el.jar
Bug#339435: Solved with 1.0.2-2
On 11/28/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After installing libcairo=1.0.2-2, everything works as it should. The package libswt3.1-jni should have a dependency to libcairo2 (= 1.0.2). I wonder how you could installed it without 1.0.2...
Bug#254535: eclipse: Conflict with plugins directory
On 11/28/05, Mateusz Kaduk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: eclipse Version: 3.1.1-5 Followup-For: Bug #254535 Plugin's perspective doesnt work What do you mean with doesn't work? Not available? Error message in the error log view? , eclipse dont recognize plugins directory with installed plugins in home directory. Probably conflict with directory from package. Works for me. Which plugins did you downloaded? Do you get a error message? What conflicts? Downloading additional plugins from update site takes hours! Which JVM do you used? If you used gcj have you also tested Sun's or IBM's vm?
Bug#304517: ITP: cacao -- Java virtual machine
Hi, I want ask about the status of the package. Cacao released 0.92 since the intial ITP and will release a new version in the next weeks. Is there inital work on the package I can look into? Do you have remaining interest to package cacao? Stephan Michels
Bug#335242: /usr/local/lib/eclipse
I added a postinst and prerm script to eclipse-platform, which creates directories for /usr/local/lib/eclipse(/plugins,/features) and chown them to root:staff and chmod to 2775, just like the scripts of python2.(3,4). The changes will be included in 3.1.1-5 $ ls -la /usr/local/lib/eclipse/ insgesamt 16 drwxrwsr-x 4 root staff 4096 2005-11-09 15:33 . drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 4096 2005-11-09 15:33 .. drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 2005-11-09 15:33 features drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 2005-11-09 15:33 plugins For the sym link within /usr/local/lib/eclipse I'm not sure if it is a good idea, Thank you, Stephan Michels.
Bug#338209: Errors in product configuration wizard
Package: eclipse-sdk Version: 3.1.1-3 The product configuration wizard reachable over Help/Software Updates/Manage configuration shows an error for Eclipse project SDK 3.1.1 I get following errors in properties/status: Included feature Eclipse Platform version 3.1.1 contains problems. Included feature org.eclipse.platform.source_3.1.1 is missing. Included feature org.eclipse.jdt.source_3.1.1 is missing. Included feature org.eclipse.pde.source_3.1.1 is missing.
Bug#336453: eclipse-platform: feature.xml cannot be found
Okay, should be fixed in the next release. $ dpkg -L eclipse-source | grep features/org.eclipse.platform.source_3.1.1/feature.xml /usr/lib/eclipse/features/org.eclipse.platform.source_3.1.1/feature.xml /usr/share/eclipse/features/org.eclipse.platform.source_3.1.1/feature.xml Stephan Michels.
Bug#336338: eclipse doesn't start
Do you have libswt3.1-gtk-java and libswt3.1-gtk-jni with the version 3.1.1-3 installed? Do following sym. link exist? $ ls -la /usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.ppc_3.1.1.jar lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 2005-10-30 12:44 /usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.ppc_3.1.1.jar - ../../../share/java/swt-gtk-3.1.jar Stephan Michels.
Bug#336453: eclipse-platform: feature.xml cannot be found
On 10/30/05, Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: eclipse-platform Version: 3.1.1-3 Severity: normal I can't install new extensions (features), I always get the error message Error creating feature file://usr/lib/eclipse/features/org.eclipse.platform \ .source_3.1.1 [/usr/lib/eclipse/features/org.eclipse.platform.source_3.1.1/feature.xml (No such file or directory) The file /usr/lib/eclipse/features/org.eclipse.platform.source_3.1.1/feature.xml should be installed by eclipse-platform-common package. $ ls -la /usr/share/eclipse/features/org.eclipse.platform_3.1.1/feature.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 9633 2005-10-30 11:12 /usr/share/eclipse/features/org.eclipse.platform_3.1.1/feature.xml Do you have the package eclipse-platform-common with the version 3.1.1-3 installed? Does the file exist? Thank you, Stephan Michels.
Bug#336389: eclipse-sdk: crashes on startup
On 10/30/05, Benoît Dejean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: eclipse-sdk Version: 3.1.1-3 Severity: normal I've just installed eclipse-sdk $ eclipse searching for compatible vm... testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj...found and boom. I'm attaching the error log. !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 2005-10-30 01:25:07.545 !MESSAGE Bundle [EMAIL PROTECTED]/org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.ppc_3.1.1.jar [65] was not resolved. Looks like the same as #336338. Stephan Michels.
Bug#336285: libswt3.1-gtk-java: Please change dependency for mozilla-browser
On 10/29/05, Michael Bergbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: libswt3.1-gtk-java depends on mozilla-browser. In case you've installed firefox, you'll need to additionally install another browser. Isn't it possible to change the dependency so that other web browsers that are already installed also fullful the depency? Should be fixed in the next release, so that you can use Firefox instead of the mozilla-browser. Stephan Michels.
Bug#336338: eclipse doesn't start
I have troubles to reproduce your problem. Can you remove your ~/.eclipse directory, and look if it change your situation. And please backup your ~/.eclipse directory before, so if it is the reason for your problem, then we can maybe solve it. Thank you, Stephan Michels.
Bug#323564: monodevelop crash after splash dialog
Package: monodevelop Version: 0.7-2 Severity: important Monodevelop crash after the splash dialog was shown. I got following output: monodevelop 2005-08-17 12:00:24,103 [-1210345792] INFO MonoDevelop.Services.ILoggingService [(null)] - Reading /home/stephan/.config/MonoDevelop/CodeCompletionData/mscorlib_1.0.5000.0_b77a5c561934e089.pidb 2005-08-17 12:00:24,322 [-1210345792] INFO MonoDevelop.Services.ILoggingService [(null)] - WARNING Could not find stock Icons.16x16.FindPrevIcon 2005-08-17 12:00:24,331 [-1210345792] INFO MonoDevelop.Services.ILoggingService [(null)] - WARNING Could not find stock gtk-stop 2005-08-17 12:00:24,467 [-1210345792] INFO MonoDevelop.Services.ILoggingService [(null)] - Creating DefaultWorkbench Loading error, please reinstall : System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object in 0x00111 Gdl.DockLayout:SetupObject (System.Xml.XmlNode node) in 0x0009d Gdl.DockLayout:RecursiveBuild (System.Xml.XmlNode parentNode, Gdl.DockObject parent) in 0x00160 Gdl.DockLayout:Load (System.Xml.XmlNode node) in 0x0006d Gdl.DockLayout:LoadLayout (System.String name) in 0x000b0 MonoDevelop.Gui.SdiWorkbenchLayout:set_CurrentLayout (System.String value) in 0x001ca MonoDevelop.Gui.SdiWorkbenchLayout:SwitchContext (MonoDevelop.Gui.WorkbenchContext ctxt) in 0x00296 MonoDevelop.Gui.SdiWorkbenchLayout:CreateDefaultLayout () in 0x00640 MonoDevelop.Gui.SdiWorkbenchLayout:Attach (IWorkbench wb) in 0x00050 MonoDevelop.Gui.DefaultWorkbench:set_WorkbenchLayout (IWorkbenchLayout value) in 0x00037 MonoDevelop.Gui.WorkbenchSingleton:SetWbLayout () in 0x7 MonoDevelop.Gui.WorkbenchSingleton:CreateWorkspace () in 0x00044 MonoDevelop.Commands.InitializeWorkbenchCommand:Run () in 0x007ac MonoDevelop.SharpDevelopMain:Main (System.String[] args) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages monodevelop depends on: ii gnome-icon-theme 2.10.1-2 GNOME Desktop icon theme ii gnome-terminal [x-termina 2.10.0-2 The GNOME 2 terminal emulator appl ii libgconf2.0-cil 1.9.5-2CLI binding for GConf 2.0, unstabl ii libgecko2.0-cil 0.10-2 CLI binding for the GtkMozEmbed li ii libglade2.0-cil 1.9.5-2CLI binding for the Glade librarie ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.0-1The GLib library of C routines ii libglib2.0-cil1.9.5-2CLI binding for the GLib utility l ii libgnome2.0-cil 1.9.5-2CLI binding for GNOME 2.0, unstabl ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.9-1The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libgtk2.0-cil 1.9.5-2CLI binding for the Gtk+ toolkit 2 ii libgtksourceview1.0-0 1.2.0-2shared libraries for the GTK+ synt ii libgtksourceview2.0-cil 0.10-1 CLI binding for the gtksourceview ii mono-classlib-1.0 1.1.8.2-1 Mono class library (1.0) ii mono-jit 1.1.8.2-1 fast CLI (.NET) JIT compiler for M ii mono-mcs 1.1.8.2-1 Mono C# compiler ii monodoc-base 1.0.6-3shared MonoDoc binaries ii monodoc-manual1.0.6-3compiled XML documentation from th ii pkg-config0.19-1 manage compile and link flags for ii xterm [x-terminal-emulato 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X terminal emulator monodevelop recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323571: Update dependency to libcairo2 for libgcj6-awt
Package: libgcj6-awt Version: 4.0.1-4 Severity: important AFAIK libgcj6-awt depend on libcairo0.6.0, which is no more available in unstable. Please update your dependency to libcairo 0.9.0 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages libgcj6-awt depends on: ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.1-2 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.5-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcairo0.6.0 0.6.0-1The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libfontconfig12.3.2-1generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-4 GCC support library ii libgcj6 4.0.1-4Java runtime library for use with ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.0-1The GLib library of C routines ii libglitz1 0.4.4-1Glitz OpenGL image compositing lib ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.9-1The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.2-1Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpixman10.1.6-1Cairo pixel manipulation library ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System protocol client li ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0-2 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxtst6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System event recording an ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-3 compression library - runtime libgcj6-awt recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#276096: Eclipse Debian package status
Unfortunately he removed the Eclipse packages from his site, and has not yet responded to these email inquiries. Does anyone have a copy of the 3.1 packages that he released? http://www.backports.org/~mkoch/unstable/ He moved the packages to backports.org Stephan Michels.
