Source: libc6
Version: 2.13-38+deb7u8
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
This is a possible regression of #694962 which is present in wheezy.
It has been fixed in redhat: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552960
And the reproducers attached to the redhat defect cause the problem in
Hi,
I've prepared a new up to date package, with localization support and
such...
Source package is here:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dcraw/dcraw_9.12+debian-1.dsc
Hi,
This does't appear to be a source package, merely the description file.
I will certainly have a look at
Package: network-manager
Version: 0.8.1-6+squeeze1
Severity: normal
Problem also exists running as a guest OS in VMware Fusion on a Mac. If the
VM is running when I put the host OS to sleep, then a few minutes after I
wake the host network-manager will realize that the DHCP address has expired
hardware supports more than 8 bits per
colour, except some nvidia cards.
If you don't mind I will close the bug.
Regards,
--
Steve King
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
releasing new packages. If you
want to email me any, I would be most grateful.
Thanks for your interest in dcraw.
Regards,
--
Steve King
John Zaitseff wrote:
Dear Steve et al.,
As already mentioned in previous e-mails to this bug report, a newer
version of dcraw is available. The current version
Thanks for you email,
dcraw on debian is woefully out of date, but I am working on it.
If you would be able to, a raw image from your camera would be very
useful for me to add to my testing of the package.
Would you be able to email me an image, I would be most grateful.
Regards,
--
Steve
image you have with white and primary colours that are identifiable
by their context within the picture would be ideal. Otherwise any
picture you have would be great.
Thanks,
--
Steve
Joerg Platte wrote:
Am Montag, 14. Juli 2008 schrieb Steve King:
Hi,
Can you verify that the current version
Hi Kurt,
Can you email some sample pics.
Preferably with white, and good primary colours identifiable from the
context of the image.
Thanks,
--
Steve King
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi John,
Can you verify that the current version in unstable fixes your issues?
Or can you send me some example raw images?
Thanks,
--
Steve King
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for
me to pass them on, that would be easier.
I am particularly interested in images with white, and clear colours
that can be identified by their context within the photo.
Thanks,
--
Steve King
Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
Package: dcraw
Version: 8.86-1
Severity: wishlist
Version 8.86 has been
Can we close this bug now, and update
dcraw/gimp-dcraw/ufraw/digikam/rawstudio etc. ?!
I'm currently waiting for a response from my sponsor,
The package is allegedly all ready to go, but I cannot upload it myself.
I will chase...
--
Steve King
Steve King wrote:
Package: dcraw
Version: 7.02-1
Severity: serious
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007, Steve King wrote:
However I would appreciate it if the assembled masses of legal
experts could confirm that they agree that this is the case.
There's actually an even more fundamental problem with dcraw.c
Package: dcraw
Version: 7.02-1
Severity: serious
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007, Steve King wrote:
However I would appreciate it if the assembled masses of legal
experts could confirm that they agree that this is the case.
There's actually an even more fundamental problem with dcraw.c
.
My query on debian-legal was with respect to the current license text,
rather than the historical license that applies to the version in debian.
However I will raise your comments with Mr Coffin.
Thanks for your help.
--
Steve King
Don Armstrong wrote:
Package: dcraw
Version: 7.02-1
Severity
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steve King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: ipfilter
Version : 4.1.10
Upstream Author : Darren Reed darrenr (at) pobox (dot) com
* URL : http://coombs.anu.edu.au/~avalon/ip_fil4.1.10.tar.gz
* License : BSD
Description
Package: installation
Severity: important
After installing debian sarge on a solaris 9 box, in a dual boot setup,
I find that the debian installer has made solaris 9 non-bootable.
Solaris complains that the physical geometry of the disk does not match
that recorded in the disklabel, and panics.
not use /var/run/rsync.pid if you are going to run
# rsync out of the init.d script.
provided you agree that the meaning is equivalent.
--
Steve King
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7-smp
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859
... time passes ...
After thrashing for many hours, my machine has found the second point of
failure.
$ pi 646456594 pi646456594
$ pi 646456595 pi646456595
$ pi 646456596 pi646456596
Internal error: statement in file float/output/cl_F_dprint.cc, line 359
has been reached!!
Please send the
I have run a number of tests, not terribly scientifically
organised! Although I haven't found the point where pi starts to
fail, it is worth keeping you informed of developments.
Sorry for the long delay, each run takes a while!
Your test program:
sizestate error
10
Ok, I have sucessfully done 100,000,000.
Please bear with me, as you saw, it takes several hours for each
run, so I will have to run them overnight.
--
Steve
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: pi
Version: 1.1.9-1
Severity: minor
Whilst messing with my new AMD64 I tried:
pi 10
and left it going over the weekend.
Unfortunately when I came back, pi had failed with a floating point
overflow.
(With such a huge request the virtual address space was 20Gbytes
But is that not
My bug report was filed with an incorrect email address,
please use this one:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
--
Steve King
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I modified the control file to Priority: extra before uploading
the current version (1.21-1).
However, the archive still lists the package as optional,
the disparity still exists. How do I fix this?
Do I need to contact the ftp masters?
Thanks,
--
Steve
Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
Package:
I'll Try and package this up over the weekend :)
--
Steve
Calum Mackay wrote:
Package: dcraw
Version: 7.02-1
Severity: wishlist
I see that Dave has a new version up that can decrypt Nikon's WB metadata
(as per numerous news reports :).
thanks much.
cheers,
calum
-- System Information:
Debian
Hello,
The 5.88 version in testing is old. dcraw 7.02-1 is 28 days old
and due to be loaded into testing as soon as the arm builders catch
up. But dcraw keeps getting pushed back by boring packages like
qt, samba, mozilla and apache which no one cares about ;)
I got as high as 15 in the queue
Hi,
Have you been able to try 7.02-1?
Does dcparse work as advertised?
Cheers,
--
Steve
Is the parse binary really included in the package?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -L dcraw
/.
/usr
/usr/bin
/usr/bin/dcraw
/usr/bin/dcfixdates
/usr/share
/usr/share/man
/usr/share/man/man1
Acknowledge,
There is a typo in the Makefile.
Don't know how it got through the other architectures.
--
Steve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: dcraw
Version: 7.00-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of dcraw_7.00-1 on sarti by
Hi,
You are quite right.
My sponsor will hopefully upload 7.02-1 soon.
Bug #300140 has been raised.
If you care, an explanation.
I omitted part of a make variable in the Make file so that dcparse
was installed in an absolute path, instead of a relative path.
So when I tested it, dcparse existed
My previous email, build bug I referenced should read #300105, not
300150, 300140 or anything else.
--
Steve
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Yep I am aware of the problem. I am not a dd, so depend on
someone else to upload for me.
Until I manage to get it uploaded, you can get dcraw 6.31 and
gimp-dcraw 1.20 .debs from http://www.twobit.demon.co.uk/dcraw
Regards
--
Steve
Package: dcraw
Version: 5.88-1
Followup-For: Bug
30 matches
Mail list logo
