Bug#884762: Recovering
Confirmed. It’s possible to recover using « nosmp » on the kernel command line (set from the bootloader). T-Bone
Bug#796612: flashybrid: diff for NMU version 0.18+nmu2
> On 10 Jul 2016, at 01:14, Andreas Beckmannwrote: > > On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 21:43:15 +0200 Thibaut VARENE wrote: >> Iâm not interested in becoming a second-class DD after 12 years of >> service. If that package cannot muster the interest of an actual maintainer, >> then maybe it should indeed be removed from the archive. I will keep it >> alive on my website anyway. > > To attract interest of prospective maintainers the package should be > orphaned (or at least RFAed). Done. #830769
Bug#796612: flashybrid: diff for NMU version 0.18+nmu2
> On 08 Jul 2016, at 01:12, Thibaut Varène <vare...@debian.org> wrote: > > >> On 08 Jul 2016, at 01:01, Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Thibaut, >> >> On 7 July 2016 at 18:41, Thibaut Varène <vare...@debian.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On 03 Jul 2016, at 22:06, z...@debian.org wrote: >>>> >>>> Control: tags 796612 + patch >>>> Control: tags 796612 + pending >>>> >>>> Dear maintainer, >>>> >>>> I've prepared an NMU for flashybrid (versioned as 0.18+nmu2) and >>>> uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I >>>> should delay it longer. >>> >>> It’s ok, you do what you have to do. >>> If you want to take over maintainership, please be my guest. I’m >>> maintaining “upstream” here now: >>> >>> http://hacks.slashdirt.org/sw/flashybrid/ >>> >>> I’d welcome a patch to merge btw. >> >> Your upstream page claims that 0.19 supports systemd. > > It “supports” it to the extent that it fixes #784890 and boots correctly on > Jessie (as far as my very basic tests showed). It does not have the glue that > the NMU supposedly fixes. Glue I’d be happy to merge were I sent a patch. For the record I should probably point out that the NMU is rather meaningless given that 0.18 on a systemd-enabled Jessie system will be utterly broken (as in, the system will go kaboom), precisely because 0.18 is plagued by #784890 Cheers, T.
Bug#796612: flashybrid: diff for NMU version 0.18+nmu2
> On 08 Jul 2016, at 01:01, Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> wrote: > > Hi Thibaut, > > On 7 July 2016 at 18:41, Thibaut Varène <vare...@debian.org> wrote: >> >>> On 03 Jul 2016, at 22:06, z...@debian.org wrote: >>> >>> Control: tags 796612 + patch >>> Control: tags 796612 + pending >>> >>> Dear maintainer, >>> >>> I've prepared an NMU for flashybrid (versioned as 0.18+nmu2) and >>> uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I >>> should delay it longer. >> >> It’s ok, you do what you have to do. >> If you want to take over maintainership, please be my guest. I’m maintaining >> “upstream” here now: >> >> http://hacks.slashdirt.org/sw/flashybrid/ >> >> I’d welcome a patch to merge btw. > > Your upstream page claims that 0.19 supports systemd. It “supports” it to the extent that it fixes #784890 and boots correctly on Jessie (as far as my very basic tests showed). It does not have the glue that the NMU supposedly fixes. Glue I’d be happy to merge were I sent a patch. > Why not upload > that version to debian? Because my upload rights have been revoked with the 1024-bit keys purge, and at this point I don’t care anymore. Cheers, T.
Bug#796612: flashybrid: diff for NMU version 0.18+nmu2
> On 03 Jul 2016, at 22:06, z...@debian.org wrote: > > Control: tags 796612 + patch > Control: tags 796612 + pending > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for flashybrid (versioned as 0.18+nmu2) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I > should delay it longer. It’s ok, you do what you have to do. If you want to take over maintainership, please be my guest. I’m maintaining “upstream” here now: http://hacks.slashdirt.org/sw/flashybrid/ I’d welcome a patch to merge btw. Best, T.
Bug#804644: RFS: flashybrid/0.19 [ITA]
> On 25 Nov 2015, at 18:24, Gianfranco Costamagna >wrote: > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > Control: owner -1 ! > > Hi Tim and Thibaut > > > (Thibaut do you have any keyring issue that you can't upload? I see your key > has been dropped because > too weak, maybe you can take the opportunity to make a new and shiny one! > https://wiki.debian.org/Keysigning/Offers) I did make a new key, see rt#5454. I’m not interested in attending keysigning. I fail to see how signing my new key with my older, still valid (and at the time still accepted by debian) key isn’t enough. Best.
Bug#804644: RFS: flashybrid/0.19 [ITA]
> On 25 Nov 2015, at 18:33, Gianfranco Costamagna >wrote: > > Hi Thibaut! > > >> I’m not interested in attending keysigning. I fail to see how signing my new >> key with my older, still valid (and at the time still accepted by debian) >> key isn’t >enough. > > > > I don't know the policy and if they allow this kind of signing... > > anyway, please let me know if you need a sponsor :) I suppose what I need is having people take over my packages and call it a day, tbh. With my upload rights revoked there’s not much meaning in being a DD. T.
Bug#784890: flashybrid: Unable to Sync ramstore directories ...
Thanks for trying still. I have put up a small webpage for flashybrid anyway, since it seems to be abandoned upstream: http://hacks.slashdirt.org/sw/flashybrid/ T. > On 08 Nov 2015, at 11:24, Tim Weippert <we...@weiti.org> wrote: > > HI, > > DM's not allowed to do an NMU Upload. Sorry, can't help. > > cheers, > tim > > On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 10:55:03AM +0100, Tim Weippert wrote: >> HI, >> >> i prepared an NMU and try to upload it. Don't know if i'm allowed to do so >> ... will see. >> >> I also included the italian translation to the new package and your fix. >> Hopefully it is ok. >> >> Cheers, >> tim >> >> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 03:00:24PM +0200, Thibaut Varène wrote: >>> OK, thanks everybody. >>> >>> For the records, I'm attaching source for flashybrid-0.19 and a patch from >>> 0.18 to this bug report. I can't upload it to the archive, but if some DD >>> wants to, let them be my guest. >>> >>> T. >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Tim Weippert >> http://weiti.org - we...@weiti.org >> GPG Fingerprint - E704 7303 6FF0 8393 ADB1 398E 67F2 94AE 5995 7DD8 > > -- > Tim Weippert > http://weiti.org - we...@weiti.org > GPG Fingerprint - E704 7303 6FF0 8393 ADB1 398E 67F2 94AE 5995 7DD8
Bug#785525: systemd fails to boot if non-essential block device is missing
On 17 mai 2015, at 14:57, Martin Pitt mp...@debian.org wrote: Control: tag -1 wontfix Hello Thibaut, Thibaut VARENE [2015-05-17 14:41 +0200]: Just upgraded my system from wheezy to jessie. Boot stopped after initial reboot, with prompt to enter root password. After looking at the logs, it seems that systemd choked on this line of my fstab: UUID=8633-12F1 /media/WDX360 vfat user,auto,utf8=no,iocharset=iso8859-1 0 2 That's a line I added for convenience whenever I plug a specific USB drive to the machine. Granted, it doesn't have the nofail flag Indeed, that *and* it's marked as auto. and it does have a 2 pass_no (instead of 0), but this never caused any problem in wheezy, so the new behavior, and the fact that it entirely halts the boot process (the machine isn't even remotely accessible) is quite a huge change from previous behavior... It's a change indeed, but IMHO a correct one. Aside from auto and nofail there is no other indication whether a file system in fstab should be considered essential (in your terms) or not. That's precisely what these flags are for. sysvinit might have not complained about this situation, but that doesn't mean that I'd like to proliferate that bug forever. Hence I consider this a wontfix. A footnote in the release/upgrade instructions would have been nice. If that machine had been remote without OOB access, I'd have been screwed over, because something that never broke previous upgrades. T. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#784890: flashybrid: Unable to Sync ramstore directories ...
OK, thanks everybody. For the records, I'm attaching source for flashybrid-0.19 and a patch from 0.18 to this bug report. I can't upload it to the archive, but if some DD wants to, let them be my guest. T. flashybrid_0.18-0.19.patch Description: Binary data flashybrid_0.19.dsc Description: Binary data flashybrid_0.19.tar.xz Description: Binary data
Bug#785525: systemd fails to boot if non-essential block device is missing
On 17 mai 2015, at 14:59, Thibaut Varène vare...@debian.org wrote: On 17 mai 2015, at 14:57, Martin Pitt mp...@debian.org wrote: Control: tag -1 wontfix Hello Thibaut, Thibaut VARENE [2015-05-17 14:41 +0200]: Just upgraded my system from wheezy to jessie. Boot stopped after initial reboot, with prompt to enter root password. After looking at the logs, it seems that systemd choked on this line of my fstab: UUID=8633-12F1/media/WDX360 vfat user,auto,utf8=no,iocharset=iso8859-1 0 2 That's a line I added for convenience whenever I plug a specific USB drive to the machine. Granted, it doesn't have the nofail flag Indeed, that *and* it's marked as auto. and it does have a 2 pass_no (instead of 0), but this never caused any problem in wheezy, so the new behavior, and the fact that it entirely halts the boot process (the machine isn't even remotely accessible) is quite a huge change from previous behavior... It's a change indeed, but IMHO a correct one. Aside from auto and nofail there is no other indication whether a file system in fstab should be considered essential (in your terms) or not. That's precisely what these flags are for. sysvinit might have not complained about this situation, but that doesn't mean that I'd like to proliferate that bug forever. Hence I consider this a wontfix. A footnote in the release/upgrade instructions would have been nice. If that machine had been remote without OOB access, I'd have been screwed over, because something that never broke previous upgrades. because of While I'm there, your argument about what should and shouldn't be considered essential seems rather bogus considering all of that is made pretty clear by the FHS: http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#REQUIREMENTS This also states that /media is for removable media, so a hard fail on anything below that mount point seems equally wrong. I'm sure you won't change your mind, but I believe the current behavior of systemd is inappropriate. Then again, I suppose I can always switch back to a saner sysvinit. T. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#785525: systemd fails to boot if non-essential block device is missing
On 17 mai 2015, at 15:32, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote: Am 17.05.2015 um 14:59 schrieb Thibaut Varène: A footnote in the release/upgrade instructions would have been nice. If that machine had been remote without OOB access, I'd have been screwed over, because something that never broke previous upgrades. It would have been nice if people actually read the release notes: https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#systemd-auto-mounts-incompat Indeed, my bad. I focused on Chapter 4 and blazed through Chapter 5 a bit too fast it seems. I suppose I have only myself to blame. The more I read it the more I think systemd is not for me. T. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#784890: flashybrid: Unable to Sync ramstore directories ...
Le 14 mai 2015 à 18:07, Stefan Blochberger stefan.blochber...@mail.de a écrit : tmpfs (rw,relatime,size=122880k) tmpfs on /ram/var/run.flash type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,noexec,relatime,size=25272k,mode=755) tmpfs on /run type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,noexec,relatime,size=25272k,mode=755) But /var/run still in use ;( See the above two lines. I suspect in Jessie, /var/run is by default a bind mount of /run. Try commenting it out from /etc/flashybrid/ramstore and see if anything breaks. In case that wasn’t obvious, I don’t have (yet) a Jessie machine to check this out. You just have to add --make-private to all mounts in /etc/init.d/flashybrid That makes sense. From the Debian Wiki it’s obvious systemd broke everything by overriding the kernel default for bind mounts. This comment in the bug thread aligns nicely with my personal opinion on the matter: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739593#97 Best, T -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#784890: flashybrid: Unable to Sync ramstore directories ...
On 11 mai 2015, at 19:32, Tim Weippert we...@weiti.org wrote: If i found another CF card i will try to install an fresh wheezy and update to jessie without migration to systemd (think this should be possible) maybe then we know if it is an systemd or kernel fault. Thanks. First ensure it's working fine in Wheezy. That would be a very valuable experiment. Best, T. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#784890: flashybrid: Unable to Sync ramstore directories ...
On 11 mai 2015, at 08:46, Tim Weippert we...@weiti.org wrote: Hi Thibaut, yes i can confirm, this happens in an fresh and newly started Jessie System. The Config Files are the Files from the Package, i only commented /etc in ramstore File. /root is there already. No change from my side. ok. I haven't started any daemons/processes rather than connect via SSH to the System. For your information my mount table looks after clean start like this: weiti@indoor01:~$ mount tmpfs on /ram type tmpfs (rw,relatime,size=122880k) tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs (rw,relatime,size=122880k) tmpfs on /run/lock type tmpfs (rw,relatime,size=122880k) tmpfs on /var/lib/dhcp type tmpfs (rw,relatime,size=122880k) tmpfs on /var/lib/misc type tmpfs (rw,relatime,size=122880k) tmpfs on /var/lib/urandom type tmpfs (rw,relatime,size=122880k) tmpfs on /var/tmp type tmpfs (rw,relatime,size=122880k) /dev/sda1 on /ram/var/lib/exim4.flash type ext4 (ro,relatime,errors=remount-ro,data=ordered) tmpfs on /var/lib/exim4 type tmpfs (rw,relatime,size=122880k) ^ Up to this, it's fine tmpfs on /ram/var/lib/exim4.flash type tmpfs (rw,relatime,size=122880k) ^ But this is wrong /dev/sda1 on /ram/var/log.flash type ext4 (ro,relatime,errors=remount-ro,data=ordered) tmpfs on /var/log type tmpfs (rw,relatime,size=122880k) ^ again, that's correct tmpfs on /ram/var/log.flash type tmpfs (rw,relatime,size=122880k) ^ that shouldn't be there. My thoughs are that these situation are my problem: /dev/sda1 on /ram/root.flash type ext4 (ro,relatime,errors=remount-ro,data=ordered) tmpfs on /root type tmpfs (rw,relatime,size=122880k) tmpfs on /ram/root.flash type tmpfs (rw,relatime,size=122880k) It seems that root.flash gets mounted twice, on ro from the cf card which is ok, the other (later?) mount is an rw tmpfs ... and every sync while go to the tmpfs i think. And after an reboot these changes are lost, because the tmpfs get cleared. There's an extraneous (and wrong) mount, and I can't quite figure out where it's coming from. Maybe you could try adding a -x to /etc/init.d/flashybrid first line: #!/bin/sh -x and then record the boot output and add it to this bug report. When i change fh-sync to do an remount,ro,bind, no errors occures, but changes weren't synced to CF also. fh-sync isn't the culprit here. The problem lies somewhere with the init script and/or the way the boot sequence happens. The init script has not been changed so I suspect this is a nasty side effect of jessie's switch to systemd. HTH, T. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#784890: flashybrid: Unable to Sync ramstore directories ...
tags 784890 moreinfo thx On 10 mai 2015, at 09:57, Tim Weippert we...@weiti.org wrote: Package: flashybrid Version: 0.18 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, i hav an fresh jessie installation on an Alix Board (alix 2d13) with an CF Card. I tried flashybrid for the first time and was unable to sync ramstore directiories to real CF Location. fh-sync run reports the following errors: root@indoor01:~# fh-sync Syncing flashybrid system... Synchronizing /var/lib/exim4mount: /ram/var/lib/exim4.flash is busy . Synchronizing /var/logmount: /ram/var/log.flash is busy . Synchronizing /var/runmount: /ram/var/run.flash is busy . Synchronizing /rootmount: /ram/root.flash is busy . Synchronizing /var/spoolmount: /ram/var/spool.flash is busy . Synchronizing /var/mailmount: /ram/var/mail.flash is busy . done. NB: there's not much I can do since I can't upload to debian anymore. This typically happens after a mounting parts of the filesystem read-write, followed by the installation/startup of some daemon. The daemon then opens a write file descriptor to the non-mirrored location (the actual media support), and when flashybrid tries to remount that media read-only, it fails. It does strike me as odd to find /root in the list though. Can you confirm that this happens (or not) immediately after booting a clean system (unmodified flashybrid) and /without/ installing or starting anything after a read-write mount. If it does, it would suggest that flashybrid is started too late in the boot process. T. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#741221: Licensing clarification
So it turns out pbuilder is broken and nobody cares: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709053 That’s why I couldn’t upload the new version yet… Cheers Le 14 avr. 2014 à 05:31, Alexandre Courbot gnu...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi everyone, Version 1.0.2 of Tagaini Jisho has been released. This version removes SKIP codes from the kanjidic as well as their support in the software. Hopefully this should solve all concerns. https://github.com/Gnurou/tagainijisho/archive/1.0.2.tar.gz I will check with the SKIP code copyright holder whether he could relax his license to avoid this issue. In any case, I will ensure that Tagaini remains distributable by Debian from now on. Cheers and thanks for spotting this issue, Alex. On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Thibaut Varène vare...@debian.org wrote: tags 741221 confirmed upstream pending thanks Hi, Due to lack of response from kanjidic’s upstream, and after careful reviewing of its documentation (which further restricts the licensing terms), tagainijisho’s upstream author has decided to remove support for SKIP codes from his software and remove SKIP codes from the embedded kanjidic file. A new version of tagainijisho will be prepared in the coming days and uploaded as soon as possible. T-Bone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#741221: Licensing clarification
tags 741221 confirmed upstream pending thanks Hi, Due to lack of response from kanjidic’s upstream, and after careful reviewing of its documentation (which further restricts the licensing terms), tagainijisho’s upstream author has decided to remove support for SKIP codes from his software and remove SKIP codes from the embedded kanjidic file. A new version of tagainijisho will be prepared in the coming days and uploaded as soon as possible. T-Bone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#741221: Licensing clarification
Hi, Alexandre, your understanding is correct and applicable to most Linux distributions. CC-BY-SA-NC isn’t freely redistributable due to the restriction on commercial use, thus, in a broad sense, not free software. I’m CC’ing the original bug report so that this information is available to others (I hope it’s fine with both of you). Cheers, Thibaut Le 10 avr. 2014 à 15:54, Alexandre Courbot gnu...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi Jim, Thanks for your quick reply! That's good news. However I'm afraid the Non-commercial clause is not compatible with Debian's terms of distribution (a non-commercial licensing is not acceptable because Debian CDs can be sold for instance). Thibaut, is my understanding correct? If I remember correctly we ran into the same issue with KanjiVG, which made us change its license to CC-SA. Getting permission by Jack for Tagaini only would also probably not work since the right would not be transmitted to derived software. So it seems that in my case I still have no choice but to strip the SKIP codes from Kanjidic. :( Cheers, Alex. On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Jim Breen jimbr...@gmail.com wrote: When Jack Halpern finally moved to CCSA-NonCommercial licence in 2008 I updated my general licence page, but forgot to update the Kanjidic one. I have now made them conform. See http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~jwb/kanjidic_doc.html#IREF14 I think for free software you can include the SKIPs without any problem. Cheers Jim -- Jim Breen Adjunct Snr Research Fellow, Japanese Studies Centre, Monash University -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#739358: wontfix
tags 739358 wontfix kthxbye martin f krafft madd...@debian.org said: Please change the dependency on libmysqlclient18 to a recommendation or even a suggestion (and change the code to conditionally load the MySQL stuff). libmysqlclient18 or MySQL is fortunately not required to use libapache2-mod-musicindex and I'd really rather not have it on my systems. No. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#741221: Licensing clarification
Hi, I am contacting you about KanjiDic2: I am the Debian maintainer of a package which includes it (tagainijisho, upstream author CC’d on this email), and it’s been brought to my attention that KanjiDic2 may raise some licensing questions, see: http://bugs.debian.org/741221 In a nutshell, it’s unclear from the wording of the file, the wording of the kanjidic documentation[1] and the wording of the EDRDG license[2] whether or not the SKIP codes included in kanjidic2.xml are submitted to the licensing terms of kanjidic2 (CC-BY-SA). [1] http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~jwb/kanjidic_doc.html#IREF08 [2] http://www.edrdg.org/edrdg/licence.html In particular, [2] paragraph 7 is different from [1]. This casts a doubt on the distributability of the kanjidic2.xml file as-is, so can you clarify whether or not CC-BY-NC-SA applies to the skip codes embedded into the file, in which case we’ll have to remove them, or if they are covered under CC-BY-SA? Thank you, Thibaut Varène -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#741221: Need more (legal) information
tags 741221 moreinfo thanks Hi, [CCing debian-legal as I'd very much like their input on the matter] Initial thread: http://bugs.debian.org/741221 Meijiko wrote: This Kanjidic contain SKIP code, SKIP code License is CC-BY-NC-SA. This license is not permit commercial use. Its non-free. (Violate DFSG 6) Note: Kanjidic license is CC-BY-SA, but Kanjidic is contain SKIP code, SKIP code license is CC-BY-NC-SA. I'm not sure I can quite agree with your statement. See: http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~jwb/kanjidic_doc.html#IREF08 The kanjidic documentation states (emphasis is mine): The following people have granted permission for material for which they hold copyright to be included in the files, _and distributed under the above conditions_, while retaining their copyright over that material: Jack HALPERN: The SKIP codes in the KANJIDIC file. As I understand this, kanjidic and the SKIP codes it embeds are freely redistributable under the licensing terms of kanjidic. That other licensing provisions for the SKIP codes may be made in other use cases (as detailed in Appendix F of the same document) seems quite irrelevant to me: you are questioning the DFSG-compliance of kanjidic (and by extension the package that includes it: tagainijisho) and as far as I can see, the whole content of the file `tagainijisho-[version number]/3rdparty/kanjidic2.xml', including the SKIP codes, are covered by the license stated at the top of the file: CC-BY-SA, which is DFSG-compliant. Can someone from d-legal shed some insightful light on this? Thanks, T-Bone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#734713: uprecords-cgi: postinst world-readability test fails due to change in nobody's shell
tags 734713 confirmed pending thanks ACK. Thanks for the patch, will upload soon. T-Bone On 9 janv. 2014, at 12:34, Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org wrote: Package: uprecords-cgi Version: 1:0.3.17-3.1 Severity: normal Tags: patch User: base-pas...@packages.debian.org Usertags: shell-fallout In base-passwd 3.5.30, I changed nobody's shell to /usr/sbin/nologin (a change that I really should have made about ten years ago). This has unfortunately had a bit of collateral damage: $ sudo chmod +x /etc/uprecords-cgi/* $ sudo apt-get --reinstall install uprecords-cgi Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: libbind9-80 libdns88 libisc84 libisccc80 libisccfg82 liblwres80 python3.2 python3.2-minimal Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 118 not upgraded. Need to get 0 B/20.8 kB of archives. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. debconf: delaying package configuration, since apt-utils is not installed (Reading database ... 18737 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace uprecords-cgi 1:0.3.17-3.1 (using .../uprecords-cgi_1%3a0.3.17-3.1_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement uprecords-cgi ... Setting up uprecords-cgi (1:0.3.17-3.1) ... This account is currently not available. This account is currently not available. This account is currently not available. * Pass -s /bin/sh to su nobody to cope with the change of nobody's shell in base-passwd 3.5.30. diff -Nru uptimed-0.3.17/debian/uprecords-cgi.postinst uptimed-0.3.17/debian/uprecords-cgi.postinst --- uptimed-0.3.17/debian/uprecords-cgi.postinst 2012-05-25 01:52:27.0 +0100 +++ uptimed-0.3.17/debian/uprecords-cgi.postinst 2014-01-09 11:32:09.0 + @@ -44,7 +44,8 @@ # is necessary for the CGI script to work) for i in uprecords.conf uprecords.footer uprecords.header; do if [ -x /etc/uprecords-cgi/$i ]; then - if su nobody -c 'test ! -r /etc/uprecords-cgi/'$i; then + if su nobody -s /bin/sh \ + -c 'test ! -r /etc/uprecords-cgi/'$i; then echo Making $i world readable chmod o+r /etc/uprecords-cgi/$i fi Sorry, -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#575461: finch: ability to use OTR-encryption
On 3 janv. 2014, at 04:19, intrigeri intrig...@debian.org wrote: Hi, at this point of the discussion (both here and with upstream), it seems to me that this bug has nothing to do anymore on the pidgin-otr bugs list. It should be converted into a RFP (request for package) asking for purple-otr, right? I'm happy to do so if Thibaut or Howard give me a go-ahead. How about taking over maintainership? I don't use pidgin-otr anymore. Cheers. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#725779: libotr: OTR clients supporting both OTRv1 and v2 are subject to protocol downgrade attacks
On 22 oct. 2013, at 20:17, intrigeri intrig...@debian.org wrote: Hi Thibault, Hi, intrig...@debian.org wrote (08 Oct 2013 09:27:56 GMT) : as you are surely aware of, it's been known [1] since 2006 that clients supporting both OTRv1 and v2 (such as libotr 3.x) are subject to protocol downgrade attacks clients. It's also been known for a while that OTRv1 has serious security issues (that were the main reason for a v2, actually). In short, support v2 only is the only safe way to go these days. [1] http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.165.7945 It took a while to obsolete older v1-only software, and another while to complete the libotr 4.x transition and get to a sane state in Debian testing. Now, I think the time has come when we can reasonably expect v2-only to work for everyone. I think that the only reasonable course of action from now on is to patch libotr in stable and oldstable to only support OTR v1. (s/v1/v2/ in the last sentence, obviously.) Ping? If you have no time to take care of that, fair enough, but then I would really appreciate to read your general opinion on the matter, even if it's a simple please go ahead and NMU. Thanks in advance! I have to admit having absolutely no time to deal with that. If everyone is fine this won't be disruptive for existing users of otr (it's not entirely clear to me what the implications of such a change are, TBH), you're more than welcome to NMU if you're confident this is The Right Thing(tm). Cheers, T-Bone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#725779: libotr: OTR clients supporting both OTRv1 and v2 are subject to protocol downgrade attacks
On 23 oct. 2013, at 01:53, Ian Goldberg i...@cypherpunks.ca wrote: To be explicit, removing support for OTRv1 from libotr 3.x is totally fine (and indeed libotr 4.x has already done it). Ian, thanks a lot for the input. I guess it's all good then, no objection for an NMU and thanks in advance to whoever will deal with it. I hope to be able to resume my normal DD duties ASAP ;P T-Bone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#718787: libapache2-mod-musicindex: Dependency on apache2.2 (-common) holds up migration to Apache 2.4
forcemerge 718787 666834 thanks Hi libapache2-mod-musicindex has been removed from testing precisely because of this. I'm currently unable to upload an updated version of the module, so for the time being, the solution is to remove the module from your system. T. On 5 août 2013, at 15:01, Dominique Brazziel dbrazz...@snet.net wrote: Package: libapache2-mod-musicindex Version: 1.3.7-2+b1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, I guess all apache2 modules should be rebuilt due to upstream ABI changes. I am getting updates for apache 2.4 but they can't be installed because of dependencies on apache2.2-common from a few packages (this one, apache2-mod-perl2, etc.). -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.9.6-1inter02-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages libapache2-mod-musicindex depends on: ii apache2.2-common 2.2.22-13 ii libapr11.4.8-1 ii libarchive12 3.0.4-3+nmu1 ii libc6 2.17-7 ii libflac8 1.3.0-1 ii libid3tag0 0.15.1b-10 ii libmad00.15.1b-8 ii libmp4v2-2 2.0.0~dfsg0-2 ii libmysqlclient18 5.5.31+dfsg-1 ii libvorbis0a1.3.2-1.3 ii libvorbisfile3 1.3.2-1.3 ii mod-musicindex-common 1.3.7-2 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-1 libapache2-mod-musicindex recommends no packages. libapache2-mod-musicindex suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#549431: pidgin-otr: Logging should be disabled by default
On 30 juil. 2013, at 09:38, intrigeri intrig...@debian.org wrote: Hi Thibaut, I've seen you've tagged this bug `upstream' a while ago, but I see no mention of this bug being forwarded to them. Was it? Upstream is subscribed to the BTS. HTH -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#673154: CVE-2012-2369: Format string security vulnerability
I've no idea how to fix this in stable and I'm currently in vacation with limited Internet access... Le 17 mai 2012 à 05:33, Florian Mayer segfaulthun...@gmail.com a écrit : Hello! I've been wondering why this isn't fixed in stable yet and there's no DSA about it either. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#673154: CVE-2012-2369: Format string security vulnerability
The update is ready I'm about to upload it. Thx Le 16 mai 2012 à 06:56, Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org a écrit : Package: pidgin-otr Version: 3.2.0-5 Severity: serious Tags: security upstream patch Hi, the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was published for pidgin-otr. CVE-2012-2369[0]: | Versions 3.2.0 and earlier of the pidgin-otr plugin contain a format | string security flaw. This flaw could potentially be exploited by | a remote attacker to cause arbitrary code to be executed on the user's | machine. Upstream's patch: --- a/otr-plugin.c +++ b/otr-plugin.c @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ static void still_secure_cb(void *opdata, ConnContext *conte static void log_message_cb(void *opdata, const char *message) { -purple_debug_info(otr, message); +purple_debug_info(otr, %s, message); } static int max_message_size_cb(void *opdata, ConnContext *context) If you fix the vulnerability please also make sure to include the CVE id in your changelog entry. I will shortly prepare an update for stable unless you wish to. For further information see: [0] http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-2369 http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2012-2369 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#595502: linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley: panics while loading INIT, IOMMU out of mapping resources
Le 14 sept. 10 à 04:22, dann frazier a écrit : On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:48:22AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 01:19 +0200, Thibaut VARÈNE wrote: Le 14 sept. 10 à 01:11, Thibaut VARÈNE a écrit : Le 14 sept. 10 à 00:09, dann frazier a écrit : On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 05:38:13PM +0200, Thibaut VARÈNE wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley Version: 2.6.32-20 Severity: grave Justification: renders system unusable System boots fine with linux-image-2.6.32-3-mckinley 2.6.32-9. Panics with 2.6.32-20 with: I/O MMU @ c000fed01000 is out of mapping resources fyi, my rx2600 boots fine on both 2.6.32-20 and 2.6.32-21. (ROM Version 2.31) This was a zx2000, same ROM, and I was about to try a rx2600. I guess this makes it moot ;P Just thinking out loud, but given the symptoms (disk errors) and the specifics of zx2000 vs rx2600, I'm guessing the IOMMU pukes on IDE, which rx2600 doesn't use for disks... That might be significant, since we've made the libata transition. Did you get a traceback for the kernel panic? Another datapoint - also was unable to reproduce on a zx2000 here, though mine uses contains only SCSI disks. Well then, looks like you've got the culprit (IDE)... HTH -- Thibaut VARÈNE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#595502: linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley: panics while loading INIT, IOMMU out of mapping resources
Le 14 sept. 10 à 00:09, dann frazier a écrit : On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 05:38:13PM +0200, Thibaut VARÈNE wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley Version: 2.6.32-20 Severity: grave Justification: renders system unusable System boots fine with linux-image-2.6.32-3-mckinley 2.6.32-9. Panics with 2.6.32-20 with: I/O MMU @ c000fed01000 is out of mapping resources fyi, my rx2600 boots fine on both 2.6.32-20 and 2.6.32-21. (ROM Version 2.31) This was a zx2000, same ROM, and I was about to try a rx2600. I guess this makes it moot ;P Cheers -- Thibaut VARÈNE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#595502: linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley: panics while loading INIT, IOMMU out of mapping resources
Le 14 sept. 10 à 01:11, Thibaut VARÈNE a écrit : Le 14 sept. 10 à 00:09, dann frazier a écrit : On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 05:38:13PM +0200, Thibaut VARÈNE wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley Version: 2.6.32-20 Severity: grave Justification: renders system unusable System boots fine with linux-image-2.6.32-3-mckinley 2.6.32-9. Panics with 2.6.32-20 with: I/O MMU @ c000fed01000 is out of mapping resources fyi, my rx2600 boots fine on both 2.6.32-20 and 2.6.32-21. (ROM Version 2.31) This was a zx2000, same ROM, and I was about to try a rx2600. I guess this makes it moot ;P Just thinking out loud, but given the symptoms (disk errors) and the specifics of zx2000 vs rx2600, I'm guessing the IOMMU pukes on IDE, which rx2600 doesn't use for disks... May be a brainfart tho. T-Bone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#595502: linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley: panics while loading INIT, IOMMU out of mapping resources
Le 14 sept. 10 à 01:48, Ben Hutchings a écrit : On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 01:19 +0200, Thibaut VARÈNE wrote: Le 14 sept. 10 à 01:11, Thibaut VARÈNE a écrit : Le 14 sept. 10 à 00:09, dann frazier a écrit : On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 05:38:13PM +0200, Thibaut VARÈNE wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley Version: 2.6.32-20 Severity: grave Justification: renders system unusable System boots fine with linux-image-2.6.32-3-mckinley 2.6.32-9. Panics with 2.6.32-20 with: I/O MMU @ c000fed01000 is out of mapping resources fyi, my rx2600 boots fine on both 2.6.32-20 and 2.6.32-21. (ROM Version 2.31) This was a zx2000, same ROM, and I was about to try a rx2600. I guess this makes it moot ;P Just thinking out loud, but given the symptoms (disk errors) and the specifics of zx2000 vs rx2600, I'm guessing the IOMMU pukes on IDE, which rx2600 doesn't use for disks... That might be significant, since we've made the libata transition. Did you get a traceback for the kernel panic? All the information I could collect was pasted in the first email and attached to the second... HTH -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#595502: closed by Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (Re: Bug#595502: linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley: panics while loading INIT, IOMMU out of mapping resources)
Le 12 sept. 10 à 18:49, Ben Hutchings a écrit : On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 01:31 +0200, Thibaut VARÈNE wrote: [...] I'm afraid this is absolutely not happening, this machine is a webserver and I've just spent enough time bringing it back to life... Besides squeeze is not shipping with 2.6.35, right? I'm hoping you plan on releasing a working kernel for the upcoming stable release? Right, but if the bug is fixed in 2.6.35 then I can look for a fix in between, and if it is not then you can report the bug to upstream. I have a different ia64 machine on which I could try kernel on, although not very easily. I'll see if I can first reproduce the bug on it, and then if it happens with 2.6.35, but that may take some time... HTH -- Thibaut VARÈNE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#595502: closed by Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (Re: Bug#595502: linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley: panics while loading INIT, IOMMU out of mapping resources)
Le 7 sept. 10 à 01:18, Ben Hutchings a écrit : On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 13:40 +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote: reopen 595502 thanks Version: 2.6.32-21 Please, explain to me how changing a Panic into a Warning without effectively fixing the root cause of the bug fixes anything? And, oh, if by graceful failure you mean: it will blow up your raid devices and kill your filesystems, then yes, the failure has been very graceful for me, thankyouverymuch. I could have lived with a little less gracefulness, though ;-/ [...] There's no need to take your frustration out on me. I know nothing I don't think I've taken out my frustration on you, I would have been a lot less ironic and a lot more postal if I had been to take the frustration resulting from the pain this caused me on anyone... I must say tho I'm quite frustrated that incremental kernel upgrades to the now frozen next stable release introduce *regressions*... about IA64 and have to assume that upstream developers know what they are doing. That remains an open question ;P Please test Linux 2.6.35 as packaged in experimental. I'm afraid this is absolutely not happening, this machine is a webserver and I've just spent enough time bringing it back to life... Besides squeeze is not shipping with 2.6.35, right? I'm hoping you plan on releasing a working kernel for the upcoming stable release? One thing I don't get is why the need to break a perfectly working kernel (2.6.32-9)? Can't the specific change that introduced this bug be simply reverted? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#595502: linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley: panics while loading INIT, IOMMU out of mapping resources
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley Version: 2.6.32-20 Severity: grave Justification: renders system unusable System boots fine with linux-image-2.6.32-3-mckinley 2.6.32-9. Panics with 2.6.32-20 with: I/O MMU @ c000fed01000 is out of mapping resources Full boot log: Loading.: Debian GNU/Linux Starting: Debian GNU/Linux ELILO v3.12 for EFI/IA-64 .. Uncompressing Linux... done Loading file \EFI\debian\initrd.img...done [0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset [0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpu [0.00] Linux version 2.6.32-5-mckinley (Debian 2.6.32-20) (b...@decadent.org.uk ) (gcc version 4.3.5 (Debian 4.3.5-2) ) #1 SMP Thu Aug 12 15:34:34 UTC 2010 [0.00] EFI v1.10 by HP: SALsystab=0x3fb38000 ACPI 2.0=0x3fb2e000 SMBIOS=0x3fb3a000 HCDP=0x3fb2c000 [0.00] booting generic kernel on platform hpzx1 [0.00] PCDP: v0 at 0x3fb2c000 [0.00] Early serial console at MMIO 0xff5e (options '9600n8') [0.00] bootconsole [uart8250] enabled [0.00] ACPI: RSDP 3fb2e000 00028 (v02 HP) [0.00] ACPI: XSDT 3fb2e02c 0007C (v01 HP zx2000 HP ) [0.00] ACPI: FACP 3fb373e0 000F4 (v03 HP zx2000 HP ) [0.00] ACPI Warning: 32/64X length mismatch in Gpe0Block: 32/16 (20090903/tbfadt-526) [0.00] ACPI Warning: 32/64X length mismatch in Gpe1Block: 32/16 (20090903/tbfadt-526) [0.00] ACPI: DSDT 3fb2e0e0 05781 (v01 HP zx2000 0007 INTL 02012044) [0.00] ACPI: FACS 3fb374d8 00040 [0.00] ACPI: SPCR 3fb37518 00050 (v01 HP zx2000 HP ) [0.00] ACPI: DBGP 3fb37568 00034 (v01 HP zx2000 HP ) [0.00] ACPI: APIC 3fb37628 00084 (v01 HP zx2000 HP ) [0.00] ACPI: SPMI 3fb375a0 00050 (v04 HP zx2000 HP ) [0.00] ACPI: CPEP 3fb375f0 00034 (v01 HP zx2000 HP ) [0.00] ACPI: SSDT 3fb33870 00A14 (v01 HP zx2000 0006 INTL 02012044) [0.00] ACPI: SSDT 3fb34290 022E2 (v01 HP zx2000 0006 INTL 02012044) [0.00] ACPI: SSDT 3fb36580 00342 (v01 HP zx2000 0006 INTL 02012044) [0.00] ACPI: SSDT 3fb368d0 00A16 (v01 HP zx2000 0006 INTL 02012044) [0.00] ACPI: SSDT 3fb372f0 000EB (v01 HP zx2000 0006 INTL 02012044) [0.00] ACPI: Local APIC address c000fee0 [0.00] SMP: Allowing 1 CPUs, 0 hotplug CPUs [0.00] warning: skipping physical page 0 [0.00] warning: skipping physical page 0 [0.00] warning: skipping physical page 0 [0.00] warning: skipping physical page 0 [0.00] Initial ramdisk at: 0xe0407df27000 (17221974 bytes) [0.00] SAL 3.1: HP version 2.31 [0.00] SAL Platform features: None [0.00] SAL: AP wakeup using external interrupt vector 0xff [0.00] ACPI: Local APIC address c000fee0 [0.00] GSI 47 (level, low) - CPU 0 (0x) vector 48 [0.00] 1 CPUs available, 1 CPUs total [0.00] MCA related initialization done [0.00] warning: skipping physical page 0 [0.00] Virtual mem_map starts at 0xa0007fffc790 [0.00] Zone PFN ranges: [0.00] DMA 0x0001 - 0x0004 [0.00] Normal 0x0004 - 0x0102 [0.00] Movable zone start PFN for each node [0.00] early_node_map[5] active PFN ranges [0.00] 0: 0x0001 - 0xfd79 [0.00] 0: 0xfec0 - 0xfecb [0.00] 0: 0x0101 - 0x0101ff5a [0.00] 0: 0x0101ff69 - 0x0101ff84 [0.00] 0: 0x0101ffa0 - 0x0101fff2 [0.00] Built 1 zonelists in Node order, mobility grouping off. Total pages: 72586 [0.00] Policy zone: Normal [0.00] Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=atapi0:/EFI/debian/ vmlinuz root=/dev/md1 ro [0.00] PID hash table entries: 4096 (order: 1, 32768 bytes) [0.00] Memory: 2046816k/2057056k available (7315k code, 39248k reserved, 3536k data, 736k init) [0.00] Leaving McKinley Errata 9 workaround enabled [0.00] SLUB: Genslabs=16, HWalign=128, Order=0-3, MinObjects=0, CPUs=1, Nodes=256 [0.00] Hierarchical RCU implementation. [0.00] NR_IRQS:1024 [0.00] Console: colour dummy device 80x25 [0.06] Calibrating delay loop... 1347.58 BogoMIPS (lpj=2695168) [0.236063] Security Framework initialized [0.288011] SELinux: Disabled at boot. [0.340165] Dentry cache hash table entries: 262144 (order: 7, 2097152 bytes) [0.434371] Inode-cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 6, 1048576 bytes) [0.529254] Mount-cache hash table entries: 1024 [0.592420] Initializing cgroup subsys ns [
Bug#579025: libflac-dev: libFLAC.m4 may set empty -L flag
Le 14 juin 10 à 10:10, Fabian Greffrath a écrit : Am 27.04.2010 19:25, schrieb Thibaut VARÈNE: It does, provided of course that the target package's configure script is properly re-generated against the fixed libFLAC.m4 Ugh, don't want! This means that any package that was autoconf'd against the broken m4 file will fail to build when its configure script is executed without any option. You might want to add a note about that somewhere... How come that no package in Debian that builds against libflac-dev FTBFS so far? for the same reason my package didn't FTBFS *in Debian*: rules define --prefix, which masks the bug. The bug is hit when there's no defined prefix and the configure script has to guess it. I thought this was clear enough from my initial bug report: when configure is called without arguments... HTH T-Bone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#583926: libapache-mod-musicindex: [INTL:de] German translation
tags 583926 pending thanks Le 31 mai 10 à 19:31, Chris Leick a écrit : Package: libapache-mod-musicindex Version: 1.3.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n Hi, please find attached the initial german translation of libapache-mod- musicindex. Thanks, it'll be applied to the upcoming upload. T-Bone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#532123: What's up
Hi, Why is this bug taking so long to fix? It's plaguing the soon to be released squeeze and renders webalizer useless... HTH -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#286917: [PATCH] fix endless loop in local queries
Le 29 avr. 10 à 18:36, Thibaut VARÈNE a écrit : I'm pondering cleaning up/rewriting the code. I've spotted a few other problems. If I get around to doing that, maybe I'll step up to maintain the code while I'm there, if that can help. Just for the records, I'm doing it. It's gonna be pretty much a rewrite, but I'll keep the original construct and spirit. I'm fixing a few issues on the go: mostly better error checking, better compliance with RFC, as well as a few bugs. I'm also trying to make the code more portable (I'm hoping to have it run on BSD, at least for local queries) and I'm making way for eventual IPV6 support. Not saying I'm actually gonna implement any of these tho ;-) I'll keep you posted. HTH T-Bone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#286917: bidentd new incarnation
Hi, Here's the code. It's standalone. I do not consider it release-ready just yet, I want to stress test it a little more. I've done preliminary testing on local/forward on 2.4 and 2.6. I can't test 2.2 (hence the #define in the code). Builds with `gcc -Wall -pedantic -o bidentd bidentd.c` Here's a quick summary of what I did: - run indent -linux main.cc - converted to pure C, C90 compliant - switched to getopt() - simplified logging and verbosity - removed no longer necessary wrappers - moved magic numbers to defines - added more error checking - added supplementary checks on local/forward resolvers: + modified check that proto is TCP (no more strcmp) + check that connection is ESTABLISHED + check that receiving query IP matches resolver found entry (machines with several addresses could have the same local/remote ports used on different addresses by different users) - rewrote code path to have only one exit point in main(), with proper cleanup - removed sending numeric uid (that's non-RFC and a security leak) - split Resolve() - prepared for other OS support (linux-specific only: resolv_*_linux() and the 3 fopen() in main) - prepared for IPV6 support I think that's it. I may have forgotten a bit or two... Since I've completely rewritten the code, I understand it well enough to be ok to maintain it, if that's fine with Joel. I'd rather avoid forking if Joel doesn't plan to maintain bidentd anymore, it would only confuse users since this code does nothing less than what the previous version does. BTW, there was no copyright notice in main.cc, I assumed the file was licensed under GPL v2.0 and that Joel had (C) 1992,2005. Let me know what you think. Feedback welcome. HTH -- Thibaut VARÈNE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ bidentd.c Description: Binary data
Bug#286917: bidentd new incarnation
Le 1 mai 10 à 03:42, Thibaut VARÈNE a écrit : I think that's it. I may have forgotten a bit or two... - a timeout handler for the forwarder. Default socket timeout can be very long, and a timeout can especially occur if the remote host is firewalled (DROP instead of REJECT). HTH -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#286917: [PATCH] fix endless loop in local queries
Le 29 avr. 10 à 17:06, Wesley W. Terpstra a écrit : Well, what I mean is that as long as the firewall doesn't have any connections of its own. Which is pretty typical for a firewall, I'd say. Well, depends. The initial submitter had MTA running on his firewall, which is not entirely silly, and exposed the bug. But yeah, it doesn't happen if the firewall doesn't make any connection of its own. I'll try this now and see if I can make the problem appear and then disappear. Ok, I've gotten it to appear: Apr 29 16:44:37 orange inetd[17916]: ident/tcp server failing (looping), service terminated for 10 min Apr 29 16:44:37 orange bidentd[18702]: 57372, 22 : : Apr 29 16:44:37 orange bidentd[18701]: 57372, 22 : : ... a minor note: if you load ip_conntrack, you need to recreate the connection after loading it, or the problem doesn't appear. That's expected since the lookup only happens at connection init. Also, you might consider merging my manpage fixes upstream. They're needed for UTF-8 terminals. I'm pondering cleaning up/rewriting the code. I've spotted a few other problems. If I get around to doing that, maybe I'll step up to maintain the code while I'm there, if that can help. HTH
Bug#286917: [PATCH] fix endless loop in local queries
Hi, Using bidentd 1.1.1 (lenny), I have the exact same problem. Steps to reproduce: install bidentd and an IRC client locally. Connect to any IRC server. Cause: bidentd code for local query is never reached. Fix: see attached patch. I simply moved the local query code before the forwarding path. Checked, works both locally and with remote (forwarded) queries. I really have to wonder if people drink their own shit :-/ T-Bone -- Thibaut VARÈNE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ fix.diff Description: Binary data
Bug#579025: libflac-dev: libFLAC.m4 may set empty -L flag
Le 26 avr. 10 à 10:05, Fabian Greffrath a écrit : So, can you confirm the attached patch fixes this issue? It does, provided of course that the target package's configure script is properly re-generated against the fixed libFLAC.m4 This means that any package that was autoconf'd against the broken m4 file will fail to build when its configure script is executed without any option. You might want to add a note about that somewhere... Also plagues libflac-dev in lenny, btw. my 2c T-Bone empty_-L_flag.patch -- Thibaut VARÈNE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#516382: closed by Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (Re: linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic: tg3: incoming ssh fails with Corrupted MAC on input)
Le 6 avr. 10 à 05:27, Debian Bug Tracking System a écrit : De : Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk Date : 6 avril 2010 05:24:00 HAEC À : 516382-d...@bugs.debian.org Objet : Rép : linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic: tg3: incoming ssh fails with Corrupted MAC on input Closing due to lack of response. lack of response to what? This bug has sufficient evidence proving that it's real and affecting 2.6.26 in lenny.
Bug#517449: closed by maximilian attems m...@stro.at (Re: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64: SCHED_IDLE issues (tasks blocked for more than 120 seconds))
Le 12 mars 10 à 03:16, maximilian attems a écrit : On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 01:48:20AM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote: On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Debian Bug Tracking System ow...@bugs.debian.org wrote: Version: 2.6.26-21 this should have been fixed on stable update, thus closing. Which stable update? It happened to me no later than this morning, and I'm running: ii linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64 2.6.26-21lenny3 Linux 2.6.26 image on AMD64 please post aboves, thanks ? -- Thibaut VARÈNE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#566512: Cache directory creation
Le 24 janv. 10 à 02:48, Dominique Brazziel a écrit : So, this bit here --- if (chdir((char *)(conf-cache_setup))) { mi_serror(%s, strerror(errno)); goto exit; One last thing, if a note is added to the documentation about cache file directory, perhaps something about the ownership of the directory (www-data:www-data) should be included. It already is, as I said in my first email: - flat file: 'file://absolute/path/to/cache/tree' This path must be read/write accessible for the webserver's uid. mkdir /some persistent directory/musicindex chown www-data:www-data /some persistent directory/musicindex I cannot be this specific, the README is intended to everyone, not just Debian users, and on some systems the webserver runs eg as httpd:httpd or nobody:nogroup, etc. -- Thibaut VARÈNE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#561055: FTBFS: ../astronomy/boinc_astronomy.C:29:21: error: config.h: No such file or directory
reassign 561055 boinc-dev merge 561055 556816 affects 556816 boinc-app-milkyway thanks This is a duplicate of #556816 Thanks Le 14 déc. 09 à 03:00, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu a écrit : Package: boinc-app-milkyway Version: 0.18d-1 Justification: FTBFS Severity: serious Hi, boinc-app-milkyway FTBFS on i386 and other architecture. - dh_testdir # Add here commands to configure the package. touch configure-stamp dh_testdir # Add here commands to compile the package. cd bin /usr/bin/make -f make.linux make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/boinc-app-milkyway-0.18d/bin' g++ -DGMLE_BOINC -DBOINC_APP_VERSION=0.18 -DBOINC_APP_NAME='milkyway' -g -O2 -ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops -I/usr/include/BOINC -m32 -Wall -x c++ -c ../astronomy/boinc_astronomy.C -o ../astronomy/boinc_astronomy.o ../astronomy/boinc_astronomy.C:29:21: error: config.h: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [../astronomy/boinc_astronomy.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/boinc-app-milkyway-0.18d/bin' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 - Plese check and fix this problem. Best regards, Nobuhiro -- Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org} GPG ID: 40AD1FA6 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#450520: What's up?
Hi, Any reason why ushare still hasn't been uploaded to debian? It's been packaged in Ubuntu, so most of the work seems to have been done already... If the original submitter no longer intends to package the software, this ITP should be updated. Thanks -- Thibaut VARÈNE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#518466: pidgin-otr: update the translation template during the build
tags 518466 confirmed pending thanks Le 6 mars 09 à 12:34, Sebastien Bacher a écrit : Package: pidgin-otr Version: 3.2.0-3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu jaunty ubuntu-patch Hi, The Ubuntu packages in main need to update their translation template during the build so the strings are available for the translators. The change is not really revelant for debian but doesn't cost a lot either and would allow us to keep the package in sync between the distributions so it would be nice if you could do a similar change to the debian version Looks good to me, I'll upload it when I come back from vacation @+ -- Thibaut VARÈNE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#517627: linux-image-2.6.26-1-parisc64-smp: Acenic driver without firmware triggers HPMC
] dev_ifsioc+0x1d8/0x410 [17179672.056000] [40215bc8] compat_sys_ioctl+0x3e8/0x480 [17179672.056000] [40104ef8] syscall_exit+0x0/0x14 [17179672.056000] [17179672.056000] Kernel panic - not syncing: Kernel Fault ** VIRTUAL FRONT PANEL ** System Boot detected * LEDs: RUN ATTENTION FAULT REMOTE POWER ON FLASH FLASH ON ON LED State: System Running. Unexpected Reboot. Non-critical Error Detected. Check Chassis and Console Logs for error messages. processor system panic 1B00 * EARLY BOOT VFP * End of early boot detected * ** VIRTUAL FRONT PANEL ** System Boot detected * LEDs: RUN ATTENTION FAULT REMOTE POWER ON FLASH FLASH ON ON LED State: System Running. Unexpected Reboot. Non-critical Error Detected. Check Chassis and Console Logs for error messages. processor system panic 1B00 With jumb disabled: Configuring network interfaces...[17179671.856000] eth0: Firmware not running! SIOCSIFFLAGS: De[17179671.864000] eth0: Firmware not running! vice or resource busy SIOCSIFFLAGS: Device or resource busy Failed to bring up eth0. done. -- Thibaut VARÈNE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#515956: linux-image-2.6.26-1-alpha-generic: 2.6.26-1-alpha-generic fails to boot on DS10 (Tsunami)
Le 18 févr. 09 à 19:40, maximilian attems a écrit : On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 02:39:43PM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote: 19:39 vorlon abrotman: upgrade the aboot on your disk 19:39 abrotman isn't that part of the upgrade process from etch- lenny ? 19:39 vorlon no 19:39 vorlon we never change the boot block on upgrade can you confirm to have been hit by this? Running swriteboot /dev/sda /boot/bootlx -f1 allowed me to boot the new kernel. AFAICT, this wasn't mentioned in the release notes... Still, it's still a no go: with the new kernel booted, I can no longer log into the box using SSH: OpenSSH_4.7p1 Debian-8ubuntu1.2, OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007 debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config debug1: Applying options for * debug1: Connecting to pluto port 22. debug1: Connection established. debug1: identity file /home/varenet/.ssh/identity type -1 debug1: identity file /home/varenet/.ssh/id_rsa type -1 debug1: identity file /home/varenet/.ssh/id_dsa type 2 debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_5.1p1 Debian-5 debug1: match: OpenSSH_5.1p1 Debian-5 pat OpenSSH* debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_4.7p1 Debian-8ubuntu1.2 debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received debug1: kex: server-client aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none debug1: kex: client-server aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST(102410248192) sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY debug1: Host 'pluto' is known and matches the RSA host key. debug1: Found key in /home/varenet/.ssh/known_hosts:8 debug1: ssh_rsa_verify: signature correct debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent Disconnecting: Corrupted MAC on input. This is consistently happening across reboots (box sporting a BCM5701, tg3 driver). I guess I'm gonna have to submit another bug report... HTH -- Thibaut VARÈNE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#515653: uptimed: on brutal reboot, all records are lost
Please don't remove the BTS from the CC-list. Bug report information must be recorded. Le 16 févr. 09 à 19:26, Sandro Tosi a écrit : On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 19:19, Thibaut VARENE vare...@debian.org wrote: What filesystem are you using on /var? xfs By default, XFS will zero-out inconsistent files after an unclean mount. If that's what happened, it's likely uptimed tried to use the (invalid) content of the file instead of its backup, which is why you didn't see anything in the log (when it uses its backup database it prints a message). Radek, I don't really know what to do about this. Working around filesystem issues is gonna be a burden. Adding supplementary checks to assert the validity of the file being read doesn't look really straightforward; do you have any suggestion about this? The way I see it, we could bail out in urec.c:231, and 1) give feedback on failure to read record entry, while 2) falling back to the backup database on such a failure... Of course, if the backup db is also damaged, we're doomed. What's the content of /var/spool/uptimed/records* ? $ for file in /var/spool/uptimed/records* ; do echo --- $file --- ; cat $file ; done --- /var/spool/uptimed/records --- 35228:1234767249:Linux 2.6.25-2-amd64 5978:1234802550:Linux 2.6.25-2-amd64 --- /var/spool/uptimed/records.old --- 35228:1234767249:Linux 2.6.25-2-amd64 5918:1234802550:Linux 2.6.25-2-amd64 That's ok. -- Thibaut VARÈNE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org