Bug#901062: qtbase5-dev: qtbase5-dev: QFile::exists() returns false for existing files?!

2018-06-08 Thread Wearenotalone
emengine_unix.cpp#n931 [13] /usr/include/asm-generic/errno-base.h [14] https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/tree/src/corelib/io/qfilesystemengine_unix.cpp#n350 [15] https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/tree/src/corelib/io/qfilesystemengine_unix.cpp#n979 [16] https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/tree/src

Bug#901062: qtbase5-dev: qtbase5-dev: QFile::exists() returns false for existing files?!

2018-06-08 Thread Wearenotalone
Package: qtbase5-dev Version: 5.10.1+dfsg-7 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer,   did a fresh install of debian sid within docker and stumbled upon this bug in QFile: QFile's method exists() returns false even if that file exists. STEPS TO REPRODUCE: $ cat << 'EOF' >> /tmp/CMakeLists.txt

Bug#718348: closed by Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer lisan...@debian.org (Bug#718348: fixed in qtbase-opensource-src 5.1.0+dfsg-2)

2013-08-09 Thread Wearenotalone
Thank you! Am 09.08.2013 05:21, schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System: This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report which was filed against the qtbase5-dev package: #718348: qtbase5-dev: Unable to configure cmake project using qt5 without qtbase5-private-dev It has been closed by

Bug#668274: linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64: Intel Core i3-2310M (HD 3000) / i915: Black screen at boot

2012-04-10 Thread WEARENOTALONE
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.2.14-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainers, when I try to boot the current kernel 3.2 from debian wheezy||sid, my notebook screen goes black. Switching to another tty doesn't help, but the system is still usable e.g. via ssh. This bug is already known and fixed

Bug#668274: Intel Core i3-2310M (HD 3000) / i915: Black screen at boot

2012-04-10 Thread Wearenotalone
Hello Jonathan, ... Am I correct in assuming 3.3 works fine on your machine? Cheers, Jonathan Yes, this bug seems to be fixed in linux-image-3.3.0-trunk-amd64 (3.3-1~experimental.1). Kind regards, Jakob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Bug#660394: Screen goes blank @30 seconds into boot

2012-04-07 Thread Wearenotalone
Hello there, after updating my Debian Wheezy/Testing to linux kernel 3.2 my screen goes black at boot, too. My system is a Lenovo Thinkpad L420 with an Intel Core i3 (HD3000) inside. The fix posted above (http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2012-January/014332.html) fixes this bug

Bug#660394: Screen goes blank @30 seconds into boot

2012-04-07 Thread Wearenotalone
the i915.modeset=0 workaround. Then i patched my kernel as proposed at [1], rebooted and voilà the black/blank screen is gone. Kind regards [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660394#10 Am 07.04.2012 15:52, schrieb Jonathan Nieder: Hi, Wearenotalone wrote: after updating

Bug#480728: Info received (keytouch-init: failed to set keycode)

2009-05-04 Thread Wearenotalone
I don't know why but for me this problem is gone (around one week ago). My keycodes are back: $ LANG=C sudo getkeycodes Plain scancodes xx (hex) versus keycodes (dec) for 1-83 (0x01-0x53) scancode equals keycode 0x50: 80 81 82 83 84 0 86 87 0x58: 88 117 0 0 95 183 184 185

Bug#516003: (no subject)

2009-03-01 Thread Wearenotalone
Thanks for your feedback :) But why is a loop device attached to my LUKS partition? Because you specified so. I already noticed that i made some bad configuration mistakes ;) But i don't know for sure, where exactly i made this error. Is my assumption correct, that this problem is

Bug#516003: (no subject)

2009-03-01 Thread Wearenotalone
Jan Engelhardt schrieb: On Sunday 2009-03-01 18:19, Wearenotalone wrote: Thanks for your feedback :) But why is a loop device attached to my LUKS partition? Because you specified so. I already noticed that i made some bad configuration mistakes ;) But i don't know

Bug#516003: segfault caused by umount.crypt after libpam-mount update

2009-02-24 Thread Wearenotalone
Hello, Bastian Kleineidam schrieb: Hi, Am Friday 20 February 2009 11:50:48 schrieb Wearenotalone: Yesterday i continued looking for a solution to my problem. At first i changed my volume definition to volume fskeycipher=aes-256-cbc fskeyhash=sha512 options=fsk_cipher=aes-256-cbc,fsk_hash

Bug#516003: segfault caused by umount.crypt after libpam-mount update

2009-02-20 Thread Wearenotalone
= ehd_dmcrypt_ops.unload(mt); // WEARENOTALONE: Error??? #elif defined(HAVE_DEV_CGDVAR_H) ret = ehd_cgd_ops.unload(mt); #endif /* Try to free loop device even if cryptsetup remove failed */ if (mt-loop_device != NULL) ret = pmt_loop_release(mt-loop_device); return ret

Bug#516003: segfault caused by umount.crypt after libpam-mount update

2009-02-20 Thread Wearenotalone
I think i have identified the cause of my unmount problem. The mount option keybits implies the loop option. This causes the LUKS partition again to be mounted as a loop device. At the moment mount.crypt only filters the loop option but not the keybits option. Usualy this is no problem

Bug#516003: segfault caused by umount.crypt after libpam-mount update

2009-02-20 Thread Wearenotalone
The first solution seems to be incomplete. If the keybits option is given then the loop device (/dev/loop1) on top of the LUKS partition is not created (correct behavior), BUT the loop device of the /my/encrypted.img file (/dev/loop0) is not removed after luksClosing