Bug#857423: link to sso page is broken

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org> wrote: > On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, anatoly techtonik wrote: >> Git is not linked to Debian bugtracker to reference and close bugs >> automatically, isn't it? > > There's no general rule but this reposit

Bug#857423: link to sso page is broken

Package: tracker.debian.org Login page https://tracker.debian.org/accounts/login/ refers to non-existing https://sso.debian.org/spkac/enroll/ page for SSO login.

Bug#857422: fails to send report from root in container

Package: reportbug Version: 6.6.3 Trying to submit report under root fails after editing message with vim. Report will be sent to "Debian Bug Tracking System" Submit this report on tracker.debian.org (e to edit) [Y|n|a|c|e|i|l|m|p|q|d|t|s|?]? Traceback (most recent call

Bug#830892: A better patch

Attached patch sets --user option only if no --system, --prefix or --target are defined, which are mutually exclusive to this option. diff --git a/pip/commands/install.py b/pip/commands/install.py index 13b328f..dcc4cd4 100644 --- a/pip/commands/install.py +++ b/pip/commands/install.py @@ -55,12

Bug#717834: Fwd: Kill DEHS

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:38 AM, Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org wrote: Given that UDD does more, it could also implement a stripped down version. But I'm not sure what is the functionality you are looking for. Monitor a specific package using RSS? Stats? As for me, the most useful Debian

Bug#717834: Fwd: Kill DEHS

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:45 PM, anarcat anar...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 05:01:46PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: Package: qa.debian.org DEHS service at http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/ looks alive, but in fact it is dead and its database is offline for almost two years

Bug#771714: cp preserves mode with --no-preserve=mode (should clear x)

Package: coreutils This is a continuation of archived https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=488024 The above bug closed as wontfix in Debian, but seems fixed in Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/379233 Why it is important to make cp --no-preserve=mode

Bug#768359: git clone unconditionally creates worktree with permission 755 ~umask instead of 777 ~umask

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote: tags 768359 + upstream patch fixed-upstream quit Hi, anatoly techtonik wrote: git clone unconditionally creates main dir with 755 mode ignoring ACL and POSIX permissions if they are different. More info here

Bug#768359: git: clone unconditionally creates dir with 755 ignoring ACL and POSIX permisson setup

Package: git Version: 1:1.7.10.4-1+wheezy1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, git clone unconditionally creates main dir with 755 mode ignoring ACL and POSIX permissions if they are different. More info here:

Bug#744852:

If you use web-based client, the process is not that painful after setting mailto: handler correctly. As for actual SSO integration I believe it depends on #277744. http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2012/02/open-mailto-links-using-gmail-in-google.html -- anatoly t. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#761007: /robots.txt is invalid, prevents bugs from being indexed by Internet Archive

Package: bugs.debian.org Access to Debian bug reports in Internet Archive is blocked by robots.txt http://web.archive.org/web/*/https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736214 Current contents of https://bugs.debian.org/robots.txt: [cut here] User-Agent: Googlebot, bingbot,

Bug#744852:

Well, even with mailto: integration it takes me absolute minimal of 8 actions (all mouse clicks) to go through a full cycle if subscription to a single bug, so I confirm that the issue exists. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#717824: anonscm.debian.org needs a feedback channel

Package: general http://anonscm.debian.org/ doesn't have any coordinates in site footer to report issues such as this one http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-modules/packages/python-pyftpdlib/trunk/debian/watch?r1=13515r2=13521 and others. -- anatoly t. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#717834: Fwd: Kill DEHS

Package: qa.debian.org DEHS service at http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/ looks alive, but in fact it is dead and its database is offline for almost two years, which is shown by multiple reports in ML over that time http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/dehs-devel/ It's time to kill it so that it

Bug#717561: closed by Mònica Ramírez Arceda mon...@debian.org (bug 717561 is RFP for package fabric already in Debian)

is already in Debian: http://packages.qa.debian.org/fabric Regards. -- Forwarded message -- From: anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com To: Debian BTS Submit sub...@bugs.debian.org Cc: Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:45:12 +0300 Subject: RFP: fabric -- a simple pythonic tool

Bug#717561: RFP: fabric -- a simple pythonic tool for remote deployment and SSH automation

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Package name : fabric Version : 1.6.1 Upstream Author : https://github.com/fabric/fabric/blob/1.6/AUTHORS URL : http://docs.fabfile.org/ License : BSD (https://github.com/fabric/fabric/blob/1.6/LICENSE) Description : Python library and command-line tool for

Bug#702715:

If the package is broken and doesn't work at all, what is the reason to upload it to unstable with low priority?

Bug#653068:

The same problem trying Debian Squeeze in virt-manager with qxl on Fedora 17: unaligned pointer 0x8ef20002 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#581626: trac crash seems likely to be due to sqlite or python, not trac directly

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.netwrote: Are you still able to reproduce this error? No. I am using Trac 0.12 in custom virtualenv installation that's independent of Debian libraries. Even though Martin does a great job in maintaining Trac packages,

Bug#646549:

I'd say the priority should be raised to critical. See bug #646945 for another symptom.

Bug#646549:

affects 649349 xen-hypervisor-4.1-amd64 affects 646945 svn-buildpackage -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#146207:

Why is it so hard to fix this, i.e. to teach aptitude update apt-get structures for packages that aptitude puts on hold? This inconsistency is already causing troubles with SCM tools. http://trac.mcs.anl.gov/projects/bcfg2/ticket/1066 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#146207:

On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote: Quoting anatoly techtonik (techto...@gmail.com): Why is it so hard to fix this, i.e. to teach aptitude update apt-get structures for packages that aptitude puts on hold? This inconsistency is already causing troubles

Bug#646945: [Svn-bp-devel] Bug#646945: svn-buildpackage: 'Illegal instruction' when executing

On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Jan Hauke Rahm j...@debian.org wrote: tag 646945 + moreinfo thanks Hi, thanks for trying to improve Debian! On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 05:53:48PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: Package: svn-buildpackage Version: 0.8.3 Severity: important svn-buildpackage

Bug#646945: [Svn-bp-devel] Bug#646945: svn-buildpackage: 'Illegal instruction' when executing

On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote: tag 646945 + unreproducible quit On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:53:48 +0300 anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote: I (and the rest of the team @ work) use svn-bp on squeeze on a daily basis, I don't see these problems

Bug#646945: [Svn-bp-devel] Bug#646945: svn-buildpackage: 'Illegal instruction' when executing

On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote: On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 13:46:48 +0300 anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote: tag 646945 + unreproducible quit i.e. you're going to have

Bug#646945: closed by Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org (Re: [Svn-bp-devel] Bug#646945: svn-buildpackage: 'Illegal instruction' when executing)

reopen On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System ow...@bugs.debian.org wrote: I understand that, but I am nor Perl expert, neither have time to become one, so unless somebody tells me what to do, chances that I can do anything on my own are minimal. If that

Bug#646945: [Svn-bp-devel] 'Illegal instruction' when executing)

Thanks for the explanation. I'll work more closely with the person, who created this machine and let you know if the problem persists in a new setup. -- anatoly t. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#646945: svn-buildpackage: 'Illegal instruction' when executing

Package: svn-buildpackage Version: 0.8.3 Severity: important svn-buildpackage doesn't execute at all failing with the message Illegal instruction -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.2 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux

Bug#441887: www.debian.org: APT-HOWTO is out of date

Could you, please, provide links to replacements from the headers of corresponding sections? The documentation is still available from the web, and its (Obsolete Documentation) confuses people without providing any hints where to look for updated information. For example, the HOW-TO its the top

Bug#601839: debian/rules: reword build-arch, build-indep one line fix

Package: debian-policy Severity: normal I propose a clarification to build-arch and build-indep fields: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-debianrules - The build target should depend on those of the targets build-arch and build-indep that are provided in the rules file. +

Bug#575127: trac-bitten: need bitten-slave only binary package

Package: trac-bitten Version: 0.6b2 Severity: normal I'd like to install some Bitten slaves without installing Trac dependecy. Bitten allows that. Debian is not. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers oldstable APT policy: (500, 'oldstable') Architecture: i386 (i686)

Bug#562963: Trac: wrong plugin names

Attaching the patch here as it won't be integrated upstream, because 0.11 branch accepts only critical bugfixes. 0.12 uses different approach that modifies behavior of plugin loader and backporting this can break things. -- anatoly t. On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 9:54 PM, anatoly techtonik techto

Bug#562963: Trac: wrong plugin names

wrote: tags 562963 +patch thanks Quoting anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com: Here is a patch prototype for 0.11-dev branch. It won't work from the start probably, because I don't have time to test it right now and there is no guarantee I'll return to it next week. But it's better than

Bug#562963: Trac: wrong plugin names

these. I'll keep you updated. -- anatoly t. On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 4:38 PM, W. Martin Borgert deba...@debian.org wrote: Quoting anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com: Yep. I know that. It is because plugin system in original WebAdmin plugin was designed with eggs in mind (whatever that means

Bug#562963: Trac: wrong plugin names

Here is a patch prototype for 0.11-dev branch. It won't work from the start probably, because I don't have time to test it right now and there is no guarantee I'll return to it next week. But it's better than nothing. -- anatoly t. On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 2:41 PM, anatoly techtonik techto

Bug#533176: debhelper: clarify current directory in dh_install man

Package: debhelper Version: 5.0.42 Severity: minor It would be nice if dh_install man page included some hints about what is the current directory in the following paragraph: The name of the files (or directories) to install should be given relative to the current directory, while the

Bug#515048: wipe2fs: does not install from source

Package: wipe2fs Version: 0.2.1-1 Severity: important Justification: fails to build from source $ sudo apt-get -b source wipe2fs Reading package lists... Done ../configure --build i486-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr checking ext2fs/ext2fs.h usability... no checking ext2fs/ext2fs.h presence...