ct that approximately the only thing it ought to have is the
> include line
I can definitely work on that once weasel confirms a /etc/tor/torrc file
with only a single include line is what we expect. Also, could you
please specify which directory will be used as torrc.d directory, weasel?
Thank you very mcuh!
Best Regards,
iry
ow if there is anything I could help to sort out
supporting the torrc.d feature because I will be more than happy to do so!
Best,
iry
[0]:
https://forums.whonix.org/t/graphical-gui-whonix-setup-wizard-anon-connection-wizard-technical-discussion/650/377
better for the Debian maintainers.
>
> Another alternative is just to ignore the browser camouflage layer
> on Debian. That's what every other nonTor Browser platform already
> does, as far as I know.
Could you please tell me the status of this p
but I don't think
> deviating from upstream would be particularly worthwhile.
>
I have sent the proposal[0] to tor-dev@ and Cced you.
Let's see how it goes :)
Best,
iry
[0]: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2017-August/012399.html
of bridges will distinguish the
anon-connection-wizard bridge users from the TBB bridge users, which
compromises their anonymity.
Thank you very much! And looking forward to a further discussion.
Best,
iry
[0]:
https://gitweb.torproject.org/builders/tor-browser-bundle.git/tree/Bundle-Data
ebian will
> set up) since that won't throw dpkg interactive conflict resolution dialogs
> when /etc/tor/torrc gets modified by Debian?
Do you think it will be a good solution? I am looking forward to a
further discussion since it is a really important feature for Debian and
its derivative
very much for your time and effort!
Best,
iry
7 matches
Mail list logo
