Bug#611282: [Pkg-opennebula-devel] Seperate client package

2011-02-16 Thread wvengen+pkg-opennebula-devel
Thanks, I'm glad to see the plan is to take it up for 2.2. Great!
If you need help testing, let me know.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#611282: [Pkg-opennebula-devel] Seperate client package

2011-01-27 Thread wvengen+pkg-opennebula-devel

Hi Damien,

Thanks for your quick response! I'm happy to hear you like the idea and 
that you've submitted a bug report (which I might do right away next 
time :) ).



IMHO, we have to split actual opennebula package in something like :

Looks good, but see comments.


- libopennebula-ruby (all /usr/lib/one/ruby/ ? split client and server
  part ?)

  it's about 600k ... I'd leave it one package


- opennebula-tools (onevm  others CLI tools)

  or maybe opennebula-client


- opennebula (oned, sched_mm and all /etc/one )

  opennebula-server? (which would recommend the client, I guess)

- opennebula
  possibly meta-package containing dependencies for client+server,
  or maybe a transitional package to opennebula-server and -client?

Just my 2c.

Regards,
- Willem



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org