Bug#1052028: please update to pydantic 2.x
Hi Alexandre, * Alexandre Detiste [2024-04-14 16:12]: Now that pydantic-core is available, I started packaging v2.7. pydantic-core in Debian is not the latest release, because anything above 2.11.0 requires an additional Rust dependency (jiter), which in turns needs several other Rust dependencies packaged. According to the listed requirements, I would expect pydantic 2.4.2 to be compatible, so I suggest we start there and upgrade to the latest release as soon as pydantic-core gains its missing dependencies and can be upgraded, too. Cheers Timo -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ╭╮ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ │ Timo Röhling │ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ │ 9B03 EBB9 8300 DF97 C2B1 23BF CC8C 6BDD 1403 F4CA │ ⠈⠳⣄ ╰╯ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1052028: please update to pydantic 2.x
Hi, Now that pydantic-core is available, I started packaging v2.7. There's a lot left to do, especially for dataclasses. Greetings tests/test_dataclasses.py FF [ 10%] FF.F.FFFsFFF [ 12%] FFFFFFssFFFF [ 14%] FFF.
Bug#1052028: please update to pydantic 2.x
Wouldn't it be better to package it as python3-pydantic2 directly? To avoid breaking every software that uses it. In that way they could just coexist and packages depending on the old one wouldn't all suddenly break. Best -- Salvo Tomaselli "Io non mi sento obbligato a credere che lo stesso Dio che ci ha dotato di senso, ragione ed intelletto intendesse che noi ne facessimo a meno." -- Galileo Galilei http://ltworf.github.io/ltworf/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#1052028: please update to pydantic 2.x
Hi Timo, On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 12:26:32PM +0200, Timo Röhling wrote: > I would like to have pydantic updated to the latest 2.x major release, > because rstcheck depends on it. > > The 2.x API has some breaking changes, but according to the pydantic > README, version 1.10.4 is shipped as pydantic.v1 legacy module. > Therefore, any reverse dependency which is incompatible with the 2.x API > can be fixed trivially at import level. > > As pydantic is only weakly team managed, I am submitting this wishlist > bug, but I am willing to do the grunt work for this and provide the > necessary team uploads. Please go ahead, I don't think I will have time before the end of Debconf to do this, and then probably even less for a while afterwards Michael
Bug#1052028: please update to pydantic 2.x
Source: pydantic Version: 1.10.4-1 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear maintainer, I would like to have pydantic updated to the latest 2.x major release, because rstcheck depends on it. The 2.x API has some breaking changes, but according to the pydantic README, version 1.10.4 is shipped as pydantic.v1 legacy module. Therefore, any reverse dependency which is incompatible with the 2.x API can be fixed trivially at import level. As pydantic is only weakly team managed, I am submitting this wishlist bug, but I am willing to do the grunt work for this and provide the necessary team uploads. I cc'd the Python team mailing list as advance notice for the maintainers of affected reverse dependencies. Cheers Timo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQGzBAEBCgAdFiEEJvtDgpxjkjCIVtam+C8H+466LVkFAmUFgtIACgkQ+C8H+466 LVlPWgwA48KvUKxcwuy9DEQKH6jPaa7g8vNJXIz7EdXnqhUJAVUlDV+7nJ4T5+rJ aesvqHpC6NE76Okkm76UhPk3wwCvsvoww+Ib4OHMKfYt9f1QS3FvQvMRSQWZrUpq +AB0nPfUxc5HepCcH+prshDeUkJ5QmotqeMZTmDbdmZmpHyyF1hAz+0BfgXuJlSg Gpyew8M/qm4IiN04wdG34JwyVTSGutxcHNV8o4cnupp7TuiYpLFVDVYkeJkdWYq1 vFIH80pHfTvDX+2Gk+KlfJA4tcPxvMu2sZm3S4OvIYSq97FeVWLHBUiZmNYboXIe doiAC87EFEo/NTjv1xFXzjKYz27ae/XTpTVgS2FD2U1YUYyYUtr88423QrtvUGnz gDiz+efixPsdy3H26yH1x/Y6qRLQWnag3dyXjPx3xUZgDe0Merhrm5C9Djk8ZKD4 9WuSLNVwXit3n6MMZRZHIdNO/QVxYyFsPSobytXRluroxWVYhOYeSH+uEOhvBYLl qhf317wZ =6qsd -END PGP SIGNATURE-
