Bug#331397: What's the bug, then?

2005-11-21 Thread Thomas Hood
Martin-Éric Racine wrote: That /etc/fstab mounts for /proc are included in a default install? Also, an fstab entry is perhaps needed if the admin wants to mount /proc with options? -- Thomas Hood

Bug#331397: What's the bug, then?

2005-11-21 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
ma, 2005-11-21 kello 16:18 +0100, Thomas Hood kirjoitti: IIUC, the submitter requested that mountall.sh call mount with the noproc option and it was later explained that this is not possible because bind mounts can be included in /etc/fstab. So it seems that users should not include an entry

Bug#331397: What's the bug, then?

2005-11-21 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
ma, 2005-11-21 kello 16:46 +0100, Thomas Hood kirjoitti: Martin-Éric Racine wrote: That /etc/fstab mounts for /proc are included in a default install? Also, an fstab entry is perhaps needed if the admin wants to mount /proc with options? Why not. Then again, mount(8) says: 8X- Mount