On Thursday 27 July 2006 09:18, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
Hello Tobias,
shouldn't the changes be reflected in iso_3166_2.tab, too?
They seem to be in the XML file only.
Hello,
actually, the file iso_3166_2.tab is outdated and should no longer be used.
I've therefore removed the file from the
thanks for the patch and the additional hints about the ISO 3166-2 XML file.
I've verified that the most part of the patch is indeed correct, except the
code DE-BR for Brandenburg. All other corrections have been applied to
the SVN repository and will appear in the next release.
Hello
Hello,
I came across bug #375688 because I had discovered the wrong entry
DE-BR for Berlin in iso-codes.
While I agree that DE-BR should be changed to DE-BE, I believe
that the following hunk from the proposed patch is not correct:
1748c1748
code=DE-BBname=Brandenburg /
---
package iso-codes
tag 375688 pending
thanks
Hello Ulrich, hello Andreas,
thanks for the patch and the additional hints about the ISO 3166-2 XML file.
I've verified that the most part of the patch is indeed correct, except the
code DE-BR for Brandenburg. All other corrections have been applied
Hello Andreas,
I'm sorry for the late reply. We don't use the bug tracking system on Alioth
for the iso-codes package, that's why your bug report got lost. I've filed
it now on the Debian BTS, see http://bugs.debian.org/375688.
i'm looking for a xml-file that contains iso3166-2 entries and
5 matches
Mail list logo
