Bug#393831: more info

2007-06-21 Thread Martin Michlmayr 
* Wesley J. Landaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-20 18:46]:
  package from ia64 for now...
 I was hoping that the underlying bug in ld would get fixed and that this 
 would start working again, as it has in the past. Otherwise, yes, perhaps 
 it just needs to be removed from ia64.

I'm not sure binutils is at fault here.  I forwarded the bug upstream
and there is a patch now floating around that fixes the ld assertation
failure - but now ld produces an error.  Maybe
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3351 will give you more
clues as to what's wrong.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#393831: more info

2007-06-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum 
On 19/10/06 at 09:40 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
 * Wesley J. Landaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-18 20:17]:
  Hmmm... I'll see if upstream can help with this, but it can almost 
  guarantee 
  it won't be in time for etch. (It's doubtful upstream has an IA64 to test 
  on).
 
 In this case I suggest you get the ia64 binary removed and downgrade
 this bug.

Hi,

Any news on this? I think that the best solution would be to remove the
package from ia64 for now...
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#393831: more info

2007-06-20 Thread Wesley J. Landaker 
On Wednesday 20 June 2007 00:22:34 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
 On 19/10/06 at 09:40 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
  * Wesley J. Landaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-18 20:17]:
   Hmmm... I'll see if upstream can help with this, but it can almost
   guarantee it won't be in time for etch. (It's doubtful upstream has
   an IA64 to test on).
 
  In this case I suggest you get the ia64 binary removed and downgrade
  this bug.

 Hi,

 Any news on this? I think that the best solution would be to remove the
 package from ia64 for now...

I was hoping that the underlying bug in ld would get fixed and that this 
would start working again, as it has in the past. Otherwise, yes, perhaps 
it just needs to be removed from ia64.

-- 
Wesley J. Landaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP FP: 4135 2A3B 4726 ACC5 9094  0097 F0A9 8A4C 4CD6 E3D2


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#393831: more info

2006-10-19 Thread Martin Michlmayr 
* Wesley J. Landaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-18 20:17]:
 Hmmm... I'll see if upstream can help with this, but it can almost guarantee 
 it won't be in time for etch. (It's doubtful upstream has an IA64 to test 
 on).

In this case I suggest you get the ia64 binary removed and downgrade
this bug.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#393831: more info

2006-10-18 Thread Martin Michlmayr 
ghdl_0.24+gcc4.1.1-1 can be compiled with a current version of sid.

So it seems pretty clear this bug is due to a change from 0.24 to
0.25.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#393831: more info

2006-10-18 Thread Wesley J. Landaker 
On Wednesday 18 October 2006 03:39, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
 ghdl_0.24+gcc4.1.1-1 can be compiled with a current version of sid.

 So it seems pretty clear this bug is due to a change from 0.24 to
 0.25.

Hmmm... I'll see if upstream can help with this, but it can almost guarantee 
it won't be in time for etch. (It's doubtful upstream has an IA64 to test 
on).

=(

-- 
Wesley J. Landaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgpC0LFqq0qZv.pgp
Description: PGP signature