Bug#422347: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#422347: can't get ntpq without ntpd

2017-06-20 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 08:45:35AM +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > Am 20.06.2017 um 03:33 schrieb Vincent Lefevre: > > On 2017-06-19 23:55:04 +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > >> Marking as wontfix since this is not going to be changed in stable > >> releases. > > > > Most bugs are in that case,

Bug#422347: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#422347: can't get ntpq without ntpd

2017-06-20 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2017-06-20 07:02:54 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 03:33:50AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On 2017-06-19 23:55:04 +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > > > For sid there is a new binary package sntp that ships a proper > > > ntp client. > > > > Unless sntp completely

Bug#422347: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#422347: can't get ntpq without ntpd

2017-06-19 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 03:33:50AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2017-06-19 23:55:04 +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > > Marking as wontfix since this is not going to be changed in stable > > releases. > > Most bugs are in that case, so "wontfix" is improper. What matters > is that the bug

Bug#422347: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#422347: can't get ntpq without ntpd

2008-04-03 Thread Steve Kostecke
Josip Rodin said: On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 12:04:59PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: I had the ntp package because I wanted the ntpq utility Now I found that I also have use for the the ntpdc utility on a machine where openntpd suffices as the server. In general, all this generic NTP client software

Bug#422347: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#422347: can't get ntpq without ntpd

2008-04-03 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 03:52:11PM -0400, Steve Kostecke wrote: Josip Rodin said: On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 12:04:59PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: I had the ntp package because I wanted the ntpq utility Now I found that I also have use for the the ntpdc utility on a machine where openntpd