Bug#440763: lsusb omits some devices and (apparently) cannot be fixed

2007-09-13 Thread Karl O. Pinc
On 09/13/2007 05:59:13 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 05:34:02PM -0500, Karl O. Pinc wrote: > > On 09/13/2007 05:17:17 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > >Karl O. Pinc a écrit : > > >> lsusb silently ignores at least some permission errors, resulting in > >> no output for the device

Bug#440763: lsusb omits some devices and (apparently) cannot be fixed

2007-09-13 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 05:34:02PM -0500, Karl O. Pinc wrote: > > On 09/13/2007 05:17:17 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > >Karl O. Pinc a écrit : > > >> lsusb silently ignores at least some permission errors, resulting in > >> no output for the device to which there are no permissions. > > > > >As al

Bug#440763: lsusb omits some devices and (apparently) cannot be fixed

2007-09-13 Thread Karl O. Pinc
On 09/13/2007 05:17:17 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Karl O. Pinc a écrit : > lsusb silently ignores at least some permission errors, resulting in > no output for the device to which there are no permissions. As already explained, lsusb does not parse /dev, but uses libusb for that. If a devi

Bug#440763: lsusb omits some devices and (apparently) cannot be fixed

2007-09-13 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Karl O. Pinc a écrit : > Hello, > > lsusb silently ignores at least some permission errors, resulting in > no output for the device to which there are no permissions. I have it > on the authority of the Debian lsusb maintainter that this cannot be > fixed in the application. Therefore there is a

Bug#440763: lsusb omits some devices and (apparently) cannot be fixed

2007-09-13 Thread Karl O. Pinc
Hello, lsusb silently ignores at least some permission errors, resulting in no output for the device to which there are no permissions. I have it on the authority of the Debian lsusb maintainter that this cannot be fixed in the application. Therefore there is a problem in the kernel or the USB