Bug#454730: lintian: bogus W: dpatch-missing-description
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Also, the warning could include the patch name as a useful hint :) Yeah, it actually was -- that's how I figured out the problem. It was warning about the patch . :) Ah, nice, then :) JB. -- Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian, because code matters more Debian GNU/Linux Developer| http://www.debian.org Public key available on http://www.jblache.org - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#454730: lintian: bogus W: dpatch-missing-description
Package: lintian Version: 1.23.38 Severity: normal Hi, It looks like lintian gives a bogus warning for dpatch-missing-description because of the 00list index file: % ls debian/patches 00list 10_no_lib64_on_64_bits.dpatch 11_always_smp.dpatch 12_acc_enable_radius_diameter.dpatch % grep DP: debian/patches/* debian/patches/10_no_lib64_on_64_bits.dpatch:## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch. debian/patches/10_no_lib64_on_64_bits.dpatch:## DP: Debian uses /usr/lib even for 64bit architectures. debian/patches/11_always_smp.dpatch:## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch. debian/patches/11_always_smp.dpatch:## DP: Always build for SMP. debian/patches/12_acc_enable_radius_diameter.dpatch:## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch. debian/patches/12_acc_enable_radius_diameter.dpatch:## DP: Enable RADIUS and Diameter in the acc module. Or am I missing something ? JB. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.23-hrt1 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages lintian depends on: ii binutils2.18.1~cvs20071027-2 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii diffstat1.45-2 produces graph of changes introduc ii dpkg-dev1.14.12 package building tools for Debian ii file4.21-3 Determines file type using magic ii gettext 0.17-1 GNU Internationalization utilities ii intltool-debian 0.35.0+20060710.1Help i18n of RFC822 compliant conf ii libparse-debianchan 1.1.1-1 parse Debian changelogs and output ii man-db 2.5.0-4 on-line manual pager ii perl [libdigest-md5 5.8.8-12 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction lintian recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#454730: lintian: bogus W: dpatch-missing-description
Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's the blank line in 00list. Will be fixed in the next upload. Great, thanks ! Also, the warning could include the patch name as a useful hint :) Yeah, it actually was -- that's how I figured out the problem. It was warning about the patch . :) -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#454730: lintian: bogus W: dpatch-missing-description
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Patches for both packages have a description. I haven't tested my other packages but I guess the result would be the same. It's the blank line in 00list. Will be fixed in the next upload. Great, thanks ! Also, the warning could include the patch name as a useful hint :) JB. -- Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian, because code matters more Debian GNU/Linux Developer| http://www.debian.org Public key available on http://www.jblache.org - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#454730: lintian: bogus W: dpatch-missing-description
Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I encountered that issue first on openser (in experimental), but also on iaxmodem (in 1.0.0~dfsg-1, incoming or unstable). Patches for both packages have a description. I haven't tested my other packages but I guess the result would be the same. It's the blank line in 00list. Will be fixed in the next upload. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#454730: lintian: bogus W: dpatch-missing-description
Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Package: lintian Version: 1.23.38 Severity: normal It looks like lintian gives a bogus warning for dpatch-missing-description because of the 00list index file: Looking at the code, it looks like it should do the right thing, but this certainly sounds broken. Is this package in the archive, and if so, what's its name? I'll take a look. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#454730: lintian: bogus W: dpatch-missing-description
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, It looks like lintian gives a bogus warning for dpatch-missing-description because of the 00list index file: Looking at the code, it looks like it should do the right thing, but this certainly sounds broken. Is this package in the archive, and if so, what's its name? I'll take a look. I encountered that issue first on openser (in experimental), but also on iaxmodem (in 1.0.0~dfsg-1, incoming or unstable). Patches for both packages have a description. I haven't tested my other packages but I guess the result would be the same. Thanks, JB. -- Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian, because code matters more Debian GNU/Linux Developer| http://www.debian.org Public key available on http://www.jblache.org - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
