Bug#486399: vim gui
On 18 Jun 2008, James Vega wrote: On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 07:47:29AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote: I've reverted to the previous version now so I can't easily do further tests. I had tried setting the font both directly, via set gfn and via the menu -- same result. set gfn=* just gave terminal -- no choice of fonts. The biggest problem was that the display was tiny; at a resolution of 1600x1020 the characters in the menus were almost too small to read. I'm unable to reproduce any problems using a testing chroot. set gfn=* lists the DejaVu fonts, monospace, sans, and serif as expected since I have no other fonts installed. I'm able to choose fonts from the selection dialog and set them via the normal :set gfn=... format. Your initial bug report states the version was 1:7.1.293-3 but I notice that you're using unstable. Was the buggy version really 1:7.1.314-2 and you had already downgraded before filing the bug report? If so, that makes sense as there were build problems with 1:7.1.314-2 and vim-gtk was actually using lesstif instead of gtk libraries. -- James GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega [EMAIL PROTECTED] No, my report was made before downgrading. But last night I repeated the upgrade process in Sid and this time vim-gtk worked properly. I don't know quite what happened here but anyway I think you could probably close the bug now. Anthony -- Anthony Campbell - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Microsoft-free zone - Using Debian GNU/Linux http://www.acampbell.org.uk (blog, book reviews, and sceptical articles) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#486399: vim gui
I've reverted to the previous version now so I can't easily do further tests. I had tried setting the font both directly, via set gfn and via the menu -- same result. set gfn=* just gave terminal -- no choice of fonts. The biggest problem was that the display was tiny; at a resolution of 1600x1020 the characters in the menus were almost too small to read. -- Anthony Campbell - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Microsoft-free zone - Using Debian GNU/Linux http://www.acampbell.org.uk (blog, book reviews, and sceptical articles) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#486399: vim gui
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 07:47:29AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote: I've reverted to the previous version now so I can't easily do further tests. I had tried setting the font both directly, via set gfn and via the menu -- same result. set gfn=* just gave terminal -- no choice of fonts. The biggest problem was that the display was tiny; at a resolution of 1600x1020 the characters in the menus were almost too small to read. I'm unable to reproduce any problems using a testing chroot. set gfn=* lists the DejaVu fonts, monospace, sans, and serif as expected since I have no other fonts installed. I'm able to choose fonts from the selection dialog and set them via the normal :set gfn=... format. Your initial bug report states the version was 1:7.1.293-3 but I notice that you're using unstable. Was the buggy version really 1:7.1.314-2 and you had already downgraded before filing the bug report? If so, that makes sense as there were build problems with 1:7.1.314-2 and vim-gtk was actually using lesstif instead of gtk libraries. -- James GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#486399: vim gui
I'm having similar issues. the vim-gtk GUI also, now, doesn't look like it's using GTK anymore. In fact, vim-gtk and vim-lesstif both appear to be using lesstif widgets. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#486399: vim gui
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:16:06AM +0100, Oliver Jeeves wrote: I'm having similar issues. the vim-gtk GUI also, now, doesn't look like it's using GTK anymore. In fact, vim-gtk and vim-lesstif both appear to be using lesstif widgets. Your issue is different and fixed in the latest upload (1:7.1.314-2). This bug was reported against the version in testing, not unstable and the lesstif problem is specific to 1:7.1.314-1. -- James GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature