Bug#548046: --ignore-permissions breaks reportbug when not available
Sandro Tosi wrote: On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 17:38, Michal Suchanek michal.sucha...@ruk.cuni.cz wrote: It should either depend on the updated version or detect if the argument is supported and accordingly. read policy about what should be in depends, recommends and suggets. Suggests is not a fix for failure that occurs in common configuration. Ask to apt maintainer to pull into the updated version in suggests, or look at packages depends, and decide it yourself. It seems reportbug always only suggested debsums so debsums were installed for completely different reason rather than resolving this suggest dependency. Since reportbug cannot force debsums to be a particular version by suggests it should handle cleanly the case when debsums aren't the newest version. Thanks Michal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#548046: --ignore-permissions breaks reportbug when not available
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 09:09, Michal Suchanek michal.sucha...@ruk.cuni.cz wrote: It seems reportbug always only suggested debsums so debsums were installed for completely different reason rather than resolving this suggest dependency. Of course: if not present, it's not used. Since reportbug cannot force debsums to be a particular version by suggests it should handle cleanly the case when debsums aren't the newest version. No. Check the package relationships with other packages, install the relevant packages. Now please stop. Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#548046: --ignore-permissions breaks reportbug when not available
On 09/24/2009 09:17 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 09:09, Michal Suchanek michal.sucha...@ruk.cuni.cz wrote: It seems reportbug always only suggested debsums so debsums were installed for completely different reason rather than resolving this suggest dependency. Of course: if not present, it's not used. Since reportbug cannot force debsums to be a particular version by suggests it should handle cleanly the case when debsums aren't the newest version. No. Check the package relationships with other packages, install the relevant packages. No, that's the packager's and apt's job. Since earlier version worked with my debsums and current does not this is certainly a regression. debsums has a --version option so you can use its output and check it in your scripts or devise some other means. Thanks Michal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#548046: --ignore-permissions breaks reportbug when not available
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 13:23, Michal Suchanek michal.sucha...@ruk.cuni.cz wrote: On 09/24/2009 09:17 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: No. Check the package relationships with other packages, install the relevant packages. No, that's the packager's and apt's job. I did mine: if you want to complain, go and knock on apt door Since earlier version worked with my debsums and current does not this is certainly a regression. could you please turn on your brain? the version required is clearly stated in reportbug suggests, now if you still want to use an older version, that's ONLY YOUR FAULT. do YOU understand it or it's too difficult? debsums has a --version option so you can use its output and check it in your scripts or devise some other means. in no fscking way! should I support older versions? no. should I support new versions and update the relevant information suggests? yes. Did I do the last one? yes. So, goodbye. -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#548046: --ignore-permissions breaks reportbug when not available
On 09/24/2009 01:30 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 13:23, Michal Suchanek michal.sucha...@ruk.cuni.cz wrote: On 09/24/2009 09:17 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: No. Check the package relationships with other packages, install the relevant packages. No, that's the packager's and apt's job. I did mine: if you want to complain, go and knock on apt door Suggests are not automatically installed. They need not, that's how they are defined. No problem with apt here. Since earlier version worked with my debsums and current does not this is certainly a regression. could you please turn on your brain? the version required is clearly stated in reportbug suggests, now if you still want to use an older version, that's ONLY YOUR FAULT. do YOU understand it or it's too difficult? I'm very well aware of exact cause of the problem. I do not want to check suggests of every package I install on every machine, and I should not need to for well behaving packages. Stop shouting, please. debsums has a --version option so you can use its output and check it in your scripts or devise some other means. in no fscking way! should I support older versions? no. should I support new versions and update the relevant information suggests? yes. Did I do the last one? yes. When new features are added it is nice to do so in a way that does not break existing features where reasonably possible. I think adding a version check is reasonably possible. You clearly don't want to do so but that does not make the issue with this package disappear. Thanks Michal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#548046: --ignore-permissions breaks reportbug when not available
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 15:39, Michal Suchanek michal.sucha...@ruk.cuni.cz wrote: On 09/24/2009 01:30 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 13:23, Michal Suchanek michal.sucha...@ruk.cuni.cz wrote: On 09/24/2009 09:17 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: No. Check the package relationships with other packages, install the relevant packages. No, that's the packager's and apt's job. I did mine: if you want to complain, go and knock on apt door Suggests are not automatically installed. They need not, that's how they are defined. No problem with apt here. neitehr with reportbug. Since earlier version worked with my debsums and current does not this is certainly a regression. could you please turn on your brain? the version required is clearly stated in reportbug suggests, now if you still want to use an older version, that's ONLY YOUR FAULT. do YOU understand it or it's too difficult? I'm very well aware of exact cause of the problem. it doesn't seem so. I do not want to check suggests of every package I install on every machine, and I should not need to for well behaving packages. again: YOU don't want to fix YOUR problem. Stop shouting, please. I'll do when you'll stop bothering with false claims. debsums has a --version option so you can use its output and check it in your scripts or devise some other means. in no fscking way! should I support older versions? no. should I support new versions and update the relevant information suggests? yes. Did I do the last one? yes. When new features are added it is nice to do so in a way that does not break existing features where reasonably possible. dlin dlon: please weak up. I added a feature that depends on a new version of a package, and I set the new version in suggests. my work is done. I think adding a version check is reasonably possible. NO WAY. You clearly don't want to do so but that does not make the issue with this package disappear. Ok, yeah, sure, keep going on this way. You know what? I'll ignore you from now on. Invest your time in something else (fishing for example?) and stop wasting my time fighting your clueless mind. GO AWAY, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#548046: --ignore-permissions breaks reportbug when not available
Package: reportbug Version: 4.8 Severity: normal /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.5/gtk-2.0/gtk/__init__.py:72: GtkWarning: could not open display warnings.warn(str(e), _gtk.Warning) *** Welcome to reportbug. Use ? for help at prompts. *** Detected character set: UTF-8 Please change your locale if this is incorrect. Using 'Michal Suchanek hramr...@centrum.cz michal.sucha...@ruk.cuni.cz' as your from address. Getting status for reportbug... Verifying package integrity... There may be a problem with your installation of reportbug; the following problems were detected by debsums: Unknown option: ignore-permissions Try 'debsums --help' for more information. -- Package-specific info: ** Environment settings: DEBFULLNAME=Michal Suchanek hramr...@centrum.cz INTERFACE=text ** /home/hramrach/.reportbugrc: reportbug_version 3.39 mode standard ui text email michal.sucha...@ruk.cuni.cz header X-Debbugs-CC: hramr...@centrum.cz smtphost dec59.ruk.cuni.cz -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.3 APT prefers stable APT policy: (900, 'stable'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages reportbug depends on: ii apt 0.7.20.2+lenny1 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii python 2.5.2-3 An interactive high-level object-o ii python-reportbug 4.8 Python modules for interacting wit reportbug recommends no packages. Versions of packages reportbug suggests: pn debconf-utils none (no description available) ii debsums 2.0.36 verification of installed package pn dlocate none (no description available) ii file 4.26-1 Determines file type using magic ii gnupg 1.4.9-3+lenny1 GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep ii python-gtk2 2.12.1-6 Python bindings for the GTK+ widge pn python-gtkspell none (no description available) pn python-urwid none (no description available) pn python-vtenone (no description available) ii ssmtp [mail-transport-age 2.62-3 extremely simple MTA to get mail o pn xdg-utils none (no description available) -- no debconf information -- debsums errors found: Unknown option: ignore-permissions Try 'debsums --help' for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
