Bug#739790: please provide a python3-subversion package

2014-02-22 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: subversion
Version: 1.8.5-2
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3

Please build the subversion bindings for Python3, but keep building the bindings
for Python2.  I don't think that a hard switch can be made, and we have to
provide both at least for some time.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#739790: please provide a python3-subversion package

2014-02-22 Thread Peter Samuelson

[Matthias Klose]
 Please build the subversion bindings for Python3, but keep building
 the bindings for Python2.  I don't think that a hard switch can be
 made, and we have to provide both at least for some time.

Python3 is not supported upstream.  A port was done, or at least
attempted, a couple years ago by an upstream developer, but the patches
were deemed too ugly to mainstream, for not much benefit.  The
situation may change in the future if, e.g., upstream drops support for
Python 2.5.  Perhaps the patches to support both 2.6 and 3.x would be
less ugly.

I'd rather not maintain a patchset for Python 3 compatibility until
upstream supports it, as I don't really understand it.

Peter


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#739790: please provide a python3-subversion package

2014-02-22 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 22.02.2014 20:59, schrieb Peter Samuelson:
 
 [Matthias Klose]
 Please build the subversion bindings for Python3, but keep building
 the bindings for Python2.  I don't think that a hard switch can be
 made, and we have to provide both at least for some time.
 
 Python3 is not supported upstream.  A port was done, or at least
 attempted, a couple years ago by an upstream developer, but the patches
 were deemed too ugly to mainstream, for not much benefit.  The
 situation may change in the future if, e.g., upstream drops support for
 Python 2.5.  Perhaps the patches to support both 2.6 and 3.x would be
 less ugly.
 
 I'd rather not maintain a patchset for Python 3 compatibility until
 upstream supports it, as I don't really understand it.

ohh, thanks for the clarification. I only did see some conditionalization on
python3 in the upstream sources.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org