Bug#754926: Apply to debian fonts task force
Quoting Vasudev Kamath (2014-08-04 05:30:53) There is a wishlist bug requesting to split it into families, I'm not sure if we really want to do it, It probably lead to one source containing 28+ binary packages!. Since upstream doesn't ship individual families still I thought of waiting. What do you think? I think it is probably most sensible to discuss the details at the appropriate bugreport - so will do that now... :-) - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature
Bug#754926: Apply to debian fonts task force
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 08:30:59PM +0800, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote: Hi, I am current DM and could like to apply to debian fonts task force and help to pack fonts-noto to solve #754926, #756456. Please add me to the task force, thanks. make command in upstream does not generate tarball for CJK fonts [0]. Shall I wait for upstream to fix it, or just generate tarball myself? [0] https://code.google.com/p/noto/issues/detail?id=110 -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#754926: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#754926: Apply to debian fonts task force
Hi Chang,
ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 08:30:59PM +0800, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote:
Hi,
I am current DM and could like to apply to debian fonts task force and
help to pack fonts-noto to solve #754926, #756456. Please add me to the
task force, thanks.
make command in upstream does not generate tarball for CJK fonts [0].
Shall I wait for upstream to fix it, or just generate tarball myself?
[0] https://code.google.com/p/noto/issues/detail?id=110
I've updated the package and is already in Git, basically I manually git
cloned and created tarball and noted sha hash at which this was
generated.
One more note package uses CDBS, if you are okay with this feel free to
add yourself to uploaders.
@Jonas: I know you are busy but if you can upload fonts-noto and give me
DM permission it would be great.
If other DD's can upload that is also well and good :).
Cheers,
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: copyni...@samsargika.copyninja.info
IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net}
GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4 C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Bug#754926: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#754926: Apply to debian fonts task force
On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 01:47:24PM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote: I've updated the package and is already in Git, basically I manually git cloned and created tarball and noted sha hash at which this was generated. The current package in git does not solve #754926 because upstream does not pack CJK fonts into tarball when using make [0]. We might need to create tarball for CJK family by our own, or wait for upstream to fix it. And due to the size of CJK fonts (total 419M in upstream third_party/noto_cjk directory), we might need to separate them into the following packages: - fonts-noto-jp (*JP*) - fonts-noto-kr (*KR*) - fonts-noto-cn (*Hans*) - fonts-noto-tw (*Hant*) One more note package uses CDBS, if you are okay with this feel free to add yourself to uploaders. I can learn CDBS, but I am not in pkg-fonts-devel yet. If anyone willingly to add me to pkg-fonts-devel, my alioth account is czchen-guest. [0] https://code.google.com/p/noto/issues/detail?id=110 -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#754926: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#754926: Apply to debian fonts task force
ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 01:47:24PM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
I've updated the package and is already in Git, basically I manually git
cloned and created tarball and noted sha hash at which this was
generated.
The current package in git does not solve #754926 because upstream does
not pack CJK fonts into tarball when using make [0]. We might need to
create tarball for CJK family by our own, or wait for upstream to fix
it.
Oh thats why I didn't find them, in the list. Then I thought it might be
in already included fonts so marked closes for the bug. I will fix that.
And due to the size of CJK fonts (total 419M in upstream
third_party/noto_cjk directory), we might need to separate them into the
following packages:
- fonts-noto-jp (*JP*)
- fonts-noto-kr (*KR*)
- fonts-noto-cn (*Hans*)
- fonts-noto-tw (*Hant*)
Uh 419M? Thats just too huge!. Probably better to make them separate
package? and make fonts-noto depends on it? or suggest it so we don't
end up pulling everything to user machine who don't want CJK.
One more note package uses CDBS, if you are okay with this feel free to
add yourself to uploaders.
I can learn CDBS, but I am not in pkg-fonts-devel yet. If anyone
willingly to add me to pkg-fonts-devel, my alioth account is
czchen-guest.
Cool. Well pkg-fonts lacks active DD's so you might need to wait in the mean
time I've mirrored package on alioth[1] can you access it from there?
Just let me know when you have pushed so I can sync it across to actual repo.
[1] git.debian.org:/git/collab-maint/noto.git
[0] https://code.google.com/p/noto/issues/detail?id=110
Thanks,
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: copyni...@samsargika.copyninja.info
IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net}
GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4 C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Bug#754926: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#754926: Apply to debian fonts task force
On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 04:25:18PM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote: And due to the size of CJK fonts (total 419M in upstream third_party/noto_cjk directory), we might need to separate them into the following packages: - fonts-noto-jp (*JP*) - fonts-noto-kr (*KR*) - fonts-noto-cn (*Hans*) - fonts-noto-tw (*Hant*) Uh 419M? Thats just too huge!. Probably better to make them separate package? and make fonts-noto depends on it? or suggest it so we don't end up pulling everything to user machine who don't want CJK. Since #756456 requests to split fonts-noto, maybe it is time to separate different font family. Cool. Well pkg-fonts lacks active DD's so you might need to wait in the mean time I've mirrored package on alioth[1] can you access it from there? Just let me know when you have pushed so I can sync it across to actual repo. [1] git.debian.org:/git/collab-maint/noto.git Sorry, I do not have permission for collab-maint either. I tried to use github, but CJK tarball is too big (~200M) for github. Maybe you can generate pristine-tar/upstream branch first so that I can help to create separated packages? Or we can wait for upstream to fix make command? [0] https://code.google.com/p/noto/issues/detail?id=110 -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#754926: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#754926: Bug#754926: Apply to debian fonts task force
ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 04:25:18PM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
And due to the size of CJK fonts (total 419M in upstream
third_party/noto_cjk directory), we might need to separate them into the
following packages:
- fonts-noto-jp (*JP*)
- fonts-noto-kr (*KR*)
- fonts-noto-cn (*Hans*)
- fonts-noto-tw (*Hant*)
Uh 419M? Thats just too huge!. Probably better to make them separate
package? and make fonts-noto depends on it? or suggest it so we don't
end up pulling everything to user machine who don't want CJK.
Since #756456 requests to split fonts-noto, maybe it is time to separate
different font family.
It can be done but since upstream themselves won't split the fonts, we
manually splitting them will be more work. So I'm just waiting till
upstream themselves split it into multiple binary.
Also upstream doesn't use tags in their repo, if they had used it we
could used watch file to track individual tags just like we do in
fonts-android (Thanks to Yamane San).
So lets hold on a bit till upstream organizes their source more.
Cool. Well pkg-fonts lacks active DD's so you might need to wait in the mean
time I've mirrored package on alioth[1] can you access it from there?
Just let me know when you have pushed so I can sync it across to actual repo.
[1] git.debian.org:/git/collab-maint/noto.git
Sorry, I do not have permission for collab-maint either. I tried to use
github, but CJK tarball is too big (~200M) for github. Maybe you can
generate pristine-tar/upstream branch first so that I can help to create
separated packages? Or we can wait for upstream to fix make command?
Since you have already registered on Alioth ask some DD you know to send
a signed mail to NM Front Desk requesting them to add you to
collab-maint. Since you are DM I think you yourself can request them.
Yes I can generate that pristine-tar ball, you can also do simply use
git.debian.org to clone and generate the pristine source. I did same for
importing new version of noto today.
[0] https://code.google.com/p/noto/issues/detail?id=110
Cheers,
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: copyni...@samsargika.copyninja.info
IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net}
GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4 C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Bug#754926: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#754926: Apply to debian fonts task force
[replying only to bugreport - hope that reaches all involved] Quoting Vasudev Kamath (2014-08-03 10:17:24) @Jonas: I know you are busy but if you can upload fonts-noto and give me DM permission it would be great. Didn't look at the code, but sounds like more work is needed to split this package into families - and as I understand it DM permission won't allow uploading that split anyway. Please tell me when that work is done (and then also please help remind me the magic dput-ng command I should do to grant you the DM permission). - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature
Bug#754926: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#754926: Bug#754926: Apply to debian fonts task force
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
Didn't look at the code, but sounds like more work is needed to split
this package into families - and as I understand it DM permission won't
allow uploading that split anyway. Please tell me when that work is
done (and then also please help remind me the magic dput-ng command I
should do to grant you the DM permission).
There is a wishlist bug requesting to split it into families, I'm not
sure if we really want to do it, It probably lead to one source
containing 28+ binary packages!. Since upstream doesn't ship
individual families still I thought of waiting. What do you think?
And yes I need to remove the closes on the bug#754926 as Chang
mentioned CJK variants are not included in the main hinted folder.
Also size comes to around 419M :-O.
Sure I will remind the dput-ng magic command once I've fixed. it and
yes DM on split package won't help if we split it should be uploaded
by a DD first.
Cheers,
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
