On Sun, 08. Feb 22:11 Ivo De Decker iv...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 07:00:28PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
Ok. Makes sense. I understand that only a minority of users is affected
by that. If you think it's not worth including, so be it. I thought the
change was
unblock tecnoballz/0.93.1-4
Unfortunately I missed that the new dependency was unsatisfiable on
arm64 and ppc64el hence another update was required. Please find
attached the new debdiff for tecnoballz.
Regards,
Markus
diff -Nru tecnoballz-0.93.1/debian/changelog
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 22:06:53 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear release team,
Please unblock package tecnoballz.
It was discovered [1] that tecnoballz' dependency on
On 31.01.2015 18:47, Julien Cristau wrote:
[...]
I don't think kluding this is worth it. The only reasonable way to
avoid something like this (for next time) is to have versioned symbols
in libraries (libmikmod in this case).
Cheers,
Julien
Ok. Makes sense. I understand that only a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear release team,
Please unblock package tecnoballz.
It was discovered [1] that tecnoballz' dependency on libsdl-mixer1.2
was not strict enough. This could lead to a situation where
5 matches
Mail list logo
