On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 16:47, r...@debian.org said:
>> If this works for you I'll commit that upstream.
>
> Thanks for the quick response. It worked!
Thanks for testing. Pushed to the repo. I plan a new upstream release
for this week.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnah
Dear Werner,
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:51:46AM +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
> Should be easier to allow than expected. I had in mind that we are using
> status lines causing the limit but in reality this is a sanity limit
> which you can change in the source:
[snip]
> If this works for you I'll com
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 21:46, r...@debian.org said:
> This may be because my key is "stupidly long" (cf. [0]). I admit, it is
> stupidly long, but I generated it years ago and am stuck with it. So
> could we please maintain support for it?
Should be easier to allow than expected. I had in mind that
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 21:46, r...@debian.org said:
> This may be because my key is "stupidly long" (cf. [0]). I admit, it is
> stupidly long, but I generated it years ago and am stuck with it. So
Arghh 10k RSA. This will require quite some work. Please have some
patience.
Shalom-Salam,
Wern
4 matches
Mail list logo
