severity 834744 serious
thanks
On 07/09/16 at 14:17 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> I suggest to raise the severity now
Yes.
Lucas
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 02:05:45PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> I have just filed
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/836940
>
> against cowbuilder and sbuild and asked both maintainers for a
> clarification. Apparently apt moved the dependency on gnupg from Depends
> to Recommends in version 1.3~exp1
On 07.09.2016 13:06, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Sep 2016, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
>> I haven't been able to reproduce this issue either with a clean pbuilder
>> environment. For some reason gnupg was installed by default in the
>> environment, but maybe this changed recently?
>
> I don't
On Wed, 7 Sep 2016, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I haven't been able to reproduce this issue either with a clean pbuilder
> environment. For some reason gnupg was installed by default in the
> environment, but maybe this changed recently?
I don't know if this changed recently with pbuilder, but
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 04:47:15AM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> I disagree with your bug severity. The build does not fail in a clean
> cowbuilder environment. I'm attaching my build log as proof.
The build log is just a proof that the build succeeded, but *not* a proof
that the environment
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 04:47:15AM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> You should rather work towards defining a common build environment
> standard in Debian [...]
You must be joking. There is already a "common build environment standard",
and it's called the set of build essential packages, of
I haven't been able to reproduce this issue either with a clean pbuilder
environment. For some reason gnupg was installed by default in the
environment, but maybe this changed recently?
Emmanuel Bourg
Correct build log attached now.
xmlgraphics-commons_2.1-1_amd64.build.gz
Description: application/gzip
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: severity -1 normal
On 07.09.2016 01:25, Santiago Vila wrote:
> severity 834744 serious
> tags 834744 - unreproducible
> thanks
>
> Sorry, but missing build-dependencies are RC, and they have always been.
>
>
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Markus Koschany wrote:
>
>> This package builds fine
severity 834744 serious
tags 834744 - unreproducible
thanks
Sorry, but missing build-dependencies are RC, and they have always been.
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Markus Koschany wrote:
> This package builds fine in a clean cowbuilder chroot environment
No, it does not. If the chroot environment
Control: tags -1 unreproducible
Control: severity -1 normal
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 14:22:57 + Santiago Vila wrote:
> Package: src:xmlgraphics-commons
> Version: 2.1-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
>
> Dear maintainer:
>
> I tried to build this package with
Package: src:xmlgraphics-commons
Version: 2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
12 matches
Mail list logo