Bug#850799: italc: please make it multiarch ready

2017-01-11 Thread Mike Gabriel

On  Mi 11 Jan 2017 22:07:56 CET, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:


Hello Mike,




For italc, multi-arch does not make sense, because libitalccore is not
a real shared library. The library gets dynamically linked in via an
RPATH and there is no point in make multi-arch installation possible.

So, why do you think italc should be multi-arch'ified?



because:


1) it does not harm, and seems more "clean" the installation directory
(FHS-wise)
2) the Ubuntu cmake is more picky about automatic multiarchify of packages,
and I would like to avoid an Ubuntu delta for italc.

I'm also thinking about removing that Ubuntu patch, but more multiarch
is better :)

what is your opinion?

G.


ACK. I will incorporate that patch with upcoming 3.0.3 release of iTALC.

Mike
--

DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby
mobile: +49 (1520) 1976 148
landline: +49 (4354) 8390 139

GnuPG Fingerprint: 9BFB AEE8 6C0A A5FF BF22  0782 9AF4 6B30 2577 1B31
mail: mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de



pgpkAiJ_T2Eh_.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur


Bug#850799: italc: please make it multiarch ready

2017-01-11 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello Mike,



>For italc, multi-arch does not make sense, because libitalccore is not  
>a real shared library. The library gets dynamically linked in via an  
>RPATH and there is no point in make multi-arch installation possible.
>
>So, why do you think italc should be multi-arch'ified?


because:


1) it does not harm, and seems more "clean" the installation directory
(FHS-wise)
2) the Ubuntu cmake is more picky about automatic multiarchify of packages,
and I would like to avoid an Ubuntu delta for italc.

I'm also thinking about removing that Ubuntu patch, but more multiarch
is better :)

what is your opinion?

G.



Bug#850799: italc: please make it multiarch ready

2017-01-11 Thread Mike Gabriel

Hi Gianfranco,

On  Di 10 Jan 2017 10:17:48 CET, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:


source: italc
version: 1:3.0.2.90+dfsg1-1
severity: wishlist
tags: patch

Hello, the following patch should make the package multiarch ready

can you please apply/test the package?
Note: I don't know if the change in rules file is needed or not, I don't get
why you override shlibdeps that way :)

G.


For italc, multi-arch does not make sense, because libitalccore is not  
a real shared library. The library gets dynamically linked in via an  
RPATH and there is no point in make multi-arch installation possible.


So, why do you think italc should be multi-arch'ified?

Mike
--

DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby
mobile: +49 (1520) 1976 148
landline: +49 (4354) 8390 139

GnuPG Fingerprint: 9BFB AEE8 6C0A A5FF BF22  0782 9AF4 6B30 2577 1B31
mail: mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de



pgpEHqTBuxgFt.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur


Bug#850799: italc: please make it multiarch ready

2017-01-10 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
source: italc
version: 1:3.0.2.90+dfsg1-1
severity: wishlist
tags: patch

Hello, the following patch should make the package multiarch ready

can you please apply/test the package?
Note: I don't know if the change in rules file is needed or not, I don't get
why you override shlibdeps that way :)

G.


debdiff
Description: Binary data


debdiff
Description: Binary data