Hi Sebastian,
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 09:01:08PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Could you please test this? It seems to compile now.
Thanks for updating the patch. I rebased/updated it for the latest upstream
release (6.0.3p1) and it seems to compile / run. I've forwarded it
On 2018-01-11 21:45:35 [+0100], To Ryan Kavanagh wrote:
> I will try give it a try once I have some time…
Could you please test this? It seems to compile now.
> > Best wishes,
> > Ryan
Sebastian
>From 0edb13aac685566cc0db2806e0e19dfab3421e52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Andrzej
On 2018-01-04 11:11:42 [-0500], Ryan Kavanagh wrote:
> Control: tag -1 + help
>
> Hi Sebastian,
Hi,
> Sorry for dropping the ball on this.
>
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:07:54PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > Could you retry with the following patch?
>
> I've applied the patch,
Control: tag -1 + help
Hi Sebastian,
Sorry for dropping the ball on this.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:07:54PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Could you retry with the following patch?
I've applied the patch, and it successfully builds with libssl 1.0.2n, but FTBFS
with 1.1.0g (logs
Hi Sebastian,
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:07:54PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Could you retry with the following patch?
> SSL_F_SSL_CTX_USE_CERTIFICATE_FILE and SSL_CTX_clear_extra_chain_certs
> was around in openssl since before they forked it. So with this patch
> it should work
On 2017-10-13 11:21:03 [-0400], Ryan Kavanagh wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
Hi Ryan,
> To clarify: I wrote a patch that I believe ports opensmtpd to OpenSSL
> 1.1, but with no backwards compatibility for 1.0. It has not been
> applied (nor reviewed) by upstream, because upstream needs to cope with
>
Hi Sebastian,
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 01:24:19PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
wrote:
> On 2017-10-12 18:33:40 [-0400], Ryan Kavanagh wrote: [trimmed]
> > I made initial efforts to port it to OpenSSL 1.1 and sent them
> > upstream, but things are complicated by opensmtpd needing to be able
> >
On 2017-10-12 18:33:40 [-0400], Ryan Kavanagh wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
Hi Ryan,
> This is being tracked upstream. I made initial efforts to port it to
> OpenSSL 1.1 and sent them upstream (see second comment in the upstream
> bug), but things are complicated by opensmtpd needing to be able to cope
Hi Sebastian,
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:44:58PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Please react before that happens.
This is being tracked upstream. I made initial efforts to port it to
OpenSSL 1.1 and sent them upstream (see second comment in the upstream
bug), but things are
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
10 matches
Mail list logo
