Bug#870959: pearpc: should pearpc be removed from unstable?

2017-08-08 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org retitle -1 RM: pearpc -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch thanks Maintainer seems inactive, reassigning for removal. Cheers, Moritz On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 09:50:12AM -0400, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: pearpc > User: debian...@lists.debian.org >

Bug#870959: pearpc: should pearpc be removed from unstable?

2017-08-06 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: pearpc User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch Hi, Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this package from unstable, because: it was in unstable at the time of