Bug#923091: That merged-usr is mandatory is RC

2019-05-29 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Ivo" == Ivo De Decker writes: Ivo> Hi, Given that there is still discussion about the impact of Ivo> merged /usr at this very late point of the freeze, I think Ivo> having merged /usr by default for new installations should be Ivo> reconsidered. What discussion are you

Bug#923091: That merged-usr is mandatory is RC

2019-05-29 Thread Ivo De Decker
Hi, Given that there is still discussion about the impact of merged /usr at this very late point of the freeze, I think having merged /usr by default for new installations should be reconsidered. On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 07:22:08AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: > I've been debating doing this, but

Bug#923091: That merged-usr is mandatory is RC

2019-05-20 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 07:22:08AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: > > "Ian" == Ian Jackson writes: > > Ian> (sending this because I got the release team address wrong) Ian > Ian> Jackson writes ("That merged-usr is mandatory is RC"): > >> In #923091, Guillem (with dpkg maintainer hat

Bug#923091: That merged-usr is mandatory is RC

2019-05-19 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Ian" == Ian Jackson writes: Ian> (sending this because I got the release team address wrong) Ian Ian> Jackson writes ("That merged-usr is mandatory is RC"): >> Control: severity -1 serious >> >> In #923091, Guillem (with dpkg maintainer hat on) asks for a >>

Bug#923091: That merged-usr is mandatory is RC

2019-05-15 Thread Guillem Jover
On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 17:24:55 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 11:22:35AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > In #923091, Guillem (with dpkg maintainer hat on) asks for a > > base-installer option to allow installing buster without merged-usr. > > No, he did not mention dpkg.

Bug#923091: That merged-usr is mandatory is RC

2019-05-13 Thread Bastian Blank
Control: severity -1 wishlist Hi Ian On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 11:22:35AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > In #923091, Guillem (with dpkg maintainer hat on) asks for a > base-installer option to allow installing buster without merged-usr. No, he did not mention dpkg. But as always, please provide a

Bug#923091: That merged-usr is mandatory is RC

2019-05-13 Thread Ian Jackson
(sending this because I got the release team address wrong) Ian Jackson writes ("That merged-usr is mandatory is RC"): > Control: severity -1 serious > > In #923091, Guillem (with dpkg maintainer hat on) asks for a > base-installer option to allow installing buster without merged-usr. > >

Bug#923091: That merged-usr is mandatory is RC

2019-05-13 Thread Ian Jackson
Control: severity -1 serious In #923091, Guillem (with dpkg maintainer hat on) asks for a base-installer option to allow installing buster without merged-usr. Guillem filed the bug as `wishlist' but given the controversy it seems to me that it should be RC if for no other reasons than social