Bug#962533: mlpack FTBFS on mips64el: relocation truncated to fit

2020-06-28 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
How about switching to clang; would there be any objections to that? If a mips porter could rip all the space save and --parallel=1 stuff out of debian/rules and build with fakeroot debian/rules CXX=clang++-9 CC=clang-9 build and if it works I think just switching would make sense.

Bug#962533: mlpack FTBFS on mips64el: relocation truncated to fit

2020-06-12 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 05:56:39AM +0800, YunQiang Su wrote: > Adrian Bunk 于 2020年6月9日周二 下午11:18写道: >... > just add -mxgot to cxxflags. > there are 2 type of GOT in mips: one use fewer insn while has a length > limitaion; another uses more insns while has a big address space support. >... That's

Bug#962533: mlpack FTBFS on mips64el: relocation truncated to fit

2020-06-11 Thread YunQiang Su
Adrian Bunk 于 2020年6月9日周二 下午11:18写道: > Source: mlpack > Version: 3.3.1-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > > It seems Boost 1.67 -> 1.71 increased something: > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=mlpack=mips64el=3.3.1-1%2Bb1=1591444281=0 > > ... > /usr/bin/c++ -g -O2

Bug#962533: mlpack FTBFS on mips64el: relocation truncated to fit

2020-06-09 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: mlpack Version: 3.3.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs It seems Boost 1.67 -> 1.71 increased something: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=mlpack=mips64el=3.3.1-1%2Bb1=1591444281=0 ... /usr/bin/c++ -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat