Bug#969453: RFS: solo-python/0.0.26-1 [ITP] -- command line interface for SoloKeys 2FA security keys

2020-12-23 Thread Philip Rinn
Hi Santiago, On 22.12.20 at 10:03, Santiago R.R. wrote: I could, if nobody else can respond earlier. given the holidays, I'd have some delay. thank you very much, I would appreciate that. Sure, holidays are approaching and I think we all need some tranquil time. Best Philip Cheers

Bug#969453: RFS: solo-python/0.0.26-1 [ITP] -- command line interface for SoloKeys 2FA security keys

2020-12-22 Thread Santiago R.R.
El 21 de diciembre de 2020 8:39:44 a. m. GMT-03:00, Philip Rinn escribió: >Hi, > >anyone willing to sponsor this package I think having tools around for >more >security keys in Bullseye would be very nice. > I could, if nobody else can respond earlier. given the holidays, I'd have some

Bug#969453: RFS: solo-python/0.0.26-1 [ITP] -- command line interface for SoloKeys 2FA security keys

2020-12-21 Thread Philip Rinn
Hi, anyone willing to sponsor this package? I think having tools around for more security keys in Bullseye would be very nice. Thanks & happy hacking Philip On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 10:03 +0200, Philip Rinn wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "solo-python": *

Bug#969453: RFS: solo-python/0.0.26-1 [ITP] -- command line interface for SoloKeys 2FA security keys

2020-09-03 Thread Philip Rinn
On 03.09.20 at 10:09 Ansgar wrote: > If it is a command-line utility the choice of language for its > implementation doesn't matter to users and probably shouldn't be part > of a package's name for the same reason Policy recommends scripts in > PATH not including a `.sh` or `.py` suffix[1].

Bug#969453: RFS: solo-python/0.0.26-1 [ITP] -- command line interface for SoloKeys 2FA security keys

2020-09-03 Thread Ansgar
Hi, On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 10:03 +0200, Philip Rinn wrote: > It builds those binary packages: > > solo-python - command line interface for SoloKeys I don't have time to review the package, just one small notice: If it is a command-line utility the choice of language for its implementation

Bug#969453: RFS: solo-python/0.0.26-1 [ITP] -- command line interface for SoloKeys 2FA security keys

2020-09-03 Thread Philip Rinn
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "solo-python": * Package name: solo-python Version : 0.0.26-1 Upstream Author : SoloKeys * URL : https://github.com/solokeys/solo-python * License :