Bug#1001661: notcurses: flaky autopkgtests on armhf

2022-08-21 Thread Paul Gevers

Hi bunk,

On 20-08-2022 21:38, Adrian Bunk wrote:

A package with a flaky autopkgtest is worse than
a package without an autopkgtest.

Not having working and used software in the next stable is also worse
than disabling the autopkgtest.

One possible mitigation would be to disable the autopkgtest until the
issue has been fixed.


For avoidance of doubt, I totally agree with you (I have already NMUed 
packages to only turn of tests). Maybe I should suggest that more often 
explicitly?


Paul


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#1001661: notcurses: flaky autopkgtests on armhf

2022-08-20 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 10:48:23PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
>...
> All timeout after 2:47 hours.

There are no reports of runtime issues.

There do not seem to be any FTBFS issues due to it:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/notcurses.html

A package with a flaky autopkgtest is worse than
a package without an autopkgtest.

Not having working and used software in the next stable is also worse 
than disabling the autopkgtest.

One possible mitigation would be to disable the autopkgtest until the 
issue has been fixed.

> Paul

cu
Adrian



Bug#1001661: notcurses: flaky autopkgtests on armhf

2022-05-17 Thread peter green

Version 3.0.7 seems to be be passing most of the time on armhf, though there 
were
a few failures duing attempts to migrate gcc-12. The failures appear to be 
timeouts.

Unfortunately 3.0.7 seems to be pretty consistently failing on s390x :(



Bug#1001661: notcurses: flaky autopkgtests on armhf

2022-04-05 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 02:05:15 -0400 nick black  wrote:
> i'm pretty sure raspberry pi is armhf, so i ought be able to dig
> that one RPi4 i've got up and explore this. if we can reproduce
> the problem interactively, it ought fall pretty quickly.

Note that on Debian, the RPi 0/0w/1 use armel, the RPi 2 uses armhf and RPi 3
and 4 use arm64. I know RPi 0/0w/1/2/3 can (also) run in 32-bit 'mode' and
I think the RPi 4 does too (but I don't have that version).

On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 02:20:40 -0400 nick black  wrote:
> wait...even the most recent of these logs shows that it is
> testing notcurses 3.0.4, which indeed had this timing problem on
> input, which was fixed in notcurses 3.0.5:

I guess you checked the wrong log? The highest version is:
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/armhf/n/notcurses/20022214/log.gz

starting date: 2022-03-15
...
autopkgtest [22:12:59]: testbed dpkg architecture: armhf
autopkgtest [22:13:00]: testbed running kernel: Linux 5.10.0-12-arm64 #1 SMP 
Debian 5.10.103-1 (2022-03-07)
autopkgtest [22:13:00]:  apt-source notcurses
Get:1 http://deb.debian.org/debian testing/main notcurses 3.0.7+dfsg.1-1 (dsc) 
[3,148 B]
Get:2 http://deb.debian.org/debian testing/main notcurses 3.0.7+dfsg.1-1 (tar) 
[7,399 kB]
Get:3 http://deb.debian.org/debian testing/main notcurses 3.0.7+dfsg.1-1 (asc) 
[833 B]
Get:4 http://deb.debian.org/debian testing/main notcurses 3.0.7+dfsg.1-1 (diff) 
[17.3 kB]

> oh, i guess "No testing version" indicates it's gone from
> testing. so why isn't 3.0.7 in unstable the candidate for
> testing? 3.0.4 is definitely known to be bad.

https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/notcurses shows there is a version in testing.

root@bagend:~# aptitude versions notcurses-bin
Package notcurses-bin:  
p   2.2.3+dfsg.1-1stable
 500 
i   3.0.7+dfsg.1-1  
testing,unstable500 
root@bagend:~# apt-show-versions notcurses-bin
notcurses-bin:amd64/testing 3.0.7+dfsg.1-1 uptodate
notcurses-bin:arm64 not installed

And both aptitude and apt-show-versions confirm that on my machine.

HTH,
  Diederik

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#1001661: notcurses: flaky autopkgtests on armhf

2022-04-04 Thread nick black
i'm pretty sure raspberry pi is armhf, so i ought be able to dig
that one RPi4 i've got up and explore this. if we can reproduce
the problem interactively, it ought fall pretty quickly.



Bug#1001661: notcurses: flaky autopkgtests on armhf

2022-03-16 Thread Paul Gevers

Control: severity -1 serious
Control: found -1 3.0.7+dfsg.1-1

On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 22:26:10 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher 
 wrote:

For a recent failure see
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/armhf/n/notcurses/17505950/log.gz


https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/armhf/n/notcurses/20022214/log.gz

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/armhf/n/notcurses/19977381/log.gz

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/armhf/n/notcurses/19573842/log.gz

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/armhf/n/notcurses/18318908/log.gz

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/armhf/n/notcurses/18235559/log.gz

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/armhf/n/notcurses/18231285/log.gz

All timeout after 2:47 hours.

Paul


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#1001661: Info received (Bug#1001661: notcurses: flaky autopkgtests on armhf)

2021-12-25 Thread nick black
well, we don't yet know whether this "took", since 3.0.2 shows
regressions across the board in autopkgtests.

i've set up the upstream bug to track this, and am on it:

 https://github.com/dankamongmen/notcurses/issues/2505

thus far i've been able to run down that it's the "box" demo
that's failing in the "demo" autopkgtest. i expect to have it
resolved tonight. i'll either cut a new debian package with the
necessary patch, or cut a 3.0.3, we'll see.



Bug#1001661: notcurses: flaky autopkgtests on armhf

2021-12-13 Thread nick black
Thanks for the heads-up. I believe/hope that this is the same issue that 
affected our ARM MacOS builds and Alpine i686/ARMHF builds through the 3.0.0 
release, and which has been fixed in the 3.0.1 release:

 https://github.com/dankamongmen/notcurses/issues/2420

3.0.0 is currently in the NEW queue, uploaded to experimental, pending approval 
from the FTPteam (new SONAME -> libnotcurses3). Once it is approved, I will 
upload 3.0.1 (or a newer release, if one exists) to unstable, and I expect that 
this will address this problem.

In the meantime, since the fix is small and precise, I could easily prepare a 
patch for 2.4.9. I think I will go ahead and do so, both to support/disabuse 
the notion that this is the same issue, and since FTPteam + TransitionTeam 
could take significant time.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1001661: notcurses: flaky autopkgtests on armhf

2021-12-13 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: notcurses
Version: 2.4.9+dfsg.1-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org

notcurses' autopkgtest fail from time to time on armhf:
| bash: line 1:  5188 Segmentation fault  bash -ec 'TERM=xterm-256color 
notcurses-demo -d0 -c' 2> >(tee -a 
/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.w6ikw2j4/downtmp/demo-stderr >&2) > >(tee -a 
/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.w6ikw2j4/downtmp/demo-stdout)
| autopkgtest [23:46:21]: test demo: ---]
| autopkgtest [23:46:21]: test demo:  - - - - - - - - - - results - - - - - - - 
- - -
| demo FAIL non-zero exit status 139

For a recent failure see
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/armhf/n/notcurses/17505950/log.gz

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature