Bug#1002291: bpfcc: Fails to build with libbpf/0.6.1-1
HI Vasudev, On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 11:30 AM Vasudev Kamath wrote: > > Sudip Mukherjee writes: > > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 4:12 AM Vasudev Kamath > > wrote: > >> > >> Sudip Mukherjee writes: > >> > >> > You are trying to build 0.24.0+ds and I am rebuilding 0.22.0+ds-2 to > >> > test. :) > >> > > >> > Can you rebuild 0.22.0+ds-2 and verify. > >> > >> Err yes. It works with 0.22.0. I was preparing 0.23.0 and then 0.24.0. > >> Both of which fails as of now. Not sure what should be done. > > > > I think, since it works with 0.22.0 I will update libbpf in unstable. > > I am guessing the previous FTBFS was fixed by libbpf in this release. > > But now bpfcc has messed up something. > > If you are ok, then I can update libbpf and then you can ping the > > bpfcc upstream about the FTBFS with latest bpfcc with latest libbpf. > > Yes please go ahead. I will wait for the new upload a bit more. If it > still does not work I will ping the upstream. Thanks. I have uploaded now. Also, if you can please push your branch to salsa I can have a look sometime next week. -- Regards Sudip
Bug#1002291: bpfcc: Fails to build with libbpf/0.6.1-1
Sudip Mukherjee writes: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 4:12 AM Vasudev Kamath wrote: >> >> Sudip Mukherjee writes: >> >> > You are trying to build 0.24.0+ds and I am rebuilding 0.22.0+ds-2 to test. >> > :) >> > >> > Can you rebuild 0.22.0+ds-2 and verify. >> >> Err yes. It works with 0.22.0. I was preparing 0.23.0 and then 0.24.0. >> Both of which fails as of now. Not sure what should be done. > > I think, since it works with 0.22.0 I will update libbpf in unstable. > I am guessing the previous FTBFS was fixed by libbpf in this release. > But now bpfcc has messed up something. > If you are ok, then I can update libbpf and then you can ping the > bpfcc upstream about the FTBFS with latest bpfcc with latest libbpf. Yes please go ahead. I will wait for the new upload a bit more. If it still does not work I will ping the upstream. Cheers, Vasudev
Bug#1002291: bpfcc: Fails to build with libbpf/0.6.1-1
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 4:12 AM Vasudev Kamath wrote: > > Sudip Mukherjee writes: > > > You are trying to build 0.24.0+ds and I am rebuilding 0.22.0+ds-2 to test. > > :) > > > > Can you rebuild 0.22.0+ds-2 and verify. > > Err yes. It works with 0.22.0. I was preparing 0.23.0 and then 0.24.0. > Both of which fails as of now. Not sure what should be done. I think, since it works with 0.22.0 I will update libbpf in unstable. I am guessing the previous FTBFS was fixed by libbpf in this release. But now bpfcc has messed up something. If you are ok, then I can update libbpf and then you can ping the bpfcc upstream about the FTBFS with latest bpfcc with latest libbpf. -- Regards Sudip
Bug#1002291: bpfcc: Fails to build with libbpf/0.6.1-1
Sudip Mukherjee writes: > You are trying to build 0.24.0+ds and I am rebuilding 0.22.0+ds-2 to test. :) > > Can you rebuild 0.22.0+ds-2 and verify. Err yes. It works with 0.22.0. I was preparing 0.23.0 and then 0.24.0. Both of which fails as of now. Not sure what should be done. Cheers, Vasudev
Bug#1002291: bpfcc: Fails to build with libbpf/0.6.1-1
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 6:32 AM Vasudev Kamath wrote: > > Sudip Mukherjee writes: > > > On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 5:36 AM Vasudev Kamath > > wrote: > >> > >> Sudip Mukherjee writes: > >> > >> > I have now uploaded libbpf/0.7.0 to experimental, can you please try > >> > building bpfcc and let me know if it works for you. > >> > > >> > >> I'm ending up getting different error now related to deprecation. > > > > I am not sure why and how you are getting the error. I have tried > > building bpfcc_0.22.0+ds-2 with sbuild and have also tried building in > > an unstable VM with dpkg-buildpackage and in both the cases it has > > built fine with libbpf/0.7.0 > > Regular build using sbuild + git-buildpackage. Attaching the full log > and git diff. I tried to build using libbpf 0.7.0 from experimental. But > it continues to fail. > > > Let me know if you are able to figure out. I'm bit lost and unable to > really figure out what is happening here. You are trying to build 0.24.0+ds and I am rebuilding 0.22.0+ds-2 to test. :) Can you rebuild 0.22.0+ds-2 and verify. -- Regards Sudip
Bug#1002291: bpfcc: Fails to build with libbpf/0.6.1-1
On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 5:36 AM Vasudev Kamath wrote: > > Sudip Mukherjee writes: > > > I have now uploaded libbpf/0.7.0 to experimental, can you please try > > building bpfcc and let me know if it works for you. > > > > I'm ending up getting different error now related to deprecation. I am not sure why and how you are getting the error. I have tried building bpfcc_0.22.0+ds-2 with sbuild and have also tried building in an unstable VM with dpkg-buildpackage and in both the cases it has built fine with libbpf/0.7.0 -- Regards Sudip
Bug#1002291: bpfcc: Fails to build with libbpf/0.6.1-1
Sudip Mukherjee writes: > I have now uploaded libbpf/0.7.0 to experimental, can you please try > building bpfcc and let me know if it works for you. > I'm ending up getting different error now related to deprecation. >/<>/src/cc/bcc_btf.cc:178:33: error: invalid application of >‘sizeof’ to incomplete type >‘btf_ext_vendored::btf_ext_setup_core_relos(btf_ext_vendored::btf_ext*)::bpf_core_relo’ > 178 | .min_rec_size = sizeof(struct bpf_core_relo), > | ^~~~ > /<>/src/cc/bcc_btf.cc: In member function ‘int > ebpf::BTF::get_map_tids(std::string, unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned > int*, unsigned int*)’: > /<>/src/cc/bcc_btf.cc:655:30: warning: ‘int > btf__get_map_kv_tids(const btf*, const char*, __u32, __u32, __u32*, __u32*)’ > is deprecated: libbpf v0.7+: this API is not necessary when BTF-defined maps > are used [-Wdeprecated-declarations] > 655 | return btf__get_map_kv_tids(btf_, map_name.c_str(), > | ^~~~ > 656 | expected_ksize, expected_vsize, > | ~~~ > 657 | key_tid, value_tid); > | ~~~ > In file included from /<>/src/cc/bcc_libbpf_inc.h:5, > from /<>/src/cc/bcc_btf.cc:22: > /usr/include/bpf/btf.h:154:16: note: declared here > 154 | LIBBPF_API int btf__get_map_kv_tids(const struct btf *btf, const char > *map_name, > |^~~~ > /<>/src/cc/bcc_btf.cc: In function ‘int > btf_ext_vendored::btf_ext_setup_core_relos(btf_ext_vendored::btf_ext*)’: > /<>/src/cc/bcc_btf.cc:178:33: error: invalid application of > ‘sizeof’ to incomplete type > ‘btf_ext_vendored::btf_ext_setup_core_relos(btf_ext_vendored::btf_ext*)::bpf_core_relo’ > 178 | .min_rec_size = sizeof(struct bpf_core_relo), > | ^~~~ > /<>/src/cc/bcc_btf.cc: In member function ‘int > ebpf::BTF::get_map_tids(std::string, unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned > int*, unsigned int*)’: > /<>/src/cc/bcc_btf.cc:655:30: warning: ‘int > btf__get_map_kv_tids(const btf*, const char*, __u32, __u32, __u32*, __u32*)’ > is deprecated: libbpf v0.7+: this API is not necessary when BTF-defined maps > are used [-Wdeprecated-declarations] > 655 | return btf__get_map_kv_tids(btf_, map_name.c_str(), > | ^~~~ > 656 | expected_ksize, expected_vsize, > | ~~~ > 657 | key_tid, value_tid); > | ~~~ > In file included from /<>/src/cc/bcc_libbpf_inc.h:5, > from /<>/src/cc/bcc_btf.cc:22: > /usr/include/bpf/btf.h:154:16: note: declared here > 154 | LIBBPF_API int btf__get_map_kv_tids(const struct btf *btf, const char > *map_name, > |^~~~ > make[3]: *** [src/cc/CMakeFiles/bcc-shared.dir/build.make:121: > src/cc/CMakeFiles/bcc-shared.dir/bcc_btf.cc.o] Error 1 > make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs > [ 69%] Building CXX object > src/cc/CMakeFiles/bcc-static.dir/bpf_module_rw_engine.cc.o > cd /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/cc && /usr/bin/c++ -DEXPORT_USDT > -DHAVE_EXTERNAL_LIBBPF -I/usr/lib/llvm-13/include/../tools/clang/include > -I/<>/src -I/<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src > -I/<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/cc -I/<>/src/cc > -I/<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/cc/frontends/b > -I/<>/src/cc/frontends/b > -I/<>/src/cc/frontends/clang -I/usr/lib/llvm-13/include -g -O2 > -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat > -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -DCUSTOM_MACRO=true > -Wall -fno-rtti -fPIC -DBCC_PROG_TAG_DIR='"/var/tmp/bcc"' -Wno-unused-result > -DLLVM_MAJOR_VERSION=13 -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS > -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -std=gnu++14 -MD -MT > src/cc/CMakeFiles/bcc-static.dir/bpf_module_rw_engine.cc.o -MF > CMakeFiles/bcc-static.dir/bpf_module_rw_engine.cc.o.d -o > CMakeFiles/bcc-static.dir/bpf_module_rw_engine.cc.o -c > /<>/src/cc/bpf_module_rw_engine.cc > [ 69%] Building CXX object > src/cc/CMakeFiles/bcc-shared.dir/exported_files.cc.o > cd /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/cc && /usr/bin/c++ -DEXPORT_USDT > -DHAVE_EXTERNAL_LIBBPF -Dbcc_shared_EXPORTS > -I/usr/lib/llvm-13/include/../tools/clang/include -I/<>/src > -I/<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src > -I/<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/cc -I/<>/src/cc > -I/<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/cc/frontends/b > -I/<>/src/cc/frontends/b > -I/<>/src/cc/frontends/clang -I/usr/lib/llvm-13/include -g -O2 > -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat > -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
Bug#1002291: bpfcc: Fails to build with libbpf/0.6.1-1
Hi Vasudev, On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 7:15 PM Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > Hi Vasudev, > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 6:07 PM Sudip Mukherjee > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:52 AM Vasudev Kamath > > wrote: > > > > > Seems like the FTBFS is not there with libbpf/0.7.0 > I will upload to experimental by Friday so that you can test. I have now uploaded libbpf/0.7.0 to experimental, can you please try building bpfcc and let me know if it works for you. -- Regards Sudip
Bug#1002291: bpfcc: Fails to build with libbpf/0.6.1-1
Hi Vasudev, On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 6:07 PM Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:52 AM Vasudev Kamath > wrote: > > > > Hi Sudip, > > > > Sudip Mukherjee writes: > > > > > > > > > > Reported error: > > > > > > > > > > I tried building bpfcc 0.23.0 with experimental libbpf and it too > > failed. These versions are released with 0.5.0 libbpf. I see that next > > release 0.24.0 (not sure when it happens) should work with newer libbpf. > > Can we hold uploading newer libbpf to unstable till then?. > > Sure, just let me know when its ready and I can upload then. Seems like the FTBFS is not there with libbpf/0.7.0 I will upload to experimental by Friday so that you can test. -- Regards Sudip
Bug#1002291: bpfcc: Fails to build with libbpf/0.6.1-1
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:52 AM Vasudev Kamath wrote: > > Hi Sudip, > > Sudip Mukherjee writes: > > > > > > Reported error: > > > > I tried building bpfcc 0.23.0 with experimental libbpf and it too > failed. These versions are released with 0.5.0 libbpf. I see that next > release 0.24.0 (not sure when it happens) should work with newer libbpf. > Can we hold uploading newer libbpf to unstable till then?. Sure, just let me know when its ready and I can upload then. -- Regards Sudip
Bug#1002291: bpfcc: Fails to build with libbpf/0.6.1-1
Hi Sudip, Sudip Mukherjee writes: > > Reported error: > In file included from /<>/src/cc/bcc_libbpf_inc.h:5, > from > /<>/src/cc/frontends/clang/b_frontend_action.cc:37: > /usr/include/bpf/btf.h: In function ‘bool btf_is_mod(const btf_type*)’: > /usr/include/bpf/btf.h:463:24: error: ‘BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG’ was not declared in > this scope; did you mean ‘BTF_KIND_TYPEDEF’? > 463 |kind == BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG; > |^ > |BTF_KIND_TYPEDEF > /usr/include/bpf/btf.h: In function ‘bool btf_is_decl_tag(const btf_type*)’: > /usr/include/bpf/btf.h:493:31: error: ‘BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG’ was not declared in > this scope; did you mean ‘BTF_KIND_FLOAT’? > 493 | return btf_kind(t) == BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG; > | ^ > | BTF_KIND_FLOAT > /usr/include/bpf/btf.h: In function ‘bool btf_is_type_tag(const btf_type*)’: > /usr/include/bpf/btf.h:498:31: error: ‘BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG’ was not declared in > this scope; did you mean ‘BTF_KIND_TYPEDEF’? > 498 | return btf_kind(t) == BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG; > | ^ > | BTF_KIND_TYPEDEF > I tried building bpfcc 0.23.0 with experimental libbpf and it too failed. These versions are released with 0.5.0 libbpf. I see that next release 0.24.0 (not sure when it happens) should work with newer libbpf. Can we hold uploading newer libbpf to unstable till then?. Thanks and Regards, Vasudev
Bug#1002291: bpfcc: Fails to build with libbpf/0.6.1-1
Source: bpfcc Version: 0.22.0+ds-2 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: sudipm.mukher...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, bpfcc is failing to build with the latest release of libbpf. Reported error: In file included from /<>/src/cc/bcc_libbpf_inc.h:5, from /<>/src/cc/frontends/clang/b_frontend_action.cc:37: /usr/include/bpf/btf.h: In function ‘bool btf_is_mod(const btf_type*)’: /usr/include/bpf/btf.h:463:24: error: ‘BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘BTF_KIND_TYPEDEF’? 463 |kind == BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG; |^ |BTF_KIND_TYPEDEF /usr/include/bpf/btf.h: In function ‘bool btf_is_decl_tag(const btf_type*)’: /usr/include/bpf/btf.h:493:31: error: ‘BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘BTF_KIND_FLOAT’? 493 | return btf_kind(t) == BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG; | ^ | BTF_KIND_FLOAT /usr/include/bpf/btf.h: In function ‘bool btf_is_type_tag(const btf_type*)’: /usr/include/bpf/btf.h:498:31: error: ‘BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘BTF_KIND_TYPEDEF’? 498 | return btf_kind(t) == BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG; | ^ | BTF_KIND_TYPEDEF I have uploaded libbpf to experimental for now. -- Regards Sudip
