Bug#1002837: tiledb: diff for NMU version 1.7.7-1.2

2021-12-31 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Ok, we are now at a place where the package is tamed somewhat: - a lot of the smaller architectures did not build for 1.7.7-4 - five larger ones (all 64-bit based AFAICT) did - so I hard-wired these explicitly in Architecture: All green now for the ones attempted:

Bug#1002837: tiledb: diff for NMU version 1.7.7-1.2

2021-12-30 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Adam, On 30 December 2021 at 11:12, Adam Cécile wrote: | Sure, I was suggesting adding you directly to uploaders because the | package is maintained on Salsa, sadly I see we both missed each other there: | | https://salsa.debian.org/acecile-guest/tiledb |

Bug#1002837: tiledb: diff for NMU version 1.7.7-1.2

2021-12-30 Thread Adam Cécile
Hello Dirk, Sure, I was suggesting adding you directly to uploaders because the package is maintained on Salsa, sadly I see we both missed each other there: https://salsa.debian.org/acecile-guest/tiledb https://salsa.debian.org/debian/tiledb It seems you forked mine, which is fine but I

Bug#1002837: tiledb: diff for NMU version 1.7.7-1.2

2021-12-29 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Couldn't resist an attempt to send in an 1.7.7-3 attempt but still seeing too many unit test failures. Very strange as this works for me on amd64 :-/ Adam, how would you feel about an update to 2.5.3 and catch2 (and no more tbb-dev) ? Would you be ok with me sending that up as NMU? Dirk --

Bug#1002837: tiledb: diff for NMU version 1.7.7-1.2

2021-12-29 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Thank you both for quick thumbs-up! 1.7.7-1.2 was just shipped, fingers crossed about how it'll do with the builders. Dirk -- https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

Bug#1002837: tiledb: diff for NMU version 1.7.7-1.2

2021-12-29 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi Dirk, On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:59 PM Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > Thanks for the *very* prompt response. I may still wait a day or two to also > hear from Utkarsh who last NMUed. +1 to what Adam said. Please upload directly, thanks for asking. :D For the backstory, I was just a sponsor-er

Bug#1002837: tiledb: diff for NMU version 1.7.7-1.2

2021-12-29 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Adam, On 29 December 2021 at 17:51, Adam Cecile wrote: | Hello Dirk, | | You're obviously a person of choice to perform any change on tiledb so please go ahead for a non-delayed upload ! Thanks for the *very* prompt response. I may still wait a day or two to also hear from Utkarsh who

Bug#1002837: tiledb: diff for NMU version 1.7.7-1.2

2021-12-29 Thread Adam Cecile
Hello Dirk, You're obviously a person of choice to perform any change on tiledb so please go ahead for a non-delayed upload ! Regards, Adam. On December 29, 2021 5:42:33 PM GMT+01:00, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: >Package: tiledb >Version: 1.7.7-1.1 >Severity: normal >Tags: patch pending >

Bug#1002837: tiledb: diff for NMU version 1.7.7-1.2

2021-12-29 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Package: tiledb Version: 1.7.7-1.1 Severity: normal Tags: patch pending Dear maintainer, I have prepared an NMU for tiledb (versioned as 1.7.7-1.2) and can uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. In the NMU, I propose to not package tiledb-doc