On 2022-01-20 11:51:48 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> Jonas Smedegaard writes:
>
> > Looks good to me. But then again, I was the one with the wrong approach
> > here, so not sure how much my input can be trusted ;-)
>
> And I'm the one who packaged this initially with *completely* bogus
>
Quoting Keith Packard (2022-01-20 02:28:30)
> Keith Packard writes:
>
> > Suggestions welcome, but it looks like Sebastian may be right and that I
> > need to change the package name of the libraries at each release. Ick.
>
> I've put together a patch which does this, automatically generating
On 2022-01-18 19:30:39 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Control: clone -1 -2
> Control: reassign -1 src:cmark-gfm 0.29.0.gfm.2-1
> Control: retitle -1 cmark-gfm: shlibs too relaxed for unstable ABI
> Control: affects -1 pandoc blogliterately gitit pandoc-citeproc patat
> Control: reassign -2
Quoting John MacFarlane (2022-01-18 22:02:02)
> A note from upstream, in case it's helpful: we haven't depended on
> cmark-gfm since pandoc 2.10.1 (released a year and a half ago). If
> you could move to a more recent version of pandoc, this would avoid
> the problem entirely. I'm aware that
A note from upstream, in case it's helpful: we haven't depended
on cmark-gfm since pandoc 2.10.1 (released a year and a half
ago). If you could move to a more recent version of pandoc, this
would avoid the problem entirely. I'm aware that issues of
policy and packaging may make this
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2022-01-18 19:30:39)
> Control: reassign -1 src:cmark-gfm 0.29.0.gfm.2-1
> Control: retitle -1 cmark-gfm: shlibs too relaxed for unstable ABI
> Control: affects -1 pandoc blogliterately gitit pandoc-citeproc patat
[...]
> Hmm - thinking on it, it seems to me that the
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -1 src:cmark-gfm 0.29.0.gfm.2-1
Control: retitle -1 cmark-gfm: shlibs too relaxed for unstable ABI
Control: affects -1 pandoc blogliterately gitit pandoc-citeproc patat
Control: reassign -2 src:cmark 0.30.2-3
Control: severity -2 important
Control: retitle -2
On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 18:40:33 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Thanks for reporting, Gregor - might be enough to request a binNMU but
> I'd better tighten that dependency, so will do a regular upload.
Great, thanks in advance!
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian
Quoting gregor herrmann (2022-01-18 18:08:02)
> While looking at some test issues in libpod-pandoc-perl, I noticed
> that pandoc looks quite broken in current amd64/sid:
>
> % pandoc --version
> pandoc: error while loading shared libraries: libcmark-gfm.so.0.29.0.gfm.0:
> cannot open shared
Package: pandoc
Version: 2.9.2.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
While looking at some test issues in libpod-pandoc-perl, I noticed
that pandoc looks quite broken in current amd64/sid:
% pandoc --version
pandoc: error
10 matches
Mail list logo
