On Thu, 5 May 2022 at 22:39, Paul Gevers wrote:
> It just occurred to me that it may be useful to try and reduce the
> number of concurrent running tests to something you would expect on a
> more normal computer (under conditions where the framework is better
> tested). Our armel host has 160
Hi Jussi,
On 21-01-2022 19:17, Paul Gevers wrote:
Running tests with 160 workers
It just occurred to me that it may be useful to try and reduce the
number of concurrent running tests to something you would expect on a
more normal computer (under conditions where the framework is better
Hi Jussi,
On 21-01-2022 00:05, Jussi Pakkanen wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 at 23:33, Paul Gevers wrote:
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of you package on armhf
because it was showing up as a regression for the upload of
python-defaults and setuptools. I noticed that the test
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 at 23:33, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of you package on armhf
> because it was showing up as a regression for the upload of
> python-defaults and setuptools. I noticed that the test regularly fails,
> what's worse, it also seems to hang as
Source: meson
Version: 0.56.2-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky timeout
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of you package on armhf
because it was showing up as a regression for the upload of
5 matches
Mail list logo
