Bug#1004293: warn users that src:webkit2gtk and src:khtml are insecure?

2022-02-11 Thread Trent W. Buck
Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > Am Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 10:01:34AM +1100 schrieb Trent W. Buck: > > Alberto Garcia wrote: > > > Two WebKit ports are actively maintained, available in Debian and have > > > security support: WPE WebKit and WebKitGTK (the package is called > > > webkit2gtk for technical /

Bug#1004293: warn users that src:webkit2gtk and src:khtml are insecure?

2022-02-10 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
Am Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 10:01:34AM +1100 schrieb Trent W. Buck: > Alberto Garcia wrote: > > Two WebKit ports are actively maintained, available in Debian and have > > security support: WPE WebKit and WebKitGTK (the package is called > > webkit2gtk for technical / historical reasons). > > > >

Bug#1004293: warn users that src:webkit2gtk and src:khtml are insecure?

2022-01-26 Thread Trent W. Buck
Alberto Garcia wrote: > Two WebKit ports are actively maintained, available in Debian and have > security support: WPE WebKit and WebKitGTK (the package is called > webkit2gtk for technical / historical reasons). > > Other WebKit ports available in Debian are not covered by security > support. I

Bug#1004293: warn users that src:webkit2gtk and src:khtml are insecure?

2022-01-26 Thread Alberto Garcia
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 07:30:23PM +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote: > But maybe it only meant webkit (MacOS-only, not ever in Debian) or > "webkitgtk" (not in Debian for about 8 years)? > But then why even mention it in the *bullseye* release notes? WebKit is an open source browser engine that works

Bug#1004293: warn users that src:webkit2gtk and src:khtml are insecure?

2022-01-26 Thread Trent W. Buck
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 12:20:46AM +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote: > > Package: debian-security-support > > Version: 1:11+2021.03.19 > > Severity: normal > > File: /usr/share/debian-security-support/security-support-limited > > > > As at Debian 11, > > > > * webkitgtk

Bug#1004293: warn users that src:webkit2gtk and src:khtml are insecure?

2022-01-24 Thread Holger Levsen
control: retitle -1 warn users that src:khtml is insecure? On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 04:39:22PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > webkit2gtk is fully supported since Buster and there have been plenty of > security updates since > then:

Bug#1004293: warn users that src:webkit2gtk and src:khtml are insecure?

2022-01-24 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 12:20:46AM +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote: > Package: debian-security-support > Version: 1:11+2021.03.19 > Severity: normal > File: /usr/share/debian-security-support/security-support-limited > > As at Debian 11, > > * webkitgtk is in src:webkit2gtk, not src:webkit. > *

Bug#1004293: warn users that src:webkit2gtk and src:khtml are insecure?

2022-01-24 Thread Trent W. Buck
Package: debian-security-support Version: 1:11+2021.03.19 Severity: normal File: /usr/share/debian-security-support/security-support-limited As at Debian 11, * webkitgtk is in src:webkit2gtk, not src:webkit. * khtml is in src:khtml, not src:kde4libs. GNOME3 and KDE5 have been around for a