On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 4:45 PM Martin-Éric Racine
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 4:39 PM Marc Haber
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 04:32:58PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 4:30 PM Marc Haber
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 4:39 PM Marc Haber
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 04:32:58PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 4:30 PM Marc Haber
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 04:23:40PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > > > The Geode LX is not a
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 04:32:58PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 4:30 PM Marc Haber
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 04:23:40PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > > The Geode LX is not a vanilla 586. It is a vanilla 686. The reported
> > > CPU variant has
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 4:30 PM Marc Haber
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 04:23:40PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > The Geode LX is not a vanilla 586. It is a vanilla 686. The reported
> > CPU variant has simply remained at 586 for reasons only known to AMD.
>
> According to all docs
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 04:23:40PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> The Geode LX is not a vanilla 586. It is a vanilla 686. The reported
> CPU variant has simply remained at 586 for reasons only known to AMD.
According to all docs available to me, it is a vanilla 686 sans
multi-byte NOP
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 4:21 PM Marc Haber
wrote:
>
> Control: tags -1 wontfix
> Control: severity -1 minor
> thanks
>
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 09:02:02AM +0100, Henning Paul wrote:
> > IIRC, it doesn't implement all of the i686 instruction set (hence the
> > illegal opcode).
>
> I apologize,
Control: tags -1 wontfix
Control: severity -1 minor
thanks
On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 09:02:02AM +0100, Henning Paul wrote:
> IIRC, it doesn't implement all of the i686 instruction set (hence the
> illegal opcode).
I apologize, but it looks like the Geode LX is no longer among the CPUs
supported in
Hello,
Am 19.02.22 um 06:30 schrieb Marc Haber:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 09:51:57PM +0100, Henning Paul wrote:
root@alix:~# lscpu
Architecture: i586
CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit
Address sizes:32 bits physical, 32 bits virtual
Byte Order: Little Endian
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 09:51:57PM +0100, Henning Paul wrote:
> root@alix:~# lscpu
> Architecture: i586
> CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit
> Address sizes:32 bits physical, 32 bits virtual
> Byte Order: Little Endian
> CPU(s): 1
> On-line CPU(s)
Am 18.02.22 um 15:21 schrieb Henning Paul:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 22:45:28 Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 10:31 PM Marc Haber
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 07:15:37PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
So it still doesn't build on Geode LX.
How about your i386 build chroot?
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 10:31 PM Marc Haber
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 07:15:37PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > I cannot help but wonder why the build doesn't simply parse
> > $(HARDENING_CFLAGS) and $(HARDENING_LDFLAGS). Hard-coded hardening
> > options tend to be a bad idea. GCC
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 07:15:37PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> I cannot help but wonder why the build doesn't simply parse
> $(HARDENING_CFLAGS) and $(HARDENING_LDFLAGS). Hard-coded hardening
> options tend to be a bad idea. GCC supports them all, but the target
> host's CPU won't always
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 6:45 PM Marc Haber
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 09:58:49PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 9:10 PM Marc Haber
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 09:03:01PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > > > 1.9.8p2-1 FTBFS on Geode
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 09:58:49PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 9:10 PM Marc Haber
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 09:03:01PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > > 1.9.8p2-1 FTBFS on Geode testing host (log attached earlier)
> > > 1.9.9-1 FTBFS on
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 10:11 AM Marc Haber
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 10:08:01AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > ../../../lib/util/json.c:122:1: internal compiler error: in
> > graphds_scc, at graphds.c:316
>
> That makes it a toolchain issue.
>
> This bug has grown huge. Can you
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 10:08:01AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> ../../../lib/util/json.c:122:1: internal compiler error: in
> graphds_scc, at graphds.c:316
That makes it a toolchain issue.
This bug has grown huge. Can you please file a new bug against gcc and
mark this bug as affected? I
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 9:11 AM Marc Haber
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 09:58:49PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 9:10 PM Marc Haber
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 09:03:01PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > > > 1.9.8p2-1 FTBFS on Geode
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 09:58:49PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 9:10 PM Marc Haber
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 09:03:01PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > > 1.9.8p2-1 FTBFS on Geode testing host (log attached earlier)
> > > 1.9.9-1 FTBFS on Geode
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 9:10 PM Marc Haber
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 09:03:01PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > 1.9.8p2-1 FTBFS on Geode testing host (log attached earlier)
> > 1.9.9-1 FTBFS on Geode testing host (log attached earlier)
>
> I apologize, I didnt see earlier that your
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 09:03:01PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> 1.9.8p2-1 FTBFS on Geode testing host (log attached earlier)
> 1.9.9-1 FTBFS on Geode testing host (log attached earlier)
I apologize, I didnt see earlier that your builds were already failing
at build time. The error is
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 8:35 PM Marc Haber
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 04:12:03PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > I also tried building that 1.9.8p2-1 on my amd64 host's i386 chroot.
> > It builds, and the binaries don't produce a core dump on the Geode
> > host. Presumably the
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 04:12:03PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> I also tried building that 1.9.8p2-1 on my amd64 host's i386 chroot.
> It builds, and the binaries don't produce a core dump on the Geode
> host. Presumably the breakage happened after that release.
>
> Hopefully this can help
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 3:04 PM Martin-Éric Racine
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 1:52 PM Marc Haber
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 12:47:47PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 01:36:17PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > > > Logged onto my unstable-i386
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 12:47:47PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 01:36:17PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > Logged onto my unstable-i386 chroot.
> > $ dget http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/sudo/sudo_1.9.5p2-3.dsc
> > Fetched build-deps.
> > $ debuild -uc -us
> >
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 01:36:17PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> Logged onto my unstable-i386 chroot.
> $ dget http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/sudo/sudo_1.9.5p2-3.dsc
> Fetched build-deps.
> $ debuild -uc -us
> Copied sudo and sudo-dbgsym over to the Geode host.
> Logged onto the
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 1:23 PM Marc Haber
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 12:56:54PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 10:14 AM Martin-Éric Racine
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 10:10 AM Marc Haber
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 09:55:53AM
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 12:56:54PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 10:14 AM Martin-Éric Racine
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 10:10 AM Marc Haber
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 09:55:53AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 10:14 AM Martin-Éric Racine
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 10:10 AM Marc Haber
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 09:55:53AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 9:41 AM Marc Haber
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 10:11:30AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> W: sudo-dbgsym: elf-error In program headers: Unable to find program
> interpreter name
> [usr/lib/debug/.build-id/52/9f0be3cc3ee3895db3782367a6d5027b490c16.debug]
See #1000977 and #1000449
tl;dr, that's a binutils bug, which
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 10:10 AM Marc Haber
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 09:55:53AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 9:41 AM Marc Haber
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 09:11:10AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > > > On a Geode LX (i686 without
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 9:55 AM Martin-Éric Racine
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 9:41 AM Marc Haber
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 09:11:10AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > > On a Geode LX (i686 without PAE), the most recent sudo dumps core. dmesg
> > > shows the following:
>
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 09:55:53AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 9:41 AM Marc Haber
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 09:11:10AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > > On a Geode LX (i686 without PAE), the most recent sudo dumps core. dmesg
> > > shows the
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 9:41 AM Marc Haber
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 09:11:10AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > On a Geode LX (i686 without PAE), the most recent sudo dumps core. dmesg
> > shows the following:
>
> Just for the record, the current i386 sudo was built on x86-ubc-02,
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 09:11:10AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> On a Geode LX (i686 without PAE), the most recent sudo dumps core. dmesg
> shows the following:
Just for the record, the current i386 sudo was built on x86-ubc-02, Logs
Package: sudo
Version: 1.9.9-1
Severity: important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On a Geode LX (i686 without PAE), the most recent sudo dumps core. dmesg shows
the following:
# dmesg | grep traps
[ 150.890563] traps: sudo[729] trap invalid opcode ip:44ffa0 sp:bfd59cfc
35 matches
Mail list logo