Bug#1006198: docbook: Packaging license incompatible with the upstream

2022-02-21 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Montag, dem 21.02.2022 um 10:57 -0300 schrieb Eriberto Mota: > [..] > Considering that docbook is orphan plus your reply (or your very > aggressive reply), Maybe you should re-consider your approach and reflect on the actions you were announcing. I cannot even believe that a DD threatens to

Bug#1006198: docbook: Packaging license incompatible with the upstream

2022-02-21 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Montag, dem 21.02.2022 um 00:55 -0300 schrieb Joao Eriberto Mota Filho: > Package: docbook > Version: 4.5-9 > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: Mark W. Eichin , Adam Di Carlo > , J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) , Yann Dirson > , Steve Langasek , Daniel Leidert > (dale) , Jakub Wilk , Mathieu > Malaterre ,

Bug#1006198: docbook: Packaging license incompatible with the upstream

2022-02-20 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Eriberto, On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 12:55:05AM -0300, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote: > The current packaging license (GPL-2+) is incompatible with upstream > licensing (DocBook License). It is a hampering condition to submit patches > from Debian to the upstream. > > I would like to change the

Bug#1006198: docbook: Packaging license incompatible with the upstream

2022-02-20 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: docbook Version: 4.5-9 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: Mark W. Eichin , Adam Di Carlo , J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) , Yann Dirson , Steve Langasek , Daniel Leidert (dale) , Jakub Wilk , Mathieu Malaterre , Helmut Grohne The current packaging license (GPL-2+) is incompatible with upstream