On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 08:52:45AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Marc Haber writes:
> > That regexp was copied verbatim from my codesearch search box. Did you
> > forget to switch the dropdown to "regex"?
>
> > The shadow package contains about ten of those constructs, for example
>
> >
Marc Haber writes:
> That regexp was copied verbatim from my codesearch search box. Did you
> forget to switch the dropdown to "regex"?
> The shadow package contains about ten of those constructs, for example
> shadow_1:4.11.1+dfsg1-2/contrib/shadow-anonftp.patch
> -
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 01:47:27PM -0800, Felix Lechner wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 1:18 PM Marc Haber
> wrote:
> >
> > [^[:alpha:]]chown[[:space:]][^[:space:]]+\.[^[:space:]]
>
> I cannot get that search to work properly on codesearch.d.n. Do you
> have a sample from the archive, please?
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 1:18 PM Marc Haber
wrote:
>
> [^[:alpha:]]chown[[:space:]][^[:space:]]+\.[^[:space:]]
I cannot get that search to work properly on codesearch.d.n. Do you
have a sample from the archive, please?
Kind regards
Felix Lechner
Package: lintian
Version: 2.114.0
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
chown user.group has been deprecated in favor of chown user:group for
many years. Yet, a codesearch for
[^[:alpha:]]chown[[:space:]][^[:space:]]+\.[^[:space:]] yields 829 hits.
Most of them are in docs, texts and comments, but I still feel
5 matches
Mail list logo
