On 26/03/22 at 23:36 +0100, Tino Didriksen wrote:
> This was an expected failure due to new incompatible tool packages, and
> same goes for all the other Apertium-related FTBFS.
>
> How can one prevent such a slew of superfluous automatic bugs from being
> filed? Is there a way to mark packages
This was an expected failure due to new incompatible tool packages, and
same goes for all the other Apertium-related FTBFS.
How can one prevent such a slew of superfluous automatic bugs from being
filed? Is there a way to mark packages as "will be updated, just waiting
for deps in NEW queue"?
--
Source: apertium-spa-arg
Version: 0.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220326 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> checking for
3 matches
Mail list logo
