Bug#1009733: src:exempi: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on armel and armhf
On 2022-05-29 17:53 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 00:21:46 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote: > > Dear arm porters, > > > > can you please take a look at this? > > Ping from the Release Team. This package is a key package (so the RC bug > can't be "fixed" by removal from testing). I did take a look at this, but the logs from different builds were quite confusing and it was not at all obvious what the actual problem was. I left it for a mo to deal with somthing easier... I have failed to get back to it so far, and won't for at least another month (on holiday away from computers). Ah, but I see Bernhard has fixed it in the meantime. Wookey -- Principal hats: Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1009733: src:exempi: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on armel and armhf
Hi Bernhard, On 06-06-2022 18:47, Bernhard Übelacker wrote: Am 06.06.22 um 18:43 schrieb Bernhard Übelacker: I came here due to the recent message to debian-arm. Still unsure because this bug is already closed? Yeah, sorry about that. I file those "fails to migrate for too long bugs" most often against the version in testing, hence I close it immediately. With FTBFS bugs I'm unsure what my default should be. Forgot to mention the merge request with the actual change: https://salsa.debian.org/bernhardu-guest/exempi/-/merge_requests/1 It looks like that archive is private and thus can't bee seen. Also, I'd hope/expect the merge_request would be against the s.d.o/debian/exempi archive. Thanks for taking the time to look into the issue, much appreciated. Paul OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1009733: src:exempi: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on armel and armhf
Hi, On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 00:21:46 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote: Dear arm porters, > can you please take a look at this? Ping from the Release Team. This package is a key package (so the RC bug can't be "fixed" by removal from testing). Am 15.04.22 um 21:19 schrieb Paul Gevers: > Source: exempi > Version: 2.5.2-1 > Severity: serious > Control: close -1 2.6.1-1 > Tags: sid bookworm ftbfs > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: out-of-sync > > Dear maintainer(s), > > The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing > and unstable for more than 60 days as having a Release Critical bug in > testing [1]. Your package src:exempi has been trying to migrate for 61 > days [2]. Hence, I am filing this bug. You package failed to build from > source on armel and armhf where it built successfully in the past. > > If a package is out of sync between unstable and testing for a longer > period, this usually means that bugs in the package in testing cannot be > fixed via unstable. Additionally, blocked packages can have impact on > other packages, which makes preparing for the release more difficult. > Finally, it often exposes issues with the package and/or > its (reverse-)dependencies. We expect maintainers to fix issues that > hamper the migration of their package in a timely manner. > > This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new > bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed. > > I have immediately closed this bug with the version in unstable, so if > that version or a later version migrates, this bug will no longer affect > testing. I have also tagged this bug to only affect sid and bookworm, so > it doesn't affect (old-)stable. > > If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to > issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team. > > Paul > > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg5.html > [2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=exempi Paul OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1009733: src:exempi: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on armel and armhf
Dear arm porters, can you please take a look at this? Thanks, Michael Am 15.04.22 um 21:19 schrieb Paul Gevers: Source: exempi Version: 2.5.2-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 2.6.1-1 Tags: sid bookworm ftbfs User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 60 days as having a Release Critical bug in testing [1]. Your package src:exempi has been trying to migrate for 61 days [2]. Hence, I am filing this bug. You package failed to build from source on armel and armhf where it built successfully in the past. If a package is out of sync between unstable and testing for a longer period, this usually means that bugs in the package in testing cannot be fixed via unstable. Additionally, blocked packages can have impact on other packages, which makes preparing for the release more difficult. Finally, it often exposes issues with the package and/or its (reverse-)dependencies. We expect maintainers to fix issues that hamper the migration of their package in a timely manner. This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed. I have immediately closed this bug with the version in unstable, so if that version or a later version migrates, this bug will no longer affect testing. I have also tagged this bug to only affect sid and bookworm, so it doesn't affect (old-)stable. If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team. Paul [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg5.html [2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=exempi OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1009733: src:exempi: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on armel and armhf
Source: exempi Version: 2.5.2-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 2.6.1-1 Tags: sid bookworm ftbfs User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 60 days as having a Release Critical bug in testing [1]. Your package src:exempi has been trying to migrate for 61 days [2]. Hence, I am filing this bug. You package failed to build from source on armel and armhf where it built successfully in the past. If a package is out of sync between unstable and testing for a longer period, this usually means that bugs in the package in testing cannot be fixed via unstable. Additionally, blocked packages can have impact on other packages, which makes preparing for the release more difficult. Finally, it often exposes issues with the package and/or its (reverse-)dependencies. We expect maintainers to fix issues that hamper the migration of their package in a timely manner. This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed. I have immediately closed this bug with the version in unstable, so if that version or a later version migrates, this bug will no longer affect testing. I have also tagged this bug to only affect sid and bookworm, so it doesn't affect (old-)stable. If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team. Paul [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg5.html [2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=exempi OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
