Control: severity -1 important
On Sun, 29 May 2022 14:45:29 -0400 Alan Beadle wrote:
> Package: linuxinfo
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs patch upstream
> Justification: fails to build from source
...
> linuxinfo currently fails to build on riscv64
Please note that FTBFS bugs on unofficial
Hello Alan,
On Sat, Jun 04, 2022 at 08:52:40AM -0400, Alan Beadle wrote:
> It looks like this will always be a complex issue on RISC-V since
> there is such a variety of manufacturers. However I think the
> following would be the best approach.
>
> First, if there is a uarch field, use that since
Hi Helge,
It looks like this will always be a complex issue on RISC-V since
there is such a variety of manufacturers. However I think the
following would be the best approach.
First, if there is a uarch field, use that since it will describe the
design of the cores present, such as Sifive's
Hello Alan,
hello Bo,
hello Xiao,
hello Tienhock,
I have preliminary support for riscv now locally. However, there is a
design question:
How would you put riscv processors into families? On x86, thats done
be vendor and some marketing label ("AMD" and "Ryzen"). On Alpha,
that's the model (i.e.
Hello Alan,
On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 02:45:29PM -0400, Alan Beadle wrote:
> Package: linuxinfo
> Version: 3.3.3-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs patch upstream
> Justification: fails to build from source
> X-Debbugs-Cc: ab.bea...@gmail.com
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> linuxinfo currently fails to
Package: linuxinfo
Version: 3.3.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs patch upstream
Justification: fails to build from source
X-Debbugs-Cc: ab.bea...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
linuxinfo currently fails to build on riscv64 due to this architecture not being
supported by upstream. I am attaching a
6 matches
Mail list logo
